Disrupting E.ON at London City University undergraduate fair + Kingsnorth shelved, or not? (+ Tilbury)

7th Octo­ber 2009

7th Octo­ber 2009
E.ON, were hold­ing a talk at the stu­dent recruit­ment fair yes­ter­day. The com­pa­ny is respon­si­ble for the planned new coal pow­er sta­tions at Kingsnorth, which com­bined would pro­duce the same car­bon emis­sions as Ghana. With the report by the Glob­al and Human­i­tar­i­an forum stat­ing that three hun­dred thou­sand peo­ple are already dying already each year due to cli­mate change, it isn’t a viable option.

The group of activists stormed the talks yes­ter­day by E.ON, get­ting past the secu­ri­ty guards who were hold­ing a pret­ty tight pres­ence out­side the doors, quite pos­si­bly due to the con­tin­ued protests against E.ON at stu­dent fairs last year http://leaveitintheground.org.uk/?p=185 .

While three burly guys jumped on one activist, the oth­ers hand­ed out fly­ers to the bemused stu­dents wok­en up from the cor­po­rate Pow­er­Point slum­ber. An activist took to the podi­um to tell the audi­ence what E.ON are real­ly about. Claim­ing them­selves as a Green Ener­gy Com­pa­ny while 95% of their invest­ment is into non renew­able ener­gies is a clear sign of green­wash­ing and the cor­po­rate bull­shit that stu­dents have to lis­ten to.

—–

Kingsnorth pow­er sta­tion plans axed — Local Cam­paign­ers Respond

8.10.2009
The tim­ing couldn’t be bet­ter, Kingsnorth Cli­mate Action Med­way (KCAM) and WDM host­ed a debate tonight to dis­cuss the future of coal in Med­way. The meet­ing cul­mi­nat­ed in the announce­ment that E.on have essen­tial­ly pulled out of build­ing a new coal fired pow­er sta­tion at Kingsnorth.

Local cam­paign­er Trish Marchant said “Its fan­tas­tic news for us, but it’s a small vic­to­ry. We in Med­way will be send­ing our sup­port to the next local group who take on the fight” In a heavy blow to the government’s plans to pro­mote ener­gy from coal, the Ger­man com­pa­ny have said they will not pur­sue the new plant in the UK until at least 2012.

Jane Har­ris, a local KCAM cam­paign­er said “This is a step in the right direc­tion, it shows that peo­ple real­ly do have the pow­er to chal­lenge the gov­ern­ment and cor­po­ra­tions. How­ev­er, accord­ing to UN fig­ures cli­mate change is cur­rent­ly respon­si­ble for 300,000 deaths per year. We need to seri­ous­ly rethink any plans to use new coal, we need to be focus­ing on renew­able green ener­gy”.

Should the project have gone ahead, the coal units would have been be the first to be built for more than 20 years.

Dave David­son, a res­i­dent of the penin­su­la said “I’m cau­tious about Eons real agen­da. Are they try­ing to apply pres­sure to Ed Mil­liband to make a deci­sion or are we real­ly see­ing the change we have been work­ing for. I hope for the future of our plan­et that it’s the lat­ter.”

Jill Osborne of Tip­ping Point said “Its been amaz­ing work­ing along­side such com­mit­ted locals. The peo­ple of Med­way cer­tain­ly know how to mount a resis­tance. This vic­to­ry will be a huge inspi­ra­tion to cli­mate change cam­paign­ers across the world.”

http://kcam.co.cc

- Cli­mate Camp responds

Wednes­day, 7 Octo­ber 2009: Cli­mate activists cel­e­brat­ed vic­to­ry against car­bon inten­sive coal pow­er last night, as ener­gy com­pa­ny E.ON announced they were indef­i­nite­ly delay­ing build­ing a new pow­er sta­tion in Kent. The Camp for Cli­mate Action tar­get­ed the Kingsnorth site in August 2008 1 as coal is one of the most envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive ways of gen­er­at­ing electricity.2

E.ON’s anounce­ment comes as hun­dreds of activists pre­pare for the Great Cli­mate Swoop on 17th Octo­ber, when they plan to take con­trol of Rat­cliffe-on-Soar3, anoth­er coal-fired pow­er plant oper­at­ed by E.ON 4. Activists will be co-ordi­nat­ing the protests through text mes­sages and twit­ter, which were also used to plan the G20 protests.

Activist Den­nis Stevens said: “This is an amaz­ing vic­to­ry which shows how ordi­nary peo­ple can take back the pow­er from cor­po­ra­tions and gov­ern­ment which do not val­ue peo­ple and the envi­ron­ment. We need a social move­ment to devel­op com­mu­ni­ty con­trol of our ener­gy sup­ply and our soci­ety; not our cur­rent sys­tem which ignores the needs of peo­ple and the cli­mate.”

Resis­tance by Cli­mate Camp activists to the Kingsnorth plan has been wide­spread, includ­ing the Tip­ping Point shop in near­by Gilling­ham which works with­in the local com­mu­ni­ty to expose E.ON’s green­wash, and actions tar­get­ing E.ON’s PR firm Edel­man and con­struc­tion firms bid­ding for the Kingsnorth con­tract. Cli­mate Camp activists have also dumped coal at E.ON stu­dent recruit­ment events, giv­en out leaflets at FA Cup foot­ball match­es spon­sored by E.ON, and even dis­rupt­ed a cli­mate change con­fer­ence spon­sored by the ener­gy giant itself.5

Emma Jack­son added: “E.ON are final­ly recog­nis­ing that the days of build­ing new coal-fired pow­er sta­tions are over. Now we have to start shut­ting down exist­ing pow­er sta­tions, and that’s why we’re going to Rat­cliffe-on-Soar next week. And if E.ON try and bring back their plans for Kingsnorth then we’ll be back there too”.

More infor­ma­tion on the Great Cli­mate Swoop at Rat­cliffe on Soar is avail­able at thegreatclimateswoop.org

Ends.

NOTES FOR EDITORS

1 Kingsnorth would have been the first coal-fired pow­er sta­tion in the UK for more than 30 years.

2 If built, Kingsnorth will emit between 6 and 8 mil­lion tons of CO2 every year. If all the coal plants pro­posed for Britain are built, an extra 50 mil­lion tonnes of car­bon diox­ide a year would be pumped into the atmos­phere, almost a tenth of the UK’s cur­rent total emis­sions.

3 Rat­cliffe-on-Soar is the UK’s third most pol­lut­ing pow­er sta­tion and emits more CO2 each year than Cos­ta Rica.

4 climatecamp.org.uk/actions/climate-swoop-2009

5 leaveitintheground.org.uk/?p=185

Tel: 07772861099, 07040900905 or 07932096677
Email: press@climatecamp.org.uk

http://tippingpoint.co.cc

Or is it real­ly a suc­cess?

Head­lines would sug­gest a major ground break­ing vic­to­ry for the envi­ro­men­tal move­ment and the cam­paign against new coal with the announce­ment by Eon how­ev­er the Tip­ping Point blog sug­gests the news might not be so sig­nif­i­cant (see http://climateshop.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/news-sinking-in/). Eon has since con­firmed that it remains in the gov­ern­ments com­pe­ti­tion to build a demon­stra­tion car­bon cap­ture and stor­age facil­i­ty attached to a coal-fired pow­er plant by 2014 and since the win­ner is unlike­ly to be announced untill 2011 how can Eons annouce­ment be tak­en as a vic­to­ry?

All Eon are say­ing is that they a like­ly to delay com­mit­ing cash to build the new plant for the next two or three year so that cer­tain­ly does not trans­late as shelv­ing the project, not when they are still seek­ing the bil­lion pound gift from Ed Miliband to tri­al the CCS.

What does this mean for coal in the UK?

It is the sus­pen­sion of the key project that has so far defined the bat­tle over new coal in the UK. It is there­fore high­ly sig­nif­i­cant, but not a fatal blow. The invest­ment freeze could be un-frozen with the right lev­el of sub­sidy, and has no direct impact on the oth­er plants being con­sid­ered for CCS demon­stra­tion. There is now a new threat emerg­ing at Hunter­ston in Scot­land, from a con­sor­tium includ­ing RWE and Dong ener­gy (a Dan­ish util­i­ty) for a plant iden­ti­cal to Kingsnorth, and they are claim­ing they will build with or with­out Gov­ern­ment assis­tance.

—–

Health warn­ing — report from main­stream news­pa­per, hence “ecofriend­ly”!!!

POWER FIRM HALTS PLANS FOR NEW GREEN STATION 12th Novem­ber 2009.

PLANS to build a new, ecofriend­ly pow­er sta­tion in South Essex have been put on hold.

The exist­ing pow­er coal­fired pow­er sta­tion at Tilbury is due to be decom­mis­sioned in 2014,possibly even in 2013.It had been expect­ed that its oper­a­tors, npow­er, would replace it with a new pow­er sta­tion, but on Mon­day they announced they would­n’t now be mak­ing an appli­ca­tion to build a new super­crit­i­cal coal-fired pow­er sta­tion at the site.

There has been a pow­er sta­tion at Tilbury since 1956, with oil-fired Tilbury ‘A’ com­ing online to the nation­al grid a year later.Coal-fired Tilbury ‘B’ fol­lowed in 1967 and has oper­at­ed, with sig­nif­i­cant effi­cien­cy upgrades since then. The orig­i­nal sta­tion was moth­balled in 1981 and even­tu­al­ly demol­ished in 1999, allow­ing the cre­ation of the sta­tion’s inno­v­a­tive envi­ron­men­tal cen­tre.

How­ev­er, a Euro­pean direc­tive which came into force on 1 Jan­u­ary, 2008 gave the pow­er sta­tion just 20,000 hours of oper­at­ing life before it has to be replaced by a more envi­ron­men­tal­ly-friend­ly, car­bon effi­cient sys­tem (see fur­ther below for data *1* ). Nigel Staves, Tilbury Pow­er Sta­tion man­ag­er, esti­mates that timescale will run out as ear­ly as 2013. He says: “Giv­en the cur­rent mar­ket, we are unable to make an eco­nom­ic case for this new coal pow­er sta­tion. “We are also con­sid­er­ing the out­come of the Gov­ern­men­t’s pol­i­cy review on the con­di­tions for new coal sta­tions. For this rea­son, our plans for Tilbury are now on hold. “However,we firm­ly believe new, more effi­cient, coal-fired gen­er­a­tion should ulti­mate­ly have a role to play in a low ‑car­bon econ­o­my along­side gas, nuclear pow­er and increas­ing­ly renew­able ener­gy sources. “We con­tin­ue to see the Tilbury site as an impor­tant one, both to RWE npow­er and in terms of the future of pow­er gen­er­a­tion in the UK. “Giv­en the exist­ing ener­gy infra­struc­ture and prox­im­i­ty to areas of high demand for elec­tric­i­ty, it is an obvi­ous choice for pow­er gen­er­a­tion. “We are now review­ing poten­tial options.”

RWE npow­er said this meant it would not be pro­gress­ing with its bid for Gov­ern­ment funds to devel­op a car­bon diox­ide cap­ture demon­stra­tion plant at a new Tilbury sta­tion, but it remained inter­est­ed in oth­er oppor­tu­ni­ties to devel­op the tech­nol­o­gy.