Pre-Eviction Gathering! Sat 23rd to Tues 26th January

*A long week­end of action, work­shops and defence-build­ing in prepa­ra­tion for the evic­tion of the Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp*

Pre-eviction gathering*A long week­end of action, work­shops and defence-build­ing in prepa­ra­tion for the evic­tion of the Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp*

With the long-await­ed and high­ly-antic­i­pat­ed evic­tion of the camp sure­ly draw­ing clos­er, join us for the week­end (and as much time after that as you can spare!) to add the fin­ish­ing touch­es to defences, build new ones and for­ti­fy bar­ri­cades. Ever want­ed to build your­self a tree­house? Dig your­self a tun­nel? Make your­self a lock-on? Now is your chance!

We’re ask­ing any­one who wants to be a part of stop­ping this open cast coal mine, any­one who wants to fight cor­po­rate greed, cor­rupt gov­ern­ment and the feu­dal land own­er­ship, and any­one who wants to defend a com­mu­ni­ty from the self-inter­est of the few, to come to the camp and help us build a viable alter­na­tive to the destruc­tion that will oth­er­wise ensue.

Ask­ing nice­ly has failed. Its time to fight back!

What to bring:

* Warm clothes and water­proofs
* Sleep­ing bag

Tasty veg­an food will be pro­vid­ed, but bring any sup­plies you can. Any build­ing mate­ri­als, tools, climb­ing equip­ment, bed­ding or any­thing on our wish list you can spare please bring it along.

Direc­tions – http://coalactionscotland.noflag.org.uk/?page_id=415#How%20to%20Get%20There

http://mainshill.noflag.org.uk/

Hasty Lane Adopt-a-Resident Launch- Manchester — Sun 7th Feb 2010

On Sun­day 7th Feb­ru­ary 2010, Hasty Lane ten­ants threat­ened by the expan­sion of Man­ches­ter Air­port will be team­ing up with cli­mate jus­tice cam­paign­ers in the pub­lic launch of the Adopt-a-Res­i­dent scheme.

Hasty Lane Adopt-a-Resident logoOn Sun­day 7th Feb­ru­ary 2010, Hasty Lane ten­ants threat­ened by the expan­sion of Man­ches­ter Air­port will be team­ing up with cli­mate jus­tice cam­paign­ers in the pub­lic launch of the Adopt-a-Res­i­dent scheme. Like at Heathrow, the scheme aims to build sol­i­dar­i­ty and cam­paign­ing links and to send out a mes­sage that if the bull­doz­ers come, they will have to deal with peo­ple from across Man­ches­ter stand­ing togeth­er to pro­tect peo­ple’s homes and to pro­tect the cli­mate.

Pub­lic launch — Sun­day 7th Feb­ru­ary 2010

Hasty Lane ‘Adopt a Res­i­dent’ Launch
Sun­day 7th Feb­ru­ary 2010
1pm — 3pm

Hasty Lane, next to Man­ches­ter Air­port, WA15 8UT

What will the day involve?
———————————————
We’ll have a grand tour of Hasty Lane, includ­ing the threat­ened hous­es and near­by wildlife spots. We’ll intro­duce each oth­er and have a live video link up with Sip­son vil­lage near Lon­don Heathrow. There will be tea, cake and music.

What what what?
———————————————
In Novem­ber 2009, Man­ches­ter City Coun­cil approved plans to bull­doze peo­ple’s homes on Hasty Lane to expand the World Freight Cen­tre at Man­ches­ter Air­port.

Not only do these plans threat­en peo­ple’s homes, but the ris­ing emis­sions from air freight also threat­en the sta­bil­i­ty of the cli­mate.

But we can stop them. We’re invit­ing you to Adopt-a-Res­i­dent at Hasty Lane. Togeth­er, we can team up to rein in Man­ches­ter air­port’s cli­mate wreck­ing expan­sion plans. Togeth­er, we’ll also show that if the bull­doz­ers come, they will have to deal with peo­ple from across Man­ches­ter stand­ing togeth­er to pro­tect peo­ple’s homes and to pro­tect our future.

At the same time, we’ll be twin­ning Hasty Lane with Sip­son vil­lage at Heathrow. Like Hasty Lane, Sip­son is also threat­ened by air­port expan­sion plans. A third run­way at Heathrow would bull­doze around 400 homes.

With res­i­dents, sup­port­ers, cam­paign­ers and activists link­ing up across Man­ches­ter and across the coun­try — we can stand togeth­er to pro­tect peo­ple’s homes and to pro­tect our cli­mate.

For more infor­ma­tion, see:
http://stopmanchesterairport.blogspot.com/

or con­tact: manchester@planestupid.com

TRANSPORT
———————————————
Stop Expan­sion at Man­ches­ter Air­port will be organs­ing trans­port from cen­tral Man­ches­ter. To book your space email manchester@planestupid.com with the sub­ject HASTY LANE.

Otherwise,TRAIN + BUS
Get the train to Man­ches­ter Air­port trans­port inter­change then either bus num­bers 18 & 18A towards Hale Barns/ Altrin­cham. Get off at the top off Hasty lane.
take the TRAM to Altrin­cham inter­change and take bus­es num­ber 18 or 18a towards the Airport/Wythenshawe. Get off at the top off Hasty lane.

Stop Expan­sion at Man­ches­ter Air­port
— Home­page: http://stopmanchesterairport.blogspot.com/

Rapid Technology Transfer Group to take over the Earth Centre

A cam­paign has been run­ning to reclaim the earth cen­tre in don­cast­er as a com­mu­ni­ty skill share cen­tre. It has come to light that the local coun­cil and a con­glo­morate of many multi­na­tion­als has been plan­ning a take over. They deal in chem­i­cals, con­struc­tion, nuclear, engi­neer­ing, audio­vi­su­al, 3D tech, aero­space, defense and a whole lot more.

A cam­paign has been run­ning to reclaim the earth cen­tre in don­cast­er as a com­mu­ni­ty skill share cen­tre. It has come to light that the local coun­cil and a con­glo­morate of many multi­na­tion­als has been plan­ning a take over. They deal in chem­i­cals, con­struc­tion, nuclear, engi­neer­ing, audio­vi­su­al, 3D tech, aero­space, defense and a whole lot more.

They planned an open day to our knowl­edge this has not been pub­li­cised and very few peo­ple in the com­mu­ni­ty are aware so in order that the com­mu­ni­ty not be exclud­ed again! We feel it impor­tant to share this infor­ma­tion and urge you to attend:

Earthw rks
Devel­op­ment Plan­ning 2010
First Quar­ter – Open Days — Tues­day, Feb­ru­ary 9th and Wednes­day, March 31st
This is an open invi­ta­tion to all organ­i­sa­tions and indi­vid­u­als will­ing to con­tribute exper­tise to restore the site of the for­mer Earth Cen­tre as a nation­al resource for research­ing, under­stand­ing and prac­tis­ing sus­tain­abil­i­ty.

Please e‑mail mike@therttg.org to reg­is­ter and receive full details. Out­door wear is rec­om­mend­ed. Pho­tog­ra­phy for per­son­al use is per­mit­ted in all areas.

for more details of this sit­u­a­tion please see http://welovetheearthcentre.blogspot.com

climate camp ‘where next?’ regional gatherings and reader

PROPOSALS FOR 2010 SO FAR

We’ve got a new dis­cus­sion board up on the Cli­mate Camp web­site with all the pro­pos­als for the region­al gath­er­ings received so far, plus some oth­er use­ful texts from the Where Next? dis­cus­sions. Join the dis­cus­sion here:

http://discussion.climatecamp.org.uk

REGIONAL GATHERINGS IN JANUARY

PROPOSALS FOR 2010 SO FAR

We’ve got a new dis­cus­sion board up on the Cli­mate Camp web­site with all the pro­pos­als for the region­al gath­er­ings received so far, plus some oth­er use­ful texts from the Where Next? dis­cus­sions. Join the dis­cus­sion here:

http://discussion.climatecamp.org.uk

REGIONAL GATHERINGS IN JANUARY

Here are the lat­est con­firmed details of our region­al gath­er­ings in Jan­u­ary…

(More details as we have them will be post­ed at:
http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/get-involved/national-gatherings/next)

Cli­mate Camp Read­er

Dysophia and Shift Mag­a­zine have joined forces to put togeth­er a Cli­mate Camp Read­er, “Crit­i­cism with­out Cri­tique”, pub­lished in Jan­u­ary 2010. This read­er hopes to encour­age and facil­i­ate debates at the next cli­mate camp gath­er­ings. To down­load it fol­low this link:
http://dysophia.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cca_reader.pdf
The edi­to­r­i­al is post­ed below:

Edi­to­r­i­al

In Jan­u­ary & Feb­ru­ary 2010, the Camp for Cli­mate Action will go through a peri­od of intro­spec­tion as it works out where it shall go next. While in some ways the Camp has been a suc­cess, it has also come under a bar­rage of crit­i­cism from some quar­ters with­in the rad­i­cal move­ments that spawned it.

To help this debate we have put togeth­er a set of resources and rel­e­vant arti­cles to inform and spark dis­cus­sion relat­ing to this crit­i­cism. Our bias is obvi­ous, though the opin­ions expressed are those of the authors alone. Whether you agree with them or not, we believe they are worth tak­ing on board. We hope at least that you feel con­fi­dent answer­ing their chal­lenges, rather than just dis­miss­ing them.

Now is the time for the Camp to exam­ine its pol­i­tics in more depth, to work out just what it stands for. This is a cross-roads in its devel­op­ment, to con­tin­ue down a path of ever increas­ing lib­er­al, reformist approach, or to be the noisy rad­i­cal, point­ing out all the white ele­phants in the cli­mate change debate. The future of the move­ment around the camp is being shaped here. The deci­sions being made now will have pro­found impacts on who is and who is not involved in the future.

The Camp for Cli­mate Action grew out of the rad­i­cal anar­chist and envi­ron­men­tal move­ments, a syn­the­sis of the organ­i­sa­tion­al skills devel­oped at the Anti-G8 protest camp at Stir­ling, and the eco­log­i­cal direct action move­ments such as Earth First! The per­cep­tion that emerges from these crit­i­cisms is this has been lost along the way.

We accept that this book­let makes chal­leng­ing read­ing and that we offer lit­tle in the way of solu­tions. These, we believe, must come from with­in the camp itself. How­ev­er, it is appar­ent that there is a need for two things. First­ly, a greater vis­i­bil­i­ty for the anar­chist roots with­in the day to day life of the CCA process and pro­pos­als. Sec­ond­ly, and just as impor­tant, a more open and explic­it cri­tique of cap­i­tal­ism and how it is the root cause of cli­mate change.

If we do nei­ther out of fear of a main­stream media back­lash, then we are reduced to being anoth­er NGO. Yet, the pow­er of the Camp has always been the promise of a gen­uine alter­na­tive action in the face of pre­var­i­ca­tion and obstruc­tion from gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions – now is the time to spell that cri­tique out and use it to build real alter­na­tives, not legit­imis­ing the sys­tem we com­plain of. It was the strength of the Camp’s found­ing cri­tiques that gave it the bold­ness its sub­se­quent suc­cess­es have rest­ed on.

Ulti­mate­ly, the mes­sage of the Camp is a very rad­i­cal one – that rad­i­cal social change is need­ed, espe­cial­ly if we are to tack­le of the root caus­es of cli­mate change. The answer is not to water down our actions and our mes­sages, but to be bold­er than ever. That is the excite­ment and pow­er that gives the Camp its life.

To down­load the read­er fol­low this link:
http://dysophia.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cca_reader.pdf

http://dysophia.wordpress.com/
http://www.shiftmag.co.uk/

Coal Machinery Sabotaged in South Lanarkshire, Scotland

Late one night in ear­ly Jan­u­ary Pen­nile open cast coal mine was vis­it­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple who sab­o­taged machines. A total of 13 pieces of machin­ery were dam­aged, includ­ing one giant earth mover, six giant dumper trucks, four stan­dard sized earth movers and two flood light gen­er­a­tors.

Late one night in ear­ly Jan­u­ary Pen­nile open cast coal mine was vis­it­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple who sab­o­taged machines. A total of 13 pieces of machin­ery were dam­aged, includ­ing one giant earth mover, six giant dumper trucks, four stan­dard sized earth movers and two flood light gen­er­a­tors.

Recent­ly Pen­nile open cast fin­ished min­ing, but the machines Scot­tish Coal had work­ing there were sup­posed to be mov­ing to Main­shill Wood. How­ev­er as we all know Scot­tish Coal’s plans have been sub­stan­tial­ly dis­rupt­ed by the occu­pa­tion of the wood by the Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp.

This action was tak­en by autonomous peo­ple in sol­i­dar­i­ty with every­one who oppos­es the destruc­tion of Main­shill Wood and it’s devel­op­ment into anoth­er coal mine.

videos from Mainshill and German treesit against a proposed pipeline

The Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp presents:

*Off With Their Heads!*

Hold­ing the politi­cians behind Main­shill Open Cast Coal Mine to account

Fea­tur­ing: Jim Hood MP, Karen Gillon MSP, Coun­cil­lor Dan­ny Meik­le and Lord Home

Snow and Anarchy at MainshillThe Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp presents:

*Off With Their Heads!*

Hold­ing the politi­cians behind Main­shill Open Cast Coal Mine to account

Fea­tur­ing: Jim Hood MP, Karen Gillon MSP, Coun­cil­lor Dan­ny Meik­le and Lord Home

This short film doc­u­ments the cor­rup­tion, con­flict of inter­est and hypocrisy dom­i­nat­ing the pol­i­tics of South Lanark­shire, that result in Scot­tish Coal receiv­ing approval for coal mine after coal mine in the Dou­glas Val­ley. With no regard for com­mu­ni­ty health, local democ­ra­cy, the envi­ron­ment or cli­mate change, Scot­tish Coal are allowed to run roughshod over the peo­ple of the Dou­glas Val­ley. The Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp occu­pied the site of Main­shill Wood over six months ago to help local com­mu­ni­ties fight off Scot­tish Coal and the landown­er Lord Home.

The strug­gle con­tin­ues!

Watch it here: http://www.politube.org/show/23788

Since the 18.12.09 ROBIN WOOD-Activists squat sev­er­al trees in the Gäh­ler­park in Ham­burg Altona to impende the con­truc­tion of a heat­ing pipeline for the planned coal pow­er plant Ham­burg Moor­burg, which would mean the loss of the trees in the park. The com­pa­ny propos­ing the pipeline is Vat­ten­fall, a Swedish cor­po­ra­tion. With their protest they sup­port two res­i­dents who have squat­tet two trees already at 3rd of decem­ber.

(Ger­man with Eng­lish sub­ti­tles)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJeo631Pyv4

Letter from Climate Prisoners

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

Some­thing is rot­ten (but not just) in Den­mark. As a mat­ter of fact, thou­sands of peo­ple have been con­sid­ered, with­out any evi­dence, a threath to the soci­ety. Hun­dreds have been arrest­ed and some are still under deten­tion, wait­ing for judge­ment or under inves­ti­ga­tion. Among them, us, the under­signed. We want to tell the sto­ry from the pecu­liar view­point of those that still see the sky from behind the bars.

A UN meet­ing of cru­cial impor­tance has failed because of sev­er­al con­tra­dic­tions and ten­sions that have shown up dur­ing the COP15. The pri­ma­ry con­cern of the pow­er­fuls was the gov­er­nance of the ener­gy sup­ply for nev­erend­ing growth. This was the case whether they were from the overde­vel­oped world, like the EU coun­tries or the US, or from the so-called devel­op­ing coun­tries, like Chi­na or Brazil.

At odds, hun­dreds of del­e­gates and thou­sands of peo­ple in the streets have raised the issue that the ratio­nale of life must be (and actu­al­ly is) opposed to that of prof­it. we have strong­ly affirmed our will to stop anthrop­ic pres­sure on the bios­phere.

A cri­sis of the ener­gy par­a­digm is com­ing soon. The mech­a­nism of the glob­al gov­er­nance have proven to be over­whelm­ing­ly pre­car­i­ous. The pow­er­fuls failed not only in reach­ing an agree­ment on their inter­nal equi­li­br­ruim but also in keep­ing the for­mal con­trol of the dis­cus­sion.

Cli­mate change is an extreme and ulti­mate expres­sion of the vio­lence of the cap­i­tal­is­tic growth par­a­digm. Peo­ple glob­al­ly are increas­ing­ly show­ing the will­ing­ness of tak­ing the pow­er to rebel against that vio­lence. we have seen that in Copen­hagen, as well as we have seen that same vio­lence. Hun­dreds of peo­ple have been arrest­ed with­out any rea­son or clear evi­dence, or for par­tic­i­pat­ing in peace­ful and legit­i­mate demon­stra­tions. Even mild exam­ples of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence have been con­sid­ered as a seri­ous threath to the social order.

In response we ask – What order do we threat­en and who ordered it? Is it that order in which we do not any­more own our bod­ies? The order well beyond the terms of any rea­son­able “social con­tract” that we would ever sign, where our bod­ies can be tak­en, man­aged, con­strained and impris­oned with­out any seri­ous evi­dence of crime. Is it that order in which the deci­sion are more and more shield­ed from any social con­flicts? Where the gov­er­nance less and less belongs to peo­ple, not even through the par­lia­ment? As a mat­ter of fact, non-demo­c­ra­t­ic organ­isms like the WTO, the NB, the G‑whatever rule beyond any con­trol.

We are forced to notice that the the­ater of democ­ra­cy is a bro­ken one as soon as, one approach­es the core of the pow­er. That is why we reclaim the pow­er to the peo­ple. We reclaim the pow­er over our own lives. Above all, we reclaim the pow­er to coun­ter­pose the ratio­nale of life and of the com­mons to the ratio­nale of prof­it. It may have been declared ille­gal, but still we con­sid­er it ful­ly legit­i­mate.

Since no real space is left in the bro­ken the­ater, we reclaimed our col­lec­tive pow­er – Actu­al­ly we expect­ed it – to speak about the cli­mate and ener­gy issues. Issues that, for us, involve crit­i­cal nodes of glob­al jus­tice, sur­vival of man and ener­gy inde­pen­dence. We did march­ing with our bod­ies.

We pre­fer to enter the space where the pow­er is locked danc­ing and singing. We would have liked to do this at the Bel­la cen­ter, to dis­rupt the ses­sion in accord with hun­dreds of del­e­gates. But we were, as always, vio­lent­ly ham­pered by the police. They arrest­ed our bod­ies in an attempt to arrest our ideas. we risked our bod­ies, try­ing to pro­tect them just by stay­ing close to each oth­er. We val­ue our bod­ies: We need them to make love, to stay togeth­er and to enjoy life. They hold our brains, with beau­ti­ful bright ideas and views. They hold our hearts filled with pas­sion and joy. Nev­er­the­less, we risked them. we risked our bod­ies get­ting locked in pris­ons. In fact, what would be the worth of think­ing and feel­ing if the bod­ies did not move? Doing noth­ing, let­ting-it-hap­pen, would be the worst form of com­plic­i­ty with the busi­ness that want­ed to hack the UN meet­ing. At the COP15 we moved, and we will keep mov­ing.

Exact­ly like love, civ­il dis­obe­di­ence can not just be told. We must make it, with our bod­ies. Oth­er­wise, we would not real­ly think about what we love, and we would not real­ly love what we think about. It’s as sim­ple as that. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

How the COP15 has end­ed proves that we were right. Many of us are pay­ing what is manda­to­ry for an obses­sive, per­va­sive and total repres­sion: To find a guilty at the cost of invent­ing it (along with the crime per­haps).

We are detained with evi­dent­ly absurd accu­sa­tions about either vio­lences that actu­al­ly did not take place or con­spir­a­cies and orga­niz­ing of law-break­ing actions.

We do not feel guilty for hav­ing shown, togeth­er with thou­sands, the recla­ma­tion of the inde­pen­dence of our lives from profit’s rule. If the laws oppose this, it was legit­i­mate to peace­ful­ly – but still con­flict­ual­ly – break them.

We are just tem­porar­i­ly docked, ready to sail again with a wind stronger than ever. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

Luca Tor­na­tore – from the Ital­ian social cen­tres net­work “see you in Copen­hagen”.
Natasha Ver­co – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Stine Gry Jonassen – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Tan­nie Nyboe – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Johannes Paul Schul Mey­er
Arvip Peschel
Chris­t­ian Beck­er
Khar­lanchuck Dzmit­ry
Cristoph Lang
Antho­ny Arra­bal

Climate Protestors in Court Following Defacing of Canadian Flag

Three cli­mate activists are this morn­ing due in West­min­ster Magistrate’s Court charged with crim­i­nal dam­age against the Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion in Lon­don fol­low­ing an action to stop the Tar Sands..

Tar Sands
Three cli­mate activists are this morn­ing due in West­min­ster Magistrate’s Court charged with crim­i­nal dam­age against the Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion in Lon­don fol­low­ing an action to stop the Tar Sands..

On Decem­ber 15th, while the Inter­na­tion­al Cli­mate Sum­mit was tak­ing place in Copen­hagen, the pro­test­ers scaled the entrance to the Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion in Grosvenor Square. They cut loose the Cana­di­an flag, before defac­ing it with crude oil while unfurl­ing a ban­ner read­ing “Shut Down the Tar Sands”.

The action was a response to Cana­di­an Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harper’s obstruc­tion of the sum­mit in Copen­hagen in order to pro­tect Canada’s Tar Sands Indus­try [1]. Tar Sands are the dirt­i­est fuel known to man, both in terms of its impact on the cli­mate and the dev­as­ta­tion inflict­ed on the
local com­mu­ni­ties [2].

There is an enor­mous open cast mine in the Alber­ta Tar Sands region of Cana­da, where an area the total size of Eng­land will be exploit­ed. This is the largest indus­tri­al devel­op­ment in the world and is dev­as­tat­ing for the indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties that live there, not only destroy­ing the land
itself but increas­ing lev­els of can­cer, poi­son­ing much of their tra­di­tion­al food sources and leav­ing the water unsafe to drink [3]. This vio­lates the indige­nous treaty rights legal­ly bound to this region.

Jake Col­man, 20, Bradley Day, 22, and Daniel White­ly, 19, are all par­tic­i­pants in the Camp for Cli­mate Action [4], an action group that occu­pied Trafal­gar Square for the two-week dura­tion of the Cli­mate Sum­mit.

Bradley Day, a wait­er from Oxford, speak­ing after the action:

“This is just the begin­ning of a UK-based direct action cam­paign to stop Cana­di­an Tar Sands. These mur­der­ous ven­tures are being fund­ed from with­in the UK, with the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land, now 84%-owned by the pub­lic invest­ing bil­lions, and British Petro­le­um cur­rent­ly prepar­ing to move in
to Tar Sands. [5] We won’t stand by and let these greed dri­ven cor­po­ra­tions cause cat­a­stroph­ic envi­ron­men­tal and human destruc­tion.”

Clay­ton Thomas-Muller, an Indige­nous activist with the Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work (IEN), spoke dur­ing the Copen­hagen sum­mit:
“The Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment con­tin­ues to ignore its own laws, which state they must con­sult with Indige­nous Peo­ples who have been try­ing to con­vey con­cerns about Tar Sands devel­op­ment. Tar Sands are killing our com­mu­ni­ties and tram­pling over our rights. Fur­ther­more, the envi­ron­men­tal destruc­tion wreaked by the Tar Sands is direct­ly threat­en­ing thou­sands of lives now and is dri­ving our cli­mate into chaos. The world has wok­en up to the fact that Cana­da is now Pub­lic Cli­mate Ene­my Num­ber One. It’s time Cana­da did its glob­al duty and shut down the Tar Sands,”

NOTES TO EDITORS:

[1] At the failed Copen­hagen Cli­mate Sum­mit, Cana­da pro­posed an inad­e­quate tar­get for reduc­ing green­house emis­sions by only 3% by 2020 ignor­ing world sci­en­tists’ rec­om­men­da­tions to com­mit to over 40% reduc­tions below 1990 lev­els in order to avoid dan­ger­ous run­away cli­mate change. Cana­da already failed to meet its com­mit­ments to the Kyoto Treaty and refus­es to sign the UN’s Dec­la­ra­tion of Rights for Indige­nous Peo­ples whilst con­tin­u­ing devel­op­ment of Tar Sands oil extrac­tion.

[2] Tar Sands fuel is a way of extract­ing oil who’s ener­gy inten­sive process has not only com­plete­ly destroyed areas of the Bore­al forests the size of Eng­land, burns enough nat­ur­al gas to pow­er 6 hun­dred thou­sand homes a year, pro­duces lakes of tox­ic waste 66km wide ‑which fil­ters into
all local life and drink­ing water- but would itself be enough to push our cli­mate into chaos.

http://tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com/about/

[3] http://tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com/about/

[4] http://climatecamp.org.uk

[5] This is the start of a fast grow­ing UK cam­paign against Tar Sands. Although we do not receive oil direct­ly from Cana­di­an Tar Sands, Cor­po­ra­tions such as RBS which is now 84% owned by the British Tax Pay­er invests bil­lions and British Petro­le­um have plans to move in to the ‘Sun Rise’ site in the com­ing months. Action on these issues and these cor­po­ra­tions are soon to become a focus of UK activism as we begin to stand up to Inter­na­tion­al injus­tices such as Tar Sands in Cana­da.

Stop the Tar Sands

Sabotage at Broken Cross Open Cast Coal Mine (Mainshill Solidarity Action)

In the ear­ly hours of the 25th Decem­ber, a group of autonomous activists deliv­ered their Christ­mas present to Scot­tish Coal. Four machines were sab­o­taged at the Bro­ken Cross open cast site, the largest of its type in Europe, just 5 miles from Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp.

In the ear­ly hours of the 25th Decem­ber, a group of autonomous activists deliv­ered their Christ­mas present to Scot­tish Coal. Four machines were sab­o­taged at the Bro­ken Cross open cast site, the largest of its type in Europe, just 5 miles from Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp.
This is a mes­sage to Scot­tish Coal that regard­less of the time of year, we will resist. Not just at Main­shill, but at all of their sites across South Lanark­shire, which is one of the most heav­i­ly mined areas in Europe.
As the “fes­tive” sea­son comes to an end, the destruc­tive work will com­mence again at Main­shill. Evic­tion is loom­ing as their work pro­gress­es. Num­bers are need­ed as ever on site to help out and fill defences.

UK Coal ’ greenwash’ Durham planner’s! OPENCAST looks likely (near where Winter Moot will be in February)

Mon­ey grab­bing UK coal have over­come one of the largest bar­ri­ers in their plans to open­cast the PONT VALLEY,

OPPONENTS of a large open­cast mine in a pic­turesque val­ley fear the worst now that plan­ning per­mis­sion has been grant­ed to move a colony of Great Crest­ed Newts – a pro­tect­ed species.

Mon­ey grab­bing UK coal have over­come one of the largest bar­ri­ers in their plans to open­cast the PONT VALLEY,

OPPONENTS of a large open­cast mine in a pic­turesque val­ley fear the worst now that plan­ning per­mis­sion has been grant­ed to move a colony of Great Crest­ed Newts – a pro­tect­ed species.

Durham Coun­ty Coun­cil plan­ners agreed to an appli­ca­tion by UK Coal to cre­ate four habi­tat ponds for wildlife near Leadgate, Con­sett, Coun­ty Durham.

The com­pa­ny, which plans to extract 556,000 tonnes from the Bradley site, an area of 73,000 square meters in the Der­went Val­ley between the vil­lages of Leadgate and Dip­ton, was hin­dered by the pres­ence of the tiny ani­mals on a pond in the mid­dle of the area where it wants to mine. Now that coun­cil­lors have approved the plans to cre­ate new ponds UK Coal will pro­ceed with its appli­ca­tion to mine.

A spokesman for the com­pa­ny said: “The pro­pos­als are to cre­ate a site of nature con­ser­va­tion involv­ing addi­tion­al plant­i­ng and land­scap­ing and new ponds on part of the site to form an extend­ed wildlife habi­tat from the adja­cent Billing­side Wood Site of Nature Con­ser­va­tion Impor­tance.

“The appli­ca­tion for habi­tat ponds in con­struc­tion terms is rel­a­tive­ly minor in nature and has the poten­tial for sig­nif­i­cant con­ser­va­tion and habi­tat enhance­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties for the local area.”

Eight let­ters of objec­tion includ­ing respons­es from the Dip­ton Com­mu­ni­ty Part­ner­ship and the Pont Val­ley Net­work were received.

Objec­tors argued that the appli­ca­tion is part of the inten­tion to open­cast the site, known as the Bradley site and should not be treat­ed sep­a­rate­ly.

But senior plan­ning offi­cer Mike Hemp­sall said the two appli­ca­tions had to be treat­ed indi­vid­u­al­ly.

He said: “The pro­pos­al pro­vides an oppor­tu­ni­ty for addi­tion­al habi­tats that would be of eco­log­i­cal and land­scape ben­e­fit to the area and can be car­ried out in an envi­ron­men­tal­ly accept­able man­ner.

“The stat­ed grounds of objec­tion con­cern­ing deter­mi­na­tion of the appli­ca­tion sep­a­rate to the sur­face coal mine appli­ca­tion, archae­o­log­i­cal, land­scape char­ac­ter, effects on pub­lic rights of way and wildlife impact are not con­sid­ered suf­fi­cient to lead to rea­sons to refuse the appli­ca­tion.”

UK Coal says the open­cast pro­pos­al would cre­ate 38 jobs, pro­duce 556,000 tonnes of coal need­ed for the British steel or elec­tric­i­ty indus­try, and pro­vide a new con­ser­va­tion area after min­ing is com­plet­ed with­in three years. It intends to for­mal­ly sub­mit a plan­ning appli­ca­tion in the new year.

But Durham Coun­ty coun­cil­lor Watts Stelling said: “This area has been rav­aged by indus­try in the past and should now be allowed to recov­er.

“Every­body knows the two appli­ca­tions are linked. UK Coal is not build­ing new ponds due to any fond­ness for Great Crest­ed Newts. It wants to dig a great big hole in attrac­tive coun­try­side.”

It should be not­ed that Durham wildlife trust did­n’t even respond when asked for an opin­ion by Durham Coun­ty Coun­cil maybe this is because lots of fund­ing for wildlife trusts comes from the aggre­gate indus­try or maybe their just lazy!

GOOD NEWS!!!
FAMILIES in a rur­al ham­let are call­ing on a devel­op­ment com­pa­ny to aban­don its bid for an open­cast mine in the Northum­ber­land coun­try­side after plan­ners firm­ly reject­ed the con­tro­ver­sial scheme.

Cam­paign­ers in tiny Hal­ton Lea Gate near Halt­whis­tle say they are “over­joyed” after coun­ty coun­cil­lors vot­ed unan­i­mous­ly to refuse per­mis­sion to dig 140,000 tonnes of coal from a 75-acre site, with­in the North Pen­nines Area of Out­stand­ing Nat­ur­al Beau­ty.

They urged appli­cant HM Project Devel­op­ments to “get the mes­sage”, admit defeat and not launch an appeal against the deci­sion.

HM Project Devel­op­ments’ agent, New­cas­tle-based firm Black­ett, Hart and Pratt, did not com­ment.