climate camp ‘where next?’ regional gatherings and reader

PROPOSALS FOR 2010 SO FAR

We’ve got a new dis­cus­sion board up on the Cli­mate Camp web­site with all the pro­pos­als for the region­al gath­er­ings received so far, plus some oth­er use­ful texts from the Where Next? dis­cus­sions. Join the dis­cus­sion here:

http://discussion.climatecamp.org.uk

REGIONAL GATHERINGS IN JANUARY

PROPOSALS FOR 2010 SO FAR

We’ve got a new dis­cus­sion board up on the Cli­mate Camp web­site with all the pro­pos­als for the region­al gath­er­ings received so far, plus some oth­er use­ful texts from the Where Next? dis­cus­sions. Join the dis­cus­sion here:

http://discussion.climatecamp.org.uk

REGIONAL GATHERINGS IN JANUARY

Here are the lat­est con­firmed details of our region­al gath­er­ings in Jan­u­ary…

(More details as we have them will be post­ed at:
http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/get-involved/national-gatherings/next)

Cli­mate Camp Read­er

Dysophia and Shift Mag­a­zine have joined forces to put togeth­er a Cli­mate Camp Read­er, “Crit­i­cism with­out Cri­tique”, pub­lished in Jan­u­ary 2010. This read­er hopes to encour­age and facil­i­ate debates at the next cli­mate camp gath­er­ings. To down­load it fol­low this link:
http://dysophia.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cca_reader.pdf
The edi­to­r­i­al is post­ed below:

Edi­to­r­i­al

In Jan­u­ary & Feb­ru­ary 2010, the Camp for Cli­mate Action will go through a peri­od of intro­spec­tion as it works out where it shall go next. While in some ways the Camp has been a suc­cess, it has also come under a bar­rage of crit­i­cism from some quar­ters with­in the rad­i­cal move­ments that spawned it.

To help this debate we have put togeth­er a set of resources and rel­e­vant arti­cles to inform and spark dis­cus­sion relat­ing to this crit­i­cism. Our bias is obvi­ous, though the opin­ions expressed are those of the authors alone. Whether you agree with them or not, we believe they are worth tak­ing on board. We hope at least that you feel con­fi­dent answer­ing their chal­lenges, rather than just dis­miss­ing them.

Now is the time for the Camp to exam­ine its pol­i­tics in more depth, to work out just what it stands for. This is a cross-roads in its devel­op­ment, to con­tin­ue down a path of ever increas­ing lib­er­al, reformist approach, or to be the noisy rad­i­cal, point­ing out all the white ele­phants in the cli­mate change debate. The future of the move­ment around the camp is being shaped here. The deci­sions being made now will have pro­found impacts on who is and who is not involved in the future.

The Camp for Cli­mate Action grew out of the rad­i­cal anar­chist and envi­ron­men­tal move­ments, a syn­the­sis of the organ­i­sa­tion­al skills devel­oped at the Anti-G8 protest camp at Stir­ling, and the eco­log­i­cal direct action move­ments such as Earth First! The per­cep­tion that emerges from these crit­i­cisms is this has been lost along the way.

We accept that this book­let makes chal­leng­ing read­ing and that we offer lit­tle in the way of solu­tions. These, we believe, must come from with­in the camp itself. How­ev­er, it is appar­ent that there is a need for two things. First­ly, a greater vis­i­bil­i­ty for the anar­chist roots with­in the day to day life of the CCA process and pro­pos­als. Sec­ond­ly, and just as impor­tant, a more open and explic­it cri­tique of cap­i­tal­ism and how it is the root cause of cli­mate change.

If we do nei­ther out of fear of a main­stream media back­lash, then we are reduced to being anoth­er NGO. Yet, the pow­er of the Camp has always been the promise of a gen­uine alter­na­tive action in the face of pre­var­i­ca­tion and obstruc­tion from gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions – now is the time to spell that cri­tique out and use it to build real alter­na­tives, not legit­imis­ing the sys­tem we com­plain of. It was the strength of the Camp’s found­ing cri­tiques that gave it the bold­ness its sub­se­quent suc­cess­es have rest­ed on.

Ulti­mate­ly, the mes­sage of the Camp is a very rad­i­cal one – that rad­i­cal social change is need­ed, espe­cial­ly if we are to tack­le of the root caus­es of cli­mate change. The answer is not to water down our actions and our mes­sages, but to be bold­er than ever. That is the excite­ment and pow­er that gives the Camp its life.

To down­load the read­er fol­low this link:
http://dysophia.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cca_reader.pdf

http://dysophia.wordpress.com/
http://www.shiftmag.co.uk/

Forest occupation against Very High Voltage power lines in Catalonia

Since Octo­ber 17th we’re occu­py­ing a piece of for­est that was meant to host one of the hun­dreds of elec­tri­cal tow­ers that con­form the new Very High Volt­age (MAT) pow­er line, and that will even­tu­al­ly inter­con­nect France, Spain and, time will tell, A

Des dels boscos welcome signDes dels boscos walk-waysSince Octo­ber 17th we’re occu­py­ing a piece of for­est that was meant to host one of the hun­dreds of elec­tri­cal tow­ers that con­form the new Very High Volt­age (MAT) pow­er line, and that will even­tu­al­ly inter­con­nect France, Spain and, time will tell, Africa. The place we now call our home is in an area called Guil­leries (Girona), near Sant Hilari Sacalm vil­lage, at about 1000 metres high and sur­round­ed by moun­tains in a pret­ty iso­lat­ed envi­ron­ment.

The rea­sons for this occu­pa­tion are many: we won’t accept with­out fight­ing yet anoth­er gigan­tic infra­struc­ture that will solve absolute­ly noth­ing and in fact, will wors­en things up. We have to choose which side we’re in: either we stand for west­ern civ­i­liza­tion or we fight against it. It’s time for action. This is an attempt to show that some peo­ple still have what it takes, that chal­leng­ing the estab­lish­ment is a con­di­tion for us to be able to live in this world.

Some of the “prob­lems” this MAT line hopes to solve are: to be able to secure elec­tri­cal pow­er for the tourist vil­lages (espe­cial­ly in sum­mer) of Girona (Cos­ta Bra­va, for exam­ple); elec­tri­cal sup­ply for the TAV/AVE (which would hap­pen to be the first one to need it!); avoid elec­tri­cal black­outs like the one of 2007? in Barcelona… We’re not going to enter the debate are­na in which one side shows an “inde­pen­dent study” that states how much this pow­er line is need­ed and the oth­er side comes yet with anoth­er study that shows the oppo­site. It’s obvi­ous which side we’re with, but we state that it is imper­a­tive to actu­al­ly FIGHT this pow­er line and not just keep debat­ing and mak­ing press con­fer­ences.

In the mean­time, we’re try­ing to build the foun­da­tions of a new world start­ing right here and now, recon­nect­ing with the Earth. Liv­ing what our instincts tell us, hurt­ing the empire and mak­ing pres­sure on its fis­sures. From here, from the forests that have always hid the rebels, maquis, con­spir­a­tors and plot­ters. We can still be kin­da invis­i­ble and feel pro­tect­ed by these forests.

They’ve sold us the idea of progress and sci­ence as a nostrum/panacea that will free human­i­ty of its fears and that will give us com­modi­ties nev­er dreamed before. A com­mod­i­ty that, on the oth­er hand, we nev­er get to catch because progress has to cre­ate new gad­gets every sin­gle minute. What we’re able to see is that progress reduces us to total use­less per­sons, full of inse­cu­ri­ties and pas­siv­i­ty. Every moment we spend in this world we lose knowl­edge about how a life would be with­out all these com­modi­ties they sell to us.

So long the occu­pa­tion is very suc­cess­ful. In this (almost) two months, a lot of struc­tures have been built: many beds on the trees, a com­mu­nal “chill” house in between three trees to read and plot, a com­mu­nal kitchen, a info point, a “ware­house” to store mate­ri­als and keep things dry…and many resis­tance struc­tures that will keep police busy for (we hope) some days when they try to evict us. Also very impor­tant has been the help and involve­ment of many peo­ple we did­n’t know until some weeks ago: local peo­ple from the near­by vil­lages, peo­ple from Barcelona and oth­er cities that show up and help, peo­ple that decide to stay for some days (or even that came to live with us) and bypassers that are curi­ous of what we’re doing.

Our com­mu­ni­ca­tion strat­e­gy has been to try to com­mu­ni­cate direct­ly with peo­ple instead of let­ting mass-media por­tray us and manip­u­late us as they want. No work has been done with them. We have used our own means: texts, fly­ers, posters, face-to-face talk­ing with peo­ple of the vil­lages, social move­ments and our own blog (desdelsboscos.blogspot.com). Mass-media are nev­er impar­tial, less when they’re means to enrich them­selves and to keep this cap­i­tal­ist machine run­ning full-speed. That’s why we invite every­one to show up with no cam­eras or micro­phones.

From the for­est, a big hug to all peo­ple try­ing to get rid of this cap­i­tal­ist-indus­tri­al­ist sys­tem and that strug­gle to cre­ate a world with­out any kind of dom­i­na­tion!

How to get there by car, bus or train
Wish list

Des dels boscos web­site — http://desdelsboscos.blogspot.com/

First day of struggle at Valsusa

Last night the strug­gle resumed in Val­susa. In this Alpi­an val­ley of Italy a High Speed Train rail­way is pro­ject­ed with all its relat­ed infra­struc­ture. How­ev­er yes­ter­day it was a first vic­to­ry­for activists: 100 of them sur­round­ed the geo­log­i­cal sur­vey works… and the pigs did not turn up!!

no tavLast night the strug­gle resumed in Val­susa. In this Alpi­an val­ley of Italy a High Speed Train rail­way is pro­ject­ed with all its relat­ed infra­struc­ture. How­ev­er yes­ter­day it was a first vic­to­ry­for activists: 100 of them sur­round­ed the geo­log­i­cal sur­vey works… and the pigs did not turn up!!

This is a new phase in the strug­gle against this destruc­tive project. Peo­ple from Val­susa have been up against it for many years now. Peo­ple already stopped this project four years ago and then the author­i­ties start­ed to think oth­er pos­si­bil­i­ties, includ­ing trans­fer­ring the project to anoth­er val­ley. Now, they are back in Val­susa to try it again. How­ev­er, resis­tance has not van­ished in the val­ley, it keeps strong and once again they’ll try to stop the exca­va­tors and the… thou­sands of cops deploy for pro­tect­ing them.

last night it was the first night, but this will be a long fight, with loads of snow and cold. But they are used to it and so the defeat­ed the machin­ery before.

Val­susa’s activists send a call to any­one to join them, offer­ing food and shel­ter.
Police are already tak­ing on strate­gic places. So are activists. From tomor­row onwards the fight will be direct and will last days.

SERA DURA!! IT’LL BE HARD!
NO PASARÁN! THEY SHALL NO PASS!
NO TO THE HIGH SPEED TRAIN!

(in Eng­lish: http://www.notav.eu/modules.php?name=Zina&op=modload&file=index&p=Documenti%2FInglese)

pre­vi­ous sto­ries on this strug­gle:
http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/685
http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/1516

and oth­er High Speed Train strug­gles:
http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/23225
http://earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/23229

Lappersfort Callout For Eviction

This morn­ing (Thurs­day 7th), the police snipped open part of our fence and broke their way in to the for­est

This morn­ing (Thurs­day 7th), the police snipped open part of our fence and broke their way in to the for­est

On Decem­ber 31st 09, a judge of the Brugge court ruled that the evic­tion notice passed against the occu­piers of 2002 may still be used to evict the present occu­piers of the Lap­pers­fort. On Tues­day last week, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive robot from Fab­ri­com GTI was quot­ed in the media say­ing that they would fol­low the judi­cial path, and were plan­ning to sit down and dis­cuss the evic­tion with the Brugge police. This claim that they will fol­low the “legal” path isn’t some­thing we’re rely­ing on, and we are expect­ing an evic­tion any day now. This morn­ing (Thurs­day 7th), the police snipped open part of our fence and broke their way in to the for­est. Four of them had a lit­tle pig­gy tour, tak­ing pho­tos and being gen­er­al­ly mys­te­ri­ous and stu­pid. One of us heard them sneak­ing around in the night, which means they must have cut the fence at night then snuck in dur­ing the morn­ing. As the police start doing such things here, and the fact that Fab­ri­com Suez already has an evic­tion notice, can only make us think that the evic­tion is just around the cor­ner.….

IN THE FOREST, WE NEED MORE HUMANS WILLING TO STAY HERE A WHILE AND DEFEND THE FOREST AGAINST THE POLICE IN CASE OF EVICTION.
OUTSIDE THE FOREST, WE NEED MORE HUMANS WILLING TO SUPPORT FROM OUTSIDE, TO COME TO BRUGGE AND DEMONSTRATE ON THE DAY OF EVICTION, AND TO TAKE SOLIDARITY ACTIONS AGAINST FABRICOM GTI AND GDF SUEZ. FOR A FREESPACE IN THE WOODS AND FOR THE WOODS, AND FOR WILDERNESS EVERYWHERE, LAPPERSFORT WON’T GO OFF WITHOUT A FIGHT.….
PLEASE TRANSLATE AND SEND ON THIS CALLOUT

lappersfort@riseup.net
http://lappersfort.freehostia.com

Struggle resumes in Valsusa (Italy)

9.1.10
Tomor­row the strug­gle starts again in Val­susa, an Alpi­an val­ley in Italy where the High Speed Train rail­way and all its infra­struc­ture is planned.

valsusa (Italy)9.1.10
Tomor­row the strug­gle starts again in Val­susa, an Alpi­an val­ley in Italy where the High Speed Train rail­way and all its infra­struc­ture is planned.
I mean, rather than ‘start­ing again’, the strug­gle will get more direct as these peo­ple have been up against this destruc­tive years for years. Peo­ple already stopped this project and the author­i­ties start­ed to think oth­er pos­si­bil­i­ties, includ­ing trans­fer­ring the project to anoth­er val­ley. Now, they are back in Val­susa to try again. How­ev­er, resis­tance has not van­ished, it keeps strong and once again they’ll try to stop the exca­va­tors and the… thou­sands of cops deploy for pro­tect­ing them.
There is snow over there but activists remain as pos­i­tive as ever.
They do send a call to any­one to join them, offer­ing food and shel­ter.
Police are already tak­ing on strate­gic places. So are activists. From tomor­row onwards the fight will be direct and will last days.
SERA DURA!! IT’LL BE HARD!
NO PASARÁN! THEY SHALL NO PASS!
NO TO THE HIGH SPEED TRAIN!

www.notav.eu

Coal Machinery Sabotaged in South Lanarkshire, Scotland

Late one night in ear­ly Jan­u­ary Pen­nile open cast coal mine was vis­it­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple who sab­o­taged machines. A total of 13 pieces of machin­ery were dam­aged, includ­ing one giant earth mover, six giant dumper trucks, four stan­dard sized earth movers and two flood light gen­er­a­tors.

Late one night in ear­ly Jan­u­ary Pen­nile open cast coal mine was vis­it­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple who sab­o­taged machines. A total of 13 pieces of machin­ery were dam­aged, includ­ing one giant earth mover, six giant dumper trucks, four stan­dard sized earth movers and two flood light gen­er­a­tors.

Recent­ly Pen­nile open cast fin­ished min­ing, but the machines Scot­tish Coal had work­ing there were sup­posed to be mov­ing to Main­shill Wood. How­ev­er as we all know Scot­tish Coal’s plans have been sub­stan­tial­ly dis­rupt­ed by the occu­pa­tion of the wood by the Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp.

This action was tak­en by autonomous peo­ple in sol­i­dar­i­ty with every­one who oppos­es the destruc­tion of Main­shill Wood and it’s devel­op­ment into anoth­er coal mine.

Japanese whale killers ram and destroy Sea Shepherd protest vessel the Ady Gil

6.1.2010
Ear­ly this morn­ing the Japan­ese whale killing ship Shonan Maru2 rammed and destroyed the Sea Shep­herd protest ves­sel the Ady Gil. It was a mir­a­cle no Sea Shep­herd crew were killed or seri­ous­ly injured.

From Sea Shep­herd CEO Steve Roest.

Sea Shepherd Ady Gil rammed6.1.2010
Ear­ly this morn­ing the Japan­ese whale killing ship Shonan Maru2 rammed and destroyed the Sea Shep­herd protest ves­sel the Ady Gil. It was a mir­a­cle no Sea Shep­herd crew were killed or seri­ous­ly injured.

From Sea Shep­herd CEO Steve Roest.
I was wok­en at 4am GMT to hear that the Japan­ese whaler and secu­ri­ty ves­sel Shonan Maru2 had delib­er­ate­ly rammed the small Sea Shep­herd inter­cept ves­sel Ady Gil. The Ady Gil had lost the front 3 metres of her nose com­plete­ly and it is a mir­a­cle nobody was seri­ous­ly injured or killed.

Cap­tain Wat­son has made the fol­low­ing state­ment to the press:

In an unpro­voked attack cap­tured on film, the Japan­ese secu­ri­ty ship Shonan Maru #2 delib­er­ate­ly rammed and caused cat­a­stroph­ic dam­age to the Sea Shep­herd ves­sel Ady Gil.

Six crew crewmem­bers, four from New Zealand, one from Aus­tralia and one from the Nether­lands were imme­di­ate­ly res­cued by the crew of the Sea Shep­herd ship Bob Bark­er. None of the crew Ady Gil crew were injured.

The Ady Gil is believed to be sink­ing and chances of sal­vage are very grim.

Accord­ing to eye­wit­ness Cap­tain Chuck Swift on the Bob Bark­er, the attack hap­pened while the ves­sels were dead in the water. The Shonan Maru #2 sud­den­ly start­ed up and delib­er­ate­ly rammed the Ady Gil rip­ping eight feet of the bow of the ves­sel com­plete­ly off. Accord­ing to Cap­tain Swift, the ves­sel does not look like it will be saved.

“The Japan­ese whalers have now esca­lat­ed this con­flict very vio­lent­ly.” Said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “If they think that our remain­ing two ships will retreat from the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary in the face of their extrem­ism, they will be mis­tak­en. We now have a real whale war on our hands and we have no inten­tion of retreat­ing.”

Cap­tain Paul Wat­son onboard the Steve Irwin is rac­ing towards the area at 16 knots but still remains some five hun­dred miles to the north. The Bob Bark­er will has tem­porar­i­ly stop the pur­suit of the Nis­shin Maru to res­cue the crew of the Ady Gil. The Japan­ese ships refused to acknowl­edge the May Day dis­tress of the Ady Gil and used the inci­dent to break away from the scene of the ram­ming.

The inci­dent took place at 64 Degrees and 03 Min­utes South and 143 Degrees and 09 Min­utes East

Until this morn­ing the Japan­ese were com­plete­ly unaware of the exis­tence of the Bob Bark­er. This newest addi­tion to the Sea Shep­herd fleet left Mau­ri­tius off the coast of Africa on Decem­ber 18th and was able to advance along the ice edge from the West as the Japan­ese were busy wor­ry­ing about the advance of the Steve Irwin from the North.

“This is a sub­stan­tial loss for our orga­ni­za­tion,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “The Ady Gil, the for­mer Earth­race ves­sel, rep­re­sents a loss of almost two mil­lion dol­lars. How­ev­er the loss of a sin­gle whale is of more impor­tance to us and we will not lose the Ady Gil in vain. This blow sim­ply strength­ens our resolve, it does not weak­en our spir­it.”

The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety is request­ing that the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment send a naval ves­sel to restore the peace in the waters of the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry. We have 77 crew from 16 nations on three ves­sels, 6 of them were on the Ady Gil. Of these 21 are Aus­tralian cit­i­zens. 16 Aus­tralians on the Steve Irwin and 5 on the Bob Bark­er. Sea Shep­herd believes that the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment has a respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect the lives of Aus­tralian cit­i­zens work­ing to defend whales from ille­gal Japan­ese whal­ing activ­i­ties.

“Aus­tralia needs to send a naval ves­sel down here as soon as pos­si­ble to pro­tect both the whales and the Aus­tralian cit­i­zens work­ing to defend these whales.” Said Steve Irwin Chief Cook Lau­ra Dakin of Can­ber­ra. “This is Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters and I see the Japan­ese whalers doing what­ev­er they want with impuni­ty down here with­out a sin­gle Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment ves­sel any­where to be found. Peter Gar­rett, I have one ques­tion for you. Where the bloody hell are you?”

http://www.seashepherd.org

Sea Shep­herd vows to con­tin­ue cam­paign after whalers destroy Ady Gil

Yes­ter­day was a hec­tic day in Com­mon­wealth Bay, near Antarc­ti­ca, in the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary. The Ady Gil, while sta­tion­ary, was pupose­ful­ly rammed at speed by the Japan­ese whal­ing secu­ri­ty ves­sel, the Shonan Maru 2. And the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet, and the world dis­cov­ered Sea Shep­herds sur­prise new con­ser­va­tion ship, the Bob Bak­er, an ex-Nor­we­gian Antarc­tic ice-class whal­ing ves­sel that was bought in 2009 and secret­ly refit­ted in South Africa.

In the Antarc­tic ear­ly morn­ing twi­light at 0300 Hours, 6 Jan­u­ary, the Bob Bak­er found the Nis­shin Maru and her four har­poon ves­sels. The Japan­ese whal­ing oper­a­tion had been caught unawares. They had been focussing on the loca­tion of the Steve Irwin, pay­ing New Zealan­der Glenn Inwood’s Ome­ka Pub­lic Rela­tions com­pa­ny to hire char­ter flights first in Albany, and then in Mel­bourne and Hobart to locate and fol­low the Steve Irwin.

The ‘spy flights’ from Albany were able to direct the Shonan Maru 2 to shad­ow the Steve Irwin when it left Fre­man­tle so that the main whal­ing fleet could avoid a con­flict and do their whale slaugh­ter in peace. The stra­e­gy worked for two weeks, until the Steve Irwin returned to Hobart to refu­el and repro­vi­sion. Leav­ing Hobart on New Years Eve, the Steve Irwin was able to slip past under­cov­er of a thun­der­storm. The spy flights from Mel­bourne and Hobart organ­ised by Glenn Inwood, esti­mat­ed to cost about $18,000, could not locate the Steve Irwin due to the low cloud cov­er.

The Sea Shep­herd also had some unex­pect­ed assis­tance depart­ing Hobart from six peo­ple on a small motor­boat, self iden­ti­fied as ‘Taz Patrol’, who patrolled the perime­ter of the Aus­tralian Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone (EEZ) locat­ing the Yushin Maru and twit­ter­ing it’s loca­tion to the world (and Sea Shep­herd).

So with the whal­ing fleet locat­ed, New Zealand skip­per of the Ady Gil, Pete Bethune, drove his power­boat around the Nis­shan Maru whal­ing fac­to­ry ship, attempt­ing to foul the fac­to­ry ship’s pro­pel­lors. Evi­dent­ly only one bauble of rot­ten but­ter reached the deck of the Nis­shan Maru, but the green laser pho­ton­ic dis­rupters were also used. In return the Nis­shan Maru fired up its LRAD acoustic weapon and used its water can­non. Stale­mate.

So the Ady Gil retreats with the Nis­shan Maru flee­ing. Sea Shep­herd’s new ves­sel the Bob Bak­er pre­pares to chase the Nis­shan Maru and the fleet, while most of the Ady Gil crew sit on the roof with the ves­sel in a sta­tion­ary idle. The videos show the Japan­ese har­poon ves­sel, the Shonan Maru 2 charg­ing the Ady Gil with water canons blaz­ing. Peter Bethune tells his crew to pre­pare for a drench­ing, lit­tle real­iz­ing the dan­ger he and his crew were fac­ing. While the water can­non sprays the roof of the Ady Gil blind­ing the crew, the Shonan Maru turns sharply to star­board right at the Ady Gil. In the few moments before impact Peter Bethune guns the Ady Gil, but it is far too late with Shonan Maru 2 slic­ing 2 metres off the bow of the Ady Gil, forc­ing the power­boat momen­tar­i­ly under­wa­ter and immers­ing the crew in the icy waters hold­ing on to the roof for their lives.

Even after impact and seper­a­tion of the ships, the Shonan Maru 2 con­tin­ues to pound the bedrag­gled crew hang­ing on to the top of the Ady Gil with water canon blasts.

Video: Japan­ese Whalers film Ady Gil being rammed by Shonan Maru 2

Video: Ady Gil rammed by Shonan Maru 2 filmed by Sea Shep­herd from Bob Bark­er

Rammed Ves­sel Ady Gil Sinks

Sea Shep­herd Resumes Pur­suit of Ille­gal Whalers

On Jan­u­ary 8, 2010 at 17:20 (GMT) the Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety ves­sel Bob Bark­er report­ed the last known posi­tion of anoth­er Sea Shep­herd ves­sel, the Ady Gil, to the Aus­tralian Res­cue Coor­di­na­tion Cen­ter (ARCC). This report was made because the Ady Gil—which was orig­i­nal­ly going to be towed to a near­by base—is now sink­ing and could pose a nav­i­ga­tion haz­ard for the next two to three hours.

Hav­ing bare­ly sur­vived a vicious attack by the ille­gal Japan­ese whal­ing ves­sel Shonan Maru No. 2 on Jan­u­ary 6, 2010, the Ady Gil began tak­ing on water. Since that time, Bob Bark­er crew mem­bers have been work­ing around the clock in an attempt to save the ship and remove pos­si­ble envi­ron­men­tal haz­ards in case the ves­sel had fur­ther com­pli­ca­tions while being towed.

videos from Mainshill and German treesit against a proposed pipeline

The Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp presents:

*Off With Their Heads!*

Hold­ing the politi­cians behind Main­shill Open Cast Coal Mine to account

Fea­tur­ing: Jim Hood MP, Karen Gillon MSP, Coun­cil­lor Dan­ny Meik­le and Lord Home

Snow and Anarchy at MainshillThe Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp presents:

*Off With Their Heads!*

Hold­ing the politi­cians behind Main­shill Open Cast Coal Mine to account

Fea­tur­ing: Jim Hood MP, Karen Gillon MSP, Coun­cil­lor Dan­ny Meik­le and Lord Home

This short film doc­u­ments the cor­rup­tion, con­flict of inter­est and hypocrisy dom­i­nat­ing the pol­i­tics of South Lanark­shire, that result in Scot­tish Coal receiv­ing approval for coal mine after coal mine in the Dou­glas Val­ley. With no regard for com­mu­ni­ty health, local democ­ra­cy, the envi­ron­ment or cli­mate change, Scot­tish Coal are allowed to run roughshod over the peo­ple of the Dou­glas Val­ley. The Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp occu­pied the site of Main­shill Wood over six months ago to help local com­mu­ni­ties fight off Scot­tish Coal and the landown­er Lord Home.

The strug­gle con­tin­ues!

Watch it here: http://www.politube.org/show/23788

Since the 18.12.09 ROBIN WOOD-Activists squat sev­er­al trees in the Gäh­ler­park in Ham­burg Altona to impende the con­truc­tion of a heat­ing pipeline for the planned coal pow­er plant Ham­burg Moor­burg, which would mean the loss of the trees in the park. The com­pa­ny propos­ing the pipeline is Vat­ten­fall, a Swedish cor­po­ra­tion. With their protest they sup­port two res­i­dents who have squat­tet two trees already at 3rd of decem­ber.

(Ger­man with Eng­lish sub­ti­tles)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJeo631Pyv4

Letter from Climate Prisoners

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

Some­thing is rot­ten (but not just) in Den­mark. As a mat­ter of fact, thou­sands of peo­ple have been con­sid­ered, with­out any evi­dence, a threath to the soci­ety. Hun­dreds have been arrest­ed and some are still under deten­tion, wait­ing for judge­ment or under inves­ti­ga­tion. Among them, us, the under­signed. We want to tell the sto­ry from the pecu­liar view­point of those that still see the sky from behind the bars.

A UN meet­ing of cru­cial impor­tance has failed because of sev­er­al con­tra­dic­tions and ten­sions that have shown up dur­ing the COP15. The pri­ma­ry con­cern of the pow­er­fuls was the gov­er­nance of the ener­gy sup­ply for nev­erend­ing growth. This was the case whether they were from the overde­vel­oped world, like the EU coun­tries or the US, or from the so-called devel­op­ing coun­tries, like Chi­na or Brazil.

At odds, hun­dreds of del­e­gates and thou­sands of peo­ple in the streets have raised the issue that the ratio­nale of life must be (and actu­al­ly is) opposed to that of prof­it. we have strong­ly affirmed our will to stop anthrop­ic pres­sure on the bios­phere.

A cri­sis of the ener­gy par­a­digm is com­ing soon. The mech­a­nism of the glob­al gov­er­nance have proven to be over­whelm­ing­ly pre­car­i­ous. The pow­er­fuls failed not only in reach­ing an agree­ment on their inter­nal equi­li­br­ruim but also in keep­ing the for­mal con­trol of the dis­cus­sion.

Cli­mate change is an extreme and ulti­mate expres­sion of the vio­lence of the cap­i­tal­is­tic growth par­a­digm. Peo­ple glob­al­ly are increas­ing­ly show­ing the will­ing­ness of tak­ing the pow­er to rebel against that vio­lence. we have seen that in Copen­hagen, as well as we have seen that same vio­lence. Hun­dreds of peo­ple have been arrest­ed with­out any rea­son or clear evi­dence, or for par­tic­i­pat­ing in peace­ful and legit­i­mate demon­stra­tions. Even mild exam­ples of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence have been con­sid­ered as a seri­ous threath to the social order.

In response we ask – What order do we threat­en and who ordered it? Is it that order in which we do not any­more own our bod­ies? The order well beyond the terms of any rea­son­able “social con­tract” that we would ever sign, where our bod­ies can be tak­en, man­aged, con­strained and impris­oned with­out any seri­ous evi­dence of crime. Is it that order in which the deci­sion are more and more shield­ed from any social con­flicts? Where the gov­er­nance less and less belongs to peo­ple, not even through the par­lia­ment? As a mat­ter of fact, non-demo­c­ra­t­ic organ­isms like the WTO, the NB, the G‑whatever rule beyond any con­trol.

We are forced to notice that the the­ater of democ­ra­cy is a bro­ken one as soon as, one approach­es the core of the pow­er. That is why we reclaim the pow­er to the peo­ple. We reclaim the pow­er over our own lives. Above all, we reclaim the pow­er to coun­ter­pose the ratio­nale of life and of the com­mons to the ratio­nale of prof­it. It may have been declared ille­gal, but still we con­sid­er it ful­ly legit­i­mate.

Since no real space is left in the bro­ken the­ater, we reclaimed our col­lec­tive pow­er – Actu­al­ly we expect­ed it – to speak about the cli­mate and ener­gy issues. Issues that, for us, involve crit­i­cal nodes of glob­al jus­tice, sur­vival of man and ener­gy inde­pen­dence. We did march­ing with our bod­ies.

We pre­fer to enter the space where the pow­er is locked danc­ing and singing. We would have liked to do this at the Bel­la cen­ter, to dis­rupt the ses­sion in accord with hun­dreds of del­e­gates. But we were, as always, vio­lent­ly ham­pered by the police. They arrest­ed our bod­ies in an attempt to arrest our ideas. we risked our bod­ies, try­ing to pro­tect them just by stay­ing close to each oth­er. We val­ue our bod­ies: We need them to make love, to stay togeth­er and to enjoy life. They hold our brains, with beau­ti­ful bright ideas and views. They hold our hearts filled with pas­sion and joy. Nev­er­the­less, we risked them. we risked our bod­ies get­ting locked in pris­ons. In fact, what would be the worth of think­ing and feel­ing if the bod­ies did not move? Doing noth­ing, let­ting-it-hap­pen, would be the worst form of com­plic­i­ty with the busi­ness that want­ed to hack the UN meet­ing. At the COP15 we moved, and we will keep mov­ing.

Exact­ly like love, civ­il dis­obe­di­ence can not just be told. We must make it, with our bod­ies. Oth­er­wise, we would not real­ly think about what we love, and we would not real­ly love what we think about. It’s as sim­ple as that. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

How the COP15 has end­ed proves that we were right. Many of us are pay­ing what is manda­to­ry for an obses­sive, per­va­sive and total repres­sion: To find a guilty at the cost of invent­ing it (along with the crime per­haps).

We are detained with evi­dent­ly absurd accu­sa­tions about either vio­lences that actu­al­ly did not take place or con­spir­a­cies and orga­niz­ing of law-break­ing actions.

We do not feel guilty for hav­ing shown, togeth­er with thou­sands, the recla­ma­tion of the inde­pen­dence of our lives from profit’s rule. If the laws oppose this, it was legit­i­mate to peace­ful­ly – but still con­flict­ual­ly – break them.

We are just tem­porar­i­ly docked, ready to sail again with a wind stronger than ever. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

Luca Tor­na­tore – from the Ital­ian social cen­tres net­work “see you in Copen­hagen”.
Natasha Ver­co – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Stine Gry Jonassen – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Tan­nie Nyboe – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Johannes Paul Schul Mey­er
Arvip Peschel
Chris­t­ian Beck­er
Khar­lanchuck Dzmit­ry
Cristoph Lang
Antho­ny Arra­bal

Lappersfort Eviction Notice Confirmed By Judge

On Decem­ber 31st 09, the Brugge court gave a ver­dict con­cern­ing the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers who signed a con­tract with the own­er, GDF Suez, and also con­cern­ing the evic­tion notice for the present occu­piers of the Lap­pers­fort.

Accord­ing to the judge, Suez can not hold the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers respon­si­ble for the new occu­pa­tion, and there­fore their claim against them has been dis­missed.

On Decem­ber 31st 09, the Brugge court gave a ver­dict con­cern­ing the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers who signed a con­tract with the own­er, GDF Suez, and also con­cern­ing the evic­tion notice for the present occu­piers of the Lap­pers­fort.

Accord­ing to the judge, Suez can not hold the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers respon­si­ble for the new occu­pa­tion, and there­fore their claim against them has been dis­missed.
How­ev­er, the judge has declared that the evic­tion notice issued in 2002, dur­ing the first occu­pa­tion of the Lap­pers­fort, is still valid and may be used to evict the cur­rent occu­piers. This, despite the fact that the first evic­tion notice was issued to 13 peo­ple iden­ti­fied by the court, and who were threat­ened after the first evic­tion with a €50,000 fine if they re-entered the for­est or were involved in any oth­er actions against Fab­ri­com / Suez. None of these 13 peo­ple have any­thing to do with the cur­rent occu­pa­tion and there­fore an evic­tion notice based on a ver­dict passed against them should not be able to be used against us, the present occu­piers. Suez had, before this tri­al, appar­ent­ly already approached a bailiff with the evic­tion notice from 2002, but the bailiff refused to enforce it, as it was doubt­ful whether they could still legal­ly use it. The judge’s ver­dict on the 31st has giv­en them bla­tant right to enforce this notice, claim­ing that the right to pri­vate prop­er­ty is one of the pil­lars of our soci­ety and there­fore must be upheld by the law enforcers blablabla.
As it stands, Suez now have a notice allow­ing them to evict the Lap­pers­fort, which they will have to present to a bailiff who will then have to acti­vate the remote-con­trol pig cir­cus. We are on evic­tion alert every day, and are well pre­pared, after 16 months of occu­pa­tion. We’re not sure how long the process will take from here, and we now need more humans inside the for­est, aswell as oth­ers sup­port­ing from the out­side. If Suez wants to destroy the Lap­pers­fort, now is the time to come togeth­er to make their job as dif­fi­cult as pos­si­ble.

Love respect and sol­i­dar­i­ty to our friends in Tit­nore Woods (eng­land), Des­dels­boscs (spain), Main­shill (scot­land), Tas­ma­nia (aus­tralia), also under evic­tion threat; to the peo­ple of the Brazil­ian Ama­zon fight­ing against the GDF Suez Jirau dam project, and to all oth­er humans defend­ing wilder­ness and nature across the plan­et.…

lap­pers­fort
— e‑mail: lappersfort@riseup.net