How to use a bikelock to save the Great Barrier Reef — protest halts Gladstone dredging

9 Novem­ber 2011

9 Novem­ber 2011

Derec Davies used a bicy­cle U lock to attach him­self to a dredger in Glad­stone Har­bour this morn­ing. The direct action was tak­en to pro­tect the Great Bar­ri­er Reef against the devel­op­ment of Glad­stone har­bour liq­ue­fied nat­ur­al gas facil­i­ties on Cur­tis Island to export Coal Seam Gas. Mas­sive Dredg­ing of the Glad­stone har­bour is occur­ring which fish­er­man and envi­ron­men­tal­ists say is caus­ing tur­bid­i­ty in the water and caus­ing ill­ness of fish effec­tive­ly clos­ing down the local fish­ing indus­try. Devel­op­ment is endan­ger­ing the World Her­itage sta­tus of the Great Bar­ri­er Reef.

Relat­ed: In 2010 Con­ser­va­tion­ists crit­i­cised gov­ern­ment over coal ship ground­ing on Great Bar­ri­er Reef near Glad­stone | Capri­corn Con­ser­va­tion Coun­cil: The LNG inva­sion of Cur­tis Island | ABC TV Four Cor­ners: Great Bar­ri­er Grief | Get­up! peti­tion to Save the reef

Derec Davies, a Friends of the Earth cam­paign­er, was whisked out to a dredger about 9.30am this morn­ing by a fast inflat­able boat. He unfurlled a ban­ner on the dredge, which read “Save the reef, halt dredg­ing” and chained him­self. All dredg­ing stopped when he locked onto equip­ment. The police were called and attend­ed to cut him free. Dredg­ing was stopped for over 2 hours.

Derec Davies was released from cus­tody at 3:40pm today with three charges under the Trans­port Oper­a­tions and Mar­itime Safe­ty act. The charges car­ry a total max­i­mum penal­ty of $74000 or one years impris­on­ment.

“The Great Bar­ri­er Reef is worth a lot more than $74 000, so I think that it was worth­while,” said Mr Davies. “We should­n’t have to take action like this, but our Envi­ron­ment min­is­ters Vicky Dar­ling and Tony Burke are let­ting us all down. Hope­ful­ly the judge will see that peo­ple need to have the right to protest, oth­er­wise this destruc­tion of the reef will go unchal­lenged.” said Mr Davies.

Drew Hut­ton, a spokeper­son for Friends of the Earth said that the pur­pose of the protest was to call for a halt to all dredg­ing in the har­bour until a gen­uine inde­pen­dent enquiry was held into the caus­es of the appar­ent ecosys­tem col­lapse in the har­bour.

The ABC TV Four Cor­ners cur­rent affairs Pro­gram on Mon­day night did an in depth report on port devel­op­ments in Queens­land and their impact on The Great Bar­ri­er Reef Marine Park and World Her­itage Area. (Watch Great Bar­ri­er Grief)

In the 12 hours fol­low­ing the air­ing of the pro­gram some 19,000 peo­ple signed an online Get­up! peti­tion to Save the reef.

There are six major port devel­op­ments already planned or under­way along the Queens­land coast to export coal and coal seam gas.

“ABC has report­ed that the chair of the Great Bar­ri­er Reef Marine Park Author­i­ty expressed ‘extreme con­cern’ to the Gov­ern­ment about the dredg­ing and its unac­cept­able impacts on marine life with­in the World Her­itage area,” said Sen­a­tor Laris­sa Waters from the Greens.

“We now have a huge spike in marine ani­mal deaths up and down the coast, a fish dis­ease epi­dem­ic in Glad­stone har­bour and the fish­ing indus­try on its knees, after just 1.5 mil­lion of the 46 mil­lion cubic metres have been dredged. The tur­bid­i­ty con­di­tions imposed by the fed­er­al Envi­ron­ment Min­is­ter for the dredg­ing are being con­tin­u­al­ly breached, and now we learn that three heavy met­als – alu­mini­um, cop­per and chromi­um – are exceed­ing the nation­al safe­ty guide­lines. And still the dredg­ing con­tin­ues.” Sen­a­tors Waters said in a media release.

Mr Hut­ton said the dis­pro­por­tion­ate num­ber of marine ani­mal deaths and dis­eased fish in Glad­stone har­bour reflect­ed an ecosys­tem under extreme stress and his organ­i­sa­tion had no faith in the Queens­land Gov­ern­men­t’s pre­pared­ness to look seri­ous­ly for the caus­es.

“This is an issue of con­cern to all Aus­tralians who believe the Great Bar­ri­er reef should not be sac­ri­ficed for fleet­ing eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment. The coal seam gas indus­try, once again, has demon­strat­ed what a detri­men­tal impact it is hav­ing on rur­al and region­al Queens­land.” said Drew Hut­ton.

Accord­ing to Drew Hut­ton in a report on Lock the Gate, nei­ther the Queens­land gov­ern­ment nor the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment were trust­ed by most peo­ple to get to the bot­tom of the prob­lem because they had too strong a vest­ed inter­est in see­ing these projects go ahead.

“So far all we have seen from the Bligh gov­ern­ment is flawed water qual­i­ty mon­i­tor­ing, con­stant asser­tions that the prob­lems of marine species’ deaths and fish dis­ease have noth­ing to do with devel­op­ments in the har­bour and the desire to see devel­op­ments pro­ceed at break­neck speed.”

“The Glad­stone Port Corporation’s dredg­ing pro­gram is one of the biggest in our his­to­ry and we need to know if dredg­ing up his­toric lay­ers of indus­tri­al pol­lu­tants as well as the acid sul­phate soils that are known to be in the area are linked with this cat­a­stro­phe.”

Drew Hut­ton has high­light­ed the links between the reck­less pace of devel­op­ment in Coal Seam Gas wells, with the port expan­sion threat­en­ing major impacts to fish­eries and tourism indus­tries asso­ci­at­ed with the Great Bar­ri­er Reef.

“Coal seam gas is, in all like­li­hood, linked with the prob­lems in Glad­stone har­bour but you can fol­low the trail of destruc­tion and pos­si­ble cat­a­stro­phe back to the tens of thou­sands of hectares of bush­land being cleared for gas pipelines and the long-term destruc­tion of under­ground water.” he said, “It is only peo­ple pow­er that will force recal­ci­trant gov­ern­ments to act respon­si­bly to bring the coal seam gas indus­try under con­trol and to act to pro­tect the Great Bar­ri­er Reef from high-impact devel­op­ment..”

Friends of the Earth is call­ing for a dredg­ing halt, inde­pen­dent test­ing in Glad­stone har­bour, and the cur­rent enquiry announced by Fed­er­al and State Gov­ern­ments to widen its terms of ref­er­ence to include all aspects of indus­tri­al devel­op­ment in the region.

Aus­tralia failed to noti­fy the World Her­itage Com­mit­tee ear­li­er this year regard­ing the port devel­op­ments and their pos­si­ble impact on the World Her­ti­age sta­tus of the Great Bar­ri­er Reef. They have called for a strate­gic assess­ment of all coastal assess­ments impact­ing on the reef. The reef may be in dan­ger of los­ing its World Her­itage sta­tus.

“Aus­tralians have to ask right now – are we pre­pared to lose one of our great­est nation­al assets so we can turn the Great Bar­ri­er Reef into a coal and gas high­way?” con­clud­ed Sen­a­tor Waters.