Civilian Uprising against Barrick Gold in Tanzania

Mine secu­ri­ty shoots young man, vil­lagers respond by destroy­ing $7 mil­lion in equip­ment

Decem­ber 24th, 2008

Mine secu­ri­ty shoots young man, vil­lagers respond by destroy­ing $7 mil­lion in equip­ment

Decem­ber 24th, 2008

Last week, reports sur­faced in the main­stream press that thou­sands of vil­lagers had raid­ed a gold mine in North­ern Tan­za­nia, set­ting fire to $7 mil­lion* worth of mine equip­ment. Most reports blamed prob­lems with crime in the area, call­ing the intrud­ers “gold-seek­ers.”

While the spokesman for Bar­rick Gold** Tan­za­nia, Teweli Teweli, describes these vil­lagers as “well-orga­nized groups” who attacked the pit fol­low­ing the blast­ing of high-grade ore, oth­ers paint Bar­rick as the aggres­sor in this event, cit­ing imme­di­ate and his­toric caus­es that have been large­ly ignored by the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty.

Accord­ing to sev­er­al wit­ness­es, the imme­di­ate cause of the civil­ian upris­ing was the killing of a young man named Mang’weina Mwi­ta Mang’weina. Human rights lawyer Tun­du Lis­su, who rep­re­sents many of the vil­lagers, explains that Mang’weina and some friends were engaged in an argu­ment with Bar­rick secu­ri­ty when one of the guards shot Mang’weina, who was unarmed at the time. This inci­dent caused an uproar with­in the com­mu­ni­ty, which imme­di­ate­ly took up stones, over­pow­ered mine secu­ri­ty (who then fled), and attacked the mine, set­ting fire to mil­lions worth of equip­ment.

Mang’weina him­self is a part of the lega­cy of the North Mara mine. He was one of the thou­sands of unem­ployed locals in the area, angry over the mine’s recent his­to­ry of forced dis­place­ment, loss of liveli­hoods, human rights abus­es and ongo­ing repres­sion. He is the sev­enth per­son killed at the hands of mine secu­ri­ty since July 2005, when the killing of a local boy sparked a sim­i­lar upris­ing that result­ed in the destruc­tion of mine equip­ment and the sub­se­quent deten­tion of over 200 vil­lagers.***

Eye­wit­ness­es to the 2005 killing told The Guardian (Tan­za­nia) that “the boy who was shot dead was walk­ing past the com­pa­ny premis­es when com­pa­ny secu­ri­ty guards, sus­pect­ing him of steal­ing oil, stopped him. When the boy failed to heed the order, the guards called the police who, before even ques­tion­ing him, shot him in the chest.”

Not one year lat­er, secu­ri­ty guards employed by Bar­rick Gold alleged­ly shot – five times in the back – anoth­er vil­lager who was alleged to have ille­gal­ly entered the mine com­plex, bring­ing the death toll to six.

Accord­ing to Lis­su in a let­ter writ­ten in June 2006:

The killings rep­re­sent a major shift in Bar­rick­’s strat­e­gy for deal­ing
with the trou­ble­some locals who have always opposed the Mine. In the
peri­od after the forced evic­tions of the vil­lagers in August 2001,
hun­dreds of vil­lagers, par­tic­u­lar­ly com­mu­ni­ty lead­ers and promi­nent
locals were tar­get­ed for ille­gal arrests, crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tions and
long term impris­on­ment. Numer­ous local lead­ers includ­ing the area’s
[late] Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment Chacha Zakayo Wang­we and elect­ed Mem­ber of
the Tarime Dis­trict Coun­cil Augusti­no Nesto­ry Sasi were harassed this
way, with the lat­ter being sen­tenced to 30 year jail before we got him
out on appeal to the High Court of Tan­za­nia in Decem­ber 2004.

Cal­cu­lat­ing from media reports, Lis­su esti­mates that over 10,000 arti­sanal min­ers, peas­ant farm­ers and their fam­i­lies were kicked out of the area to make way for the North Mara mine in 2001. Since that time, there has been ongo­ing ten­sion between the mine and the local com­mu­ni­ties.

Accord­ing to Allan Cedil­lo Liss­ner, a Toron­to-based pho­to­jour­nal­ist who recent­ly inter­viewed fam­i­lies sur­round­ing the North Mara mine, “Ongo­ing con­flict between the mine and local com­mu­ni­ties have cre­at­ed a cli­mate of fear for those who live near­by.” Since the mine opened in 2002, one fam­i­ly told Liss­ner that they live in a state of con­stant anx­i­ety because they are repeat­ed­ly harassed and intim­i­dat­ed by the mine’s pri­vate secu­ri­ty forces and by gov­ern­ment police. “There have been sev­er­al dead­ly con­fronta­tions in the area and every time there are prob­lems at the mine, the Mwi­ta fam­i­ly say their com­pound is the first place the police come look­ing. Dur­ing police oper­a­tions the fam­i­ly scat­ters in fear to hide in the bush, ‘like fugi­tives,’ for weeks at a time wait­ing for the sit­u­a­tion to calm down,” Liss­ner explains.

The Mwi­ta fam­i­ly explained that they used to farm and raise live­stock, telling Liss­ner that “now there are no pas­tures because the mine has almost tak­en the whole land … we have no sources of income and we are liv­ing only through God’s wish­es. … We had nev­er expe­ri­enced pover­ty before the mine came here.” They also told Liss­ner that they would like to be relo­cat­ed, but the appli­ca­tion process has been com­pli­cat­ed, and they feel the amount of com­pen­sa­tion offered was mere­ly “can­dy.”

Accord­ing to Tan­zan­ian jour­nal­ist and com­mu­ni­ty advo­cate Evans Rubara, this lat­est upris­ing “is a sign to both the gov­ern­ment of Tan­za­nia and the Inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty (espe­cial­ly Cana­da) that poor and mar­gin­al­ized peo­ple also get tired of oppres­sion.” He hopes that the recent con­flict will inspire Bar­rick “to start anoth­er strat­e­gy that will bring a good and con­struc­tive rela­tion­ship with the local com­mu­ni­ties by imple­ment­ing pro­grams that do not enhance more loot­ing and belit­tle Tan­za­nia, leav­ing thou­sands in des­ti­tu­tion.”

Since this most recent upris­ing, dozens of vil­lagers have been arrest­ed. Accord­ing to Lis­su, who plans to rep­re­sent those arrest­ed, “They have arrest­ed dozens of peo­ple; [Bar­rick is] on a war path; these peo­ple have been denied bail, they are tar­get­ing the youth and repres­sion is on.”

Lis­su also spoke about reports of weapons mak­ing their way into the North Mara area. “Two days ago, we got infor­ma­tion that [Bar­rick is] import­ing weapons: a ton and a half of tear gas, and hand grenades were trans­port­ed to the mine on Thurs­day. The hand grenades were seized by cus­toms on the way to the North Mara Gold Mine, but have since been let through,” he told ProtestBarrick.net on the phone from Tan­za­nia.

Saku­ra Saun­ders is an edi­tor for protestbarrick.net, an all-vol­un­teer news site that net­works orga­ni­za­tions and com­mu­ni­ty groups orga­nized against Bar­rick Gold around the world.

* On Decem­ber 17, 2008 Bar­rick Gold said it had revised down the dam­age to its North Mara Mine in Tan­za­nia dur­ing an attack last week to about $7 mil­lion from an ear­li­er esti­mate of $15 mil­lion.

** In Jan­u­ary 2006, Bar­rick Gold merged with Plac­er Dome, who pre­vi­ous­ly owned the North Mara mine.

*** By mid 2006 all of the vil­lagers detained after the 2005 upris­ing had been released by the courts after the author­i­ties failed to pros­e­cute them.

Actions in India and the Philippines

I’m not sure whether the fol­low­ing reports are ‘ide­o­log­i­cal­ly accept­able’ but over the last year there has been a rash of direct action attacks against cor­po­ra­tions and in defence of the envi­ron­ment and the indige­nous peo­ples that live there, under­tak­en by Maoist forces in both India and the Philip­pines.

I’m not sure whether the fol­low­ing reports are ‘ide­o­log­i­cal­ly accept­able’ but over the last year there has been a rash of direct action attacks against cor­po­ra­tions and in defence of the envi­ron­ment and the indige­nous peo­ples that live there, under­tak­en by Maoist forces in both India and the Philip­pines. The fol­low­ing reports and com­mu­niques are tak­en from a vari­ety of web-sites (sup­port­ive and hos­tile).

India

1. Nax­als attack in Gad­chi­roli [Decem­ber 2007]

CHANDRAPUR: Nax­alites set ablaze three vehi­cles — two tip­pers and a truck — of a con­trac­tor on Wednes­day evening. The inci­dent took place near Hald­wahi Tola vil­lage in Chamor­shi tehsil of Gad­chi­roli dis­trict, said the police.

Accord­ing to sources, the Nax­als came to the vil­lage and after iden­ti­fy­ing the vehi­cles of the con­struc­tion com­pa­ny — Sainath Con­struc­tions — set those ablaze. The Nax­alites then dis­ap­peared into the jun­gle.

San­jay Latkar, SDPO of Chamor­shi divi­sion, said, “The Nax­als have burnt the three vehi­cles owned by Raju Biyani, direc­tor of Sainath Con­struc­tions on Wednes­day evening.”

(http://maoistresistance.blogspot.com/2007/12/naxals-attack-in-gadchiroli.html)

2. Maoists attack Essar Steel plant in Chhat­tis­garh

Raipur, Apr 25 [2008]: About 300 heav­i­ly armed Maoists on Fri­day attacked an iron ore ben­e­fi­ci­a­tion plant of Essar Steel in Chhat­tis­garh, and set 53 trucks and three heavy machines on fire, a senior police offi­cer said.
The attack was car­ried out near Kiran­dul in the state’s Dan­te­wa­da Dis­trict where the insur­gents have been run­ning a de-fac­to admin­is­tra­tion for years.
“Armed rebels attacked Essar Steel’s iron ore facil­i­ty and cre­at­ed hav­oc for hours, by set­ting at least 53 trucks and three heavy machines on fire, in a raid that end­ed in the ear­ly hours of Fri­day,” R. K. Vij, Inspec­tor Gen­er­al of Police of Bas­tar range, told media.
The plant sup­plies high qual­i­ty iron ore from its 8 mil­lion tonne per annum (MTPA) unit to the pel­let plant at Visakha­p­at­nam in Andhra Pradesh.
Accord­ing to police, rebels over­pow­ered a few employ­ees work­ing in the plant dur­ing night shift and then sprayed diesel on vehi­cles and set them on fire.
The rebels lat­er slipped into the near­by for­est. The rebels left pam­phlets at the attack site say­ing their act was to protest trans­porta­tion of local rare nat­ur­al resource iron ore to out­side the state and the coun­try.
Con­gress Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary Rahul Gand­hi is on a four-day vis­it to trib­al pock­ets in Mad­hya Pradesh and Chhat­tis­garh.

(http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/business/maoists-attack-essar-steel-plant-in-chhattisgarh-2_10042081.html)

3. In Sep­tem­ber 2008 a pho­to essay about the anti-Maoist mili­tia the Sal­wa Judum appeared on the Inter­net. Part of the essay read as fol­lows:

The con­flict sits on top of one of the most valu­able iron mines in Asia [in Bache­li, Chhat­tis­garh]….. Some peo­ple allege that Sal­wa Judum only exists to free up land for min­ing con­tracts, and is not real­ly a fight against com­mu­nism.

[A] mas­sive steam shov­el was attacked by Nax­als a month before I arrived. Nax­als tar­get min­ing infra­struc­ture because they say local peo­ple don’t reap any ben­e­fit from the mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar indus­try. (Unfor­tu­nate­ly the dam­age was tem­po­rary and the machine has been repaired)

Christo­pher Kin­do is the Deputy Direc­tor of Min­ing in Chhat­tis­garh. he says that he does­n’t under­stand why Nax­als keep attack­ing his equip­ment. (Aaah­hh .… the inno­cence drip­ping from his face could melt any­one’s heart)

The min­ing machin­ery in Chhat­tis­garh comes from an Amer­i­can com­pa­ny and sells for half a mil­lion dol­lars per truck. [A] mas­sive load puller can hold sev­er­al tons of top grade iron which even­tu­al­ly ends up in build­ing projects across India and Japan. The mines are a cen­tral tar­get of Nax­al mil­i­tants.

(http://naxalrevolution.blogspot.com/2008/09/salwa-judum-photo-essay.html)

4. Nax­alites set eight vehi­cles on fire

Sun­day Novem­ber 30 2008

Raipur (PTI): Eight vehi­cles were set on fire in two sep­a­rate inci­dents by sus­pect­ed Nax­alites in Dan­te­wa­da and Bijapur dis­trict, police said today.

Nax­alites stopped the road con­struc­tion work between Kamalur and Kun­deli in Dan­te­wa­da dis­trict and set three tip­pers, two doz­ers, a poke­lene machine and a trail­er on fire late last night, police said.

In anoth­er inci­dent, about three dozen Nax­alites led by Ursa Bodhra, a hard­core Nax­alite, set a vehi­cle on fire for alleged­ly car­ry­ing sup­plies meant for secu­ri­ty forces at Gan­galur region of Bijapur last night….

http://naxalwatch.blogspot.com/2008/11/naxalites-set-eight-vehicles-on-fire.html
Philip­pines

5. com­mu­nique pub­lished by the New Peo­ples Army, repub­lished on the web­site of the Negros Chron­i­cle

….Sep­tem­ber 15, 2008
The NPA Mt. Tal­i­n­is Front Com­mand based in south­east Negros island imple­ment­ed last Sep­tem­ber 9 a direc­tive from the Pro­vi­sion­al Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Gov­ern­ment to pun­ish the Tam­lang Val­ley Agri­cul­tur­al Devel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion (TVADC) for pro­mot­ing and plant­i­ng jathropa and cas­sa­va in the said area.
Accord­ing to Ka Dom Pan­ta­le­on, spokesper­son of the NPA Mt. Tal­i­n­is Front Com­mand, Red fight­ers seized and imme­di­ate­ly burned three trac­tors owned by the TVADC late Tues­day night in Sitio Cuadra, Barangay Man­tik­il, Sia­ton town in Ori­en­tal Negros.
The puni­tive action was imple­ment­ed after it was proven that the year-old TVADC project has grave­ly dis­lo­cat­ed the plant­i­ng of the tra­di­tion­al corn, rice and oth­er food crops in Tam­lang Val­ley, he said.
Lands pre­vi­ous­ly used by farm­ers for own-con­sump­tion food pro­duc­tion were now forcibly used for bio-fuel pur­pos­es, and a suc­ces­sion of Army bat­tal­ions were employed to active­ly harass and dupe farm­ers to plant jathropa and cas­sa­va, he added……

(http://www.negroschronicle.com/?p=379)

6. Red Army’s anti-bio­fu­els cam­paign con­tin­ues
Octo­ber 28, 2008

The NPA will imple­ment more pre­ven­tive mea­sure against pri­vate agri-busi­ness cor­po­ra­tions like the Tam­lang Val­ley Agri­cul­tur­al Devel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion (TVADC) for wors­en­ing the food sup­ply prob­lem and caus­ing numer­ous mil­i­tary abus­es in south­east Negros.
Thus said Ka Dom Pan­ta­le­on, spokesper­son of the NPA Pulang Mt. Tal­i­n­is Front Com­mand, as he announced yet anoth­er puni­tive action against the TVADC bio­fu­els com­pa­ny main­ly based in barangay Casalaan, Sia­ton, Ori­en­tal Negros.
In a press release, Pan­ta­le­on said the coun­try­side-based people’s demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­ern­ment ordered an NPA team last Octo­ber 3 to con­fis­cate and burn two TVADC-owned trac­tors in sityo Tam­lang, barangay Talalak, in Sta. Catali­na town. No one was harmed in the inci­dent, he added.
It was the sec­ond such oper­a­tion in as many months by the Red army to pro­tect upland peas­ants from the intru­sive and harm­ful bio­fu­els com­pa­ny co-owned by the fam­i­ly of ex-Con­gress­man Her­minio Teves and their Kore­an busi­ness part­ners….
Pan­ta­le­on revealed that the NPA will con­tin­ue imple­ment­ing sim­i­lar orders for puni­tive actions from the coun­try­side-based people’s demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­ern­ment that are meant to block the wide­spread grow­ing of jathropa and cas­sa­va in and around the vast Sta. Catali­na-Sia­ton-Valen­cia-Pam­plona bor­der barangays of Ori­en­tal Negros known as Tam­lang Val­ley.
More impor­tant­ly, it will impose armed puni­tive actions against the 302nd Brigade for pro­vid­ing pro­tec­tion and even col­lud­ing with TVADC in forc­ing ordi­nary farm­ers to plant jatrhopa and cas­sa­va, instead of their tra­di­tion­al food crops like upland rice and corn, he added.
The NPA spokesper­son said the mer­ce­nary AFP has become the bio­fu­els campaign’s most vis­i­ble “errand boys” for the agri-busi­ness com­pa­ny and the Teves fam­i­ly in south­east Negros.
This has result­ed to numer­ous human rights abus­es, includ­ing the enforced dis­ap­pear­ances of ordi­nary farm­ers Fla­viano Arante and Reynold Yanoc – both res­i­dents of barangay Talalak, Sta. Catali­na town – who have been miss­ing and feared sal­vaged since ear­ly this year, he added…..

http://www.philippinerevolution.net/cgi-bin/statements/statements.pl?author=npasn;date=081028;language=eng

7. Decem­ber 23, 2008

[extract]…..The NPA also burned six (6) mul­ti-mil­lion heavy equip­ments of SRMI as pun­ish­ment for their con­sid­er­able trans­gres­sions against the envi­ron­ment, indige­nous Fil­ipinos, work­ers and peo­ple affect­ed by their min­ing oper­a­tions.
SRMI is owned by the Amante polit­i­cal fam­i­ly and has wrought envi­ron­men­tal destruc­tion to the munic­i­pal­i­ty of Tubay, paid low wages and unjust­ly treats its work­ers, dis­re­spects the rights of the indige­nous Fil­ipinos to their ances­tral lands and deprives them of their ”roy­al­ty share”. SMRI’s unquench­able greed is forcibly put over and above the inter­ests of the indige­nous Fil­ipinos, small min­ers and the mass­es through the hir­ing of Ret. Col De Lara and estab­lish­ing a big secu­ri­ty force whose mem­bers include abu­sive crim­i­nals.

http://www.philippinerevolution.net/cgi-bin/statements/statements.pl?author=ndfnm;date=081223;language=eng

ALF & ELF Continue Telmex Sabotage

“On Decem­ber 11 the Frente de Lib­era­cion Ani­mal in Mex­i­co sab­o­taged 25 tele­phones of the dis­gust­ing com­pa­ny Telmex in an act of direct sup­port for our fight­ing com­rades in Colom­bia, we are glad to know that the attacks that are bad­ly need­ed in Latin Amer­i­ca have this con­ti­nu­ity, we hope that the flame will not go out in Colom­bia and that they con­tin­ue on!

“On Decem­ber 11 the Frente de Lib­era­cion Ani­mal in Mex­i­co sab­o­taged 25 tele­phones of the dis­gust­ing com­pa­ny Telmex in an act of direct sup­port for our fight­ing com­rades in Colom­bia, we are glad to know that the attacks that are bad­ly need­ed in Latin Amer­i­ca have this con­ti­nu­ity, we hope that the flame will not go out in Colom­bia and that they con­tin­ue on!

Con­tin­u­ous, well-planned sab­o­tage is the worst night­mare of the exploiters.

A fight­ing embrace!

For ani­mal, human and earth lib­er­a­tion!

FLA Mex­i­co”

———–

“On Decem­ber 18 we sab­o­taged 20 phones of the destroy­er of the plan­et, the Telmex com­pa­ny, in the same man­ner as before (with bolt cut­ters and oth­er tools).

We will not stop …

FLT Méx­i­co”

———–

Pre­vi­ous actions

ELF sab­o­tage phone booths in Colum­bia & Mex­i­co
http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/21875

Telmex phone booths sab­o­taged in Mex­i­co City
http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/21813

Source http://www.directaction.info

Invitation to the Northern Climate Rush — January 12th

On Mon­day 12th Jan­u­ary 2009 at 7pm the North­ern Cli­mate Rush will hit Man­ches­ter Air­port Ter­mi­nal 3 (Domes­tic Depar­tures).

Climate suffragette small groupOn Mon­day 12th Jan­u­ary 2009 at 7pm the North­ern Cli­mate Rush will hit Man­ches­ter Air­port Ter­mi­nal 3 (Domes­tic Depar­tures).

Every­one is wel­come to join us. Come in Edwar­dian dress if you can (think long skirts, coats and tails, and sil­ly hats, all hid­den under a big coat!) with ham­pers of food to have our ‘Din­ner at Domes­tic Depar­tures’, to the strains of our very own string quar­tet! It will take place on the day that the MPs return from their win­ter hol­i­day, and at exact­ly the same time as the main Cli­mate Rush, at Heathrow.

Our protest will be against air­port expan­sion and domes­tic flights. In a time of reces­sion and cli­mate cri­sis, gov­ern­ment mon­ey should be spent on improve­ments to rail, trams, and bus­es, not on sub­si­dies and infra­struc­ture for the avi­a­tion indus­try.

For an acces­si­ble report on the lat­est cli­mate sci­ence, check out http://climatesafety.org/

We have wait­ed too long and been mis­led too many times. It is time for us to take con­trol and to lead social change.

northernclimaterush@googlemail.com

Radley Lakes saved

Fol­low­ing years of cam­paign­ing through legal chan­nels, and the squat­ting of a build­ing by the side of Thrupp Lake at the begin­ning of 2007, the Save Radley Lakes cam­paign is vic­to­ri­ous — hoorah! Use the search above for old sto­ries and pho­tos from the cam­paign — sto­ries about the recent vic­to­ry and future plans are below.

Thrupp Lake at sunsetFol­low­ing years of cam­paign­ing through legal chan­nels, and the squat­ting of a build­ing by the side of Thrupp Lake at the begin­ning of 2007, the Save Radley Lakes cam­paign is vic­to­ri­ous — hoorah! Use the search above for old sto­ries and pho­tos from the cam­paign — sto­ries about the recent vic­to­ry and future plans are below.

End of an Era

Yes­ter­day’s (17.12.08) announce­ment by RWE Npow­er brought to an end a 41 month cam­paign to save the last remain­ing Radley Lakes, Thrupp and Bull­field Lakes, from destruc­tion by being filled with waste pul­verised fuel ash (PFA) from the Did­cot A Pow­er Sta­tion.

It also brings to an end 23 years of fill­ing of old grav­el pits in Radley with pow­er sta­tion ash, which began in 1985, when the Pow­er Sta­tion was run by the nation­alised Cen­tral Elec­tric­i­ty Gen­er­at­ing Board and when the envi­ron­ment fig­ured less high­ly in pop­u­lar con­cerns. The choice back then was between land­fill with gen­er­al waste, com­mer­cial exploita­tion, or ash. Local peo­ple vot­ed for the ash, which is prob­a­bly what they would have got any­way.

The ash had been pumped into the grav­el pits as a slur­ry via an under­ground pipeline. Many grav­el pits were filled in this way over the inter­ven­ing years and peo­ple did not seem to mind, though eye­brows were being increas­ing­ly raised, and there were objec­tions to the fill­ing of Lakes H and I, which had become a spec­tac­u­lar haven for wild­fowl. In 2005, RWE npow­er sought per­mis­sion to fill the the two remain­ing grav­el pits. These were the old­est exca­va­tions, which had, over the half cen­tu­ry or so of their exis­tence, become restored into beau­ti­ful lakes and had been giv­en names by local peo­ple.

How the Lakes Were Saved (in a nut­shell)

The small­er Bull­field Lake was res­cued from this fate fol­low­ing protests back in 2005, but the much larg­er and more impor­tant Thrupp Lake has remained under threat ever since, as plan­ning, legal and oth­er bat­tles raged around it. As a last resort, local peo­ple even applied to have the area turned into a Town Green. This too failed, but it remains the sub­ject of a Judi­cial Review, which was due to be heard in the High Court in Feb­ru­ary 2009. In Feb­ru­ary 2007, hav­ing got all nec­es­sary plan­ning per­mis­sions and removed the pro­tes­tors who’d occu­pied the lake­side build­ing, npow­er went ahead with clear­ance work on the site, and many trees were destroyed. Work then had to stop until the Autumn, because of nest­ing birds. After car­ry­ing out some pre­lim­i­nary work in Octo­ber 2007, npow­er sud­den­ly ceased their activ­i­ties on the site.

Then, in Feb­ru­ary 2008, events took an unex­pect­ed turn: npow­er announced an inter­im reprieve for Thrupp Lake. A lit­tle lat­er, Waste Recy­cling Group (WRG) open­ly came for­ward with a pro­pos­al that would save Thrupp Lake for ever. It has tak­en until now to bring this to fruition. Plan­ning per­mis­sion was need­ed, tech­ni­cal prob­lems had to be resolved, a com­mer­cial agree­ment had to be reached; then there was the ques­tion of what to do with Thrupp Lake. Many del­i­cate nego­ti­a­tions, it seemed, were going on in the back­ground, cul­mi­nat­ing in yes­ter­day’s momen­tous announce­ment.

Tri­umph at Last!

To mark the occa­sion, the Pow­er Sta­tion oper­a­tors invit­ed press and pub­lic into the grounds of San­dles, the house on the shore Thrupp Lake. There, Mr John Rain­ford, the Pow­er Sta­tion man­ag­er, announced that, because the pow­er sta­tion had found bet­ter and more sus­tain­able ways of dis­pos­ing of its ash, there would be no need to destroy Thrupp Lake, not now, not ever. He made it clear that RWE npow­er was offer­ing The Lake to the local com­mu­ni­ty as a nature con­ser­va­tion area and that dis­cus­sions were under­way with the North­moor Trust to pro­vide for its man­age­ment. It was hoped that the house could be con­vert­ed into an edu­ca­tion­al cen­tre.

Rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the com­mu­ni­ty, Jen­ny Standen, chair­man of Radley Parish Coun­cil, and Basil Crow­ley, chair­man of Save Radley Lakes, expressed their sat­is­fac­tion and delight, thank­ing npow­er for their mag­na­nim­i­ty and look­ing for­ward to work­ing with them in restor­ing the area to cre­ate some­thing to be real­ly proud of. Both expressed grat­i­tude to all the peo­ple who had sup­port­ed the cam­paign and whose sup­port and tire­less efforts had helped bring this about.

With the late Decem­ber after­noon sun­shine cast­ing long shad­ows across the ves­tiges of San­dles’ lawn, a jubi­lant par­ty atmos­phere pre­vailed. Cham­pagne flowed, hands were shak­en, cam­eras clicked and, in a touch of sur­re­al­i­ty, a man in a frog suit played a solo trom­bone fan­fare at the lake­side to her­ald the lake’s sal­va­tion.Radley Lakes saved trombone fanfare

Where the Ash Will Go

The ash that was to have gone into Thrupp Lake will now go to Waste Recy­cling Group’s Sut­ton Courte­nay land­fill site next to the pow­er sta­tion where it will be used for engi­neer­ing, cap­ping and land­scap­ing of the land­fill oper­a­tions. Sur­plus ash will be stock­piled in a planned new stor­age facil­i­ty, which received plan­ning per­mis­sion back in July, and will main­tain WRG’s essen­tial sup­ply of ash after 2015 when the pow­er sta­tion will have closed. Because the pow­er sta­tion and the waste site are imme­di­ate­ly adja­cent, the ash can be trans­port­ed direct­ly across the fence and put into the stock­pile, which is not far from the pow­er sta­tion bound­ary. At no time will this ash be trans­port­ed on pub­lic roads, which means there will be no adverse impact on the res­i­dents of Sut­ton Courte­nay. Indeed, it will remove the need to import over half a mil­lion tonnes of sub­sti­tute mate­ri­als after 2015, which would have had an impact!

http://www.saveradleylakes.org.uk/
http://www.radleyvillage.org.uk/news/News0009.htm

Japanese Whaling Fleet Is On the Run

Fri­day, Decem­ber 19, 2008
The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety ship Steve Irwin now has the entire Japan­ese whal­ing fleet on the run.

At 2345 G.M.T. the Steve Irwin inter­cept­ed the Japan­ese har­poon ves­sel Yushin Maru #2 inside the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone at 64°26 South and 132° 40′ East.

Sea Shepherd give chaseFri­day, Decem­ber 19, 2008
The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety ship Steve Irwin now has the entire Japan­ese whal­ing fleet on the run.

At 2345 G.M.T. the Steve Irwin inter­cept­ed the Japan­ese har­poon ves­sel Yushin Maru #2 inside the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone at 64°26 South and 132° 40′ East.

The encounter took place in dense fog and in dan­ger­ous ice con­di­tions. The Steve Irwin launched a Delta boat with a crew to attack the Yushin Maru #2 with rot­ten but­ter bombs. Unfor­tu­nate­ly the wind increased to fifty knots with bliz­zard con­di­tions. Cap­tain Paul Wat­son called the small boat crew back for safe­ty rea­sons when they were halfway to their tar­get some three miles away.

The Yushin Maru #2 then head­ed due North to lead the Steve Irwin away from the whal­ing fleet. The decoy did not work. The Steve Irwin is now in pur­suit of the whal­ing fleet.

They have ceased whal­ing oper­a­tions and they are now run­ning from the Sea Shep­herd crew.

The Yushin Maru #2 was the same ves­sel that the Steve Irwin crew board­ed in Jan­u­ary 2007. This year the crew observed that the Yushin Maru #2 has set up large net­ting to be run along the side of the ship to pre­vent board­ing par­ties from going over the side. When the whalers real­ized that the Steve Irwin was onto them, they imme­di­ate­ly ran on deck to deploy the net­ting.

“It looks like Whale Wars, sea­son #2 is offi­cial­ly under­way,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “We’ve got them on the run. They are not in the Ross Sea where they said they would be. They are in Aus­tralian waters. The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety is offi­cial­ly call­ing on Aus­tralian Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter Peter Gar­rett and For­eign Min­is­ter Stephen Smith to order the Japan­ese fleet to com­ply with the orders of the Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Court and to cease and desist from killing to whales in Aus­tralian waters.”

COAL CARAVAN — route & dates update

The fab­u­lous cli­mate car­a­van lives on.

This time we will be the COAL CARAVAN, walk­ing and cycling between the sites for pro­posed open cast mines and new pow­er sta­tions in the Mid­lands, York­shire and North East.

The fab­u­lous cli­mate car­a­van lives on.

This time we will be the COAL CARAVAN, walk­ing and cycling between the sites for pro­posed open cast mines and new pow­er sta­tions in the Mid­lands, York­shire and North East.

On our route we’ll be talk­ing to local peo­ple, organ­is­ing bicy­cled pow­er films and events, hold­ing pub­lic dis­cus­sions and dis­plays, and link­ing groups from dif­fer­ent areas to help strength­en iso­lat­ed cam­paigns.

24 April 2009 Co2al Car­a­van launch par­ty, Sumac Cen­tre Not­ting­ham
25 April – set off to Ship­ley Glen
27/28 April – cycle to York­shire
29 April – Fair­bairn Ings
30 April — 2 May – cycle to North East
3 May – Anti-open­cast work­shops
4 May (Bank Hol­i­day Mon­day) – Grand Finale

The car­a­van itself will not involve direct action (although we may offer train­ing, if local groups so request). It will be open­ly organ­ised and if you would like to go on the list please email caravan@climatecamp.org.uk.

Stop the Weymouth Relief Road Update & Videos — wish list & overhanging branch tactic!

Lat­est news: a tech­ni­cal­i­ty has meant a tree top protest against a new £87m relief road scheme in Dorset has con­tin­ued despite a legal rul­ing.

The gov­ern­ment has giv­en the go-ahead for the Wey­mouth relief road and Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil secured a land pos­ses­sion order to evict pro­tes­tors.

2 Mile Coppice in summer timeLat­est news: a tech­ni­cal­i­ty has meant a tree top protest against a new £87m relief road scheme in Dorset has con­tin­ued despite a legal rul­ing.

The gov­ern­ment has giv­en the go-ahead for the Wey­mouth relief road and Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil secured a land pos­ses­sion order to evict pro­tes­tors.

But the demon­stra­tion, which began last Thurs­day, was con­tin­u­ing on Fri­day and has delayed work at Two Mile Cop­pice.

Pro­tes­tors have now occu­pied a tree branch over­hang­ing neigh­bour­ing land.

In the morn­ing, Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil served a com­pul­so­ry pur­chase order on the land which meant the pro­tes­tors were legal­ly required to leave.

While the oak tree they are in is on land cov­ered by the notice, the branch they occu­py over­hangs adja­cent Wood­land Trust land.

——–

Tat list — What we need

And lat­est update (Sat­ur­day 20th Decem­ber):-

www.greenvoice.com — short­ly to be a web space for us

PLEASE CIRCULATE

update– we have an address of sorts, and dona­tions and xmas gifts would be great !”!!

Cash is ok to send as it is a secure post box, but phonecards for Orange are bet­ter than cash.
Also need AAA and AA bat­ter­ies — Dura­cell and Ener­gis­er or alka­line ONLY.
Rope — Green or blue polypro­pe­lene — 6mm or 10mm thick­ness.
Rope — Sta­t­ic climb­ing line — 10mm or larg­er.
Rope — Dynam­ic climb­ing line — any thick­ness
Rope — arborist lines — we have 2 tree sur­geons liv­ing with us and this rope is use­ful.

sec­ond hand rope is nor­mal­ly FREE from climb­ing cen­tres ‑indoor cen­tres often throw their ropes out every 6 ‑9 months — just call in and ask for it.

Tarps, plas­tic sheet­ing.

Tools — ham­mers, nails, saws, prun­ing saws, bill hooks.

2 way radios, nightvi­sion gog­gles, cat­a­pults (to get rope up), grap­pling hooks. Head torch­es — LED are best.

The Wood­land Trust still own the land that the road is being built on, but have waived their 14 days notice peri­od and told Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil that it is ok to get on with cut­ting down the Ancient wood­land — basi­cal­ly they have thrown in the tow­el with­out even stand­ing up to argue or delay the destruc­tion on their land. The fact that the Wood­land Trust still own the land was record­ed in the Court case of the 18th decem­ber 2008 of Dorset
Coun­ty Coun­cil ’ v ’ Per­sons Unknown in Wey­mouth Coun­ty Court. Her Majesty’s Land Reg­istry in Ply­mouth also con­firmed it.

The peo­ple of Wey­mouth brought Two Mile Copse through pub­lic sub­scrip­tion. Local peo­ple dug deeply into their pock­ets and put their mon­ey into con­serv­ing the land for per­pe­tu­ri­ty, for us and all future gen­er­a­tions.

Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil have so far not giv­en one pen­ny in com­pen­sa­tion, either to the Wood­land Trust, nor local peo­ple who raised the pub­lic mon­ey to pre­serve the wood in the first place.

—————————-

More update:-

Hi Ho!, HO!, Ho!

Liv­ing up 6 trees at wey­mouth — Two Mile Copse / Ted­dy Bear Woods. I helped fight against
this road back in 1996, and 2004 and we won it then.

BUT now they gone and done it and cut 70% of the trees.….

We have a 400 year old Oak in Ancient Wood­land that’s are pro­tect­ing and 4 Ash trees reach­ing 90 feet up into the sky. Also a tall and healthy young elm.

We have a tree house, a net, lots of walk­ways in the sky and an off route vis­i­tors site on the ground.

GET HELP + MEDIA now if u can.

regards

2 Mile Copse Protest Camp
c/o Lor­ton Barn
Lor­ton Lane
Lit­tle­Moor
Wey­mouth
DT3 5QH

Sor­ry we cur­rent­ly are in the process of arrang­ing a site mobile phone — num­ber to fol­low
short­ly

Links/more below & in pre­vi­ous sto­ry.

—–

Fol­low­ing from the Stop the Wey­mouth Relief Road bul­letin. Appar­ent­ly there is a chain­saw gang now oper­at­ing 1.5 miles fur­ther North from Lit­tle­moor, between Lit­tle­moor and Ridge­way. There are 3 pro­test­ers down there but they need more back up. I have been in con­tact with the pro­test­ers occu­py­ing the sight at Lit­tle­moor. They are in urgent need of more sup­port from locals to help on the ground and oth­ers to help build tree hous­es along the route, all help would be great­ly appre­ci­at­ed.

On site mobiles are 07792717821 / 07807952822

—–
Videos: 1 | 2

COUNCIL chiefs will go to court tomor­row in a bid to remove a grow­ing num­ber of pro­test­ers from the route of Weymouth’s planned relief road.

It comes as the stand-off inten­si­fied in Two Mile Cop­pice as eco-war­riors began mov­ing a fence and telling secu­ri­ty staff it encroached too far into the ancient wood­land.

But today Dorset Coun­ty Coun­cil is hop­ing to be grant­ed pos­ses­sion of the land by Wey­mouth Coun­ty Court.

The coun­cil is ask­ing the court to rule that the pro­test­ers must leave the prop­er­ty, and if they agree to that request, when they must leave.

The num­ber of pro­test­ers reached sev­en as a camp was set up beneath an oak tree that stands alone in the fenced off area of the woods.

Four pro­test­ers set up camp and roped off their own area below three more based up inside the tree.

One new arrival, known only as Andy, said: “We are here to stop the road as there are many rea­sons why the wood­land should not be chopped down.

“The oak tree we are in and beneath is hun­dreds of years old.

“We heard about the peo­ple here and want­ed to come to sup­port the action.

“We can help pro­vide food and what­ev­er else they need in the tree.

“If you let the coun­cil go ahead with the road it won’t be long before they want to chop more of this beau­ti­ful wood­land down for devel­op­ment.

“The road won’t actu­al­ly help pre­vent traf­fic con­ges­tion in the end any­way.”

A coun­cil spokesman con­firmed clear­ance work is con­tin­u­ing in the west­ern edge strip of Two Mile Cop­pice and said it is hoped this will be fin­ished before Christ­mas.

She said: “There is a coun­ty court hear­ing today where the coun­ty coun­cil will be ask­ing for an order for the tres­passers to hand over the land to the pos­ses­sion of the coun­cil.”

Nick Pep­per, 41, has camped in the woods since he came down from a tree which has now been chopped down.

Mr Pep­per, who pre­vi­ous­ly lived in Wey­mouth but now lives in Bris­tol, said: “As soon as we received the legal papers to evict the tree we thought we’d bet­ter have a legal­ly legit­i­mate sup­port camp.

“We are pro­tect­ed under the 1977 Crim­i­nal Law Act which stops us from being legal­ly evict­ed or ille­gal­ly assault­ed.

“We’ve actu­al­ly squat­ted in an area of land so we can pro­tect the peo­ple up the tree from intim­i­da­tion or ille­gal activ­i­ty.

“There needs to be open access so we can mon­i­tor what’s going on.”

Forest and climate activists shut down Gunns’ Triabunna mill woodchip mill, Tasmania

2008-12-16
Sev­en activists were charged with tres­pass today after shut­ting down Gunns’ Tri­abun­na mill for over sev­en hours this morn­ing. Fif­teen peo­ple occu­pied the wood­chip mill at 4:45am, with sev­en activists attach­ing them­selves to a con­vey­or belt and oth­er machin­ery.

FIFTEEN FOREST AND CLIMATE ACTIVISTS SHUT DOWN TRIABUNNA WOODCHIP MILL, TASMANIA2008-12-16
Sev­en activists were charged with tres­pass today after shut­ting down Gunns’ Tri­abun­na mill for over sev­en hours this morn­ing. Fif­teen peo­ple occu­pied the wood­chip mill at 4:45am, with sev­en activists attach­ing them­selves to a con­vey­or belt and oth­er machin­ery.

“The Car­bon Pol­lu­tion Reduc­tion Scheme White Paper makes it plain that the Fed­er­al ALP is not com­mit­ted to ‘seri­ous and cred­i­ble’ emis­sions reduc­tions. There is a fail­ure by pol­i­cy mak­ers to grasp that we are fac­ing a cli­mate emer­gency – the poli­cies pro­posed by the White Paper will result in the dis­ap­pear­ance of Tas­ma­ni­a’s unique alpine ecosys­tems, the col­lapse of the Bar­ri­er Reef, and the sali­na­tion of Kakadu,” Huon Val­ley Envi­ron­ment Cen­tre spokesper­son said.

“Tar­gets of a 5% reduc­tion by 2020 are piti­ful and inter­na­tion­al­ly humil­i­at­ing. The Aus­tralian Gov­ern­men­t’s increased assis­tance to large emit­ters pro­vides a clear demon­stra­tion that their pri­or­i­ties lie with heav­i­ly pol­lut­ing big busi­ness, and not with Aus­trali­a’s peo­ple and nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment,” War­rick Jor­dan said.

“In Tas­ma­nia, the log­ging, burn­ing and wood­chip­ping of old growth for­est releas­es mas­sive quan­ti­ties of car­bon. Gunns Lim­it­ed is the dri­ver of this gross­ly irre­spon­si­ble and moral­ly rep­re­hen­si­ble sit­u­a­tion,” Still Wild Still Threat­ened spokesper­son said.

“Gunns hides this immense cli­mate crime behind offi­cial car­bon account­ing fig­ures which exclude the log­ging of native for­est. Tas­ma­ni­a’s old growth forests are glob­al­ly sig­nif­i­cant as unique ecosys­tems and car­bon stores, and their pro­tec­tion can play a sig­nif­i­cant role in Aus­tralia tak­ing real cli­mate action,” SWST

“The Tas­man­ian Gov­ern­ment has pub­licly expressed a will to address cli­mate change. If the Bartlett gov­ern­ment is seri­ous about address­ing cli­mate change then it will leg­is­late an end to old growth log­ging” con­clud­ed SWST.

Scottish coal rail terminal shut down by local residents and Climate campaigners

15/12/2008: this morn­ing thir­ty cam­paign­ers from Coal Action Scot­land togeth­er with local res­i­dents peace­ful­ly block­ad­ed the entrance to the Scot­tish Coal-oper­at­ed Raven­struther coal rail ter­mi­nal in South Lanark­shire. Hav­ing stopped its reopen­ing after the week­end, this action is cur­rent­ly pre­vent­ing the deliv­ery of thou­sands of tonnes of coal to pow­er sta­tions across Scot­land. Pro­tes­tors intend to stay in place as long as pos­si­ble.

Lanarkshire coal action tripod15/12/2008: this morn­ing thir­ty cam­paign­ers from Coal Action Scot­land togeth­er with local res­i­dents peace­ful­ly block­ad­ed the entrance to the Scot­tish Coal-oper­at­ed Raven­struther coal rail ter­mi­nal in South Lanark­shire. Hav­ing stopped its reopen­ing after the week­end, this action is cur­rent­ly pre­vent­ing the deliv­ery of thou­sands of tonnes of coal to pow­er sta­tions across Scot­land. Pro­tes­tors intend to stay in place as long as pos­si­ble.

With Scotland’s CO2 emis­sions increas­ing sig­nif­i­cant­ly, con­tin­u­ing the con­sump­tion of coal will make it impos­si­ble for Scot­land to meet its 80% tar­get reduc­tion in CO2 emis­sions by 2050. Angus Mcloud said “The fact is that the gov­ern­ment will not meet its own tar­gets. This con­firms what cli­mate pro­tes­tors have believed all along – that the Scot­tish gov­ern­ment is pay­ing lip ser­vice to the dan­gers of cli­mate change.”

The action is aim­ing to dis­rupt the oper­a­tions of Scot­tish Coal and Scot­tish Pow­er in the region. The pro­tes­tors are act­ing to oppose the five open cast coal mines that deliv­er coal to the rail ter­mi­nal and in resis­tance to the thir­teen new open cast coal mines due to open in Scot­land.

Pro­tes­tors erect­ed and scaled a 15ft scaf­fold­ing tri­pod, block­ing trucks from enter­ing the ter­mi­nal. Oth­ers are locked by their necks to a con­vey­or belt and a bull­doz­er, pre­vent­ing coal stock­piles from being loaded onto trains.

Tilly Gif­ford who is at the site said: “In the face of dan­ger­ous run­away cli­mate change, increas­ing our depen­dence on coal – the most pol­lut­ing of the fos­sil fuels – is sim­ply unac­cept­able. We urgent­ly need to make the tran­si­tion to renew­able ener­gy and close exist­ing mines. We shouldn’t even be think­ing about new ones.”

The demon­stra­tion today is in sup­port of com­mu­ni­ties oppos­ing new open cast mines. Rebec­ca Macken­zie, a local res­i­dent said: “We’re here today to send a clear mes­sage that we don’t want parts of Scot­land such as South Lanark­shire to become the most heav­i­ly mined areas in Europe, as they will be if per­mis­sion is grant­ed for all the new open cast coal mines cur­rent­ly being pro­posed. If sites such as Main­shill near Dou­glas can’t be stopped through legal avenues, then action will have to be tak­en to make sure these last remain­ing areas of un-mined coun­try­side aren’t destroyed”.

Beth Whe­lan, the cam­paign­er perched on the scaf­fold­ing tri­pod, said: “Local author­i­ties, the Scot­tish gov­ern­ment and com­pa­nies such as Scot­tish Coal and Scot­tish Pow­er are ignor­ing the sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence on cli­mate change. We have to take respon­si­bil­i­ty for our cli­mate and our future, and stop the coal indus­try and its expan­sion. This is what we doing today: act­ing respon­si­bly”.

It is esti­mat­ed that 6,380 tonnes of coal were stopped from being trans­port­ed from the coal mines to pow­er sta­tions, equiv­a­lent to 11,675,400 kg CO2 (11,675.4 tonnes) released into the atmos­phere.

Coal Action Scot­land apol­o­gizes to any work­ers affect­ed by today’s demon­stra­tion, but in rec­og­niz­ing the des­per­ate need to stop burn­ing coal sees no oth­er choice but to tar­get the com­pa­nies respon­si­ble for min­ing it.

The action last­ed over 8 hours and result­ed in 6 arrests and not a sin­gle chunk of coal was trans­port­ed from the ter­mi­nal.

http://coalactionedinburgh.wordpress.com/