(Peru) Despite Promised Reforms, Another Mine Resister Killed in Peru

Peru­vian pol

Peru­vian police are becom­ing noto­ri­ous for using lethal force against pro­test­ers. In this pic­ture, police respond with force to protests which rocked the Ama­zon region in 2009.

Despite gov­ern­ment promis­es of reforms in the way nat­ur­al resource con­ces­sions are han­dled, anoth­er anti-mines pro­test­er has been killed in Peru. This marks the 19th per­son killed in a nat­ur­al resource-relat­ed con­flict since Pres­i­dent Ollan­ta Humala took office in July 2011.

Clash­es between police and pro­test­ers broke out in the Ancash region on Wednes­day Sep. 19, when police tried to break up a block­ade of a road lead­ing to Bar­rick Gold’s Pier­na mine.  Locals blame the mine for con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing their drink­ing water and using up their water sup­ply.

The com­pa­ny tem­porar­i­ly shut down the mine fol­low­ing the killing.

The vio­lence came even as Peru’s Con­gress debates reforms to the way min­ing con­ces­sions are han­dled, includ­ing the cre­ation of a new over­sight body to eval­u­ate min­ing con­ces­sions, sep­a­rate from the agency respon­si­ble for pro­mot­ing them.

The gov­ern­ment has also been tout­ing its new pol­i­cy of con­sult­ing with affect­ed com­mu­ni­ties regard­ing oil and gas con­ces­sions in the Ama­zon, but com­mu­ni­ties in resis­tance to such projects have expressed skep­ti­cism about what such con­sul­ta­tion will actu­al­ly mean.

“Which com­mu­ni­ties will be con­sult­ed? What are the terms and con­di­tions? Indige­nous peo­ples need answers to these ques­tions, because there is a great deal of mis­trust,” said con­gress­mem­ber Veróni­ka Men­doz.

“We think it is good that they will hold a con­sul­ta­tion. But how can they rem­e­dy all of the dam­age they have done to us in the last 40 years in just a short time? They need to explain that to us first,” said Achuar indige­nous leader Andrés San­ti, pres­i­dent of the Fed­er­a­tion of Native Com­mu­ni­ties of Cor­ri­entes.

Mining Company and Government Thugs Attack Guatemalan Mine Resisters

On Sep­tem­ber 17 and 18, com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers from Mataque­s­cuint­la, Jala­pa and San Rafael Las Flo­res, San­ta Rosa, Guatemala protest­ed against the ongo­ing devel­op­ment of a min­ing project in their com­mu­ni­ties. In response to the first of these protests, provo­ca­teurs attacked both police and com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers with stones. In response to a peace­ful block­ade out­side the min­ing site, pro­test­ers were “attacked with­out warn­ing by mem­bers of the mine’s pri­vate secu­ri­ty agency, the Nation­al Civ­il Police and the army, using tear gas can­nons, firearms and rub­ber bul­let guns. Secu­ri­ty agents attacked from inside the mine, with trained attack dogs. The Police cor­nered the unarmed pro­tes­tors, and the army sur­round­ed them, crouched and at the ready. The dis­play of repres­sive force had all the char­ac­ter­is­tics of mil­i­tary counter-insur­gency tac­tics that we had thought belonged to the past, includ­ing the bad inten­tions, bru­tal­i­ty and cow­ardice that so char­ac­ter­ize the tac­tics of the Nation­al Army.”

Fol­low­ing the attack, mil­i­tary heli­copters began fly­ing over the resist­ing com­mu­ni­ties, “like in the old days of the armed con­flict.”

 

BBC Investigates Opencast Mining

THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

BBC’s COUNRTYFILE PROGRAMME INVESTIGATES WHY A REMOTE HAMLET IS ON THE FRONT LINE OF A PLANNING BATTLE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.

THE  LOOSE ANTI OPEN-CAST NETWORK

BBC’s COUNRTYFILE PROGRAMME INVESTIGATES WHY A REMOTE HAMLET IS ON THE FRONT LINE OF A PLANNING BATTLE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE.

A small vil­lage, of just 75 house­holds, is all that may stand between pre­serv­ing large sec­tions of the Eng­lish coun­try­side and the expressed desire of the UK Min­er­al Extrac­tion Indus­try to see more per­mis­sions giv­en to exploit­ing England’s min­er­al resources in areas that are more envi­ron­men­tal­ly sen­si­tive and / or are clos­er to where peo­ple live.

The unfor­tu­nate vil­lage is Hal­ton Lea Gate, locat­ed on the Cum­bria / Northum­ber­land bor­der and near an Area of Out­stand­ing Nat­ur­al Beau­ty. A team from the BBC’s Coun­r­ty­file pro­gramme was film­ing there recent­ly to inves­ti­gate why this spot now finds itself on the front line of a nation­al plan­ning con­tro­ver­sy.

 In ear­ly August, after a Pub­lic Inquiry into an Appeal to grant per­mis­sion for an Open­cast Mine, the Inspec­tor found in favour of the Appli­cant. The sting in the tale, for all oth­er com­mu­ni­ties in Eng­land, is the rea­son­ing giv­en by the Inspec­tor to allow the Appeal. His rea­son­ing set a new case law prece­dent, it is argued, which affects all future min­er­al plan­ning appli­ca­tions in Eng­land.

 What the Appli­cant has to repli­cate in the future, is the argu­ment used here: that there is a nation­al need for the min­er­al in ques­tion, in this case coal. If they can per­suade the Plan­ning Author­i­ty (or the Inspec­tor, if the Appli­ca­tion has gone to an Appeal) that this is the case, then ‘great weight’ has to be attached to this claim. So much weight it seems, that this fac­tor alone may over­ride all oth­er con­sid­er­a­tions.  (1)

This sit­u­a­tion has arisen as a con­se­quence of the Gov­ern­ment imple­ment­ing the new Nation­al Plan­ning Pol­i­cy Frame­work. In the time lead­ing up to the 2010 elec­tion, lob­by­ing organ­i­sa­tions such as Coal­pro and the CBI lob­bied long and hard for a relax­ation of the plan­ning rules for min­er­al extrac­tion. (2) It seems, from this exam­ple, the first Pub­lic Inquiry for min­er­al extrac­tion to be held under the new rules, that their efforts have been reward­ed. The advice of the Inspec­tor has now gone to the Depart­ment of Com­mu­ni­ties and Local Gov­ern­ment to be con­firmed or reject­ed by a Min­is­ter.

The BBC came to inves­ti­gate the issue and explore why local peo­ple have tak­en on the task of rais­ing £40,000 so that they can mount a Judi­cial Review over the deci­sion. If local peo­ple are suc­cess­ful in rais­ing the mon­ey and mount­ing a suc­cess­ful action, they may have pre­vent­ed the flood­gates from open­ing and saved Eng­land from expe­ri­enc­ing a rash of min­er­al plan­ning appli­ca­tions for devel­op­ing swathes of the coun­try­side. This is now a Pub­lic Appeal, and dona­tions can be made payable to The North Pen­nines Pro­tec­tion Group, who have been one of the local groups who have opposed this Appli­ca­tion

An e peti­tion to the Gov­ern­ment has been start­ed about this plan­ning deci­sion and its impli­ca­tion for sim­i­lar plan­ning deci­sions else­where which can be signed by fol­low­ing this link:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/36985

Steve Leary for the Loose Anti Open­cast Net­work com­ment­ed

“ LAON was con­tact­ed by the BBC in the lead up to film­ing for the Coun­try­side pro­gramme. We are delight­ed to be able to coop­er­ate in the mak­ing of the pro­gramme and show why we argue that this is an issue of nation­al impor­tance which will affect oth­er com­mu­ni­ties up and down the Coun­try if the deci­sion is not changed.

We know of five oth­er open­cast mine appli­ca­tions, near Smal­ly in Der­byshire (George Farm) , Kirklees, Sth. York­shire (Dearne Lea), Trow­el in Not­ting­hamshire (Short­wood Farm) , Whit­ton­stall in Northum­ber­land ( Hood­sclose) and Gateshead  (Birk­lands) that will be affect­ed by this deci­sion if it stands.

In addi­tion, we are aware of three oth­er sites where a poten­tial appli­cant is mak­ing the final deci­sion to pro­ceed with a full appli­ca­tion in Gateshead,   Mar­ley Hill Recla­ma­tion) , Der­byshire ( Hill Top Project near Clay Cross) and Northum­ber­land  (Fer­neybeds near Wid­dring­ton Sta­tion, Northum­ber­land) which might also be affect­ed.

The issue here though, we believe, goes way beyond open­cast min­ing. It’s about relax­ing the rules around all forms of min­er­al extrac­tion from pits for sand, grav­el and clay to quar­ries for gran­ite and lime­stone to open­cast mines for coal. This is what the indus­try lob­bied for and now, it seems, the Gov­ern­ment has deliv­ered, if it upholds the Inspector’s rec­om­men­da­tion to approve the Appli­ca­tion and the Judi­cial Review fails. We there­fore urge peo­ple every­where, who cher­ish and love our coun­try­side, to sup­port both the peti­tion and the pub­lic appeal for mon­ey to take this case to a Judi­cial Review.”

The Coun­r­ty­file edi­tion of the pro­gramme is to be broad­cast on Sun­day 30th Sep­tem­ber 2012. It will include a 12 minute sec­tion on the Hal­ton Lea Gate issue.

———————————————————————————-

Ref­er­ences

1)   For more infor­ma­tion on the sig­nif­i­cance of this deci­sion as far as open­cast mine appli­ca­tions are con­cerned see  LAON PR7 here

http://nottingham.indymedia.org/articles/2754

2)   Evi­dence about the lob­by­ing to relax these plan­ning rules can be found here.

Brief­ing Note E2 “Ener­gy Pol­i­cy and the Pro­posed Nation­al Plan­ning Pol­i­cy Frame­work,” MOPG 2011  @

http://www.leicestershirevillages.com/measham/mopg-briefing-notes-series.html

——————————————————————-

ABOUT LAON

The Loose Anti-Open­cast Net­work (LAON) has been in exis­tence since 2009. It  func­tions as a medi­um through to oppose open cast mine appli­ca­tions through which any per­son / group can com­mu­ni­cate ideas, infor­ma­tion, requests for infor­ma­tion and pos­si­bly con­cert­ed actions if we find a tar­get. In addi­tion feel free to invite any oth­er per­son / group who oppose open­cast min­ing appli­ca­tions, to join the net­work so that it grows. At present LAON links indi­vid­u­als and groups in N Ire­land, Scot­land, Wales, Northum­ber­land, Co Durham, Leeds, Kirklees Not­ting­hamshire, Der­byshire, Leices­ter­shire and Wal­sall.

You can now fol­low LAON on Twit­ter @ https://twitter.com/Seftonchase

Anti Opencast Coal March in Clay Cross

A march is tak­ing place on Sat­ur­day 22nd Sep­tem­ber to show the strength of oppo­si­tion to any pro­pos­al to seek to open­cast mine on the Hill­top Project site. For more info see

http://nottingham.indymedia.org.uk/events/2774

A march is tak­ing place on Sat­ur­day 22nd Sep­tem­ber to show the strength of oppo­si­tion to any pro­pos­al to seek to open­cast mine on the Hill­top Project site. For more info see

http://nottingham.indymedia.org.uk/events/2774

Indigenous Peruvians Occupy 9 Oil Wells

Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers in Canaan de Cachi­a­co

Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers in Canaan de Cachi­a­co

By: Ronald Suarez, Pres­i­dent of the Net­work of Peru­vian Indige­nous Com­mu­ni­ca­tors, Ucay­ali  

*Cor­rec­tion: Maple Ener­gy is a com­pa­ny list­ed in Lon­don and Lima, Peru. It is not a Cana­di­an com­pa­ny.

Over 400 vil­lagers in the Native Com­mu­ni­ty of Canan de Cachi­a­co in the Ucay­ali region of the Peru­vian Ama­zon have tak­en con­trol of nine oil wells, belong­ing to oil com­pa­ny, Maple Gas, in oil lot 31B.

Com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers took over the oil wells on Sep­tem­ber 2nd, and con­tin­ue to hold them as a result of 37 years of oil con­t­a­m­i­na­tion in their ter­ri­to­ry by the com­pa­ny.

The com­mu­ni­ty leader, Basilio Rodriguez Venan­cio, said the action was made nec­es­sary because the com­pa­ny did not con­sid­er the envi­ron­men­tal impact assess­ment car­ried out by an inde­pen­dent con­sul­tant.

One of the oil wells occu­pied by mem­bers of the Canaan de Cachi­a­co com­mu­ni­ty in the Peru­vian Ama­zon, Sep­tem­ber 2012

The com­mu­ni­ty is demand­ing that the com­pa­ny pay them com­pen­sa­tion for the use of their lands and for the envi­ron­men­tal dam­age they have suf­fered for 37 years. Such dam­age includes the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of their rivers, their only source of drink­ing water, and the con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of their soils due to the company´s use of chem­i­cals and heavy min­er­als, which the pop­u­la­tion says has sig­nif­i­cant­ly affect­ed the pro­duc­tiv­i­ty of their land.

Sev­er­al com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers tes­ti­fied that they have become sick due to the company’s neg­li­gence and con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of their drink­ing water. There have been sev­er­al instances in the past years of can­cer and ¨unknown deaths¨ that the com­mu­ni­ty attrib­ut­es to com­pa­ny abus­es.

The com­mu­ni­ty awaits the arrival of state rep­re­sen­ta­tives from the Min­istry of Ener­gy and Mines and Min­istry of Envi­ron­ment, sched­uled for Thurs­day, Sep­tem­ber 13th, to resolve this con­flict.

Mean­while the vil­lagers are still sta­tioned in the camp until author­i­ties set­tle their claims.

For more infor­ma­tion on the case of Canaan de Cachi­a­co, and the neigh­bor­ing com­mu­ni­ty, Nue­vo Sucre, watch this video. 

 

Protesters in Greece Clash with Police Over Gold Mine, Again

Riot police show up to pro­tect min­ing inter­est

Hun­dreds of pro­test­ers have bat­tled riot police for hours over plans for a gold mine in north­ern Greece’s Halkidi­ki penin­su­la.

Police fired tear gas to fend off pro­test­ers who had gath­ered in the Skouries area of Halkidi­ki, north­ern Greece, on Sun­day to protest gold min­ing activ­i­ty.

Dozens of res­i­dents of the near­by vil­lage of Ieris­sos, as well as pro­test­ers who arrived by coach­es and cars from Thes­sa­loni­ki, approached the for­est in Skouries, where Hel­lenic Gold, a sub­sidiary of Cana­di­an firm Eldo­ra­do Gold, has begun min­ing activ­i­ty that locals are appeal­ing against.

Pro­test­ers accused the police of mak­ing heavy use of tear gas, caus­ing a fire in the woods, and of chop­ping down trees to pre­vent demon­stra­tors from approach­ing the mine. Police say pro­test­ers threw fire­bombs at them, set­ting ablaze a forest­ed area on the site. Either way, the fire has been put out.

There were reports of sev­er­al peo­ple being arrest­ed and detained at Ieris­sos police sta­tion. Sev­er­al peo­ple were also injured, includ­ing SYRIZA MP Van­ge­lis Dia­man­topou­los.

Hel­lenic Gold has been award­ed an area of 26,400 hectares, of which 410 is for­est land. Almost all the trees in the for­est will be cut down as part of the min­ing firm’s plan to extract gold. The com­pa­ny says it will replant trees when it fin­ish­es its work.

Envi­ron­men­tal oppo­nents of the mine argue it would lead to the destruc­tion of the local for­est and irre­versible dam­age to the ecosys­tem. Own­ers of local tourist lodg­ing are also fierce­ly opposed due to envi­ron­men­tal rea­sons.

This is not the first clash over the gold mine. Oppo­nents suc­ceed­ed a decade ago in can­cel­ing a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar gold min­ing project in a near­by area.      Source

The film below, Trea­sure Hunt, doc­u­ments that strug­gle. This is the first 10 min­utes of the film:

 

The entire doc­u­men­tary with sub­ti­tles can be found online by click­ing this link.

 

Fracking on trial — again!

The safe­ty of frack­ing will be chal­lenged at Pre­ston Mag­is­trates Court today, as 3 peo­ple go on tri­al fol­low­ing a protest at Cuadrilla’s Hes­keth Bank site, Lan­cashire, in Decem­ber last year. (1) The tri­al is expect­ed to last until Thurs­day.

 

The safe­ty of frack­ing will be chal­lenged at Pre­ston Mag­is­trates Court today, as 3 peo­ple go on tri­al fol­low­ing a protest at Cuadrilla’s Hes­keth Bank site, Lan­cashire, in Decem­ber last year. (1) The tri­al is expect­ed to last until Thurs­day.

 

On 1 Decem­ber 2011, pro­tes­tors from Bris­tol Ris­ing Tide occu­pied the test drilling rig, shut­ting it down for 13 hours. (2) (3)

Hydraulic frac­tur­ing is a method of extract­ing gas in shale rock. Huge amounts of water mixed with tox­ic chem­i­cals are forced into the ground at high pres­sure, a large pro­por­tion of which are nev­er recov­ered. This flu­id also leach­es arsenic out of rocks, cre­at­ing a dan­ger­ous cock­tail that’s dif­fi­cult to dis­pose of. In the Unit­ed States numer­ous spills of these flu­ids have con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed irri­ga­tion water, affect­ing food sup­plies, and the health of sur­round­ing com­mu­ni­ties. (4) (5) (6)

Rachel Green­wood from Bris­tol Ris­ing Tide said: “Once frack­ing takes place con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of land and water, and the dev­as­ta­tion of local ecosys­tems, is inevitable. You can­not do it safe­ly, and reg­u­la­tion of frack­ing is total­ly inef­fec­tive. Cuadrilla were able to con­tin­ue drilling after their plan­ning per­mis­sion had expired. If frack­ing is allowed to go ahead in Lan­cashire it could hap­pen through­out the UK.”

There are twelve licens­es to frack for shale gas in the UK, five of which are held by Cuadrilla resources in Lan­cashire. (7)

Cuadrilla’s activ­i­ties are opposed both by local groups (8) (9) and cli­mate cam­paign­ers. On 10th July 2012, three peo­ple were found guilty of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass fol­low­ing an occu­pa­tion of the Cuadrilla Resources test drilling site at Banks. (10) On 18 June, 20 peo­ple block­ad­ed Cuadrilla Resource’s drilling rig at PR Marriot’s com­pound in Chester­field, lock­ing them­selves to the gates to pre­vent the rig from being moved to Cuadrilla’s site in Lan­cashire. (11)

UK Methane recent­ly announced their inten­tion to apply for plan­ning per­mis­sion to drill a Coal Bed Methane bore­hole in Keyn­sham, Bris­tol. (12)

Coal Bed Methane involves drilling into coal seams to extract gas in a sim­i­lar man­ner to frack­ing. A wide vari­ety of tech­niques are used depend­ing on the nature of the coal seam. If the seam is per­me­able enough, pump­ing water out of the seam will be enough to start gas flow­ing from the well, but if not, some sort of stim­u­la­tion will be need­ed. Often this is hydraulic frac­tur­ing.

Because the coal seams tend to be rel­a­tive­ly close to the sur­face, and because such large quan­ti­ties of water are pumped out of the coal seam (water that has been mari­nad­ing in coal for thou­sands of years), prob­lems with water con­t­a­m­i­na­tion and leak­ing methane tend to occur regard­less of whether frack­ing is per­formed. (13)

There is cur­rent­ly plan­ning per­mis­sion for around 60 Coal Bed Methane wells in Britain. (14)

Notes for edi­tors

1. Two of the defen­dants are charged with aggra­vat­ed tres­pass (sec­tion 68 Crim­i­nal Jus­tice and Pub­lic Order Act 1994). The oth­er is charged with an offence under sec­tion 69 Crim­i­nal Jus­tice and Pub­lic Order Act 1994, which is fail­ing to leave land as soon as prac­ti­ca­ble when direct­ed to do so by the senior offi­cer at the scene.

2. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/the-northerner/2011/dec/01/fracking-lancashire-hesketh-bank-cuadrilla

3. Pho­tos of the action are avail­able at: https://secure.flickr.com/photos/71113300@N08/

4. ‘Cracks in the Façade: EPA Traced Pol­lu­tion of Under­ground Water Sup­ply to Hydraulic Frac­tur­ing’ (Aug 2011 – EWG)
http://static.ewg.org/reports/2011/fracking/cracks_in_the_facade.pdf

5. ‘Methane con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of drink­ing water accom­pa­ny­ing gas-well drilling and hydraulic frac­tur­ing’ (May 2011 – Duke)
http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/cgc/pnas2011.pdf

6.‘Shale gas: a pro­vi­sion­al assess­ment of cli­mate change and envi­ron­men­tal impacts’ (Jan 2011 – Tyn­dall Cen­tre)
http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/coop_shale_gas_report_final_200111.pdf

7. http://frack-off.org.uk/new-homepage/bad-guys/locations/

8. Res­i­dents Action on Fylde Frack­ing: http://stopfyldefracking.org.uk/

9. Rib­ble Estu­ary Against Frack­ing: http://reafg.blogspot.co.uk/

10. The defence was sup­port­ed by a num­ber of wit­ness­es, includ­ing aca­d­e­mics from the UK and US and mem­bers of the local com­mu­ni­ty, who tes­ti­fied regard­ing the con­se­quences of shale gas extrac­tion, in terms of cli­mate change, water con­t­a­m­i­na­tion, earth­quakes and severe health effects. For more infor­ma­tion see: http://frackingontrial.org/

11. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/the-northerner/2012/jun/18/fracking-protest-chesterfield-cuadrilla-hesketh-bank

12. UK Methane have con­tact­ed Tran­si­tion Keyn­sham to announce that they will apply for plan­ning per­mis­sion to drill a Coal Bed Methane bore­hole in Keyn­sham: http://www.frackfreesomerset.org

13. http://frack-off.org.uk/coal-bed-methane-the-evil-twin-of-shale-gas/

14. http://frack-off.org.uk/bad-guys/locations/

For more infor­ma­tion see:
www.risingtide.org.uk
www.frackfreesomerset.org
www.frack-off.org.uk
www.frackingontrial.org

Dam construction site destroyed in the Kurdish East of Turkey!

On the 25th July, Wednes­day, more than 500 protest­ing peo­ple in the Kur­dish province Der­sim have destroyed the con­struc­tion site of the high­ly crit­i­cized Pem­be­lik Dam on the Peri Riv­er.

Since Sep­tem­ber 2012 local affect­ed peo­ple along the Peri Riv­er, a bor­der Riv­er of the two provinces Der­sim (Tunceli) and Elazig protest con­ti­nous­ly against the con­struc­tion of the 77 m high and 125 MW Pem­be­lik Dam on the Peri Riv­er. Since then they have pitched protest tents close to the con­struc­tion site of the dam which they refuse cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly. The affect­ed peo­ple crit­i­cize the state for destroy­ing the liveli­hoods of thou­sands of peo­ple through the con­struc­tion of the Pem­be­lik and oth­er dams on the Peri Riv­er and for exclud­ing them from any dam con­struc­tion activ­i­ties. Two oth­er dams have been built in the past and have result­ed in neg­a­tive impacts for peo­ple and nature in the whole val­ley. Although the protest con­tin­ues for so long and there is a big region­al and nation­al sol­i­dar­i­ty, no state offi­cial took into con­sid­er­a­tion the local peo­ple.

More than 500 peo­ple, affect­ed peo­ple and peo­ple in sol­i­dar­i­ty with them, gath­ered close to the dam in order to start a protest demon­stra­tion. It was one day before the start of the annu­al big Mun­zur Cul­ture and Nature Fes­ti­val which is the biggest cul­tur­al event in the province of Der­sim. After march­ing some kilo­me­ters they decid­ed to occu­py the dam con­struct­ing site although it is pro­tect­ed by many secu­ri­ty guards. These guards and dozens of sol­diers could not stopped the peo­ple although they fired in the air. The pro­test­ers over­came the gates and fences and then destroyed sev­er­al con­struc­tion machines and some build­ings by fire.

To date this protest is the most rad­i­cal one in the Kur­dish region of the Repub­lic of Turkey. In Der­sim for more than ten years there are protests by peo­ple against dams which are refused by more than 90% of the pop­u­la­tion. It con­sid­ers the dams as tools to destroy the wild nature, to dis­place peo­ple and to “paci­fy” the rebel­lious province Der­sim.

See one video of the protest: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Xcx01ZFg7M

Chinese Environmentalists Protest, Riot, Defeat Copper Plant in Sichuan

9/7/12

9/7/12

Fol­low­ing three days of mass protest, over­turned police cars, tear gas and vio­lent clash­es between pro­test­ers and riot police, the city gov­ern­ment of Shi­fang in the province of Sichuan, south­west Chi­na, announced last week that it is scrap­ping plans for a cop­per alloy plant. This is but one of dozens of indus­tri­al projects that have been suc­cess­ful­ly defeat­ed by large scale protests and riots in Chi­na in recent years. As in protests else­where in Chi­na, enraged activists stormed the city’s gov­ern­ment head­quar­ters and staged a suc­cess­ful occu­pa­tion.

“We have so many peo­ple in Shi­fang. We aren’t afraid of them (the author­i­ties),” an 18-year-old activist bold­ly stat­ed to Reuters by tele­phone from Shi­fang just before the gov­ern­ment acqui­es­cence to demands. “The Shi­fang peo­ple will def­i­nite­ly not sur­ren­der.”

But the vic­to­ry comes with seri­ous sac­ri­fice. Dozens of pro­test­ers have been  injured and many more round­ed up and detained. Their legal future is uncertain.If sim­i­lar post-protest crack-downs are of any insight there will be dozens of more orga­niz­ers round­ed up in the months to come as gov­ern­ment attempts to qui­et such protests pub­licly is coun­tered by a pri­vate dra­con­ian witch hunt to silence “ring­lead­ers.”

The gov­ern­ment has accused the banned spir­i­tu­al move­ment Falun Gong and the Dalai Lama for insti­gat­ing the vio­lence. But these are the com­mon scape­goats used by the gov­ern­ment any­time pop­u­lar upris­ings take place in Chi­na.

A Letter of Resistance in Shifang

The fol­low­ing is a trans­la­tion of a hand­out post­ed around the city of Shi­fang in the lead up and dur­ing the protests.

Save Shi­fang! All City Res­i­dents Unite!

Peo­ple of Shi­fang, let’s save our city!! It already a “can­cer town,” and they still want to build that molyb­de­num cop­per plant. We res­olute­ly oppose this! This is our shared home, and it is our respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect it. Every­one is respon­si­ble for pro­tect­ing the envi­ron­ment!!

Per­haps many peo­ple still do not know Shi­fang plans to build a molyb­de­num cop­per plant, and still more peo­ple do not know the dam­age this will cause. Once con­struc­tion of the fac­to­ry begins, it will already be too late. We do not want to leave Shi­fang! Shi­fang is the “Bright Pearl of West­ern Sichuan.” We can­not leave! Heavy met­al pol­lu­tion will cause us ter­ri­ble harm.

Are there real­ly that many Shi­fang res­i­dents who have the mon­ey to move to anoth­er province? We must come togeth­er and work to keep the molyb­de­num cop­per plant far from Shi­fang!

Peo­ple of Shi­fang, rise up!!

Brazil tribes occupy contentious dam site

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

30th June 2012

About 150 indige­nous peo­ple are protest­ing a mas­sive dam they say will dry up the riv­er their liveli­hood depends on.

A clus­ter of 12 men from the Xikrin tribe chant in their native lan­guage while march­ing togeth­er, arms inter­locked, stomp­ing their feet against the dry red dirt. They say this is their call of resis­tance from the Ama­zon.

The Xikrin are joined by about 150 indige­nous peo­ple from three oth­er tribes — the Arara, Juruna, and Parakana — that are occu­py­ing one of the work sites at the Belo Monte dam con­struc­tion site in what is becom­ing a high-stakes stand­off. The occu­pa­tion, which is enter­ing its sec­ond week, has halt­ed a part of the con­struc­tion on what will be the world’s third-largest hydro­elec­tric dam.

At the site of the protest, vis­it­ed by Al Jazeera on Wednes­day, the tribes­men were car­ry­ing clubs and spears and had built rudi­men­ta­ry sleep­ing quar­ters in what has essen­tial­ly become a non-vio­lent sit-in. An anthro­pol­o­gist was with them, typ­ing away at her lap­top as the indige­nous peo­ple artic­u­lat­ed their demands.

The tribes are occu­py­ing a road, built by the dam builders, which cuts through part of the Xin­gu River’s water­ways. The road blocks the nat­ur­al flow of the waters.

The occu­pa­tion of the site began at about 11 am on June 21 and played out like some­thing from a fic­tion­al Hol­ly­wood movie. The indige­nous peo­ple arrived at the work site in half a dozen small boats, charged the area, and announced that they were tak­ing over. The con­struc­tion work­ers, see­ing the tribes­men with their faces paint­ed for com­bat and armed with spears, imme­di­ate­ly fled for safe­ty.

“The work­ers were scared, so they imme­di­ate­ly ran when we arrived,” said Bepumuiti, from the Juruna tribe. “They prob­a­bly thought they were going to die.”

The tribes­men con­fis­cat­ed the keys to more than three dozen dump trucks and heavy machin­ery left behind.

What the indige­nous peo­ple want

Last year, a series of con­di­tions were agreed upon with the indige­nous peo­ple to reduce the impact of the con­struc­tion of the dam on their com­mu­ni­ties. Some of the con­di­tions includ­ed the demar­ca­tion of indige­nous lands, the con­struc­tion of health facil­i­ties and schools, and means of trans­porta­tion for the trib­al peo­ple when the rivers dry up.

In exchange for their agree­ment, the indige­nous said they would not force­ful­ly oppose the dam con­struc­tion.

The prob­lem, the indige­nous now say, is that while the con­struc­tion of the dam steams ahead, the promis­es made by the con­sor­tium build­ing the dam and by gov­ern­ment-led Norte Ener­gia — the ener­gy com­pa­ny over­see­ing the dam — have yet to be ful­filled.

So the tribes decid­ed to invade. This was a his­toric and sig­nif­i­cant move, because the deci­sion was made with­out the assis­tance or knowl­edge of local or inter­na­tion­al NGOs or gov­ern­ment rights bod­ies, who in the past often assist­ed tribes dur­ing protest move­ments.

“We would not be here today if the builders and the gov­ern­ment would have done what they promised us,” Bebtok, a tribe elder from the Xikrin tribe, told Al Jazeera. “In my com­mu­ni­ty, noth­ing has been done. There is no qual­i­ty health post, there is no school, they have not built a road for us. My road is the riv­er and that is going to be dried up.”

Since Octo­ber, the tribes most affect­ed by the con­struc­tion of the dam have been receiv­ing a bud­get of about $15,000 from the gov­ern­ment, through which they can request any­thing they want, such as gaso­line for their boats, food or con­struc­tion mate­r­i­al.

But the tribes have been told that the mon­ey — called “emer­gency assis­tance” in gov­ern­ment par­lance — will stop lat­er this year, infu­ri­at­ing the trib­al peo­ple at the very moment they are start­ing to feel the neg­a­tive impacts of the dam, they say.

The indige­nous peo­ple are now also start­ing to see the impact the con­struc­tion is hav­ing on their lives. Surara, from the Parakana tribe, showed Al Jazeera how a road built on the con­struc­tion site through a nat­ur­al water­way of the Xin­gu riv­er has already start­ed to dry out one side of the riv­er.

“We were always nav­i­gat­ing this riv­er because we know this riv­er like the palm of our hands,” Surara said. “And today, as you can see, it’s very dry. That is sad for us.”

Surara pre­dict­ed that, at the cur­rent pace of con­struc­tion, in two years the tribe will no longer be able to reach their com­mu­ni­ty by boat because of the changes in water lev­els. The tribes have a new list of demands they want ful­filled before they say they will end their occu­pa­tion.

Response from gov­ern­ment and builders

The tribes’ occu­pa­tion of the dam seemed to catch the dam builders and the gov­ern­ment by sur­prise. In response, Norte Ener­gia has tak­en what seems like a pecu­liar approach that involves two very oppo­site respons­es, using the car­rot and the stick at the same time. Three days after the occu­pa­tion began, a judge reject­ed a request to have the indige­nous evict­ed by force from the area.

At the same time, Norte Ener­gia is pro­vid­ing the indige­nous peo­ple three meals a day at the occu­pa­tion site. Often times, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive from the com­pa­ny will show up at the site dur­ing a meal and ask the indige­nous peo­ple for the keys back to their heavy machin­ery. So far, the tribes have refused to hand them over.

Last week, Norte Ener­gia refused an Al Jazeera request for an inter­view on the mat­ter. Norte Ener­gia has said in the past that the eco­nom­ic and social assis­tance pack­ages to help the tribes will be imple­ment­ed at var­i­ous points dur­ing the entire­ty of the project, as pre­vi­ous­ly agreed upon.

Behind the scenes, the com­pa­ny is fac­ing a daunt­ing task. Not only do each of the four tribes involved in the occu­pa­tion have their own set of demands, but there are also as many as 35 dif­fer­ent sub-com­mu­ni­ties with­in the tribes tak­ing part in the occu­pa­tion, and each have their own inter­ests and requests they want met.

Activists face arrest

Pres­sure is build­ing on mul­ti­ple fronts. Con­struc­tion of the dam ramped up ear­li­er this year, and there are strict timeta­bles to get the dam up and run­ning by late 2014.

Aside from the indige­nous protest, sev­er­al oth­er tense issues sur­round­ing the dam are coa­lesc­ing at the same time.

In Altami­ra, the clos­est city to the dam site, 11 peo­ple — all unaf­fil­i­at­ed with the indige­nous protest now occur­ring — are fight­ing arrest war­rants after being accused of help­ing organ­ise an anti-dam protest ear­li­er in June that the dam builders say led to prop­er­ty dam­age. Local TV chan­nels have been air­ing video of bro­ken win­dows and the burn­ing of office equip­ment at the con­struc­tion site.

The activists fac­ing pos­si­ble arrest all deny they were involved, and say any protests they organ­ised were peace­ful and legal. They include, among oth­ers, a Catholic priest, a nun, some mem­bers of Xin­gu Vivo Para Sem­pre — a local anti-dam NGO — as well as a local fish­er­man fea­tured in an Al Jazeera report in Jan­u­ary

Police have an open inves­ti­ga­tion, and have yet to for­mal­ly announce if charges will be filed. How­ev­er, even the threat of jail time has sent a chill through the tight-knit com­mu­ni­ty of local anti-dam activists.

How will it end?

On Thurs­day, in the city of Altami­ra, more than 60 of the indige­nous occu­piers met with a high-lev­el del­e­ga­tion from Brasil­ia that includ­ed the pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia.

The meet­ing last­ed near­ly four hours, and was closed to the media. The indige­nous peo­ple dis­cussed their demands to end the protest, but no agree­ment was reached. Norte Ener­gia said they need­ed to take the requests back to Brasil­ia for analy­sis. A new meet­ing was set for July 9. In the mean­time, the tribes say their occu­pa­tion will con­tin­ue. It was also agreed by all sides that work will con­tin­ue on the parts of the con­struc­tion site not under the con­trol of the tribes.

“This was a very friend­ly con­ver­sa­tion; the tribe elders are very wise and mea­sured,” said Car­los Nasci­men­to, pres­i­dent of Norte Ener­gia, in a brief press con­fer­ence after the meet­ing. “There are some young tribes­men that want some improve­ments, and as much as we can, we will do any­thing in our pow­er so these kinds of things will not hap­pen again.”

The indige­nous seemed deter­mined to keep up the fight for as long as it takes. “What we asked for, the dam builders did not give us an answer to, so we will only leave the con­struc­tion site when they bring an answer to us on paper,” Giliar­di, from the Juruna tribe, said after the meet­ing. “And as long as they don’t do any­thing in our com­mu­ni­ties regard­ing infra­struc­ture, we are not leav­ing the occu­pa­tion.”

Mean­while, more boats loaded with indige­nous peo­ple are arriv­ing at the protest site every day. It is an indi­ca­tion that this stand­off in the Ama­zon could drag on for days to come.

More pho­tos and video