Sea Shepherd Chases the Japanese Whalers into Yesterday

22nd Jan­u­ary 2012

The Japan­ese whal­ing fleet are not where they should be this time of year.

Last year the fleet was oper­at­ing in the Ross Sea. This year their “sci­en­tif­ic sur­vey” was sup­posed to take place in the waters south and west of Tas­ma­nia, east and south of South Africa.

22nd Jan­u­ary 2012

The Japan­ese whal­ing fleet are not where they should be this time of year.

Last year the fleet was oper­at­ing in the Ross Sea. This year their “sci­en­tif­ic sur­vey” was sup­posed to take place in the waters south and west of Tas­ma­nia, east and south of South Africa.

Every year they alter­nate. But not this year! Although the whalers attempt­ed to begin their killing oper­a­tions in the waters south­west of Aus­tralia, the Sea Shep­herd ships have chased the entire whal­ing fleet ever east­ward. At 1700 hours AEST, the Bob Bark­er encoun­tered the Yushin Maru No. 3 at 66 Degrees, 22 min­utes South and 179 Degrees, 05 min­utes West.

From being inter­cept­ed 500 miles west of Fre­man­tle, Aus­tralia, the Japan­ese fleet has run over 4,500 nau­ti­cal miles for the last 30 days, all the way into the Ross Sea, far to the East of Aus­tralia. This is an aver­age of 150 miles a day, leav­ing very lit­tle time to kill whales with only one har­poon ves­sel. The oth­er two har­poon ves­sels have either been tail­ing or search­ing for the Sea Shep­herd ships.

“You can say we chased the whale killers into yes­ter­day since we have crossed the Inter­na­tion­al Date Line,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son, of the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin. “This illus­trates that they real­ly have no sci­en­tif­ic agen­da at all since their so-called sur­vey requires them to “sam­ple” whales from the two dif­fer­ent areas alter­na­tive­ly each year. This is not about sci­ence and it nev­er has been. It’s not even about prof­it any­more because we have negat­ed their prof­its. It’s sim­ply about pride. Whal­ing in the South­ern Ocean has become a heav­i­ly sub­si­dized wel­fare project for an archa­ic indus­try that has no place in the twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry.”

Sea Shepherd’s cam­paign, Oper­a­tion Divine Wind, has been chal­leng­ing this year due to the thir­ty mil­lion dol­lars allo­cat­ed to the whal­ing fleet for added secu­ri­ty. This mon­ey was tak­en from the tsuna­mi and earth­quake relief fund.

“They have ten mil­lion dol­lars for every one mil­lion dol­lars we have to finance our three ships,” said Cap­tain Alex Cor­nelis­sen of the Bob Bark­er. “They have the full sup­port of their gov­ern­ment and lit­er­al­ly have a license to kill because if any of us are injured or killed, their gov­ern­ment will back them and jus­ti­fy their actions. Our gov­ern­ments con­demn us just for toss­ing rot­ten but­ter on their decks.”

The chase across the bot­tom of the world involves five ships from the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet and two ships from Sea Shep­herd. The third Sea Shep­herd ship, the Brigitte Bar­dot, was dam­aged by heavy seas and had to return to Fre­man­tle, Aus­tralia for repairs.

Nev­er before has the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet aban­doned one des­ig­nat­ed whal­ing “sur­vey” area for anoth­er. Sea Shep­herd has appar­ent­ly seri­ous­ly dis­rupt­ed the Japan­ese whal­ing plan for this sea­son and has cost them a huge amount in fuel costs. In addi­tion, two of the three har­poon ves­sels have been tak­en away from killing whales in order to tail the Steve Irwin and the Bob Bark­er. The Yushin Maru No. 2 is tail­ing the Steve Irwin and the Yushin Maru No. 3 is tail­ing the Bob Bark­er. This has left only the Yushin Maru to hunt for whales.

Sea Shep­herd has been able to keep the whal­ing fleet on the move and con­tin­ues to track their move­ments by rely­ing on drone oper­a­tions and ten years of expe­ri­ence fol­low­ing the pre­dictable move­ments of the whalers.

Last sea­son the Bob Bark­er was able to chase the Nis­shin Maru all the way to the tip of South Amer­i­ca before they quit and returned to Japan in humil­i­a­tion after tak­ing only sev­en­teen per­cent of their kill quo­ta.

Canadian environmentalists block logging operations for one week and running

18.1.12

18.1.12

Envi­ron­men­tal­ists in Alber­ta, Cana­da have been block­ing log­ging oper­a­tions in the Cas­tle Wilder­ness Area for over a week despite below freez­ing tem­per­a­tures. On Jan­u­ary 11 sev­er­al dozen envi­ron­men­tal­ists, includ­ing local res­i­dents, set up tents on the access road for the log­ging oper­a­tions. Spray Lakes Sawmills wants to log 300 acres of land in the wilder­ness area.

 ”If we keep peo­ple there and the machin­ery idle until spring, that might be a good time — come spring, they won’t be able to do any log­ging. I hope it doesn’t take that long, but we have a lot of com­mit­ted peo­ple, peo­ple com­ing from all over,” said Gor­don Peter­son of the Cas­tle-Crown Wilder­ness Coali­tion (CCWC) told CBC News.

 Accord­ing to CCWC the, “Cas­tle Region is an impor­tant part of the Crown of the Con­ti­nent Ecosys­tem which cov­ers approx­i­mate­ly 27,000 square miles of Alber­ta, BC, and Mon­tana and includes Water­ton Lakes Nation­al Park, Glac­i­er Nation­al Park, and the Bob Mar­shall Wilder­ness.” It also serves as an impor­tant wildlife cor­ri­dor and is crit­i­cal habi­tat for griz­zly bears. In addi­tion to log­ging the Cas­tle Wilder­ness is threat­ened by oil and gas projects in the area.

More nails in the GM coffin — bye bye BASF / amaranth fights back against GM menace / Take the Flour Back

18 Jan­u­ary 2012

BASF, the last firm still devel­op­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops in Ger­many is stop­ping its work, admit­ting defeat in the face of wide­spread Euro­pean oppo­si­tion to to the idea.

18 Jan­u­ary 2012

BASF, the last firm still devel­op­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied crops in Ger­many is stop­ping its work, admit­ting defeat in the face of wide­spread Euro­pean oppo­si­tion to to the idea.

This fol­lows deci­sions by Bay­er and Syn­gen­ta to stop their genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied (GM) crop work in Ger­many over the last few years.

Ger­man chem­i­cal giant BASF has announced that it will halt the devel­op­ment or com­mer­cial­i­sa­tion of genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied (GM) crops in Europe, and move its biotech R&D oper­a­tions to the US. The firm cit­ed con­sumer and polit­i­cal resis­tance to trans­genic plants in Europe for its deci­sion. 

BASF will now con­cen­trate its plant biotech­nol­o­gy activ­i­ties in North and South Amer­i­ca, and the head­quar­ters of BASF Plant Sci­ence will be moved from Lim­burg­er­hof, Ger­many, to Raleigh, North Car­oli­na, US. BASF expects that this will result in the loss of 140 jobs in Europe.

‘We are con­vinced that plant biotech­nol­o­gy is a key tech­nol­o­gy for the 21st cen­tu­ry,’ said Ste­fan Mar­ci­nows­ki, a mem­ber of BAS­F’s exec­u­tive board. ‘How­ev­er, there is still a lack of accep­tance for this tech­nol­o­gy in many parts of Europe — from the major­i­ty of con­sumers, farm­ers and politi­cians. There­fore, it does not make busi­ness sense to con­tin­ue invest­ing in prod­ucts exclu­sive­ly for cul­ti­va­tion in this mar­ket.’ 

BAS­F’s deci­sion was met with warn­ings from indus­try rep­re­sen­ta­tives and lob­by­ists, but cel­e­bra­tion by oth­ers, includ­ing envi­ron­men­tal advo­cates and at least one for­mer indus­try insid­er. 

Present­ly, only two GM crops are autho­rised for cul­ti­va­tion in the EU: MON810 maize, made by US-based Mon­san­to, and BAS­F’s Amflo­ra pota­to. MON810 is only approved for sale as an ani­mal feed and starch from Amflo­ra is used in indus­tri­al process­es.

Mau­rice Moloney, the chief exec­u­tive of Rotham­st­ed Research in the UK, which has been engaged in GM work, said that mov­ing the focus of crop sci­ence even fur­ther away from Europe is ‘deeply regret­table’. Such a move will ‘make inno­v­a­tive new tech­nolo­gies, includ­ing but not lim­it­ed to GM, less avail­able to Euro­pean pro­duc­ers and con­sumers and car­ries the risk of deny­ing them access to crops and foods with health and envi­ron­men­tal ben­e­fits,’ he added. 

BAS­F’s deci­sion is like­ly to adverse­ly affect Europe’s eco­nom­ic growth and food sup­ply, Moloney warned. ‘It is iron­ic that much of the sci­ence that cre­at­ed mod­ern biotech­nol­o­gy came from Europe and yet Euro­peans have been deprived of the envi­ron­men­tal ben­e­fits such as the reduc­tion of the use of pes­ti­cides and improved soil qual­i­ty as well as the more obvi­ous eco­nom­ic ben­e­fits of cheap­er food and agri­cul­tur­al prod­ucts,’ he said. 

In addi­tion, Alan Dewar, an inde­pen­dent ento­mol­o­gist who directs Dewar Crop Pro­tec­tion and used to be head of ento­mol­o­gy at a divi­sion of Rotham­st­ed Research, called BAS­F’s deci­sion to quit Europe ‘indica­tive of the ever increas­ing iso­la­tion that Euro­pean sci­en­tists find them­selves in’. Dewar high­light­ed ‘inad­e­quate sen­tences’ hand­ed down by judges in sev­er­al Euro­pean coun­tries to pro­tes­tors who have been ‘caught red-hand­ed’ destroy­ing GM field tri­als, say­ing it is not sur­pris­ing that biotech crop research has stalled in Europe. 

But Igna­cio Chapela, a micro­bial ecol­o­gy pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Berke­ley and senior researcher with the Cen­tre for Biosafe­ty in Nor­way, says that genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­isms have been over­hyped and that the indus­try needs to be sig­nif­i­cant­ly trimmed down. 

‘The size of the GMO mar­ket should be much small­er, but it is being pro­mot­ed very strong­ly with the full force of the US gov­ern­ment,’ Chapela says, who for­mer­ly worked for Swiss firm San­doz, Sygen­ta’s pre­de­ces­sor, devel­op­ing new agri­chem­i­cals. He says much pub­li­cised claims that GM crops would cut lev­els of her­bi­cides and insec­ti­cides in the food chain have failed to mate­ri­alise and, in fact, many of these prod­ucts have led to more of both. 

The envi­ron­men­tal group Friends of the Earth (FoE) Europe also cel­e­brat­ed BAS­F’s announce­ment. ‘This is anoth­er nail in the cof­fin for genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied foods in Europe,’ said Adri­an Bebb, agro­fu­els cam­paign coor­di­na­tor for FoE Europe. ‘This is a good day for con­sumers and farm­ers and opens the door for the Euro­pean Union to shift Europe to green­er and more pub­licly accept­able farm­ing.’

How­ev­er, is this a real vic­to­ry or a sleight of hand?  Read more

——

Ama­ranth, the Inca sacred plant, attacks GM soya crop

5,000 hectares trashed, 50,000 threat­ened! 

It first hap­pened in 2004, when a farmer in Atlanta in the US found ama­ranth that had spread to his fields was resis­tant to Roundup — the her­bi­cide much GM was bred to resist.  But since then, the ‘weed’ has spread wide­ly, and accord­ing to the UK’s Cen­tre for Ecol­o­gy and Hydrol­o­gy there has been gene trans­fer. 

[note: this is an old arti­cle, excerpt tak­en from here.  There have been a rash recent­ly of arti­cles about GM repost­ed from the last years, that pur­port to be from 2012; this arti­cle about ama­ranth was not pre­vi­ous­ly cov­ered on this site, hence it’s brief repost­ing]

——

Past action against BAS­F’s UK HQ

Future action this May against GM wheat tri­al

Regional Strike Paralyzes Hydroelectric Project in Colombia

19 Jan­u­ary 2012

19 Jan­u­ary 2012

The Region­al Move­ment for the Defense of the Ter­ri­to­ry launched a region­al strike in Huila, Colom­bia on Jan. 3 to protest the destruc­tive impacts of the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project and the enter­ing of UK-based petro­le­um com­pa­ny Emer­ald Ener­gy into the bio­di­verse moun­tain­top moor ecosys­tem of the Páramo of Miraflo­res. The move­ment, com­pro­mised of the Asso­ci­a­tion of Affect­ed by the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project (ASOQUIMBO), the Civic Com­mit­tee of West­ern Huila, com­mu­ni­ties from the Páramo of Miraflo­res and the Region­al Indige­nous Coun­cil of Huila (CRIHU), has blocked the high­way and bridge known as Paso del Cole­gio and has par­a­lyzed the con­struc­tion of the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project, coura­geous­ly push­ing the divert­ing of the Mag­dale­na Riv­er behind sched­ule while fac­ing vio­lent evci­tions by riot police and the mil­i­tary and a media black­out.

The three main demands of the strike are that the envi­ron­men­tal licens­es for the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project and Emer­ald Ener­gy be imme­di­ate­ly sus­pend­ed, pub­lic envi­ron­men­tal hear­ings be held for the project in affect­ed com­mu­ni­ties and for multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tion Emge­sa to imme­di­ate­ly repair the Paso del Cole­gio Bridge and oth­er high­ways that have been dam­aged while work­ing on the Quim­bo project. Last week Colom­bi­a’s Comptroller´s Office respond­ed by open­ing a “pre­lim­i­nary inves­ti­ga­tions” against the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment, the Region­al Envi­ron­men­tal Autonomous Cor­po­ra­tion (CAM) and INVIAS- High­way Trans­porta­tion Author­i­ty for vio­la­tions of the envi­ron­men­tal license of the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project. In addi­tion, Govenor Cielo Gonalez of Huila, House Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Con­sue­lo Gon­za­lez de Per­do­mo and Sen­ate Vice Pres­i­dent Alexan­der Lopez have all come out in sup­port of the region­al strike and the demands of the move­ment.

After two weeks of par­a­lyz­ing con­struc­tion of the dam, con­stant con­fronta­tions with secu­ri­ty from the con­struc­tion site in block­ing the entry of work­ers from both land and the riv­er, the Min­is­ter of Envi­ron­ment final­ly agreed to meet for an hour and a half with the com­mu­ni­ties in a meet­ing medi­at­ed by the gov­er­nor. Jan­u­ary 25 through the 31 there will be pub­lic assem­blies through­out the region where fish­er­peo­ple, agri­cul­tur­al work­ers, cat­tle ranch­ers, log­gers, pick-up truck dri­vers, sand dig­gers and con­struc­tion work­ers affect­ed by the Quim­bo will be able to present their griev­ances to rep­re­sen­ta­tives from the Comptroller’s Office and the Ombuds­men Offices fol­lowed by a day of pre­sent­ing the envi­ron­men­tal and archae­o­log­i­cal impacts and the very seri­ous tec­ton­ic risk in the area of the dam. Oth­er pre­sen­ta­tions for the Paso de Cole­gio Bridge, the Paramo of Miraflo­res and oth­er regions affect­ed the bridge dam­age will be held. Fur­ther­more, on Jan. 18 there was a Judi­cial Review of the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project as a result of Vice Pres­i­dent of the Sen­ate Alexan­der Lopez’s motion to the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment to sus­pend the divert­ing of the Mag­dale­na Riv­er to pre­vent an “irre­versible cat­a­stro­phy” until the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment present its review and response to all the cas­es pre­sent­ed on Feb­ru­ary 3. If the Quim­bo Dam is not sus­pend­ed, ASOQUIMBO is pre­pared to risk lives to occu­py the Dam Con­struc­tion site and stop it indef­i­nite­ly.

The region of the Quim­bo is rich in bio­di­ver­si­ty, includ­ing over 900 ha of Ripar­i­an for­est ecosys­tem along the river´s edge, as well as exten­sive fer­tile agri­cul­tur­al lands. Dur­ing the last four years the project has caused eco­log­i­cal destruc­tion, increased cost of liv­ing, psy­cho­log­i­cal trau­mas, and abus­es against local com­mu­ni­ties. Over 2,000 peo­ple live in the region that would be cov­ered by the 9,500 ha reser­voir, though more than 15,000 peo­ple in cen­tral Huila depend on this region for employ­ment and food pro­duc­tion.

One of the sec­tors most affect­ed by the Dam is the fish­ing indus­try. “The Quim­bo con­struc­tion site dumps a vari­ety of liq­uid and oth­er pol­lu­tion into the riv­er, before the Quim­bo a fam­i­ly could catch up to 40lb. of fish a day now a fam­i­ly is lucky if they can catch 8 lb. ad there is no way to live with that” described Miri­am Restre­po, a local fish­er­woman from Hobo at the strike. “The fish we catch can only live and feed in run­ning water and we fish­er­man do not own land, we live along the sand banks where we fish. Emge­sa does not want to com­pen­sate us because they say we won´t be affect­ed by the Quim­bo.”

The move­ment against the Quim­bo dates back to 2007 when the first envi­ron­men­tal license for the project was giv­en to the Span­ish multi­na­tion­al ener­gy com­pa­ny Emge­sa (now a sub­sidiary of Ital­ian Ener­gy giant Enel) under ques­tion­able cir­cum­stances. At th time, then-Pres­i­dent Alvaro Uribe made busi­ness deals with Emge­sa and did not include any local gov­ern­ment or the leg­is­la­ture from any say in the deci­sion mak­ing process. It was then that the Mag­dale­na Riv­er was hand­ed over to com­pa­ny as a Pub­lic Util­i­ty indef­i­nite­ly by the for­mer pres­i­dent Uribe. Since then, the envi­ron­men­tal license for the project has been changed mul­ti­ple times in nego­ti­a­tions between Emge­sa and the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment, always to cater to the demands of the com­pa­ny. When issues such as the numer­ous sen­si­tive tec­ton­ic faults with­in the region not­ed by INGEOMINAS (the State Geo­log­i­cal Insti­tute) or the unique arche­o­log­i­cal findsthat were dis­cov­ered by the Colom­bian Insti­tute of Anthro­pol­o­gy and His­to­ry (ICANH), this caused the envi­ron­men­tal license to be sus­pend­ed until an accu­rate arche­o­log­i­cal sur­vey of the area was com­plet­ed. Those deci­sions were sub­se­quent­ly revoked by the Pres­i­dent or the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment. In addi­tion,Envi­ron­men­tal Laws were changed by for­mer Pres­i­dent Uribe with less than 72 hours before his term end­ed to favor the com­pa­ny over the impact­ed com­mu­ni­ties in August 2010.

On Novem­ber 29, 2011 the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment and Ter­ri­to­r­i­al Devel­op­ment through Res­o­lu­tion 123 revoked its pri­or sus­pend­ing of the license through Res­o­lu­tion 1096 of June 14 which had been sus­pend­ed for not appro­pri­ate­ly com­pen­sat­ing landown­ers and for dis­plac­ing work­ers from pro­duc­tive farms. The new license was grant­ed stat­ing that pri­or vio­la­tions had been rec­ti­fied with­out the Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment vis­it­ing the region to ver­i­fy what actions Emge­sa report­ed to the Min­istry. The License states that Emge­sa can­not buy out farms that are cur­rent­ly in pro­duc­tion, though “numer­ous farms that we worked on such as La Vir­gina, La Güi­pa and oth­ers are aban­doned in dis­ar­ray when they pre­vi­ous­ly employed up to 30 work­ers each,” explained farm­work­er Harold Segu­ra, a res­i­dent from La Jagua.

Dur­ing the last four years the farm­ers who grow tobac­co, cof­fee, cacao, day labor­ers, fish­er­men, arti­sans, log­gers, and oth­er inhab­i­tants of the region have grown and uni­fied into ASOQUIMBO, rec­og­nized both region­al­ly and nation­al­ly as a deter­mined, effec­tive and coher­ent social move­ment and as an exam­ple of com­mu­ni­ty resis­tance against a hydro­elec­tric dam project whom many believe will set prece­dents for oth­er anti-dam strug­gles in Colom­bia and else­where. As part of Nation­al Move­ment for the Defense of Ter­ri­to­ries of theMove­ment Rios Vivos, ASOQUIMBO has grown to build ties with oth­er com­mu­ni­ties affect­ed by dams, such as Urra I & II en Cor­do­ba, Hidrosog­amoso in San­tander and Hidroituan­go in Antio­quia.

Colom­bian Pres­i­dent Juan Manuel San­tos has placed min­ing and ener­gy pro­duc­tion as a vital “loco­mo­tive” of devel­op­ment for the coun­try that seeks to be piv­otal in the region´s infra­struc­ture cre­ation and resource extrac­tion. Caught in the path of this loco­mo­tive are hun­dreds of indige­nous, Afro-descen­dent and peas­ant com­mu­ni­ties whose ter­ri­to­ries rich in gold and oth­er met­als, coal, oil, hydro­log­i­cal resources and rich soils for agro-fuel pro­duc­tion are caught in the mid­dle of a bat­tle between the State resource extrac­tion poli­cies and their human right to self-deter­mi­na­tion. In Colom­bia, the strug­gle against the Quim­bo is the strug­gle against gold in Suarez, Cau­ca, which is also the strug­gle against oil Palm in the Montes de Maria, as it is the strug­gle against the Cer­re­jon Coal Mine in la Gua­ji­ra.

Please Sup­port the Region­al Move­ment for the Defense of the Ter­ri­to­ry by con­tact­ing Colom­bian Min­is­ter of the Envi­ron­ment Dr. Frank Pearl of the Repub­lic of Colom­bia and inform him that you sup­port the Region­al Strike and call for:

Min­is­ter Frank Pearl
fpearl@minambiente.gov.co
011 57 332 3400

-Imme­di­ate sus­pen­sion of the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project´s Envi­ron­men­tal License. Yes to Agro Eco­log­i­cal Food Secu­ri­ty Campesino Reserve!
- Imme­di­ate sus­pen­sion of the Emer­ald Energy´s Envi­ron­men­tal License in the Cer­ro Paramo de Miraflo­res.
- Emge­sa imme­di­ate­ly repair of the Paso del Cole­gio Bridge and the high­ways con­nect­ing La Pla­ta-Garzón, La Pla­ta-Tesalia-Íquira and La Pla­ta-Leti­cia.

For more infor­ma­tion about the Quim­bo Hydro­elec­tric Project:
Damming Mag­dale­na: Emge­sa Threat­ens Colom­bian Com­mu­ni­ties
The His­to­ry of the Quim­bo in Colom­bia: Dammed or Damned?
Protests against the Quim­bo Dam
Polin­iza­ciones Blog

Three Sea Shepherd Crew Injured in Skirmish with Japanese Harpoon Vessel

January 18th, 2012

The Japanese whalers have escalated their aggression by throwing iron grappling hooks at Sea Shepherd boats.

Two Steve Irwin crew were struck in the shoul­der with iron grap­pling hooks and one crewmem­ber was struck twice in the face with a long bam­boo pole.

January 18th, 2012

The Japanese whalers have escalated their aggression by throwing iron grappling hooks at Sea Shepherd boats.

Two Steve Irwin crew were struck in the shoul­der with iron grap­pling hooks and one crewmem­ber was struck twice in the face with a long bam­boo pole.

The Yushin Maru No. 2 con­tin­ues to tail the Steve Irwin. The inci­dent occurred at 0400 Hours AEST at 64 degrees 17 min­utes South and 155 degrees 41 min­utes East. This is about 300 miles north of Maw­son Penin­su­la off the George V Land coast of Antarc­ti­ca.

“Our small boats were attempt­ing to slow down the Japan­ese har­poon ves­sel Yushin Maru No. 2, which is aggres­sive­ly tail­ing the Steve Irwin,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son.

Yushin Maru sprays Delta boat with water cannonYushin Maru sprays Delta boat with water can­nonAmer­i­can crewmem­ber Bri­an Race, (25) from New York, was jabbed twice in the face with a bam­boo pole receiv­ing lac­er­a­tions above his right eye and on his nose.

Rus­sell Bergh of South Africa, (35) a cam­era­man for Ani­mal Plan­et, was struck in the right arm and shoul­der with an iron grap­pling hook thrown from the har­poon ves­sel result­ing in deep bruis­ing.

Pho­tog­ra­ph­er Guil­laume Col­let of France, (27) was also struck in the right arm and shoul­der by an iron grap­pling hook result­ing in deep bruis­ing.

There were no injuries incurred by any of the crew on the Japan­ese ves­sel.

Two of the three har­poon ves­sels have been assigned to tail Sea Shep­herd ships, effec­tive­ly knock­ing out two of the three killing boats.

“We are almost at the lim­it of the east­ern bound­ary of their self assigned hunt­ing area,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “We should be get­ting close.”

Whale Wars Victory – Activists to be Released

10.1.12

An unsched­uled meet­ing between Japan’s whalers and envi­ron­men­tal activists on the high seas seems an unlike­ly back­drop to an out­break of détente.

10.1.12

An unsched­uled meet­ing between Japan’s whalers and envi­ron­men­tal activists on the high seas seems an unlike­ly back­drop to an out­break of détente.

But Aus­tralia was qui­et­ly cel­e­brat­ing a minor vic­to­ry for diplo­ma­cy on Tues­day after Japan agreed to release three anti-whal­ing activists who ille­gal­ly board­ed one of its whal­ing ships over the week­end. 

The trio, all Aus­tralian cit­i­zens, have been detained on the Shonan Maru 2, which is pro­vid­ing secu­ri­ty to the fleet, after clam­ber­ing aboard ear­ly Sun­day morn­ing to protest Japan’s annu­al hunts in the Antarc­tic. The Inter­na­tion­al Whal­ing Com­mis­sion banned com­mer­cial whal­ing in 1986 but allows Japan to hunt a lim­it­ed num­ber of whales for “sci­en­tif­ic research.” The fleet left port last month with plans to kill some 900 whales this sea­son.

The inci­dent threat­ened to cause ten­sion between Aus­tralia and Japan, close trade and secu­ri­ty part­ners. Soon after the men were detained it seemed like­ly that they would be kept aboard the Shonan Maru 2 and tak­en to Japan, where they faced a tri­al and pos­si­ble impris­on­ment for tres­pass­ing.

By late Mon­day evening, how­ev­er, Japan had agreed to release the trio, a move wel­comed by Australia’s prime min­is­ter, Julia Gillard.

Prime Min­is­ter Gillard, who came under imme­di­ate pres­sure at home to secure the activists’ release, thanked Japan for its coop­er­a­tion, but sound­ed a warn­ing to cam­paign­ers think­ing of employ­ing sim­i­lar forms of direct action.

“No one should assume that because an agree­ment has been reached with the Japan­ese gov­ern­ment in this instance that indi­vid­u­als will not be charged and con­vict­ed in the future,” she said in a state­ment. “The best way to stop whal­ing once and for all is through our court action.

Aus­tralia has lodged a legal chal­lenge to the annu­al whale hunts with the inter­na­tion­al court of jus­tice in the Hague but a deci­sion is not expect­ed until 2013 at the ear­li­est.

Can­ber­ra’s del­i­cate task was to bal­ance an elec­tion pledge to end the whale hunts with a pub­lic show of respect for mar­itime law.

The release, which won’t hap­pen until an Aus­tralian coast­guard boat ren­dezvous­es with the Shona Maru 2 in sev­er­al days’ time, was wel­comed by Sea Shep­herd’s founder, Paul Wat­son.

But in an inter­view with Mac­quar­ie Radio, Mr. Wat­son said: “If the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment would do their job and ful­fill their elec­tion promis­es, these things wouldn’t be hap­pen­ing.”

Japan, mean­while, insist­ed the deci­sion to release the men did not mean it had gone soft on Sea Shep­herd.

The trio are not mem­bers of the group – they belong to anoth­er orga­ni­za­tion called For­est Res­cue – and had not injured any mem­bers of the Shonan Maru 2’s crew when they board­ed, Japan’s chief cab­i­net sec­re­tary, Osamu Fujimu­ra, told reporters.

“The three activists were not vio­lent dur­ing or after they board­ed the whal­ing ves­sel,” he said. “There was no evi­dence that they were part of Sea Shep­herd, which has been engaged in obstruct­ing the fleet.”

Japan may have also had in mind the neg­a­tive inter­na­tion­al pub­lic­i­ty it attract­ed in 2010, when it pros­e­cut­ed for­mer Sea Shep­herd mem­ber Pete Bethune, who had board­ed the Shonan Maru 2 to protest the sink­ing of the group’s high-tech speed­boat. Mr. Bethune, who had been car­ry­ing a knife, was giv­en a sus­pend­ed sen­tence and deport­ed.

Offi­cial sup­port for the whal­ing pro­gram was also put under the spot­light last month when it was revealed that the gov­ern­ment had used 2.28 bil­lion yen ($30 mil­lion) of tax­pay­er mon­ey intend­ed for the tsuna­mi recov­ery effort to fund this year’s hunt, on top an exist­ing $6 mil­lion annu­al sub­sidy. The fish­eries agency said the use of the fund was jus­ti­fied because one of the towns destroyed in the dis­as­ter was a whal­ing port.

Sea Shepherd Dancing Dangerously With the Outlaw Whaling Fleet in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary

11 Jan­u­ary 2012

The nau­ti­cal chess pieces con­tin­ue to move and the board keeps chang­ing in the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary.

11 Jan­u­ary 2012

The nau­ti­cal chess pieces con­tin­ue to move and the board keeps chang­ing in the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary.

The Shonan Maru #2 is no longer chas­ing the Steve Irwin. The secu­ri­ty ves­sel has been replaced by the har­poon ves­sel Yushin Maru #2. It is assumed that the Shonan Maru #2 will now head west towards the Aus­tralian cus­toms ves­sel Ocean Pro­tec­tor to turn over the three Aus­tralian pris­on­ers onboard. With the Yushin Maru #2 now fol­low­ing the Steve Irwin, and the Yushin Maru #3 still at Mac­quar­ie Island, the Nis­shin Maru now has only one har­poon ves­sel left — the Yushin Maru.

Sea Shep­herd has tem­porar­i­ly lost drone con­tact with the Nis­shin Maru and can­not guar­an­tee that whal­ing has not begun. If so, it will pro­ceed with two of the three har­poon ves­sels not involved in killing oper­a­tions. “If we had one more ship, there would be no pos­si­bil­i­ty of any whales dying,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “In July I met with Green­peace rep­re­sen­ta­tives at the IWC and request­ed of them that they send one ship to sup­port us. I told them that one more ship would shut down this entire fleet. They refused, and that is deeply dis­ap­point­ing, and as a result whales may die.”

Sea Shep­herd is work­ing to secure a third large, fast, ice-strength­ened ves­sel to return next sea­son. The Sea Shep­herd fast scout ves­sel Brigitte Bar­dot remains in Fre­man­tle under­go­ing repairs from dam­age caused by the extreme weath­er con­di­tions of the South­ern Ocean.

“We have demon­strat­ed that we can shut these poach­ers down and every year we become more effec­tive than the year before. One more ship will give us the abil­i­ty to throw a blan­ket of inter­ven­tion over them that will com­plete­ly extin­guish their ille­gal oper­a­tions,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son.

The drop­ping away of the Shonan Maru #2 removes the pos­si­bil­i­ty of the trans­fer of the three For­est Res­cue men to the Steve Irwin. The trans­fer of the men to the Steve Irwin would have saved the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment hun­dreds of thou­sands of dol­lars. Mean­while despite being ordered out of the ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters of Australia’s Mac­Quar­ie Island, the Yushin Maru #3 con­tin­ues to ille­gal­ly remain inside the twelve mile ter­ri­to­r­i­al lim­it.

“The Japan­ese whalers act like they own the entire South­ern Ocean,” said Bob Bark­er Cap­tain Alex Cor­nelis­sen of the Nether­lands. “They go where they want, when they want, and do what they want, with com­plete con­tempt for Aus­tralian sov­er­eign­ty.”

 

Sea Shepherd Intercepts the Japanese Whaling Fleet with Drones

24.12.11

Japanese Security Ships Move In On the Steve Irwin

The Sea Shep­herd crew has inter­cept­ed the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet on Christ­mas Day, a thou­sand miles north of the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary.

24.12.11

Japanese Security Ships Move In On the Steve Irwin

The Sea Shep­herd crew has inter­cept­ed the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet on Christ­mas Day, a thou­sand miles north of the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary.

The Sea Shep­herd ship, Steve Irwin, deployed a drone to suc­cess­ful­ly locate and pho­to­graph the Japan­ese fac­to­ry ship Nis­shin Maru on Decem­ber 24th. Once the pur­suit began, three Japan­ese harpoon/security ships moved in on the Steve Irwin to shield the Nis­shin Maru to allow it to escape.

This time how­ev­er the Japan­ese tac­tic of tail­ing the Steve Irwin and the Bob Bark­er will not work because the drones, one on the Steve Irwin and the oth­er on the Bob Bark­er, can track and fol­low the Nis­shin Maru and can relay the posi­tions back to the Sea Shep­herd ships.

“We can cov­er hun­dreds of miles with these drones and they have proven to be valu­able assets for this cam­paign,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son on board the Steve Irwin.

The drone named Nicole Mon­te­cal­vo was donat­ed to the Steve Irwin by Bayshore Recy­cling of New Jer­sey.

Cap­tain Wat­son hav­ing received reports from fish­er­men when the Japan­ese ship passed through the Lom­bok Strait wait­ed south of the strait at a dis­tance of 500 miles off the south­west coast of West­ern Aus­tralia. Sea Shep­herd caught the whalers at 37 degrees South, far above the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary

“The chase is on for the next 1000 miles,” said Deck­hand Eleanor Lis­ter of Jer­sey (U.K.).

With the Steve Irwin tak­ing up the resources of three of the Japan­ese ships the Bob Bark­er remains clear of a tail and the Brigitte Bar­dot is clear to scout out the fac­to­ry ship, hav­ing supe­ri­or speed to the har­poon ves­sels.

The Sea Shep­herd crew have found the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet before a sin­gle whale has been killed.

“This is going to be a long hard pur­suit from here to the coast of Antarc­ti­ca,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “But thanks to these drones, we now have an advan­tage we have nev­er had before – eyes in the sky.”

Back­ground on the Steve Irwin Drone:
Bayshore Recy­cling striv­ing to pro­tect and con­serve nature

Drone Nicole Mon­te­cal­vo aids Sea Shep­herd in pre­serv­ing ocean wildlife world­wide.

Wood­bridge NJ- Bayshore Recy­cling Corp (BRC) not only strives to pro­tect the planet’s nat­ur­al resources through recy­cling but also encour­ages every­one to help endan­gered wildlife. To pro­mote and encour­age this effort, BRC’s own­ers recent­ly donat­ed a long-range drone fit­ted with cam­eras and detec­tion equip­ment to the Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety (SSCS). The SSCS is an inter­na­tion­al non-profit, direct action marine wildlife con­ser­va­tion orga­ni­za­tion. SSCS neces­si­tat­ed an addi­tion­al aer­i­al vehi­cle that could add to their fleet and expand their capa­bil­i­ties in order to scan hun­dreds of miles more with each flight in order to assist in find­ing and doc­u­ment­ing whal­ing ships and oth­er ille­gal poach­ing oper­a­tions. The drone will also assist in help­ing pro­tect the fleet, her crew and alert them to poten­tial dan­gers, when their heli­copter may not be avail­able for use.

A long-range drone is defined as an unmanned aer­i­al vehi­cle that does not require human oper­a­tion and can fly inde­pen­dent­ly or be oper­at­ed remote­ly. The drone named Nicole Mon­te­cal­vo has assist­ed in locat­ing Japan­ese whal­ing fleet in the South­ern Ocean pre­vi­ous­ly has assist­ed in oper­a­tions against blue fin tuna poach­ing oper­a­tions off the coast of Libya. The drone Nicole Mon­te­cal­vo was deliv­ered on board the ves­sel Steve Irwin by the Ves­sel Secu­ri­ty Offi­cer dur­ing tran­sit to Antarc­ti­ca while in search of the Japan­ese flag­ship, Nis­shin Maru. BRC stress­es the impor­tance of con­serv­ing our planet’s nat­ur­al habi­tats. Whether it is sav­ing nat­ur­al resources, con­serv­ing ener­gy, pre­serv­ing endan­gered wildlife or recy­cling house­hold debris—Bayshore ris­es to the chal­lenge. Togeth­er, BRC and the SSCS will fight to save the ocean and its vul­ner­a­ble inhab­i­tants.

Indian Maoists set fire to a tipper and earthdigger

BHADRACHALAM: Maoists have alleged­ly set ablaze a tip­per and a pro­clain­er (earth­mover) near Aluba­ka in the Bhadracha­lam Agency area of Kam­mam dis­trict on Fri­day night.

BHADRACHALAM: Maoists have alleged­ly set ablaze a tip­per and a pro­clain­er (earth­mover) near Aluba­ka in the Bhadracha­lam Agency area of Kam­mam dis­trict on Fri­day night.

It is said that the Maoists torched the vehi­cles to obstruct the road works tak­en up under the Left Wing Extrem­ism Affect­ed Dis­tricts Devel­op­ment Scheme. The Maoist had warned the con­trac­tor ear­li­er not to take up work on the road that con­nects Bhadracha­lam with Venkat­a­pur and Bhoopala­p­at­nam in Chhat­tis­garh. Accord­ing to sources, around 60 Maoists, 20 of them armed, from the neigh­bour­ing state entered the dis­trict, poured kerosene over the vehi­cles, and set them ablaze. The con­trac­tor suf­fered a loss of Rs 50 lakh.

A case has been reg­is­tered at Venkat­a­pur police sta­tion against those involved in the offence and inves­ti­ga­tion is in progress, Venkat­a­pur cir­cle inspec­tor of police KRK Prasa­da Rao has said.

 

from .… http://signalfire.org/?p=16492

orig­i­nal arti­cle …

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/maoists-set-afire-tipper-earthdigger/212951–60-114.html

 

Anti-Coal Plant Protesters Storm Buildings, Evict Officials, Block Roads in South China

21.12.11

21.12.11

CHINESE pro­test­ers against a coal-pow­ered pow­er sta­tion have blocked a main road and defied riot police.

Reuters reports that the sit­u­a­tion seems to have esca­lat­ed, with res­i­dents smash­ing cars and hurl­ing bricks even though offi­cials sought to calm tem­pers by sus­pend­ing the unpop­u­lar plan.

Angry crowds smashed and over­turned police cars and riot police fired tear­gas in Haimen town in Shan­tou city on Wednes­day, the sec­ond day of the unrest, Hong Kong news­pa­pers report­ed.

Res­i­dents of Haimen, furi­ous with plans to build a coal-fired pow­er plant, took to the streets , sur­round­ing a gov­ern­ment build­ing and block­ing an express­way.

Offi­cials agreed to sus­pend the project this week, but res­i­dents refused to back down, demand­ing the plan be scrapped.

Out­side a large and closed petrol sta­tion near a high­way into Haimen, about 100 men on motor­bikes watched a wall of riot police armed with batons and shields, block­ing the high­way.

“What place in the world builds two pow­er plants with­in one kilo­me­tre?” said one of the Haimen res­i­dents, who was sur­named Cai, as he watched the riot police.

“The fac­to­ries are haz­ardous to our health. Our fish are dying and there are so many peo­ple who’ve got can­cer , ” he added.

“We thought of protest­ing out­side the gov­ern­ment office but we know none of them has lis­tened to us. So we had no choice but to block the high­way. The police beat up so many of the pro­test­ers in the past two days.”

At one point, Haimen res­i­dents screamed and surged for­ward when a riot police­man, wav­ing his baton in the air, charged towards a man on a motor­cy­cle who had been rid­ing towards the police block­ade on the high­way.

State news agency Xin­hua said sev­er­al hun­dred peo­ple had protest­ed on a high­way on Wednes­day. Accord­ing to Hong Kong’s Ming Pao news­pa­per, more than 1,000 res­i­dents gath­ered at a toll gate to con­front hun­dreds of riot police.

Wit­ness­es said police fired four rounds of tear­gas and beat up pro­test­ers, who do not want anoth­er pow­er plant when exist­ing pow­er facil­i­ties there were already pol­lut­ing air and sea­wa­ter and had great­ly reduced their catch at sea, the report added.

At least three pro­test­ers were hit and arrest­ed.

Adds Reuters: “Peo­ple in Chi­na are increas­ing­ly unwill­ing to accept the relent­less speed of urban­i­sa­tion and indus­tri­al­i­sa­tion and the impact on the envi­ron­ment and health.

“Protests are also often held over cor­rup­tion, wages and land seizures, that offi­cials jus­ti­fy in the name of devel­op­ment.

“Res­i­dents of Wukan vil­lage, also in Guang­dong, agreed to end a 10-day stand­off with author­i­ties over a land dis­pute on Wednes­day.”

Video

Sec­ond report here