New UK Fracking License Areas Confirmed

Decem­ber 17th The UK gov­ern­ment has announced that rough­ly 60% of the UK is now avail­able to be licensed to frack­ing com­pa­nies.

Decem­ber 17th The UK gov­ern­ment has announced that rough­ly 60% of the UK is now avail­able to be licensed to frack­ing com­pa­nies. After a brief “con­sul­ta­tion” peri­od it is like­ly that the licens­es will be hand­ed out to frak­ing com­pa­nies in the first half of 2014. The licens­es would cov­er the exploita­tion of both shale oil and gas and coal bed methane (CBM).

The area is based on that cov­ered by a new­ly finalised Strate­gic Envi­ron­men­tal Assess­ment (PDF). Despite the name the doc­u­ment does not seem to be par­tic­u­lar­ly focused on the envi­ron­ment and does not address the long term impacts of issu­ing these poten­tial­ly 30 year long licens­es.

To extract the amounts of gas that com­pa­nies are brag­ging are in exist­ing license blocks would require tens of thou­sands of wells. If large addi­tion­al areas are licensed next year, the scale of threat will be much larg­er still. These devel­op­ments would dev­as­tate our remain­ing coun­try­side, indus­tri­al­is­ing huge areas with well pads, pipelines, com­pres­sor sta­tions and pro­cess­ing plants.

The real­i­ty of uncon­ven­tion­al gas is that it is very hard to extract. It is lit­er­al­ly scrap­ping the bot­tom of the fos­sil fuel bar­rel. Dense­ly packed wells must be drilled (up to 8 wells per square mile) over large areas, since each well indi­vid­ual wells does not pro­duce much gas and then only for a short time. Worse, frack­ing is not an iso­lat­ed tech­nol­o­gy but is part of a wider trend towards more extreme forms of ener­gy extrac­tion, which if not resist­ed could see even larg­er threats such as Under­ground Coal Gasi­fi­ca­tion (UCG) become wide­spread.

Right now the com­mu­ni­ty around Bar­ton Moss near Man­ches­ter is fight­ing the threat to their region posed by IGas Energy’s attempts to drill a Shale/CBM explo­ration well there. Across the coun­try com­mu­ni­ties are get­ting organ­ised to resist these threats, with around 70 anti-frack­ing groups already formed in the last two years, and that num­ber grow­ing fast.

Barton Moss giant wind turbine protest

Wind Turbine. Photo by Sherborne G.

Wind Tur­bine. Pho­to by Sher­borne G.

The frack­ing test site at Bar­ton Moss has been block­ad­ed with a giant wind tur­bine blade!

Around fifty peo­ple arrived at 5.30 this morn­ing to leave this imag­i­na­tive ear­ly Christ­mas gift for frack­ing com­pa­ny IGas.

The Bar­ton Moss site, near Sal­ford in Greater Man­ches­ter, is the lat­est front­line in the bat­tle for clean ener­gy in the UK. IGas are try­ing to car­ry out test drilling to see if the site is suit­able for extract­ing coal bed methane and shale gas, despite strong oppo­si­tion from local res­i­dents and the com­mu­ni­ty pro­tec­tion camp that has been resist­ing the drilling since mid-Novem­ber. How­ev­er, the site’s only entrance is now com­plete­ly blocked by the 1.5 tonne blade, so there won’t be any drilling equip­ment head­ing in there for a while…

~Sher­borne G.
Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp.

http://northerngasgala.org.uk/ — for reg­u­lar updates, press release with ref­er­ences from today.

Livestream from action

Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp Bar­ton Moss Road, Just off A57 next to Air­port, Eccles M30 7RL

 

ADDRESS:
Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp Bar­ton Moss Road, Just off A57 next to Air­port, Eccles M30 7RL

LINKS:
BIFF ! (Britain & Ire­land Frack Free)
Bar­ton Moss Com­mu­ni­ty Pro­tec­tion Camp

Twit­ter: https://twitter.com/BartonMoss

Barton Moss fracking protest continue

Day 17: Fri 13th December

A big day of resis­tance from the Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp against IGas’ drilling plans.  Around 12 drilling trucks were delayed enter­ing the site for 2 hours under a heavy police escort.  Three peo­ple were arrest­ed, includ­ing a preg­nant women and elder­ly lady.  Police were wide­ly con­demned on social media for their hea

Day 17: Fri 13th December

A big day of resis­tance from the Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp against IGas’ drilling plans.  Around 12 drilling trucks were delayed enter­ing the site for 2 hours under a heavy police escort.  Three peo­ple were arrest­ed, includ­ing a preg­nant women and elder­ly lady.  Police were wide­ly con­demned on social media for their heavy hand­ed­ness.  A dis­abled man suf­fered a bro­ken knee after being thrown into the hedgerow by police.

Many trucks also left the site the same after­noon, tak­ing a lot of equip­ment with them.  It is believed that IGas are prepar­ing for their next stage of explorato­ry drilling.

Fri­day 13th Decem­ber marks a year since the gov­ern­ment lift­ed the mora­to­ri­um on frack­ing but we’ve still had no frack­ing this year thanks to the amaz­ing and inspir­ing com­mu­ni­ty cam­paigns around the coun­try.

 

Pho­tos at http://northerngasgala.org.uk/ along with news from oth­er days

Fracking test site in Greater Manchester blockaded with giant wind turbine blade

Frack­ing test site in Greater Man­ches­ter block­ad­ed with giant wind tur­bine blade

 

Frack­ing test site in Greater Man­ches­ter block­ad­ed with giant wind tur­bine blade

 

Fifty pro-renew­ables cam­paign­ers deliv­er 17 metre, 1.5 tonne wind tur­bine blade as “Christ­mas gift” for frack­ing com­pa­ny IGas

 

Entrance to Bar­ton Moss test site blocked, to pre­vent drilling vehi­cles from enter­ing

 

For hi-res pho­tos, inter­views and film footage call 07968700604

for rolling updates: https://twitter.com/nodashforgas

 

At 5.30 this morn­ing (Mon­day 16th Decem­ber 2013), fifty peo­ple blocked the entrance to IGas’s explorato­ry drilling site in Bar­ton Moss with a giant wind tur­bine blade. The cam­paign­ers arrived at the site in Sal­ford in Greater Man­ches­ter, pro­ceed­ed to unload and assem­ble the 17-metre blade from its three com­po­nent seg­ments. They were spot­ted by a secu­ri­ty guard who called the police, but the offi­cers who arrived on the scene were too late to pre­vent the block­ade from being set up.

 

The cam­paign­ers then left, leav­ing the heavy wind tur­bine blade in place across the entrance, com­plete with a large red Christ­mas bow. Cur­rent­ly all vehi­cle access the site is being sev­er­ly dis­rupt­ed by the 1.5‑tonne blade, which can­not be moved with­out large num­bers of peo­ple or spe­cial­ist equip­ment.

 

IGas have obtained per­mis­sion to drill a 3000 metre (10000 foot) test well at Bar­ton Moss, in the hope of extract­ing both coal bed methane and shale gas. If the tests prove suc­cess­ful, IGas would then be like­ly to use the con­tro­ver­sial extrac­tion method of hor­i­zon­tal slick­wa­ter hydraulic frac­tur­ing (or “frack­ing”) to blast gas out of the ground [1]. In the US, where frack­ing has been under­way for sev­er­al years, the prac­tice has been linked to water con­t­a­m­i­na­tion, air pol­lu­tion, and risks to local water sup­plies, with over 1000 leaks and spills report­ed in one year in North Dako­ta alone [2]. If frack­ing were to spread across the UK, it would lead to the extrac­tion of large amounts of oil and gas that would oth­er­wise have remained in the ground, with seri­ous con­se­quences for the cli­mate [3].

 

The frack­ing indus­try itself has admit­ted that the prac­tice is unlike­ly to bring down ener­gy bills [4], and econ­o­mist Nicholas Stern has accused the Gov­ern­ment of “base­less eco­nom­ics” for claim­ing oth­er­wise [5]. Mean­while, the Gov­ern­men­t’s own Com­mit­tee on Cli­mate Change has released a report show­ing that a shift away from fos­sil fuels to renew­ables and ener­gy effi­cien­cy could save the UK pub­lic £85 bil­lion per year [6].

 

Fol­low­ing a sum­mer of high-pro­file anti-frack­ing protests at Bal­combe in West Sus­sex, which end­ed when the drilling com­pa­ny Cuadrilla with­drew its frack­ing appli­ca­tion [7], Bar­ton Moss is now wide­ly seen as the new front­line in the bat­tle for clean ener­gy in the UK [8], and in Novem­ber 2013 a “Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp” was set up at the site. Actions are fre­quent­ly launched from the camp to dis­rupt drilling activ­i­ties at the site, and at least ten peo­ple, includ­ing local res­i­dents, have been arrest­ed in the last few weeks [9]. This year’s anti-frack­ing protests seem to have shift­ed pub­lic opin­ion; accord­ing to nation­al polling by the Uni­ver­si­ty of Not­ting­ham, sup­port for frack­ing dropped sig­nif­i­cant­ly after the sum­mer protests at Bal­combe [10].

 

Today’s action was car­ried out by a group of peo­ple from all over the UK who had been inspired by the Reclaim The Pow­er protest camp at Bal­combe ear­li­er this year. San­dra Den­ton, who was one of the peo­ple who put the blade in place, said: “We’ve deliv­ered this ear­ly Christ­mas gift to IGas to remind them that we don’t need dam­ag­ing, risky and pol­lut­ing ener­gy sources like oil and gas to pow­er the UK. The Gov­ern­ment and the big ener­gy com­pa­nies are plan­ning to build a new wave of gas-fired pow­er sta­tions, part­ly fed by thou­sands of frack­ing wells across the British coun­try­side. This would lock us into using this expen­sive and dirty fos­sil fuel for decades to come, trap­ping us in a future of spi­ralling ener­gy prices and dis­as­trous floods, storms and droughts as cli­mate change kicks in. Mean­while, a shift to prop­er­ly insu­lat­ed homes pow­ered by clean, com­mu­ni­ty-owned or pub­licly-con­trolled renew­able ener­gy would res­cue mil­lions from fuel pover­ty, pre­vent thou­sands of win­ter deaths and give us all a decent chance at avoid­ing run­away cli­mate change.”

 

Rachel Thomp­son of Frack Free Greater Man­ches­ter, a sep­a­rate local group who are cam­paign­ing against frack­ing in the area, said: “The Gov­ern­men­t’s plan to increase our reliance on gas – includ­ing fracked gas — would lead to high­er ener­gy bills and more pol­lu­tion. The only rea­son they’re going down this path is because of the pow­er and influ­ence of the big ener­gy com­pa­nies. The Big Six can make far big­ger prof­its from fos­sil fuels than from clean ener­gy or home insu­la­tion schemes, which is why they’re using their cosy rela­tion­ship with Gov­ern­ment to block renew­able alter­na­tives and keep us all burn­ing their expen­sive gas. That’s why we all need to stand up for a fair­er, clean­er, more demo­c­ra­t­ic ener­gy sys­tem with­out the Big Six prof­i­teers in charge.”

 

Pearl Hop­kins, a local res­i­dent, said, “I did­n’t know today’s action was going to hap­pen but I’m very glad it did. It’s great that peo­ple are com­ing from all over the coun­try to sup­port us at Bar­ton Moss — and with cre­ative block­ades like this one. Local peo­ple have tried using all the offi­cial chan­nels to object to this scheme, but the Coun­cil and IGas seem deter­mined to brush our con­cerns under the car­pet and car­ry on regard­less. We’d like renew­able ener­gy for the future — not the destruc­tion of our towns and coun­try­side with thou­sands of drill sites.”

ENDS

 

Notes for Edi­tors

[1] http://frack-off.org.uk/frack­ing-man­ches­ter-igas-threat­ens-bar­ton-moss/

 

[2] http://www.propublica.org/arti­cle/the-oth­er-frack­ing-north-dako­tas-oil-boom-brings-dam­age-along-with-pros­peri

 

[3] The Inter­na­tion­al Ener­gy Agency has cal­cu­lat­ed that we need to leave two thirds of known con­ven­tion­al fos­sil fuels in the ground to have even a 50% chance of avoid­ing run­away cli­mate change. This cal­cu­la­tion does­n’t include uncon­ven­tion­al fos­sil fuel sources like shale gas and coal bed methane, which means we can’t real­ly afford to burn these forms of fuel at all. See Page 11 of http://newint.org/blog/the_fracking_files.pdf

 

[4] http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/nov/29/browne-frack­ing-not-reduce-uk-gas-prices-shale-ener­gy-bills

 

[5] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/pol­i­tic­s/base­less-eco­nom­ics-lord-stern-on-david-camerons-claims-that-a-uk-frack­ing-boom-can-bring-down-price-of-gas-8796758.html

 

[6] http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/dec/11/uk-car­bon-tar­gets-ben­e­fits

 

[7] http://www.resource.uk.com/article/UK/Cuadrilla_withdraws_planning_applications-3584#.Uq4AkOK3AgU

 

[8] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bar­ton-moss-the-lat­est-front-line-in-britains-uncon­ven­tion­al-ener­gy-rev­o­lu­tion-against-fracking-8967753.html

 

[9] http://northerngasgala.org.uk/

 

[10] http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/02/frack­ing-protest-sup­port-shale-gas-poll

Romania Update: Protests Continue as Chevron Restarts Fracking Exploration

pungesti-tvr-1 9th Decem­ber  Protests against Chevron’s activ­i­ty in Silis­tea – Pungesti, north­east­ern Roman­ian, area esca­lat­ed on Sat­ur­day, Decem­ber 6, trig­ger­ing the Amer­i­can oil and

pungesti-tvr-1 9th Decem­ber  Protests against Chevron’s activ­i­ty in Silis­tea – Pungesti, north­east­ern Roman­ian, area esca­lat­ed on Sat­ur­day, Decem­ber 6, trig­ger­ing the Amer­i­can oil and gas com­pa­ny to sus­pend its activ­i­ty on site.

Pro­test­ers destroyed the fence Chevron had built around the 20,000 – sqm land plot at the vil­lage out­skirts. One day lat­er, how­ev­er, Chevron re-start­ed their activ­i­ty on site.

Protests were staged down­town in cap­i­tal city Bucharest as well, with a peak reg­is­tered on Sun­day evening (Decem­ber 7), when three pro­test­ers were tak­en into cus­tody by the gen­darmes.

Silis­tea – Pungesti has now been declared a spe­cial area for pub­lic secu­ri­ty, with author­i­ties imple­ment­ing spe­cial mea­sures against vio­lence includ­ing plac­ing gen­darmes all around the vil­lage, accord­ing to Roman­ian media, which has been fol­low­ing the top­ic all through­out last week­end.

The gen­darmes have been check­ing the doc­u­ments of every­one vis­it­ing the vil­lage while vil­lagers have com­plained of the intru­sion, say­ing gen­darmes were in front of every house ask­ing peo­ple of their where­abouts.

The group of pro­test­ers in Pungesti, some 400 peo­ple, were a mix of locals and ecol­o­gy activists from Iaşi, Bucureşti, Braşov and Sibiu. They ini­tial­ly protest­ed peace­ful­ly, but the protest became vio­lent as some of them began throw­ing stones into Chevron’s vehi­cles, and tear­ing down the fence sur­round­ing the explo­ration site. Footage from the Pungesti protests, here.

Mean­while, Chevron has again stat­ed that all explo­ration activ­i­ties will use con­ven­tion­al tech­nolo­gies based on the per­mits it received in the begin­ning of Octo­ber. “We respect people’s right to express their opin­ion, but we believe this should be done with­in the lim­its of the law,” Chevron wrote in an offi­cial state­ment. The com­pa­ny had start­ed its activ­i­ty on site in Silis­tea – Pungesti on Decem­ber 2, after a first delay ear­li­er in Octo­ber, also because of local protests.

The protests against explo­ration for shale case was trig­gered by con­cerns that explo­ration would be harm­ful to the envi­ron­ment, and coin­cid­ed with protests against gold min­ing in Cen­tral Roma­nia, at Rosia Mon­tana, where the planned used of cyanide also caused con­cern.

Direct Action Gets the Goods: Chevron Suspends in Romania

31 8th Decem­ber 

Chevron has sus­pend­ed explo­ration for shale gas in north­east­ern Roma­nia after hun­dreds of anti-frack­ing pro­test­ers tore down fences.

31 8th Decem­ber 

Chevron has sus­pend­ed explo­ration for shale gas in north­east­ern Roma­nia after hun­dreds of anti-frack­ing pro­test­ers tore down fences.

Chevron won approval to drill explorato­ry wells in the town of Pungesti, but halt­ed work for a sec­ond time Sat­ur­day after res­i­dents blocked access to the site.

Hun­dreds of riot police couldn’t pre­vent res­i­dents from demol­ish­ing fences and break­ing into the site. Dozens were detained and 14 were charged with destruc­tion of prop­er­ty and car­ry­ing knives.

Chevron said it had sus­pend­ed work “as a result of unsafe con­di­tions” and informed police of destruc­tion to its prop­er­ty.

Thou­sands of peo­ple have ral­lied across Roma­nia in recent months to protest against gov­ern­ment sup­port for shale gas explo­ration. Chevron had resumed work at the site on Dec. 2.

Partial Success for Mi’kmaq: SWN Pulls Out (Till 2015?)

Burning tires form a blockade against pre-fracking seismic testing in Mi'kmaq territory, Dec 3, 2013 6th Dec

Burning tires form a blockade against pre-fracking seismic testing in Mi'kmaq territory, Dec 3, 2013 6th Dec

ELSIPGOTG FIRST NATION, NB–A Hous­ton-based ener­gy com­pa­ny that has faced fero­cious resis­tance from a Mi’kmaq-led coali­tion is end­ing its shale gas explo­ration work for the year, says Elsi­pog­tog War Chief John Levi.

Levi said Fri­day that the RCMP informed him that SWN Resources Cana­da is end­ing its explo­ration work, but will return in 2015.

Levi said SWN and its con­trac­tors would be pick­ing up geo­phones from the side of the high­way today. Geo­phones inter­act with thumper trucks to cre­ate imag­ing of shale gas deposits under­ground.

“They are just going to be pick­ing up their gear today,” said Levi. “At least peo­ple can take a break for Christ­mas.”

Demon­stra­tions against the com­pa­ny esca­lat­ed this week. Demon­stra­tors twice burned tires on Hwy 11 which was the area where SWN was con­duct­ing its shale gas explo­ration.

SWN said in a state­ment late Fri­day after­noon that it had com­plet­ed its “seis­mic acqui­si­tions pro­gram in New Brunswick.”

The com­pa­ny, how­ev­er, was silent on its future time­line for return­ing. [empha­sis added ‑Ed.]

SWN obtained an exten­sion to an injunc­tion against the demon­stra­tors Mon­day after argu­ing it need­ed two more weeks to fin­ish its work. In its court fil­ing, SWN claimed it need­ed about 25 km left to explore.

Levi said the Mi’kmaq com­mu­ni­ty, which sits about 80 km north of Monc­ton, will be there again in 2015 to oppose the com­pa­ny. Levi said SWN will be return­ing to con­duct explorato­ry drilling.

“We can’t allow any drilling, we didn’t allow them to do the test­ing from the begin­ning,” said Levi.

Levi said word that SWN is leav­ing is no cause for cel­e­bra­tion just yet.

“We went through a lot,” he said. “We need some time for this to sink in and think about every­thing, think about what we went through…People did a lot of sac­ri­fic­ing.”

Barton Moss: anti-fracking protest camp, Salford

Lat­est updates, wish list and direc­tions at http://northerngasgala.org.uk/

Lat­est updates, wish list and direc­tions at http://northerngasgala.org.uk/

Day 5: Sun 1st December

Day 6 -  Huge banner

Day 5 of the North­ern Gas Gala sees the Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp con­tin­ue to grow.  A call out has been made by trade unions and local res­i­dents for a protest next Sun­day 8th Decem­ber (face­book event here).

Bar­ton Moss Protest Ral­ly - Sun­day 8th Decem­ber 2013. Assem­ble 12.30pm at Junc­tion Bar­ton Moss Road/Liverpool Road, Bar­ton, Eccles M30 7RL

Sup­port the Bar­ton Moss Pro­tec­tion Camp!  Sup­port the fight to stop frack­ing every­where!

Bring your own plac­ards and ban­ners.

Day 4: Sat 30th November

Day 4 - Mad Hatters Tea Party

The com­mu­ni­ty pro­tec­tion camp out­side IGas’s frack­ing site at Bar­ton Moss con­tin­ues to estab­lish itself with com­post toi­lets being built. Their was also a Mad Frack­ers Tea Par­ty and an impres­sive sun­set. The local com­mu­ni­ty is resist­ing the threat to their region with sup­port from across the coun­try.

 

Day 1: Wed 27th November

northern-gas-gala-day-1

The first day of the North­ern Gas Gala has seen a large num­ber of peo­ple answer the call out to pro­tect Bar­ton Moss (and the wider region) from the threat of posed by IGas’s plans. The brave Bar­ton Moss pro­tec­tors have been block­ing lor­ries from enter­ing the frack­ing site and four peo­ple (three of them Sal­ford res­i­dents) have been arrest­ed for pro­tect­ing their com­mu­ni­ty from frack­ing com­pa­ny IGas Ener­gy. The police pres­ence has been large and grow­ing.

The Inde­pen­dent: Bar­ton Moss: The lat­est front line in Britain’s uncon­ven­tion­al ener­gy rev­o­lu­tion against frack­ing

ITV news footage here: http://vimeo.com/80480970

BBC News footage here:

Victory for Elsipogtog on the Highway, While Battle Continues in Court

RCMP cars burn in retaliation for a violent raid on a First Nations blockade of pre-fracking testing equipment in Elsipogtog, New Brunswick, Oct 17, 2013Novem­ber 15th, Mi’kmaq demon­stra­tors declared “vic­to­ry

RCMP cars burn in retaliation for a violent raid on a First Nations blockade of pre-fracking testing equipment in Elsipogtog, New Brunswick, Oct 17, 2013Novem­ber 15th, Mi’kmaq demon­stra­tors declared “vic­to­ry” Thurs­day after stop­ping thumper trucks belong­ing to a Hous­ton-based ener­gy com­pa­ny from con­duct­ing shale gas explo­ration north of Elsi­pog­tog First Nation.

While about 100 Mi’kmaq and sup­port­ers faced a line of RCMP offi­cers as SWN Resources Canada’s thumper trucks idled in the back­ground, the Elsi­pog­tog band coun­cil was 200 kilo­me­tres away in a Fred­er­ic­ton court­room seek­ing an ex parteinjunc­tion to stop SWN from con­tin­u­ing the explo­ration work. A hear­ing on the injunc­tion is set for Fri­day.

On Hwy 11 ten­sions ran high as Mi’kmaq demon­stra­tors from Elsi­pog­tog and oth­er com­mu­ni­ties along with non-First Nations sup­port­ers tried to block SWN from oper­at­ing their thumper trucks while the RCMP tried to inter­vene. SWN even­tu­al­ly decid­ed to turn the trucks around with plans for anoth­er attempt expect­ed Fri­day.

A well-known Elsi­pog­tog frack­ing oppo­nent Lor­raine Clair was arrest­ed dur­ing the protest for mis­chief, assault a police offi­cer and resist­ing arrest, accord­ing to New Brunswick RCMP.

 

Still, spir­its were high among peo­ple from Elsi­pog­tog who watched SWN’s trucks roll away as dusk began to set.

“It is a small vic­to­ry, but a vic­to­ry nonethe­less,” said Bren­nan Sock, from Elsi­pog­tog. “We will take any­thing right now. We got the trucks to leave, we man­aged to slow them down as much as we can.”

T’uma Bernard, a Mi’kmaq War­rior from Prince Edward Island, said he saw renewed uni­ty among the demon­stra­tors.

“It was a great vic­to­ry, it was a great day,” said Bernard.

RCMP spokesper­son Con­st. Jul­lie Rogers-Marsh said there were acts of van­dal­ism through­out the day that are under inves­ti­ga­tion.

“A truck belong­ing to a pri­vate com­pa­ny work­ing in the area and sev­er­al pieces of equip­ment were dam­aged,” said Rogers-Marsh.

She said the RCMP had video of “some­body wear­ing a mask” pulling up geo­phones along Hwy 11. Rogers-Marsh there “also threats of ille­gal acts.”

Rogers-Marsh said the police offi­cers are there to main­tain pub­lic safe­ty.

“Being safe and peace­ful and law­ful is very impor­tant and we are in the area con­tin­u­ing to mon­i­tor the sit­u­a­tion,” said Rogers-Marsh. “Our role is pub­lic safe­ty and we are there to pro­tect every­one.”

Thumper trucks inter­act with geo­phones, which are strung along the ground, to cre­ate imagery of shale gas deposits under­ground.

In Fred­er­ic­ton, the Elsi­pog­tog band was seek­ing an injunc­tion to stop SWN argu­ing “out­side rad­i­cal ele­ments” were con­verg­ing “in sig­nif­i­cant num­bers” as a result of the company’s con­tin­u­ing shale gas explo­ration.

The band’s fil­ing said mil­i­tary forces are at play on the police side of the oper­a­tion and warned a repeat of the Oct. 17 raid in Rex­ton, NB., by RCMP tac­ti­cal units is loom­ing.

“The cir­cum­stances com­bine to cre­ate a very real dan­ger that, as active seis­mic explo­ration is recom­menced in the com­ing hours and days, out­side rad­i­cal ele­ments, the respon­dent SWN and the RCMP, oth­er police and even mil­i­tary forces, all inter­act so as to cause a repeat esca­la­tion of the unac­cept­able and dan­ger­ous events that took place in Rex­ton,” said the fil­ing.

The fil­ing also names provin­cial Ener­gy Min­is­ter Craig Leonard and the Assem­bly of First Nations Chiefs in New Brunswick (AFNCNB).

The fil­ing argues that the province failed in its duty to con­sult and that the AFNCNB, which Elsi­pog­tog gave author­i­ty to con­sult on its behalf, failed in its respon­si­bil­i­ty by “inac­tion and inad­e­quate engage­ment.”

AFNCNB’s lawyer Mike Scul­ly has told APTN Nation­al News that the province set the terms of the con­sul­ta­tion and the AFNCNB had to act with­in those lim­it­ed para­me­ters.

While the band lead­er­ship will con­tin­ue its legal bat­tle in the court­room Fri­day, the grass­roots are vow­ing to be back on the pave­ment with their bod­ies to stop the thumpers.

“Nobody is going nowhere, they can’t bul­ly us and use force tac­tics against the peo­ple of the land,” said Bernard.

Sock said peo­ple would be out all night keep­ing a watch­ful eye.

“We have a lot of peo­ple who are ded­i­cat­ed and will be out there all night to make sure they don’t come back,” said Sock.

Indigenous Petro-Struggles

stop fracking indigenous 12th Novem­ber

stop fracking indigenous 12th Novem­ber

Another Elsipogtog Showdown Brewing

SWN Resources Cana­da is plan­ning to resume its con­tro­ver­sial shale gas seis­mic explo­ration work on Wednes­day, accord­ing to Elsi­pog­tog War Chief John Levi. …

Levi said Con­nors told the peo­ple that SWN would with­draw a law­suit against sev­er­al com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers if the Hous­ton-based firm was allowed to fin­ish its explo­ration work unim­ped­ed.

“We said no, we are going to be there,” said Levi, in an inter­view with APTN Nation­al News. “What we told him was we are going to be there Wednes­day.”

Ponca Families Challenge TransCanada

Key­stone XL pipeline oppo­nents took to a Neligh rancher’s land Sat­ur­day, protest­ing the pro­pos­al they say cuts through the his­toric Pon­ca Trail of Tears and pos­es a steep envi­ron­men­tal risk. Pon­ca trib­al fam­i­lies, Oceti Sakowin tribes, Brave Heart Soci­ety, Bold Nebras­ka, and oth­ers — host­ed the Pon­ca Trail of Tears Spir­i­tu­al Camp, the first in a series of trib­al events aimed at show­cas­ing sol­i­dar­i­ty among ranch­ers and Native Amer­i­cans against TransCanada’s project.