Amazon Dam Activists Threaten to Wage War on Brazil Over Military Incursion 3rd April

An Ama­zon­ian com­mu­ni­ty has threat­ened to “go to war” with the Brazil­ian gov­ern­ment after a mil­i­tary incur­sion into their land by dam builders.

The Munduruku indige­nous com­mu­ni­ty in Para state say they have been betrayed by the author­i­ties, who are push­ing ahead with plans to build a cas­cade of hydropow­er plants on the Tapa­jós riv­er with­out their per­mis­sion.

Pub­lic pros­e­cu­tors, human rights groups, envi­ron­men­tal organ­i­sa­tions and Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have con­demned the government’s strong-arm tac­tics.

Heli­copters, sol­diers and armed police have been involved in Oper­a­tion Tapa­jós, which aims to con­duct an envi­ron­men­tal impact assess­ment for the first pro­posed con­struc­tion, the 6,133MW São Luiz do Tapa­jós dam.

The facil­i­ty, to be built by the Norte Ener­gia con­sor­tium, is the biggest of three planned dams on the Tapa­jós, the fifth-largest riv­er in the Ama­zon basin. The government’s 10-year plan includes the con­struc­tion of four larg­er hydro­elec­tric plants on its trib­u­tary, the Jamanx­im.

‘We don’t want Belo Monte’ reads a sign at an anti-dam ral­ly in front of the Brazil­ian par­lia­ment in Brasil­ia. Under Brazil­ian law, major infra­struc­ture projects require pri­or con­sul­ta­tion with indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties. Fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tors say this has not hap­pened and urge the courts to block the scheme which, they fear, could lead to blood­shed.

“The Munduruku have already stat­ed on sev­er­al occa­sions that they do not sup­port stud­ies for hydro­elec­tric plants on their land unless there is full pri­or con­sul­ta­tion,” the pros­e­cu­tors not­ed in a state­ment.

A sim­i­lar sur­vey in Novem­ber led to dead­ly con­flict. One res­i­dent, Ade­nil­son Kir­ixi, was killed and sev­er­al oth­ers were wound­ed in clash­es between local peo­ple and troops accom­pa­ny­ing the researchers in Teles Pires vil­lage.

The min­istry of mines and ener­gy not­ed on its web­site that 80 researchers, includ­ing biol­o­gists and foresters, would under­take a study of flo­ra and fau­na. The army escort was made pos­si­ble by Pres­i­dent Dil­ma Rouss­eff, who decreed this year that mil­i­tary per­son­nel could be used for sur­vey oper­a­tions.

Mis­sion­ar­ies said the recent show of force in Sawré May­bu vil­lage, Itaitu­ba, was intim­i­dat­ing, degrad­ing and an unac­cept­able vio­la­tion of the rights of the res­i­dents.

“In this oper­a­tion, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has been threat­en­ing the lives of the peo­ple,” the Indige­nous Mis­sion­ary Coun­cil said. “It is unac­cept­able and ille­git­i­mate for the gov­ern­ment to impose dia­logue at the tip of a bay­o­net.”

The group said Munduruku lead­ers end­ed a phone call with rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the pres­i­dent with a dec­la­ra­tion of war. They have also issued open let­ters call­ing for an end to the mil­i­tary oper­a­tion, “We are not ban­dits. We feel betrayed, humil­i­at­ed and dis­re­spect­ed by all this,” a let­ter states.

One of the community’s lead­ers, Valdenir Munduruku, has warned thatlocals will take action if the gov­ern­ment does not with­draw its task­force by 10 April. He has called for sup­port from oth­er indige­nous groups, such as the Xin­gu, fac­ing sim­i­lar threats from hydro­elec­tric dams.

Envi­ron­men­tal groups have expressed con­cern. The 1,200-mile water­way is home to more than 300 fish species and pro­vides sus­te­nance to some of the most bio­di­verse for­est habi­tats on Earth. Ten indige­nous groups inhab­it the basin, along with sev­er­al tribes in vol­un­tary iso­la­tion.

With sim­i­lar con­flicts over oth­er pro­posed dams in the Ama­zon, such as those at Belo Monte, Teles Pires, San­to Antônio and Jirau, some com­pare the use of force to the last great expan­sion of hydropow­er dur­ing the mil­i­tary dic­ta­tor­ship.

“The Brazil­ian gov­ern­ment is mak­ing polit­i­cal deci­sions about the dams before the envi­ron­men­tal impact assess­ment is done,” said Brent Mil­likan of the Inter­na­tion­al Rivers envi­ron­men­tal group.

“The recent mil­i­tary oper­a­tions illus­trate that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is will­ing to dis­re­gard exist­ing legal instru­ments intend­ed to fos­ter dia­logue between gov­ern­ment and civ­il soci­ety.”