Aussies occupy drill rig to protest coal mining

6.02.12

6.02.12

One Aus­tralian activist has been released pend­ing sum­mons for ‘inter­fer­ing with a motor vehi­cle’ today after stop­ping drilling in Bac­chus Marsh. Paul Con­nor locked him­self  to the top of Man­tle Mining’s 8.5 metre-tall drill rig while hang­ing a ban­ner that read ‘No New Coal Bac­chus Marsh’. Anoth­er cam­paign­er, local moth­er Natasha Mills, also locked her­self to the drill rig at ground lev­el, sur­round­ed by a sup­port crew of 15 oth­er Quit Coal activists who occu­pied the drill site to stage a ‘pic­nic’, which fea­tured pro­duce from local farms.

‘We are eat­ing local­ly grown food to illus­trate what is at stake here’ said Mills, who is cur­rent­ly 7 and a half months preg­nant with her sec­ond child. ‘This project will destroy prime agri­cul­tur­al land, all for the sake of a quick buck and the burn­ing of brown coal, one of the most envi­ron­men­tal­ly harm­ful prac­tices pos­si­ble.

‘Mantle’s project has so lit­tle sup­port here among locals in Bac­chus Marsh that our May­or, our State MP and our Fed­er­al MP have all come out against it’ she con­tin­ued. ‘It’s just wrong, and we’re not going to let it hap­pen.’

The Quit Coal action drew a bar­rage of media atten­tion, with every major tele­vi­sion sta­tion in atten­dance. For a sam­ple of the media atten­tion, click on ‘dirty fight’ on the Ten News web­site here.

After 4 and a half hours chained to the top of the drill rig, Con­nor was cut free by Police from the Search & Res­cue squad with an angle-grinder. ’We need Vic­to­ri­ans to join this fight along­side us till we win it’ he said. ‘We can’t ignore the urgent warn­ings from cli­mate sci­en­tists that we need to move away from coal, and blind­ly seek to dig it up and sell it off over­seas. We have a respon­si­bil­i­ty to the world not to allow brown coal exports to begin, for the first time ever, here in Vic­to­ria.’

Because the site was on pub­lic land and they had not bro­ken any laws, the remain­ing Quit Coal activists occu­py­ing the site were not arrest­ed. They chose to com­ply with a police request and end­ed the protest peace­ful­ly, mind­ful that the police could oth­er­wise phys­i­cal­ly remove them fol­low­ing the move on order.

Man­tle also issued a state­ment say­ing that while they sup­port the right to peace­ful protest, our action will not affect their future oper­a­tions.

Quit Coal will see about that.

Videos and more at http://quitcoal.org.au/blog/

Indigenous groups shut down Interamerican highway to protest Panama mining laws

An indige­nous Ngobe pro­test­er was killed by a gun­shot wound to the chest dur­ing con­fronta­tions with the police this morn­ing, 5th Feb­ru­ary, in San Félix, Pana­ma. It has been con­firmed that three more peo­ple have been hurt with local res­i­dents insist­ing many more are injured. In flat con­tra­dic­tion, the Secu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Jose Muli­no has stat­ed that his offi­cers are not car­ry­ing guns. In retal­i­a­tion to the death, Ngobe pro­tes­tors have set light to a police sta­tion in San Félix.

Since 30th Jan­u­ary, demon­stra­tors have been posi­tioned at var­i­ous points along the inter­na­tion­al Inter­amer­i­can high­way using branch­es, pieces of wood, met­al and rocks to block the road. They are protest­ing against the gov­ern­men­t’s deci­sion to remove a law that would pro­vide envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion to their lands. The police con­tin­ue to deny that there has been any vio­lence, although on Thurs­day 2nd Jan­u­ary there were reports of up to 7 peo­ple injured in attacks involv­ing tear gas.

Ear­ly 2011 saw sim­i­lar actions by thou­sands of Ngobe who protest­ed the gov­ern­men­t’s amend­ment of the nation­al min­ing law 415, which would have allowed for the com­mis­sion of mines and oth­er projects in the region. In March 2011, after talks between gov­ern­ment offi­cials and Ngobe lead­ers, it was agreed that arti­cle 5, which will pro­tect the entire Comar­ca from explo­ration and exploita­tion, would be writ­ten into the min­ing law 415.

Although the gov­ern­ment has begun the explo­ration of oth­er mines in Pana­ma, the semi-autonomous Comar­ca holds an extreme­ly con­sid­er­able amount of min­er­al wealth. Not only is it home to Cer­ro Col­orado – the sec­ond largest cop­per deposit in the world – but it hold sev­er­al small but sig­nif­i­cant sites already under explo­ration by for­eign min­ing com­pa­nies.

Cor­ri­ente Resources Inc. have report­ed­ly been work­ing in the area since 2009 with the assis­tance of the con­sul­tan­cy firm, Kokopel­li, owned by Cana­di­an Don Clarke. Kokopel­li’s role is, accord­ing to its own web­site, “to work direct­ly with indus­try to build sus­tain­able, respect­ful and respon­si­ble rela­tion­ships with Indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties.”

Don Clarke was also Vice Pres­i­dent of sus­tain­able devel­op­ment for Ecua­cor­ri­ente, a sub­sidiary of Cor­ri­ente Resources Inc, a com­pa­ny which was alleged­ly at the cen­tre of human rights abus­es and social con­flicts in Ecuador.

In ear­ly Jan­u­ary, Hec­tor Lopez, leader of the Asso­ci­a­tion for the Rights and Social Devel­op­ment of the Ngäbe-Bugle Peo­ple, stat­ed at the Nation­al Assem­bly that he opposed arti­cle 5 as it would affect devel­op­ment in the region, and in his opin­ion, vio­late law 10, a found­ing law of the Comar­ca. Lopez is strong­ly in favor of min­ing in the region and believes the Ngobe should receive 50% of min­ing prof­its.

How­ev­er, Celio Guer­ra, pres­i­dent of the tra­di­tion­al Ngabe Bugle Coun­cil also stat­ed in Jan­u­ary that “the peo­ple who protest­ed last year in San Felix spoke loud and clear. We don’t want min­ing in the Comar­ca.”

As protests con­tin­ue to swell on the high­way, there are grow­ing con­cerns over Pana­ma’s free­dom of press. On 20th Jan­u­ary, a Cana­di­an jour­nal­ist and fix­er, Rosie Simms, was denied entry into the coun­try. She had been work­ing on behalf of the Cana­di­an broad­cast­er CBS who were cov­er­ing a sto­ry about Cana­di­an min­ing com­pa­nies in Latin Amer­i­ca.

Many believe that this is symp­to­matic of a wider issue relat­ing to free­dom of press. A recent report by Reporters With­out Bor­ders revealed that Pana­ma has dropped 58 places on the free­dom of press index since 2010.

As the protests con­tin­ue, oth­er parts of the coun­try have joined in sol­i­dar­i­ty. In Donoso dis­trict, Colón province, a group of Ngobe and campesinos have blocked a road to the Petaquil­la min­ing project. In Bocas del Toro province, Banana plan­ta­tion work­ers have announced that they will strike in 73 hours unless the gov­ern­ment hon­ors its agree­ments. Truck­ers, stuck in San Felix, have also pledged to strike. In the cap­i­tal, many peo­ple have tak­en to streets in sup­port of the Ngobe.

After five days of protests there is major dis­rup­tion through­out Pana­ma. Mar­ket sell­ers in the cap­i­tal have report­ed loss­es of up to $10,000. In Bocas del Toro, Banana Com­pa­nies have esti­mat­ed a loss of $270,000 due to road clo­sures. Accord­ing to the Cham­ber of Com­merce the econ­o­my could face a total loss of over 10 mil­lion dol­lars.

Mean­while, the Cos­ta Rican gov­ern­ment has expressed con­cern that 270 of its cit­i­zens remain stuck in Pana­ma due to the road clo­sures. Pres­sure has been increas­ing for all sides to enter into talks.

UN rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Pana­ma have urged both Ngobe lead­ers and the gov­ern­ment to begin ‘a peace­ful dia­logue’ and ‘to avoid vio­lence.’ Although Pres­i­dent Mar­tinel­li has said the sit­u­a­tion is ‘reach­ing a lim­it,’ he has refused to reach out to the Ngobe. He also con­tin­ues to under­mine the legit­i­ma­cy of the protests by accus­ing oppo­si­tion par­ties of ‘manip­u­lat­ing’ them.

In a con­tin­u­al dis­tor­tion of the facts, the gov­ern­ment has been using mis­lead­ing rhetoric such as ‘kid­napped’ and ‘hostages’ when refer­ring to trav­el­ers delayed on the high­way.

Yes­ter­day morn­ing, 4th Feb­ru­ary, mobile phone cov­er­age was sus­pend­ed along a large stretch of the high­way where the pro­test­ers are con­cen­trat­ed. Lat­er in the after­noon, six teach­ers were arrest­ed in the city of San­ti­a­go whilst protest­ing in sol­i­dar­i­ty.

The sit­u­a­tion is extreme­ly charged and ten­sion is mount­ing across the coun­try. As vio­lence con­tin­ues to unfold in San Félix, jour­nal­ists and human rights orga­ni­za­tions are being denied access to the area. The gov­ern­ment con­tin­ues to spread dis­in­for­ma­tion and there have been no attempts so far to reach out to the Ngobe and begin peace­ful talks.

India police arrest dozens of villagers for protesting against new toxic dump

4th Feb 2012

A total of 47 indige­nous peo­ple were arrest­ed and anoth­er 5 need­ed hos­pi­tal treat­ment after hun­dreds of Indi­an police and Vedan­ta secu­ri­ty guards con­front­ed a peace­ful demon­stra­tion two weeks ago in the state of Oris­sa, India.

On Jan­u­ary 21, a group of vil­lagers came togeth­er to protest against a new tox­ic mine waste dump that threat­ens to dis­rupt their way of life.

4th Feb 2012

A total of 47 indige­nous peo­ple were arrest­ed and anoth­er 5 need­ed hos­pi­tal treat­ment after hun­dreds of Indi­an police and Vedan­ta secu­ri­ty guards con­front­ed a peace­ful demon­stra­tion two weeks ago in the state of Oris­sa, India.

On Jan­u­ary 21, a group of vil­lagers came togeth­er to protest against a new tox­ic mine waste dump that threat­ens to dis­rupt their way of life.

Despite the peace­ful nature of the pro­test­ers, as seen in the fol­low­ing video by Amnesty Inter­na­tion­al, the 47 vil­lagers were sub­se­quent­ly charged with “attempt­ed mur­der” and “riot­ing”.

Amnesty Inter­na­tion­al is call­ing for the obvi­ous­ly-false charges to be dropped. They’re also urg­ing the gov­ern­ment to release the pro­test­ers; and to prop­er­ly take their needs and rights into account before let­ting the com­pa­ny pro­ceed with the new waste dump.

Just pri­or to the arrests, Amnesty alleged that the Uk-based min­ing giant has­n’t done any­thing to clean up exist­ing pol­lu­tion at the site of its Lan­ji­garh alu­minum refin­ery beside Niyam­giri moun­tain in Oris­sa.

Sim­i­lar­ly, “The Indi­an author­i­ties have remained silent on the issues of clean­ing up the refin­ery and mon­i­tor­ing the health of local com­mu­ni­ties. They must act on this now,” said Amnesty Inter­na­tion­al’s India researcher Ramesh Gopalakr­ish­nan.

“The red mud pond, which col­lects tox­ic waste by-prod­ucts from the refin­ery, cov­ers an area of approx­i­mate­ly 38 hectares. The pond is full to the brim and suf­fered seri­ous leaks dur­ing last year’s mon­soons,” explains Amnesty.

Two weeks ago, the High Court of Oris­sa reject­ed the com­pa­ny’s plan to expand the Lan­ji­garh refin­ery after find­ing that the project is in vio­la­tion of Indi­a’s envi­ron­men­tal laws.

The wel­comed deci­sion is the lat­est in a long line of legal set­backs for the com­pa­ny.

Cascadia Forest Defense blockades the Governor’s Mansion in Oregon

On Feb­ru­ary 3 Cas­ca­dia For­est Defend­ers (CFD) block­ad­ed the entrance to the Ore­gon Governor’s Man­sion with a mound of christ­mas trees. Activists held ban­ners, read­ing “Ral­ly at the State Land Board Meet­ing Feb. 14” and “KITZHABER LIES, FOREST DIE!” One per­son was arrest­ed.

On Octo­ber 11th 2011, Gov­er­nor John Kitzhaber approved a plan to almost dou­ble log­ging in the Elliott State For­est. Vot­ers, expect­ing a green Gov­er­nor, are out­raged at the hypocrisy of his actions. “The old Elliott State For­est man­age­ment plan already allowed an appalling amount of clearcut­ting,” says Erin Grady, a mem­ber of CFD, “The State Land Board made a 60 year com­mit­ment to this plan in 1995. And only six­teen years lat­er, they just threw the whole plan in the trash!” If log­ging in the Elliott con­tin­ues at the cur­rent rate, this for­est will be gone with­in our life­time.

In the past year, there has been wide­spread dis­ap­point­ment regard­ing Kitzhaber’s deci­sions towards the Elliott. For­est activist Echo Live­ly says, “If any­one was unsure about it before, we can now be sure that Kitzhaber is in the pock­et of indus­try in Ore­gon.” Anoth­er for­est advo­cate com­ments, “The only thing green about Kitzhaber is the mon­ey.” Kitzhaber has made many mis­takes man­ag­ing envi­ron­men­tal issues in Ore­gon, but there is still time to save this cru­cial rain­for­est of the Pacif­ic North­west.

CFD invites any and all who are enraged with Kitzhaber and oth­er mem­bers of the State Land Board to attend a ral­ly at their next meet­ing on Feb­ru­ary 14th at 10:00am. It will be held out­side the Depart­ment of State Lands locat­ed in Salem at 775 Sum­mer St. NE. Come tell Kitzhaber that we won’t let our forests be destroyed with­out a fight.

-Cas­ca­dia For­est Defend­ers

Call from the Wilderness Forest of Dean Wilderness Centre

State­ment from the Wilder­ness Cen­tre : On the day of Glouces­ter­shire Coun­ty Coun­cil meet­ing that will deter­mine the coun­cils next course of action.

State­ment from the Wilder­ness Cen­tre : On the day of Glouces­ter­shire Coun­ty Coun­cil meet­ing that will deter­mine the coun­cils next course of action.

Two activists jedi’d their way into the meet­ing, and hand­ing out our “state­ment of intent” (link below) to the offi­cious types sat around with mem­bers of the police, var­i­ous coun­cil offi­cers and advi­sors in Shire Hall, Glouces­ter, before being ask­ing to leave ‑all was very polite, civ­il and in good humour.

We await their deci­sion, which will dic­tate our next move.

Call from the Wilder­ness

Here in the wilder­ness we are try­ing to find our way home. How did we come to dwell here in the wilder­ness? For over 40 years the wilder­ness has been a pio­neer­ing envi­ron­men­tal edu­ca­tion cen­tre. Then last year Glouces­ter­shire coun­ty coun­cil decid­ed that it was no longer in the pub­lic inter­est to sus­tain the cen­tre. Bet­ter val­ue for the tax­pay­er to sell it to the high­est bid­der? We dis­agree. We believe that edu­ca­tion is the great­est source of wealth in our com­mu­ni­ties. Sure­ly the exploita­tion of our envi­ron­ment can only be dri­ven by igno­rance. Edu­ca­tion is our great­est tool in the strug­gle against exploita­tion.
The coun­cil seem to think oth­er­wise. The coun­ty coun­cil, or in their words “the pow­ers that be” think we are home­less. Trav­ellers, squat­ters they tell us to… move on. They want us out of here. We don’t belong here. They tell us we have no right to be here. They’ve set their wolves to prowl around the grounds lock­ing things down. They want our names and pre­vi­ous address­es. They don’t trust us. They are con­cerned about health and safe­ty. The pub­lic are a lia­bil­i­ty. We tried to talk about respon­si­bil­i­ty. We tried to assure them that we ful­ly com­pre­hend the impli­ca­tions of a com­post toi­let. But they are doubt­ful.

Exact­ly who is bewil­dered?

We came here on the first full moon of the year with the inten­tion of cre­at­ing an envi­ron­men­tal edu­ca­tion cen­tre to dis­close a process of learn­ing the skills and tech­niques required to move towards a home found­ed upon the prin­ci­ples of eco­nom­ic self-suf­fi­cien­cy and eco­log­i­cal sus­tain­abil­i­ty.
To be a force of res­o­lu­tion we need peo­ple to join us. Deci­sive peo­ple who under­stand the con­se­quences of there actions. Com­mit­ted, hard work­ing peo­ple. We need peo­ple with a respect for food. We need gar­den­ers and grow­ers who can cul­ti­vate the ideas that have been sown in our soil by the dif­fer­ing schools of per­ma­cul­ture and bio-dynam­ics. Who know how let these ideas grow organ­i­cal­ly. We need peo­ple with the deter­mi­na­tion to dig. Reflec­tive peo­ple who look for their reflec­tion in oth­ers. Peo­ple who can prac­tice the hos­pi­tal­i­ty of the guest. Peo­ple who do not wait for oth­ers to make nec­es­sary changes.
Here in the wilder­ness we make our­selves at home. You are wel­come.

State­ment of Intent : protectthewilderness.org.uk/protect.html
Web­site (still in progress) protectthewilderness.org.uk

———————————————————–
Pro­tect The Wilder­ness

Winter Warm-up round-up — Fuel Poverty Action protests

Fri­day update: an excit­ing start to the Fuel Pover­ty Action Week­end of Win­ter Warm-ups…Hundreds of peo­ple across the coun­try came out of their cold homes to get warm at the build­ings of insti­tu­tions that have a hand in cre­at­ing fuel pover­ty, to chal­lenge the Big Six’s monop­oly and the government’s com­plic­i­ty.  Lon­don — Leeds — Swin­don — Man­ches­ter:

Fri­day update: an excit­ing start to the Fuel Pover­ty Action Week­end of Win­ter Warm-ups…Hundreds of peo­ple across the coun­try came out of their cold homes to get warm at the build­ings of insti­tu­tions that have a hand in cre­at­ing fuel pover­ty, to chal­lenge the Big Six’s monop­oly and the government’s com­plic­i­ty.  Lon­don — Leeds — Swin­don — Man­ches­ter: read more

Sat­ur­day update: Cam­bridge

Mon­day update: six activists have bar­ri­cad­ed them­selves into meet­ing rooms on two floors of British Gas offices in Staines, Mid­dle­sex, as part of the ‘Win­ter Warm-Up’ week­end called by the cam­paign group Fuel Pover­ty Action. British Gas is being tar­get­ed as one of the Big Six ener­gy com­pa­nies mak­ing prof­its out of ris­ing ener­gy bills.  Read more

Updatefaced with a threat­en­ing police pres­ence, the occu­piers of the British Gas offices have now decid­ed to leave on their own terms.

Malaysia: Temiar Blockade and Indigenous Rights

29.1.12

Eight Temi­ar indige­nous peo­ple (also known as Orang Asli) in Malaysia were arrest­ed by the police for attempt­ing to set up a block­ade and pre­vent log­gers from enter­ing their vil­lage in Gua Musang, Kelan­tan.

29.1.12

Eight Temi­ar indige­nous peo­ple (also known as Orang Asli) in Malaysia were arrest­ed by the police for attempt­ing to set up a block­ade and pre­vent log­gers from enter­ing their vil­lage in Gua Musang, Kelan­tan.

The vil­lagers are against the agri­cul­tur­al project of the local gov­ern­ment which would require the cut­ting down of for­est trees in their ances­tral land. The block­ade, their sec­ond attempt at doing so, was made after attempts to nego­ti­ate with the state gov­ern­ment have failed.

The police also refused to nego­ti­ate who removed the bar­ri­cades and arrest­ed the com­mu­ni­ty res­i­dents and their lawyer, Siti Kasim. They were released lat­er that night.

More info and here

police solidarity blockade of shell petrol station

27.1.12

27.1.12

in many years of inde­pen­dent report­ing, i’ve often seen sit­u­a­tions where police have caused larg­er dis­rup­tion than a hand­full of pro­tes­tors, clos­ing roads, some­times clos­ing down busi­ness­es, and some­times mas­sive­ly ampli­fy­ing the pow­er of the pro­tes­tors alone (not that that’s their inten­tion). how­ev­er, this evening was, i think, the first time that they so com­plete­ly did the job of the activists for them, that the cam­paign­ers could sit in a nice warm pub and toast the met, instead of stand­ing around in the cold them­selves.

the protest this evening was called by the cli­mate-con­scious shell-bash­ing ‘lon­don ris­ing tide’ group, in co-ordi­na­tion with the leg­endary activist sam­ba band ‘rhythms of resis­tance’.

each jan­u­ary, the band com­mem­o­rate the life of activist, val jones, a woman who helped put the ross­port coun­ty mayo strug­gles on the polit­i­cal map, and who, as a design­er, pro­duced many bril­liant huge ban­ners for the move­ment. she was sad­ly struck down with motor neu­rone dis­ease and passed away two years ago. in mem­o­ry of val, the com­mem­o­ra­tion takes the form of a shell garage block­ade each year.

so, tonight, the call-out was for a block­ade at the shell sta­tion in old street, the scene of pre­vi­ous block­ades. around twen­ty peo­ple turned up to the meet­ing point, armed with drums, ban­ners, and leaflets. well, actu­al­ly some­one for­got the leaflets, but as it turned out they weren’t need­ed.

the usu­al time-line for these events is that the activists turn up at the garage, the band plays on the fore­court, the large ban­ners are used to close the entrance to the site, and leaflets are hand­ed out to staff, to motorists, and to passers-by. the staff then close the shop and call the police, who turn up after about half an hour. the police warn peo­ple that they might be com­mit­ting aggra­vat­ed tres­pass, and then they force­ful­ly facil­i­tate the con­tin­u­a­tion of the action on the pave­ment, so that the garage opens for busi­ness once more.

how­ev­er, tonight, some­thing was very dif­fer­ent. even before the demo began, the garage went dark, bol­lards block­ing its entrance, and small groups of police lurked on street cor­ners near­by.

so the activists were con­fused. what to do? was there any point attempt­ing a block­ade of a garage that was already closed for busi­ness? pre­vi­ous esti­mates from block­ades show that garages lose sev­er­al thou­sands of pounds of busi­ness when they close, and this is of course part of the point of the protests. also, some­one had for­got­ten the leaflets, so although there was a sug­ges­tion of mov­ing to a dif­fer­ent tar­get, there was the con­cern the protest would­n’t be so effec­tive with­out this ele­ment.

every now and then, some­one went out to check the site, and the garage remained total­ly closed for busi­ness, all lights off, staff locked in their shop, and non­cha­lant street-cor­ner polic­ing. so, anoth­er drink, a bit of food, plans afoot for future actions, and as the cold wind built up, and the wet driz­zle came down, the occa­sion­al check that the police were con­tin­u­ing to car­ry out the activists’ mis­sion.

an hour passed, anoth­er one, a third. wow, this was bet­ter than any pre­vi­ous small-scale block­ade. there was fond rem­i­nisc­ing of the upper street block­ade a few years ago, val and the band present, on a sat­ur­day. this had closed the upper street shell garage for five or six hours, and end­ed with loads of TSG arriv­ing , a cou­ple of arrests, and a lot of details tak­en. but it was a much larg­er scale event with lots of pri­or plan­ning. tonight was always meant to be a small, token, and com­mem­o­ra­tive action.

after three hours, the police scaled down and appeared to leave, but the garage stayed closed for a futher two hours, until final­ly near 11pm it opened for busi­ness once more.

this has to have been the most suc­cess­ful block­ade with­out a sin­gle activist present. maybe they should con­tact the gui­ness book of records. we have the pho­tos, the eye-wit­ness reports.

var­i­ous the­o­ries emerged as to why this hap­pened tonight, but none of us real­ly know, so in the mean­time, the met should be heart­ened that a glass or two was raised to them for their ster­ling work this evening in cost­ing shell five hours-worth of busi­ness at a nor­mal­ly very busy lon­don garage, and thanks to them that a cou­ple of dozen activists stayed warm, safe and con­spir­a­to­r­i­al. 

all involved hope that the met join in with even more sol­i­dar­i­ty for the big block­ade on the 8th feb­ru­ary (occu­py­oil).

Indonesia: Mining permit revoked after mob torches company’s office and frees prisoners

26th Jan 2012

26th Jan 2012

The Indone­sian gov­ern­ment has announced that it will revoke the per­mit for a con­tro­ver­sial gold mine after mas­sive riot­ing against the project. The protests were aimed at Sum­ber Min­er­al Nusan­tara a com­pa­ny hop­ing to open the mine on Sum­bawa island.

The crowd, which was thou­sands strong, ran­sacked and burned two gov­ern­ment offices to express their out­rage at the mine which would threat­en the com­mu­ni­ties land and drink­ing water. The mob con­tin­ued on to a near­by deten­tion cen­ter and forced the author­i­ties to release 35 of their com­rades who were arrest­ed at a protest against the mine last year.

Oppo­si­tion to the mine has been ongo­ing for over a year. A sim­i­lar protest last Decem­ber result­ed in two com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers being shot and killed by police.