Squatters Illegally Evicted From Abandoned Pub in Cheltenham

On July 17th at 14.00 squat­ters were ille­gal­ly evict­ed from the Duke of York Inn, 315–317 Lon­don Road, Chel­tenham, GL52 6YY.

The squat­ters had gained entry on the 15th July through an open win­dow after being informed by local res­i­dents that the pub was acces­si­ble with­out caus­ing any dam­age.

On July 17th at 14.00 squat­ters were ille­gal­ly evict­ed from the Duke of York Inn, 315–317 Lon­don Road, Chel­tenham, GL52 6YY.

The squat­ters had gained entry on the 15th July through an open win­dow after being informed by local res­i­dents that the pub was acces­si­ble with­out caus­ing any dam­age.

They spent the next two days secur­ing the squat, clean­ing filth from the pub area, repair­ing fix­tures, fur­ni­ture and fit­tings and repair­ing dam­age caused by van­dals includ­ing clean­ing graf­fi­ti from the walls. The inten­tion of the squat­ters was to turn the pub into a com­mu­ni­ty arts cen­tre, pro­vid­ing space for local peo­ple to meet, con­verse and express them­selves freely.

How­ev­er, after assumed­ly being informed by the police that the pub was being occu­pied, local prop­er­ty devel­op­er James Dea­con decid­ed to send some of his work­ers in, armed with sledge­ham­mers and a chain­saw. They began to forcibly gain access to the prop­er­ty using the afore­men­tioned tools. Due to the noise the squat­ters became aware of what was hap­pen­ing and tried to vacate the prop­er­ty. Their escape was ham­pered by the work­ers then using the tools to threat­en the squat­ters, includ­ing a 19 year old girl who was backed into a cor­ner with the run­ning chain­saw, despite assur­ances that they were leav­ing.

After the squat­ters left the prop­er­ty they were then fol­lowed around the local area by Mr Deacon’s work­ers in vans, forc­ing them to beg for sanc­tu­ary in the homes of local res­i­dents, even­tu­al­ly escap­ing in the car of a local “good Samar­i­tan” who was chased by the work­ers in vans for four miles before final­ly los­ing their pur­suers.

Mr Dea­con wants to con­vert the prop­er­ty into three hous­es and sev­en new flats, adding to con­ges­tion and over­crowd­ing in the area, a project which has raised many objec­tion s from local res­i­dents. To reg­is­ter your objec­tions you can email Chel­tenham Bor­ough coun­cil at builtenvironment@cheltenham.gov.uk .

32 SUVs disabled across Oxford

18.07.2008
Up to 32 SUV own­ers awoke this morn­ing to dis­cov­er that their destruc­tive vehi­cles had been dis­abled.

18.07.2008
Up to 32 SUV own­ers awoke this morn­ing to dis­cov­er that their destruc­tive vehi­cles had been dis­abled.

Using the ‘mung bean trick’, where­by a mung bean is insert­ed into the valve of a tyre before the cap is screwed back on, tyres were let down in Marston, Head­ing­ton, and the high­ly afflu­ent area of Sum­mer­town. Mes­sages were left under wind­screen wipers warn­ing the own­ers not to attempt to dri­ve their 4x4s, and explain­ing why it was felt that direct action had to be tak­en to resist their assault on this plan­et.

They were informed that more than a quar­ter of the UK’s CO2 gen­er­a­tion is attrib­ut­able to the trans­port sec­tor, and that many Sports Util­i­ty Vehi­cles emit up to 300% more green­house gas­es than the aver­age car.

They were also told that dri­ving a car is not a ‘right’, and that dri­ving an SUV is an unac­cept­ably self­ish act in the face of what may become unstop­pable cli­mate change.

This is a sim­ple action that any­one can do, any­time or place.

Anti-Wembley Academy occupation comes to an end

18.07.2008
The Tent City Occu­pa­tion of Wem­b­ley Sports Ground was evict­ed this morn­ing at 7.30am (report to fol­low). Hank Roberts — Brent Sec­re­tary of the NUT and ATL — had to be removed from the roof of the Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre on the site, where he had d‑locked him­self to a flag­pole. Spe­cial­ist baliffs had to use an angle-grinder to seper­ate him from the pole. Sup­port­ers gath­ered in front of the gate to the carpark; as he was removed from the site, he was bestowed with rap­tur­ous applause for his brave stand.

18.07.2008
The Tent City Occu­pa­tion of Wem­b­ley Sports Ground was evict­ed this morn­ing at 7.30am (report to fol­low). Hank Roberts — Brent Sec­re­tary of the NUT and ATL — had to be removed from the roof of the Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre on the site, where he had d‑locked him­self to a flag­pole. Spe­cial­ist baliffs had to use an angle-grinder to seper­ate him from the pole. Sup­port­ers gath­ered in front of the gate to the carpark; as he was removed from the site, he was bestowed with rap­tur­ous applause for his brave stand.

Cam­paign­ers (& Hank him­self) were sur­prised to observe that he was not arrest­ed for breach of the injunc­tion — served on Tues­day. Hank Roberts still has to pay an otstand­ing fee of £3,500 to Willes­den Coun­ty Court.

The fight to stop the Acad­e­my get­ting plan­ning per­mis­sion con­tin­ues, even though plans to build the ‘pre-acad­e­my’ for an ini­tial 200 pri­ma­ry-school pupils in por­to­cab­ins on the site will now pro­ceed. The fight to guar­an­tee local afford­able access for the local kids to the recre­ation ground and foot­ball pitch­es con­tin­ues along­side this aim to stop the acad­e­my being built, whether the lat­ter goal will be acheived or not.

Oth­er info:

Gallery
http://www.tentcityoccupation.co.uk/gallery.html

ITV Lon­don Tonight Report:
http://www.itvlocal.com/london/news/?player=LON_News_15&void=204972

Save Our Schools 22-minute film avail­able on Reel News issue 13
Stop them Pri­vatis­ing Our Schools avail­able on Reel News issue 12
Wem­b­ley Occu­pa­tion avail­able on Reel News issue 10
http://www.reelnews.co.uk/

Some pre­vi­ous posts for fur­ther infor­ma­tion:

200 School Pupils In Huts On A Con­struc­tion Site:
http://jasonnparkinson.blogspot.com/2008/06/200-school-pupils-in-huts-on.html

Save the Woodhead Tunnel demo

This year we have a unique oppor­tu­ni­ty to re-open the Wood­head rail line.

Join the Save the Wood­head Tun­nel Cam­paign in demand­ing the Gov­ern­ment hold to their promis­es on sus­tain­able trans­port and cli­mate change and re-open this his­toric and impor­tant line.

http://savethewoodheadtunnel.blogspot.com/

This year we have a unique oppor­tu­ni­ty to re-open the Wood­head rail line.

Join the Save the Wood­head Tun­nel Cam­paign in demand­ing the Gov­ern­ment hold to their promis­es on sus­tain­able trans­port and cli­mate change and re-open this his­toric and impor­tant line.

http://savethewoodheadtunnel.blogspot.com/
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/ms?f=q&hl=en&time=&date=&ttype=&ie=UTF8&cd=2&geocode=0,53.495117,-1.830297&om=1&msa=0&msid=100950118038398329239.000441a586b51a597a528&ll=53.478239,-1.897888&spn=0.122593,0.274658&z=11&source=embed
www.climatecamp.org.uk

Cycle from Had­field, meet train sta­tion, mid­day

Time: Sat­ur­day 2nd August 2008, 2pm
Place: Wood­head Tun­nel, West­ern entrance (click here for a map, or see below)

Cam­paign­ers work­ing to ‘Save the Wood­head Tun­nel’ are to hold a demon­stra­tion call­ing for the Gov­ern­ment to re-open the his­toric Wood­head line.

Locals argue the reopened Wood­head rail­way line would help reduce trans­port green­house gas emis­sions and the demon­stra­tion is timed to coin­cide with the nation­al Cli­mate Camp to be held at Kingsnorth Pow­er sta­tion in August.

Local activists argue the re-opened line would relieve con­ges­tion on local roads, boost the local econ­o­my and open up the area to tourists. The future of the tun­nel has been in doubt since Nation­al Grid began rout­ing cables through it ear­li­er this year. Cam­paign­ers have received assur­ances from Sec­re­tary of State Ruth Kel­ly that the tun­nel will only be pre­served for rail use after 2010 IF the case is made for the route to be re-opened.

A spokesper­son says:

“Here in Long­den­dale it’s all too obvi­ous what’s wrong with the government’s trans­port pol­i­cy. The A628,a road that pass­es through the Peak Dis­trict Nation­al Park, is clogged with cars and heavy good vehi­cles, whilst planes from Man­ches­ter Air­port spew out green­house gas­es over­head. Mean­while one of the most mod­ern rail­way tun­nels in Britain stands emp­ty.

We demand a sus­tain­able trans­port pol­i­cy with freight tak­en off the road and onto the rail­way and com­muters tak­ing the train rather than the plane. We want trains through the Wood­head Tun­nel again!”

The demon­stra­tion will include a sam­ba band, pic­nic and speak­ers and coin­cides with the Camp for Cli­mate Action which is to be held from 3rd-11th August at the coal fired pow­er sta­tion in Kingsnorth, Kent.

Wher­ev­er you are, please join us for the demo — we are espe­cial­ly keen to hear from peo­ple on the oth­er side of the Pen­nines who wish to set up their own group. You are all wel­come.

savethewoodheadtunnel@gmail.com

Melting Point: the new frontline in eco-activism

The Ecol­o­gist Film Unit (EFU), a col­lab­o­ra­tion between the eth­i­cal inves­ti­ga­tions agency Ecos­torm and the Ecol­o­gist mag­a­zine, has recent­ly pro­duced a short film called ‘Melt­ing Point: the new front­line in eco-activism’.

CO2The Ecol­o­gist Film Unit (EFU), a col­lab­o­ra­tion between the eth­i­cal inves­ti­ga­tions agency Ecos­torm and the Ecol­o­gist mag­a­zine, has recent­ly pro­duced a short film called ‘Melt­ing Point: the new front­line in eco-activism’. Ahead of next mon­th’s ‘Cli­mate Camp’ at Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion, Kent, the film expos­es gov­ern­ment tac­tics in reac­tion to envi­ro­men­tal protests.

Espi­onage, news manip­u­la­tion, legal threats and even vio­lence have become the knee-jerk response of Gov­ern­ment and big busi­ness to the increas­ing and vocal con­cerns of envi­ron­men­tal activists in the UK. This exclu­sive and pow­er­ful film expos­es the extra­or­di­nary tac­tics being used to reframe con­cerned cit­i­zens engag­ing in their right to protest, as dan­ger­ous ter­ror­ists.

The film can be viewed on var­i­ous web­sites includ­ing Green TV (www.green.tv) or the Ecol­o­gist web­site (www.theecologist.org/etv/).

The youtube URL is http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=I08J2BCPBDY.

Alter­na­tive­ly the video can be down­loaded at www.ecologistfilmunit.com.

Watch it, show it at events, spread the mes­sage!

con­tact: anna@eco-storm.com

Greenwash Guerrillas Embarrass E.ON

16.07.2008
This morn­ing, Cli­mate Campers and friends put a fresh dent in E.ON’s tar­nished rep­u­ta­tion with a Green­wash Guer­ril­las demo out­side the Guardian Cli­mate Change Sum­mit, which E.ON are spon­sor­ing.

Eon Greenwash 1Eon Greenwash 216.07.2008
This morn­ing, Cli­mate Campers and friends put a fresh dent in E.ON’s tar­nished rep­u­ta­tion with a Green­wash Guer­ril­las demo out­side the Guardian Cli­mate Change Sum­mit, which E.ON are spon­sor­ing.

Pro­tect­ed by tox­ic waste haz­ard suits and bran­dish­ing a top-of-the-line range of green­wash detect­ing devices, the 40 intre­pid Green­wash Guer­ril­las swarmed around the build­ing (the Busi­ness Design Cen­tre in Isling­ton, whose mar­ket­ing man­agers were not best pleased at their pres­ence and who might think twice about work­ing with a cli­mate crim­i­nal like E.ON in future), mak­ing sure that every del­e­gate who entered knew about E.ON’s attempt to build the first new coal fired pow­er sta­tion in the UK for thir­ty years at Kingsnorth, in Kent (site of this year’s Camp for Cli­mate Action, which has oth­er plans – like leav­ing fos­sil fuels in the ground!).

Some del­e­gates hap­pi­ly took in bot­tles of Ev.eon water (car­bon cap­ture in a bot­tle, the lat­est tech­no-fix here to save the day! Check it out: www.ev-eon.com), and end­ed up tak­ing a lit­tle piece of sub­ver­sion into the bel­ly of the E.ON-sponsored beast. At one point, the word went out that green­wash had reached max­i­mum tox­i­c­i­ty lev­els, and some of the guer­ril­las tem­porar­i­ly suc­cumbed in a mass die-in. The sounds of the Ped­als ped­al-pow­ered sound sys­tem soon revived them, how­ev­er, and the guer­ril­las went back to suck­ing green­wash out of the build­ing and chat­ting to large­ly recep­tive passers-by and large­ly sheep­ish del­e­gates.

One guer­ril­la was heard to say: “This sum­mit is green­wash of the high­est tox­i­c­i­ty. E.ON is spend­ing a lot of mon­ey try­ing to paint its dirty deeds as green. Those real­ly con­cerned about cli­mate change will be con­fronting their lies, at con­fer­ences and offices in Lon­don, at the Camp for Cli­mate Action at Kingsnorth this August, and wher­ev­er else E.ON is com­mit­ting cli­mate crimes”, said McDon­nell.

After 1000 leaflets had been hand­ed out and the ‘E.ON’s Green­wash Won’t Wash’ and ‘Cau­tion: Tox­ic Green­wash Haz­ard’ ban­ners rolled away (to be used anoth­er day, should any com­pa­ny ever be crazy enough to accept spon­sor­ship from E.ON again), the guer­ril­las out­ma­noeu­vred the police to have a debrief and late break­fast in the sun­shine at a near­by park. Just as they were prepar­ing to leave, a huge cheer went out: Oxford cli­mate campers had occu­pied the roof of the Lon­don head office of Edel­man, E.ON’s recent­ly hired PR com­pa­ny!

A bril­liant morning’s work. Keep the pres­sure on E.ON – see you at the Camp!

Green­wash Guer­rril­la
info@climatecamp.org.uk
http://www.greenwashguerrillas.org

Oxford Climate Action Spin The Spinners!

16.07.2008

Edelman protest16.07.2008
Oxford Cli­mate Action activists have today block­ad­ed the head­quar­ters of Edel­man PR. They arrived at 9:30 to protest the PR giant’s col­lu­sion with E‑On in “green­wash­ing” its pro­posed Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion devel­op­ment. Sev­er­al pro­tes­tors gained access to the firms offices. Oth­ers out­side climbed onto the roof to unfurl a ban­ner read­ing “Edel­man: Spin­ning The Cli­mate Out Of Con­trol” as anoth­er colour­ful con­tin­gent spoke to passers by about the protest. MP John MC Don­nell has also dropped by to lend his sup­port.

Edel­man have been employed by E‑On to pro­mote “E.On’s inter­ests across the gas, coal, nuclear and renew­ables sec­tors, not just lob­by­ing for Kingsnorth”[1]. Today, they have spon­sored a cli­mate change sum­mit along with BMW. The pro­tes­tors claim that this is a con­scious tac­tic to become green by asso­ci­a­tion with­out tak­ing mean­ing­ful action to stop cli­mate change. The pro­test­ers also aim to high­light the insan­i­ty of invest­ing in new coal pow­er sta­tions like Kingsnorth, in the face of human caused cli­mate change[2].

Pro­tes­tor Deb­bie Locke said, “Coal is the dirt­i­est form of fos­sil fuel. Edel­man are telling E‑On to say that Car­bon Cap­ture and Stor­age can help. But CCS is an unproven tech­nol­o­gy and 20 years away at the earliest.[3][4] We’re here to reclaim the PR machine for nor­mal peo­ple who want to see real action on cli­mate change not anoth­er dose of cor­po­rate green­wash”.

The pro­tes­tors have been inspired to take action by the Camp for Cli­mate Action which will take place at Kingsnorth from 3–11 August this year.

Edel­man have a long record of involve­ment with eth­i­cal­ly ques­tion­able com­pa­nies seek­ing to improve their image, includ­ing AstraZeneca[6], WalMart[7], Pfizer[8].

Con­tact: 0781 8021 298

— ENDS —

Notes For Edi­tors

[1] Clare O’Con­nor, ‘EON turns to Edel­man as nuclear debate rages’, PR Week, 13.03.08 prweek.com/uk/news/article/790575/EON-turns-Edelman-nuclear-debate-rages
[2] See ipcc.ch
[3] DBERR, Ener­gy Mar­kets Out­look states that CCS will deliv­er “no car­bon sav­ings in the fore­cast years until 2020 and then 0.3 MtC”.
http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file41995.pdf
[4] The IPCC says that it is unlike­ly that CCS would be deployed until the mid 21st cen­tu­ry.
http://arch.rivm.nl/env/int/ipcc/pages_media/SRCCS-final/SRCCS_WholeReport.pdf
[5] The Camp For Cli­mate Action believes that “large num­bers of deter­mined and well-organ­ised peo­ple get togeth­er they can turn things around, mak­ing a his­toric dif­fer­ence.” Last year’s camp engaged sev­er­al thou­sand peo­ple to take direct action at Heathrow Air­port. http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/home
[6] http://www.prweek.com/uk/sectors/healthcare/article/825671/edelman-overhauls-team-md-leaves/
[7] “AstraZeneca, the large phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­ny, plead­ed guilty today to a felony charge of health care fraud and agreed to pay $355 mil­lion to set­tle crim­i­nal and civ­il accu­sa­tions that it engaged in a nation­wide scheme to ille­gal­ly mar­ket a prostate can­cer drug.”
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E7D8163BF932A15755C0A9659C8B63
[8] Wal­Mart has been called “The most ruth­less com­pa­ny in the world” due to its appalling record on human rights, con­tempt for com­mu­ni­ties and the envi­ron­ment
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2004/03/16/low-hanging-fruit/
[9] Pfiz­er has been involved in price fix­ing, ille­gal­ly test­ing drugs on chil­dren, block­ing efforts to allow peo­ple in devel­op­ing coun­tries access to life-sav­ing drugs and sell­ing drugs linked to adverse side effects in pets:
http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/?lid=330#aids

Oxford Cli­mate Action

Anti City Academy protest camp defies eviction order

16.07.2008
Today Teach­ers and their sup­port­ers were cel­e­brat­ing as the dead­line to leave their protest camp expired with­out the threat­ened evic­tion. Offi­cers of the coun­cil were present but announced that they would only ‘report back’ the sit­u­a­tion. Bailiffs were seen cas­ing the area ear­li­er before the dead­line.

Academy squat banner16.07.2008
Today Teach­ers and their sup­port­ers were cel­e­brat­ing as the dead­line to leave their protest camp expired with­out the threat­ened evic­tion. Offi­cers of the coun­cil were present but announced that they would only ‘report back’ the sit­u­a­tion. Bailiffs were seen cas­ing the area ear­li­er before the dead­line.

Part of the protest is on the roof so it could well take Brent coun­cil a while to organ­ise the evic­tion. Today a unex­pect­ed­ly high num­ber of sup­port­ers and local res­i­dents came out to block the removal of the protest camp. Mem­bers of the local RMT and TSSA branch­es, who were hav­ing their month­ly meet­ings near­by, also turned out to reg­is­ter their dis­gust at gov­ern­ment plans to pri­va­tise local edu­ca­tion.

Swomp4 direct environmental action in Amsterdam

Swomp4 direct action in the Rusten­burg­er­straat in Ams­ter­dam squats piece of land and starts urban regen­er­a­tion per­ma­cul­ture project.

Swomp4 direct action in the Rusten­burg­er­straat in Ams­ter­dam squats piece of land and starts urban regen­er­a­tion per­ma­cul­ture project.

On Fri­day July 11 a group of squat­ters occu­pied this piece of land in the Rusten­burg­er­straat in de Pijp in Ams­ter­dam. Tech­ni­cal­ly they are wild campers, as the law in Hol­land only allows you to squat a build­ing that has been emp­ty for one year. With­in three days they already had run­ning water and had start­ed to plant veg­eta­bles and devel­op an urban per­ma­cul­ture project. This is direct action at its very best. The land was going to waste in the heart of the city, and these guys are try­ing their utmost to turn the sandy waste­land into a green oasis. This com­ing Sat­ur­day they are plan­ning a per­ma­cul­ture work­shop. Yes­ter­day it was inspir­ing talk­ing to them and lis­ten­ing to their plans. Their heart is in the right place and they care about how we use land in cities, the hous­ing sit­u­a­tion in a city that is becom­ing gen­tri­fied, and the envi­ron­men­tal issues of the day. Instead of hav­ing meet­ings and mak­ing plans, these guys took direct action to do some­thing pos­i­tive and show the local com­mu­ni­ty what is pos­si­ble in the field of urban regen­er­a­tion. So far most of the neigh­bors have react­ed in a pos­i­tive way. The campers are in a gold­fish bowl, and I admire their courage and deter­mi­na­tion. Some of them are old friends that I have known from protest actions in the past. These are peo­ple who stand by you when the going gets tough. So I wish them all the luck in the world and I’ll be back to take more pic­tures and get more news in the days ahead. Swomp4 is a cool action, for nature, the com­mu­ni­ty, and the future.

I‑69 Protesters Shut Down Asphalt Yard Again, Arrestees Face Severe Repression

Fif­teen I‑69 oppo­nents were arrest­ed Mon­day morn­ing (15/7/2008) block­ing the entrance to Gohmann Asphalt, and need your sup­port and sol­i­dar­i­ty. Many of them are being held on trumped up felony charges, and some of the female-bod­ied arrestees have been put in exceed­ing­ly unsafe sit­u­a­tions.

Fif­teen I‑69 oppo­nents were arrest­ed Mon­day morn­ing (15/7/2008) block­ing the entrance to Gohmann Asphalt, and need your sup­port and sol­i­dar­i­ty. Many of them are being held on trumped up felony charges, and some of the female-bod­ied arrestees have been put in exceed­ing­ly unsafe sit­u­a­tions. As of this time they are still chang­ing the charges on the fly, and we have been unable to bail out peo­ple with seri­ous med­ical con­di­tions. We are doing our best to make sure every­one is safe and get every­one out, but we need mon­ey. Any lit­tle bit helps! Dona­tions can be made through our Pay­pal account on stopi69.wordpress.com

or to the I69 Legal Office, 323 S Wal­nut, Bloom­ing­ton, Indi­ana, 47401

Peo­ple who have been call­ing the jail con­stant­ly and demand­ing humane treat­ment of the arrestees have done a great ser­vice, but at this point stop­ping those calls would make the job of the legal sup­port team sig­nif­i­cant­ly eas­i­er as we try to keep lines of com­mu­ni­ca­tion open between us, the arrestees, and the jail/D.A.’s office. THANKS!

****

This morn­ing, over 20 cit­i­zens opposed to the con­struc­tion of Inter­state 69 shut down work at the Haub­stadt Asphalt Yard belong­ing to Gohmann Asphalt & Con­struc­tion, Inc. Five of the oppo­nents locked them­selves togeth­er in a cir­cle at the yard’s gate, accom­pa­nied by five oth­ers ded­i­cat­ed to keep­ing them as com­fort­able as pos­si­ble in the face of sum­mer heat and the threat of police vio­lence. With con­struc­tion slat­ed to begin this week, oppo­nents are demand­ing that Gohmann imme­di­ate­ly drop their con­tract for work on I‑69. Addi­tion­al­ly they demand that Gohmann and their accom­plices, River­ton Truck­ing, Inc., drop a spu­ri­ous civ­il suit brought against the only I‑69 oppo­nent arrest­ed at a pre­vi­ous lock-down at Gohmann Asphalt’s Haub­stadt facil­i­ty.

Gohmann A&C is the pri­ma­ry con­trac­tor with the Indi­ana Depart­ment of Trans­porta­tion for the con­struc­tion of the first 1.77 miles of Sec­tion 1 of the pro­posed high­way from Evans­ville to Indi­anapo­lis. Sev­er­al weeks pri­or, five oppo­nents chained them­selves to a truck leav­ing Haub­stadt Asphalt Yard belong­ing to Gohmann Asphalt & Con­struc­tion, Inc.. The five—accompanied by twen­ty-five supporters—demanded that Gohmann drop their con­tract with INDOT or face con­tin­ued oppo­si­tion and work stop­pages. Until Gohmann drops its con­tract, oppo­nents will con­tin­ue to hold them account­able for the evic­tions of farm­ers, the dis­rup­tion of com­mu­ni­ties, and the dev­as­ta­tion of the envi­ron­ment caused by I‑69.

I‑69 has been hot­ly con­test­ed for almost two decades, with voic­es raised against its part in the destruc­tion of the envi­ron­ment, the eco­nom­ic pros­per­i­ty of South­ern Indi­ana com­mu­ni­ties, and the vio­la­tion of Hoosiers’ prop­er­ty rights. Although over 70% of Indi­ana res­i­dents are opposed to the road, the gov­er­nor and cor­po­rate inter­ests are ram­ming I‑69 down the throats of South­ern Indi­ana res­i­dents in a com­plete sub­ver­sion of the demo­c­ra­t­ic process.

Over 400 fam­i­lies will be dis­placed in South­ern Indi­ana; thou­sands of acres of farm­land, wet­lands, and wildlife refuge will be paved over; and the already-pol­lut­ed tri-state area will face thou­sands of pounds of increased dai­ly emis­sions from the increased truck traf­fic through the region. The inter­state is ulti­mate­ly intend­ed to stretch from Cana­da to Mex­i­co, link­ing up with an exten­sive net­work of roads being con­struct­ed there. The high­way is a phys­i­cal man­i­fes­ta­tion of NAFTA and oth­er free trade agree­ments through­out the Americas—the same free trade agree­ments that have cost 31,000 jobs in Indi­ana alone since their begin­nings in 1994.

“This road is being billed as an eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus for South­ern Indi­ana, but in fact it will only bring min­i­mum wage jobs at truck stops and fast food joints. Mean­while, all the oth­er jobs are shipped to sweat­shops fur­ther and fur­ther south of the bor­der. The peo­ple of Indi­ana deserve bet­ter,” said Judith May­land, a pro­tes­tor at the site.

Var­i­ous cit­i­zens’ groups have opposed I‑69 for two decades, but with con­struc­tion start­ing this week, oppo­nents are step­ping up the resis­tance in order to ensure that the will of the peo­ple is enact­ed.

“We’ve writ­ten let­ters, attend­ed pub­lic meet­ings, and vot­ed, and despite mas­sive oppo­si­tion they’re still try­ing to build this road,” one of the locked-down oppo­nents said. “They haven’t lis­tened and they haven’t lis­tened. Now it’s time to lay our bod­ies on the line so that they final­ly get it that when we say ‘No road!’ we mean ‘No f***king road!’”

for more info vis­it stopi69.wordpress.com

****

Legal Update on Gohmann Actions and Ensu­ing Repres­sion