CLIMATE PROTESTERS FACE LIFE SENTENCES AFTER COAL TRAIN BLOCKADE

On Mon­day 26th April, peo­ple involved in the Ris­ing Tide Net­work
lit­er­al­ly put their necks on the line by blockad­ing the rail­track which
car­ries coal from the con­tro­ver­sial open-cast mine at Ffos-y-Fran in
Merthyr Tyd­fil to Aberthaw Pow­er Sta­tion.

On Mon­day 26th April, peo­ple involved in the Ris­ing Tide Net­work
lit­er­al­ly put their necks on the line by blockad­ing the rail­track which
car­ries coal from the con­tro­ver­sial open-cast mine at Ffos-y-Fran in
Merthyr Tyd­fil to Aberthaw Pow­er Sta­tion. It took the com­bined efforts
of British Rail Police and South Wales Police over 8 hours to remove the
last of the pro­test­ers at 8.10pm on Mon­day evening.

18 Peo­ple from Bris­tol and Bath are due in court on 10th May, charged
under the Mali­cious Dam­ages Act of 1861, a law to pro­tect the inter­ests
of 19th Cen­tu­ry rail own­ers. If con­vict­ed they face any­thing up to a
life sen­tence in prison. The 18 Peo­ple, who are part of the Ris­ing Tide
(UK) Net­work were held for over 24 hours, and were only allowed to phone
out after 11.00 am yes­ter­day (Tues­day). The house of one of those
involved was raid­ed by 8 police offi­cers who spent 3 hours search­ing
their home.

Kim Green from Ris­ing Tide (UK) said:

“We are protest­ing the con­tin­ued extrac­tion and burn­ing of fos­sil fuels
in the face of a glob­al cli­mate emer­gency. The fail­ure of the Copen­hagen
cli­mate talks to deal with this huge prob­lem, and the obvi­ous pol­i­cy
inad­e­qua­cy the three main UK par­ties con­test­ing the gen­er­al elec­tion to
take the nec­es­sary action to tack­le the prob­lem has high­light­ed the need
for the peo­ple to take grass-roots direct action.”

Kim Green con­tin­ues:

“This action is also in sup­port of the local peo­ple of Merthyr Tyd­fil
whose cam­paign ‘Res­i­dents Against Ffos-y-Fran’ has been fight­ing the
mine for over six years. The mine caus­es noise pol­lu­tion for up to 16
hours a day, dust and dirt are car­ried into the town by the wind, and it
turns the rain black.”

The process by which Miller-Argent were able to get the go ahead to
exploit this resource at the social cost of both the local and glob­al
com­mu­ni­ty failed to take into con­sid­er­a­tion the social-envi­ron­men­tal
impact of such projects, high­light­ing the demo­c­ra­t­ic deficit in the
plan­ning process. The new­ly formed quan­go “The Plan­ning Com­mis­sion” will
only make these things worse, being able to ignore any con­sid­er­a­tion in
favour of prof­it.

Miller Argent have been quick to pres­sure their small work­force into
mobil­is­ing against local con­cerns — but their appar­ent con­cern for their
work­ers is betrayed by the fact that they are actu­al­ly look­ing to sell
the mine as there is only half the quan­ti­ty of high qual­i­ty coal as they
ini­tial­ly believed. They are in fact mak­ing a loss on the project.

On the poten­tial life sen­tence, a spokesper­son for the 18 said:

“We would not antic­i­pate fac­ing any such penal­ty as we took great care
to ensure the safe­ty of all tak­ing part and had made cer­tain that the
coal train would not leave the load­ing area before the line was blocked.”

“This was a care­ful­ly planned action: hence it’s suc­cess. How­ev­er, we
admit that it was a dras­tic course of action but even this bare­ly
match­es the cli­mate cri­sis we will face if much more rad­i­cal mea­sures
are not tak­en now.”

All 18 have been bailed to appear at Merthyr Tyd­fill Mag­is­trates Court
on 10th May at 10.00 am.

*** Aberthaw Pow­er Sta­tion is the biggest pol­luter in Wales. In 2006 it
released 7.4. mil­lion tonnes of Co2. It is Pro­ject­ed to run until 2025
with NO PLANS to fit car­bon cap­ture stor­age (CCS) tech­nol­o­gy. 40% of the
coal for the pow­er sta­tion is sup­plied by Ffos-Y-Fran. It was tar­get­ed
by Bris­tol & Cardiff Ris­ing Tide in 2008.

*** Miller Argent own and run Ffos-Y-Fran. Argent are in turn owned by
the BT Pen­sions Group. Both of these organ­i­sa­tions make much of their
eth­i­cal and sus­tain­able prac­tices. But in this case they seem to be
plac­ing prof­its over and above any ele­ment of social respon­si­bil­i­ty.