Whaling Opponents Collide at Sea

Sea Shep­herd Crew Remain On Guard Behind the Nis­shin Maru

Sea Shep­herd Oper­a­tion Musashi
Update from the Ross Sea

Feb­ru­ary 7th, 2009
0700 Hours (Syd­ney Time)
1200 Hours (PST) (Feb­ru­ary 5th)
75 Degrees 57 Min­utes South and 164 Degrees 53 Min­utes West

Sea Shepherd rotten butter & collisionSea Shep­herd Crew Remain On Guard Behind the Nis­shin Maru

Sea Shep­herd Oper­a­tion Musashi
Update from the Ross Sea

Feb­ru­ary 7th, 2009
0700 Hours (Syd­ney Time)
1200 Hours (PST) (Feb­ru­ary 5th)
75 Degrees 57 Min­utes South and 164 Degrees 53 Min­utes West
Despite repeat­ed assaults by frus­trat­ed and increas­ing­ly vio­lent Japan­ese whalers, the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin con­tin­ues to stand guard behind the Japan­ese float­ing abat­toir called the Nis­shin Maru. The three Japan­ese har­poon boats are not in the area but the Sea Shep­herd crew is pre­pared to obstruct them should they return.

The Japan­ese have been accus­ing Sea Shep­herd of try­ing to obstruct their props with ropes yet the whalers have been try­ing to do the same thing to the Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin. They are accus­ing the Sea Shep­herd crew of throw­ing rot­ten but­ter (which the Japan­ese refer to as “acid”) at them yet the whalers are throw­ing golf balls and chunks of met­al at the Steve Irwin crew. In addi­tion, the Japan­ese are blast­ing the Sea Shep­herd crew with water can­nons and Long Range Acousti­cal weapons — a son­ic gun that caus­es dis­ori­en­ta­tion, nau­sea and deaf­ness.

“I find it inter­est­ing that so called experts and politi­cians are quick to con­demn Sea Shep­herd’s tac­tics for uphold­ing con­ser­va­tion law yet say not a word about the esca­lat­ing phys­i­cal vio­lence direct­ed at us by the whalers who are break­ing the law,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “Their posi­tion of sid­ing with the poach­ers seems to be that if we did not put our­selves in this sit­u­a­tion we would not be expe­ri­enc­ing such vio­lence. The same could be said for any police­man and Sea Shep­herd is not down here to protest whal­ing, we are down here to obstruct ille­gal whal­ing as defined under inter­na­tion­al con­ser­va­tion law. We are down here to enforce the law, not to break it.”

There is a legal prece­dent for Sea Shep­herd’s inter­ven­tion and that is the Unit­ed Nation World Char­ter for Nature that allows for non-gov­ern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions to uphold inter­na­tion­al con­ser­va­tion law and in Sec­tion 21(e) specif­i­cal­ly in areas beyond nation­al juris­dic­tions.

The Japan­ese whale poach­ers have the advan­tage of supe­ri­or ships, faster, more pow­er­ful ships, they have weapons and they have the sup­port of their gov­ern­ment that will defend what­ev­er actions they take includ­ing the killing of our crew if that should occur.
On Feb­ru­ary 6th, two inci­dents occurred where the Steve Irwin col­lid­ed with har­poon ves­sels as they forced their way past the Steve Irwin’s block­ade in their pur­suit of their poach­ing activ­i­ties. These col­li­sions were not inten­tion­al on the part of Sea Shep­herd.

“Ear­li­er we filmed a whale being ille­gal­ly killed and we watched as that whale endured an ago­niz­ing death, thrash­ing about in its own blood for twen­ty-five min­utes,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “We view the killing of that whale as cold blood­ed mur­der and we are com­mit­ted to doing every­thing we can, short of inflict­ing injuries our­selves, to pro­tect these defence­less, gen­tle, intel­li­gent and social­ly com­plex sen­tient beings.”

The har­poon boats have not returned to the Nis­shin Maru since the last inci­dent occurred at 1800 Hours on Feb­ru­ary 6th.

The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety has made it clear to the gov­ern­ment of Aus­tralia that our inter­ven­tions which are becom­ing increas­ing­ly more dan­ger­ous because of Japan­ese aggres­sion can be avoid­ed by Peter Gar­rett and Kevin Rudd sim­ply mak­ing good on their pre-elec­tion promise to take the Japan­ese whalers to court.

“Because Gar­rett and Rudd have reneged on their promis­es to us, the peo­ple of Aus­tralia, we have been forced to defend these whales as Aus­tralian cit­i­zens in these hos­tile and remote waters sim­ply because some­one has to,” said Andrew Per­ry of Hobart, Tas­ma­nia.

—–

Steve Irwin Suf­fers Sec­ond Col­li­sion with the Japan­ese Fleet

Oper­a­tion Musashi
Update from the Ross Sea

Feb­ru­ary 6th, 2009, 1830 Hours (Syd­ney Time)
2330 Hours (PST) (Feb­ru­ary 5th)
75 Degrees 52 Min­utes South and 165 Degrees 18 Min­utes West

At 1800 Hours the har­poon ves­sels Yushin Maru No. 1 and the Yushin Maru No.3 decid­ed to run the Sea Shep­herd block­ade to trans­fer two dead whales to the flens­ing deck of the Nis­shin Maru. The Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin was block­ing the slip­way to pre­vent the trans­fer in order to shut down the ille­gal Japan­ese whal­ing oper­a­tions.

As the Nis­shin Maru attempt­ed to hook onto the dead whale, the Steve Irwin and the Yushin Maru No.3 col­lid­ed with the for­ward star­board side of the Steve Irwin and the port stern side of the har­poon ves­sel com­ing togeth­er.

“We told them to not con­tin­ue their ille­gal whal­ing oper­a­tions and that we would be block­ing the stern slip­way of the fac­to­ry ship,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “They decid­ed to test our resolve and appar­ent­ly expect­ed us to retreat when they charged in ahead of us to make the trans­fer.”

Cap­tain Wat­son said that the Steve Irwin became dif­fi­cult to con­trol under a bar­rage of met­al objects, blasts from the water can­nons, and the dis­ori­en­ta­tion caused by the LRAD acoustic weapons that the whalers were using on the con­ser­va­tion­ists.

“I was dazed by the son­ic blasts being used on us at close range.” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “I have to admit it was dif­fi­cult to con­cen­trate with that devise being focused on us.”

“I’ve nev­er felt any­thing quite like it,” said Emi­ly Hunter from Toron­to, Cana­da. “It pen­e­trates the body and you can feel your mus­cles vibrat­ing. It made me dizzy and left me some­what dazed.”

The Steve Irwin suf­fered no notice­able dam­age from the col­li­sion and no one was seri­ous­ly injured. A few of the Sea Shep­herd crew were struck by golf balls and pieces of met­al. The crew of the Steve Irwin were unable to deter­mine if there was any dam­age done to the har­poon hunter killer boat.

The two whales were trans­ferred after the Steve Irwin shut down the oper­a­tions of the fleet for twelve hours.

“We are try­ing to make this as dif­fi­cult as pos­si­ble for them to con­tin­ue their ille­gal activ­i­ties, “said Mol­ly Kendall from Ade­laide, South Aus­tralia. “It is dif­fi­cult to see them mur­der­ing these whales and we are deter­mined to do every­thing we pos­si­bly can to stop this hor­rif­ic slaugh­ter.”

The Steve Irwin remains on the tail of the Nis­shin Maru to attempt to obstruct any fur­ther trans­fers in an effort to stop the unlaw­ful poach­ing of the whales by the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet.

“I wish we did not have to be down here in this dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tion,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “I’ve said repeat­ed­ly that if Aus­tralia or New Zealand would agree to take Japan to the inter­na­tion­al court on this than we would back off. Because inter­na­tion­al law is not being enforced, we have no choice but to do what we can with the resources avail­able to us to defend these endan­gered whales in this estab­lished inter­na­tion­al whale sanc­tu­ary.”

—–

Update from the Ross Sea
Sea Shep­herd’s Oper­a­tion Musashi

Feb­ru­ary 6th, 2009
0800 Hours (Syd­ney Time)
1300 Hours (PST) (Feb­ru­ary 5th)
75 Degrees 44 Min­utes South and 165 Degrees 39 Min­utes West
The Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin col­lid­ed with the Yushin Maru #2 this morn­ing as the har­poon ves­sel moved in to block the Steve Irwin’s attempt to pre­vent the trans­fer of a dead whale up the slip­way of the Nis­shin Maru.

“We were in the process of block­ing the trans­fer from the Yushin Maru #2 when the Yushin Maru #1 moved direct­ly in front of the bow to block us,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “I could not turn to star­board with­out hit­ting the Yushin Maru #1. I tried to back down but the move­ment of the Yushin Maru #2 made the col­li­sion unavoid­able.”

The Yushin Maru #2 was trans­fer­ring a 2nd whale killed this morn­ing.

“The whalers have decid­ed to test our resolve,” said 1st Offi­cer Peter Ham­marst­edt. “They have esca­lat­ed this bat­tle to see just how deter­mined we are to pro­tect these whales. We’re shep­herds and we will do what we can to pro­tect our flock from these mur­der­ous poach­ers.”

The Yushin Maru #3 has also killed a whale but is unable to approach the fac­to­ry ship because the Steve Irwin is now guard­ing the slip­way.

The Sea Shep­herd crew intend to hold this posi­tion to pre­vent the trans­fer.

Communique released from ELF action at university

“Com­plete com­mu­nique of the action of Jan­u­ary 29:

Full communique released from ELF action at university“Com­plete com­mu­nique of the action of Jan­u­ary 29:

In the ear­ly morn­ing of Jan­u­ary 29, the sub­mis­sive fire­fight­ers in Mex­i­co City (D.F.) quelled a fire with­in the premis­es of the Col­lege of Sci­ences and Human­i­ties south cam­pus (CCH Sur) of the Uni­ver­si­dad Nacional Autóno­ma de Méx­i­co (UNAM). There a machine which destroys the Earth was left for­ev­er unus­able, and the admin­is­tra­tion offices of the cam­pus were burned.

The Frente de Lib­eración de la Tier­ra (ELF) claimed this attack through a con­tact; we were informed that the uni­ver­si­ty had been destroy­ing a large part of the eco­log­i­cal reserve where a so-called ‘edu­ca­tion’ cen­ter is being built, sev­er­al vari­eties of trees and diverse plants were cut down, con­sid­ered to be in the way of their abil­i­ty to expand their facil­i­ties, and their mas­tery over nature; the progress and edu­ca­tion that they extol in their class­rooms is always based on dom­i­na­tion and anthro­pocen­trism. In this act by the UNAM, it is more than clear that not only do they wish to dom­i­nate and mold the minds of stu­dents, they also seek to expand the same con­trol over the land and the ani­mals that inhab­it her. That’s why the destruc­tive machine was burned, and why we also decid­ed to set a fire on cam­pus, now an indis­putable part of the eco­cide that edu­ca­tion imple­ments, which only wants to pro­duce peo­ple who are sub­mis­sive to author­i­ty and pow­er; they cre­ate beings who are unable to think and act for them­selves and are only edu­cat­ed to pro­duce and con­sume.

The mass media of mis­com­mu­ni­ca­tion, which hid the machine which had been burned, only now announced that part of the admin­is­tra­tive offices had been burned, and that this had been caused by Por­ro (shock groups) [groups orga­nized to dis­cred­it stu­dent move­ments]; we want to make clear that the ELF/FLT is not com­posed of such peo­ple, who are sent by their boss­es to do absurd and mean­ing­less things; our rea­sons are clear, as we strug­gle for total lib­er­a­tion (ani­mal, land and human), and if any­thing blocks us we will face it until its com­plete destruc­tion and elim­i­na­tion.

We know that the esti­mat­ed dam­age of this action was thou­sands of pesos, but still we are not sat­is­fied with that, and we will con­tin­ue mak­ing war on all that oppress­es us and will not allow us all to be hap­py– us, ani­mals and the land.

This was just a lit­tle mes­sage, for those who prof­it at the expense of the destruc­tion and dom­i­na­tion of the ecosys­tem.

ELF/FLT Méx­i­co”

anony­mous com­mu­nique (trans­la­tion) from http://directaction.info

Group out in force for the final days of the shooting season + arrest report.

4.02.2009
A quick report from Glouces­ter­shire and Cotswold hunt sabs from the fields on the last Sat­ur­day before the end of the Pheas­ant shoot­ing sea­son.

4.02.2009
A quick report from Glouces­ter­shire and Cotswold hunt sabs from the fields on the last Sat­ur­day before the end of the Pheas­ant shoot­ing sea­son.

On our last walk­ing expe­di­tion through the beau­ti­ful Cotswold two weeks ago our small group of four came into some trou­ble with some of the secu­ri­ty from the Brimps­field park estate our small group of four were pushed around and shoved until we left the pub­lic foot­path which was clear­ly marked on the map. Appar­ent­ly it is fine to assault those who use a pub­lic right of way in the coun­try­side if shoot­ers are hav­ing a fun day’s mas­sacre. The atti­tude of those who pro­vide secu­ri­ty for the Brimps­field Park shoot­ing is far from legal, they open­ly admit on cam­era they know where we live and will be pay­ing us a vis­it, the shoot­ers have ON cam­era refused to break gun, leav­ing activists with tem­po­rary deaf­ness as cham­bers are emp­tied with­in inch­es of the heads of the sabs.

Sat­ur­day 31st Jan saw two land rovers packed with sabs stop five shoot­ers dur­ing a rough shoot in the Cotswolds, after decid­ing to move onto a dri­ven shoot in the area our land rovers were stopped by around 10 police vehi­cles and the while the dri­vers were being ques­tioned by police all sabs went for a nice walk along the foot­paths for a stroll. Unfor­tu­nate­ly although the dri­vers and vehi­cles were released by police they were fol­lowed by the yokels who pulled in front of the vehi­cles and called the police where two activists were arrest­ed for an appar­ent Aggra­vat­ed tres­pass and Sec­tion 5 Pub­lic order for caus­ing some­one to be harassed alarmed and dis­tressed.

One of the beat­ers made a state­ment say­ing that the two (one male, one female) had already been told to leave the land for three months by the police back in Novem­ber, and that they had caused him to feel alarmed, harassed or dis­tressed. They prob­a­bly can’t decide which of those three things they are as they are still look­ing in the “word meanins book” (dic­tio­nary) so they can check the def­i­n­i­tions.

Need­less to say, we will be back for the new sea­son and will con­tin­ue to fight these ani­mal abusers in our area until every last gun is silenced. Whilst prepar­ing for the new sea­son we will be out with our oth­er local fox hunts help­ing to pro­tect our wildlife.

More info check our new web­site below!

Glouces­ter­shire and Cotswold Hunt Sabs
warn@riseup.net
http://huntsabs.wordpress.com

Sound weapons used against anti-whaling protestors

Feb­ru­ary 1, 2009
The Japan­ese whal­ing ships have been jam­ming Sea Shep­herd com­mu­ni­ca­tions and have been deploy­ing a long range acoustic weapon device to repel Sea Shep­herd boats. The sound waves cause dis­ori­en­ta­tion and nau­sea.

Sea Shepherd zodiacFeb­ru­ary 1, 2009
The Japan­ese whal­ing ships have been jam­ming Sea Shep­herd com­mu­ni­ca­tions and have been deploy­ing a long range acoustic weapon device to repel Sea Shep­herd boats. The sound waves cause dis­ori­en­ta­tion and nau­sea.

The Japan­ese whal­ing ships have been jam­ming Sea Shep­herd com­mu­ni­ca­tions and have been deploy­ing a long range acoustic weapon device to repel Sea Shep­herd boats. The sound waves cause dis­ori­en­ta­tion and nau­sea.

The deploy­ment of mil­i­tary weapon sys­tems in the Antarc­tic Treaty Zone is a vio­la­tion of inter­na­tion­al law. The whalers are becom­ing increas­ing­ly vio­lent in defense of their ille­gal activ­i­ties.

“It is a very dra­mat­ic scene out here as ships zig zag back and forth in thick ice and heavy swells,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “The whalers are deploy­ing water can­nons, con­cus­sion grenades, acoustic weapons, and throw­ing sol­id brass and lead balls at Sea Shep­herd crewmem­bers. If we were to do any of the things these thugs are doing, we would be denounced as eco-ter­ror­ists. There cer­tain­ly is a dou­ble stan­dard where whale killers can use vio­lence with­out fear of con­dem­na­tion from their gov­ern­ment and we can’t even defend our­selves with­out con­dem­na­tion from our gov­ern­ments. What is impor­tant how­ev­er is that despite the vio­lence from the whalers, no whales are being killed. They can’t get away from us and if we keep on their tail they can’t kill whales.”

——–
Sea Shepherd water-cannoned
A crewmem­ber from the Steve Irwin was slight­ly injured after being struck by a high pres­sure water can­non fired from the Japan­ese whal­ing fac­to­ry ship Nis­shin Maru. One of the cam­era­men on one of the Steve Irwin’s inflat­able boats was cut and bruised above the eye when a high pres­sure blast of water knocked him off his feet while he was film­ing.

A sec­ond crew mem­ber was also injured in the con­fronta­tion with the whalers. Lau­rens De Groot of the Nether­lands was slight­ly injured when struck in the face by a met­al ball thrown by whalers. Whalers onboard the Yushin Maru #3 threw sol­id brass and lead balls at crewmem­bers on one of the Steve Irwin’s inflat­able boats.

The Sea Shep­herd crew also dis­cov­ered that the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet is deploy­ing a new weapon in defence of their ille­gal whal­ing activ­i­ties.

The fac­to­ry ship the Nis­shin Maru and the two har­poon ves­sels in the fleet are equipped with Long Range Acousti­cal Devices (LRAD). This is a mil­i­tary grade weapon sys­tem that sends out mid to high fre­quen­cy sound waves designed to dis­ori­ent and pos­si­bly inca­pac­i­tate per­son­nel. It is basi­cal­ly an anti-per­son­nel weapons sys­tem.

The Steve Irwin has been chas­ing the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet for twen­ty-four hours at high speed through scat­tered ice fields and chang­ing weath­er con­di­tions for over three hun­dred miles west­ward across the top of the Ross Sea.

At 0500 Hours (Syd­ney Time) the Steve Irwin deployed two fast inflat­able boats and a heli­copter to harass the fleet and to hur­ry them along. Sea Shep­herd’s strat­e­gy is to keep the whal­ing fleet on the move. If they are run­ning they are not killing whales and no whales have been killed dur­ing the last 24 hours. In fact the Steve Irwin crew were excit­ed to see Fin whales swim­ming along­side the ship as they pur­sued the whal­ing fleet.

The Japan­ese har­poon ves­sels have been maneu­ver­ing very close to the Steve Irwin to intim­i­date and to try and lead the Sea Shep­herd ship away from the Nis­shin Maru. The con­fronta­tion that began in clear weath­er in dense ice and heavy swells became increas­ing treach­er­ous as fog and bliz­zard con­di­tions moved in around 0900 Hours.

The Steve Irwin crew retreat­ed when with­in range of the acoustic weapons.

“All we need to do is to keep them run­ning and to keep them from whal­ing and that is exact­ly what we are doing. It is prov­ing to be a very suc­cess­ful day,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son.

Weath­er con­di­tions are becom­ing increas­ing worse with heavy snow, fog, increas­ing swells and denser ice con­di­tions.

http://www.seashepherd.org/

ELF Mexico torch urban expansion, vandalise 30 Telmex phones

report­ed anony­mous­ly:

“Jan­u­ary 22:

Graf­fi­ti such as ‘Destroy­ers,’ ‘Mur­der­ers’ and ‘F.L.T.’ was paint­ed on two machines of urban expan­sion and destroy­ers of the land; a fire had also been set in one of these.

We will not allow more exter­mi­na­tion!

F.L.T/E.L.F Mex­i­co”

——————–

anony­mous report:

“Jan­u­ary 16:

report­ed anony­mous­ly:

“Jan­u­ary 22:

Graf­fi­ti such as ‘Destroy­ers,’ ‘Mur­der­ers’ and ‘F.L.T.’ was paint­ed on two machines of urban expan­sion and destroy­ers of the land; a fire had also been set in one of these.

We will not allow more exter­mi­na­tion!

F.L.T/E.L.F Mex­i­co”

——————–

anony­mous report:

“Jan­u­ary 16:

20 Telmex tele­phones were vic­tims of van­dal­ism by the Frente de Lib­era­cion de la Tier­ra.

Attack­ing civ­i­liza­tion until its com­plete col­lapse!

Mex­i­co”

——————–

anony­mous report:

“On 12 Jan­u­ary, 10 Telmex phone booths were van­dal­ized with spray paint.

Direct com­bat against civ­i­liza­tion!

Lud­dites Against the Domes­ti­ca­tion of Wild Nature (LCDNS)

Mex­i­co”

——————–

Source — http://directaction.info
ELF actions — http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/sabotage

Bath Bomb #18 Out Now!

THE BATH BOMB

@nti-copyright: copy and dis­trib­ute!
Issue #18
free/donation
Jan 09

“Steal this new­sheet!”

Look­ing Back At A Busy Year

THE BATH BOMB

@nti-copyright: copy and dis­trib­ute!
Issue #18
free/donation
Jan 09

“Steal this new­sheet!”

Look­ing Back At A Busy Year

2009 promis­es to be a busy year for BAN and friends, but before we look for­ward, let’s look take a look back at 2008. The year start­ed with a con­tin­u­ing spate of foie gras, forc­ing the sick dish off the menus of many a restau­rant. The FreeShop went from strength to strength, dis­trib­ut­ing goods to thou­sands of sat­is­fied anti-shop­pers and spread­ing its month­ly anti-con­sumerist (2nd Sat­ur­day of each month, 12–3pm, Stall Street, oppo­site Hol­land and Bar­rett). In a new twist, BAN­ners also dis­trib­uted free eth­i­cal, eco-friend­ly veg­an food to hun­gry passers­by at the ‘There is such thing as a free lunch!’ stall. Pun­ters of the Porter were kept enter­tained at ‘Bub­bling Under’, Bath’s ongo­ing free month­ly rad­i­cal film show­ings. Mem­bers of BAN also helped open ‘The 78’, Chippenham’s first squat­ted social cen­tre, and joined dozens in Bris­tol to resist the evic­tion of ‘Ash­ley Road’.

Bath’s ani­mals rights advo­cates have been equal­ly busy, demo­ing Bath race­course dur­ing a vis­it by Rolf Har­ris, trav­el­ling to Oxford Uni and Hunt­ing­don for anti-vivi­sec­tion events, sab­o­tag­ing local fox hunts, trav­el­ling to Cardiff for an anti-bad­ger cull demo and feed­ing hun­dreds at the first Bath Veg­an Fayre. Bath activists also spent a fair bit of time in Bris­tol, help­ing organ­ise the Bris­tol Anar­chist Book­fair, sev­er­al days of cred­it crunch-relat­ed work­shops, the first Bris­tol Anar­chist Games Day (high­ly rec­om­mend­ed!) and also helped organ­ise anti-cap­i­tal­ist demos around the open­ing of the mon­strous Cabot Cir­cus shop­ping cen­tre, which was invad­ed by zom­bie pro­test­ers. Get­ting active for the envi­ron­ment, BAN joined 3,000 oth­ers at Kingsnorth Camp for Cli­mate Action, help­ing to seize the site, and caus­ing seri­ous dis­rup­tion to the coal plant by scal­ing the perime­ter fence. Ear­li­er in the year, mem­bers of BAN joined oth­ers from Bris­tol, Oxford and Wales to suc­cess­ful­ly block­ade Aberthaw coal-fired pow­er plant, whilst more recent­ly, anoth­er BAN­ner helped out at the Plane Stu­pid block­ade at Stanst­ed. We were also busy with No Bor­der­s/pro-asy­lum seek­er events, like the anti-IOM demos in Bris­tol and ID cards protest at Cardiff, and joined the anar­chist ‘Free­dom of Move­ment’ bloc and 5,000 oth­ers at the Man­ches­ter anti-Labour Par­ty Con­fer­ence.

We’ve teamed up with Bath Mad Hat­ters to high­light the dan­ger­ous effects of forced med­ica­tion, and our new ped­al-pow­ered sound sys­tem is justin about ready to go, after a year of hard work. Fas­cists failed to escape our atten­tion, with local activists head­ing up north to oppose and con­front the BNP’s annu­al Red, White and Blue fes­ti­val (due to this year’s dis­rup­tion, it is unlike­ly to hap­pen again). Com­bined events and forces helped to delay the open­ing of Bath­wick Hill Tesco for near­ly a year, and BAN were there to greet them when they arrived. BAN­ners cel­e­brat­ed Buy Noth­ing Day, and twice jour­neyed down to Brighton to join the ‘Smash EDO/ITT’ demos, aimed at clos­ing down a weapons fac­to­ry sup­ply­ing geno­ci­dal states such as Israel and the US of A; after the demos (both of which got a bit ‘rio­ty’) and a four-year cam­paign, the fac­to­ry is on its last legs – don’t miss the next demo on 04/05/09: www.smashedo.org.uk. BAN also launched its anti-cred­it crunch cam­paign, aimed at defend­ing our com­mu­ni­ties against unem­ploy­ment, bailiffs, cor­po­rate greed and reces­sion. The cam­paign kick-start­ed with a 35-strong, noisy demo in Novem­ber and will con­tin­ue on as reces­sion deep­ens, with a focus on prac­ti­cal­ly resist­ing reces­sion and direct­ly defend­ing our rights and liveli­hoods. And we even man­aged well-earned group hol­i­days at Tolpud­dle fes­ti­val and the beau­ti­ful Gow­er, too!

Oppo­si­tion Increas­es As Attacks Inten­si­fy

On Sat­ur­day 3rd Jan­u­ary, 400–500 gath­ered in Bris­tol to oppose the con­tin­ued Israeli attacks on Pales­tine. The march, attend­ed by young and old, anar­chists, stu­dents, Mus­lims and social­ists alike, took place on the after­noon of the day that Israel was report­ed to have begun its land incur­sion in Pales­tine. The demon­stra­tion coin­cid­ed with var­i­ous oth­ers around the coun­try, and indeed around the world, includ­ing a 50,000-strong march in Lon­don. The fol­low­ing week­end 100,000 peo­ple attend­ed a march in Lon­don in oppo­si­tion to the con­tin­ued dev­as­tat­ing attacks which have since includ­ed the bomb­ing of a school being used as a shel­ter for civil­ians, in which more than 40 peo­ple were killed. The IDF have also dropped leaflets over Gaza threat­en­ing to increase the feroc­i­ty of their attacks. In the five years that pre­ced­ed the recent attacks, around 5,000 Pales­tini­ans are report­ed to have been killed by the Israelis’ advanced weapon­ry. In spite of the British Gov­ern­men­t’s renewed call for cease­fire, fig­ures report­ed in the Guardian in 2006 tell a dif­fer­ent sto­ry: the Gov­ern­ment approved £22.5m of weapon­ry exports to Israel in the pre­vi­ous year. If you would like to get involved in oppos­ing the attacks, there is a vig­il in Bath every Sat­ur­day out­side the Abbey between 11.30 and 12.30. In Bris­tol, there is a vig­il every night at 5pm in the cen­tre, oppo­site the Hip­po­drome, and Bristol’s also home to the ‘Raytheon Out’ cam­paign, who are now in the fifth week of their rooftop occu­pa­tion of that arms man­u­fac­tur­er. And let’s not for­get neigh­bour­ing deathdeal­ers Boe­ing, who recent­ly found all their win­dows smashed! In Frome too, 40 peo­ple recent­ly occu­pied Lloyds TSB, who have ridicu­lous­ly closed the account of human rights char­i­ty Inter­Pal. Oth­er cor­po­rate nas­ties with ties to Israel include M&S and Star­bucks, and be sure to boy­cott Israeli super­mar­ket goods, where many pep­pers, sweet pota­toes and avo­ca­dos are grown on stolen land.

http://www.bathstopwar.org.uk/index.html
www.stopwar.org.uk/
http://palsolidarity.org/
http://raytheonout.wordpress.com/
http://electronicintifada.net
http://www.maannews.net/en
http://www.freegaza.org
http://talestotell.wordpress.com

Bash Back Against Bath’s Bas­tard Bailiffs!

Recent arti­cles in the Chron­i­cle have stark­ly con­tra­dict­ed asser­tions by gov­ern­ment and aca­d­e­m­ic think tanks that Bath would “weath­er the worst effects of the reces­sion.” At the last count, 1,542 peo­ple are claim­ing ben­e­fits in the Bath area, an increase of 59% on last year, with 600 peo­ple hav­ing lost their jobs in the city since last Novem­ber — a dra­mat­ic rise. And how are we reward­ed when we’re laid off and forced onto the dole? Do we enter a nur­tur­ing wel­fare sys­tem that caters for the needs and skills of the unem­ployed? No, it’s more author­i­tar­i­an than ever — ben­e­fits have not risen with the increas­ing cost of liv­ing, and claimants are harassed into search­ing for non-exis­tent jobs under the con­stant threat of ben­e­fit stop­page for fail­ure to con­form to the infu­ri­at­ing­ly bureau­crat­ic world of Job­seek­ers. As a direct result of this and the rise in bills, food and liv­ing costs, Bath res­i­dents are see­ing a lot more of everyone’s least favourite par­a­site, the bailiff. Recent fig­ures show that bailiffs chas­ing unpaid coun­cil tax vis­it­ed 2,400 homes in Bath last year. With three/four peo­ple in the aver­age house­hold, that means that 8,000 (10% of Bath’s pop­u­la­tion) were vis­it­ed for coun­cil tax alone! When we take into con­sid­er­a­tion bailiffs sent out by banks, loan com­pa­nies and ener­gy sup­pli­ers, we can real­is­ti­cal­ly increase the num­ber of Batho­ni­ans being harassed sev­er­al times over. At this point the old reac­tionary cry that peo­ple who are unem­ployed or bailiff-rid­den are ‘layabouts’ who have ‘brought it on them­selves’ sim­ply no longer holds true. The major­i­ty of us are now feel­ing the pinch, some hard­er than oth­ers, and it’s sim­ply not our fault. If your boss fires you and the job mar­ket is emp­ty, what choice is there but ben­e­fits? If you were going to pay your coun­cil tax, but had to spend the mon­ey on the 40% gas and elec­tric bill increase and feed­ing your fam­i­ly, what would you do?

Bailiffs are famed for their ruth­less­ness — a recent court case tells of a bailiff who posed as an ambu­lance dri­ver to gain entry to an elder­ly couple’s house to repos­sess goods, while the elder­ly occu­pant suf­fered a heart com­plaint. And this is the norm, not the excep­tion. Par­lia­ment recent­ly passed laws allow­ing bailiffs to break into your house, so with­out our elect­ed rep­re­sen­ta­tives to rely on, it looks like it’s up to us! In Bath dur­ing the Poll Tax cam­paign of the ear­ly 90s, and today in Edin­burgh, Lon­don and else­where, bailiffs have met com­mu­ni­ty sol­i­dar­i­ty. Organ­is­ing amongst your neigh­bours to face off bailiffs when they turn up on your street is a pow­er­ful way of defend­ing your­self, your prop­er­ty and your com­mu­ni­ty against these vul­tures. Bailiffs prey on the weak, the strand­ed and the vul­ner­a­ble. Resist­ing bailiffs is to be a key part of BAN’s anti-reces­sion cam­paign in the com­ing year, and they will be hold­ing an infor­mal day of dis­cus­sion, net­work­ing and organ­is­ing on Sat­ur­day the 28th of Feb­ru­ary; loca­tion TBC. To get involved in the cam­paign, if you need help organ­is­ing resis­tance to bailiffs or if you can name and shame any bailiffs, e‑mail BAN at bathac­tivist­net [at] yahoo.co.uk

EVENTS

Bath Hunt Sabo­teurs meet­ings, 2nd and 4th Mon­day of the month, 8pm, The Bell, Wal­cot Street

Lon­don Road Food Co-op, Wednes­days, 4–7pm, River­side Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre, Lon­don Road

Bath Stop The War Coali­tion vig­il, Sat­ur­days, 11.30am-12.30, Bath Abbey Court­yard

Broad­lands Orchard­share Was­sail­ing, Sat­ur­day 17th Jan­u­ary, 3pm, Broad­lands Orchard, £2 entry

Israel Out of Gaza demon­stra­tion, Sat­ur­day 17th Jan­u­ary, 12.30 start, Abbey Court­yard

Bub­bling Under, Sun­day 18th Jan­u­ary, 1–5pm, Porter Cel­lar bar, George Street

Talk: ‘Eco Upgrad­ing of Exist­ing Hous­es — Chal­lenges and Oppor­tu­ni­ties’, Mon­day 19th Jan­u­ary, 7.30pm, Quak­er Meet­ing House, Brad­ford on Avon, free entry

Seed Swap, Sun­day 1st Feb­ru­ary, 3–5pm, St Marks Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­tre, Wid­combe, £2 entry

Bath Friends of the Earth meet­ing, Mon­day 2nd Feb­ru­ary, 8pm, Still­point, Broad Street Place

Talk: ‘Com­post­ing — how to make it and when to use it’, Wednes­day 4th Feb­ru­ary, 7.30pm, Grove St Church Halls

Bath Ani­mal Action meet­ing, Wednes­day 4th Feb­ru­ary, 7.30–8.30pm, back room of The Bell

Bath Activist Net­work meet­ing, Thurs­day 5th Feb­ru­ary, 7.30–9pm, down­stairs Hob­gob­lin

Earth First! Win­ter Moot, Sat­ur­day 7th Feb­ru­ary-Sun­day 8th, 10am start, Cow­ley Club, Brighton, e‑mail: moot2009 [at] earthfirst.org.uk

Bath Green­peace meet­ing, Mon­day 9th Feb­ru­ary, 7.30–9pm, Still­point, Broad Street Place

Tran­si­tion Bath Forum, Tues­day 10th Feb­ru­ary, 7pm, Wid­combe Social Club

Bath Green Drinks, Wednes­day 11th Feb­ru­ary, 8.30pm, the Rum­mer, Grand Parade

Bor­ders & Immi­gra­tion work­shop, Sat­ur­day 14th Feb­ru­ary, 1–3pm, Bris­tol venue tbc email trapeze [at] riseup.net

Bath FreeShop, Sat­ur­day 14th Feb­ru­ary, 12–3pm, out­side Pump Rooms, Stall Street

‘Beat the Bailiffs’ lis­ten­ing post, Sat­ur­day 28th Feb­ru­ary, more details tbc

Talk: ‘Por­trait of a Road Protest’, Sun­day 1st March, 3–4pm, Bath Cen­tral Library, £6/£4 entry

Res­cue Rangers

Appar­ent­ly, a dog’s not just for Christ­mas, and nei­ther is the rest of the four-legged fur­ry world, too. Fol­low­ing the usu­al sea­son­al peak in lit­tle Tim­my and Sarah’s pass­ing whim for cute lit­tle caged pets, a huge num­ber of unwant­ed rodents need re-hom­ing. Whilst the major­i­ty of humankind can’t get over the crazed notion that oth­er ani­mals exist pure­ly to enter­tain, feed and oth­er­wise serve them, and pet breed­ers are always out to make a quick buck, offi­cial res­cue author­i­ties such as the RSPCA cen­tres and Bath Cats & Dogs Home are full to burst­ing, with many hap­less beasts not lucky enough to reach res­cue cen­ters fac­ing lethal injec­tion. If you can offer a lov­ing and respon­si­ble home for any of four mice, 21 ger­bils or 60 rats in the near­by area, please drop us a line.

www.fancy-rats.co.uk/

Greece Is The Word

Last month’s issue of the Bath Bomb car­ried a hasti­ly-writ­ten report of the mur­der of a Greek teenag­er, and the night of riots fol­low­ing his death. Since then, the riots have giv­en birth to a full-blown revolt and although (or prob­a­bly more accu­rate­ly, because) a gen­uine­ly rev­o­lu­tion­ary sit­u­a­tion has emerged in Greece, the media has lost inter­est. Don’t let the sub­si­dence of the sen­sa­tion­al­ist tabloid press’s rant­i­ng of ‘bomb-throw­ing youths’ fool you though, the insur­rec­tion in Greece is as alive as ever. Coin­cid­ing with a gen­er­al strike, the riots expand­ed beyond the anar­chist move­ment and became a coher­ent expres­sion of anger at the deep­en­ing eco­nom­ic cri­sis. For three weeks, riot­ing involv­ing hun­dreds of thou­sands raged across all of Greece, with sym­bols of cap­i­tal­ism and the state, such as police sta­tions and banks, tar­get­ed by Molo­tovs, bricks and graf­fi­ti. Uni­ver­si­ties, schools and work­places were occu­pied and self-man­aged by work­ers and stu­dents, and many dis­tricts of Greece remain in con­trol of the res­i­dents, as no-go areas for the police. So why have the events in Greece fall­en from the eye of the world’s media? It is because revolt and rev­o­lu­tion almost always ini­tial­ly man­i­fest them­selves in riot­ing and ‘chaos’. It is the instinct of most peo­ple, when lib­er­at­ed from the oppres­sive yoke of their for­mer mas­ters to cel­e­brate, rev­el, and attack the sym­bols of the old order — this makes excit­ing footage, which can eas­i­ly be por­trayed as mis­guid­ed vio­lence. The next step in a revolt is thought­ful­ness, of organ­i­sa­tion, of order, and of begin­ning to think about how to organ­ise and prac­ti­cal­ly man­i­fest a lib­er­at­ed space. The media have giv­en this phase no atten­tion, as first­ly, it’s less dra­mat­ic, and sec­ond­ly, and most impor­tant­ly, because it is against the ethos of the cor­po­rate media to report on rad­i­cals as ratio­nal peo­ple capa­ble of, and seri­ous about, organ­is­ing a soci­ety free of lead­ers, pover­ty and cap­i­tal­ist greed. Make no mis­take, Greece is still in revolt, and is prov­ing that as the old say­ing goes “cap­i­tal­ism is chaos, anar­chy is order.”

Wel­come To The New Year

2008 fin­ished with riots in Greece, as peo­ple on the streets fought back against the cor­rupt gov­ern­ment and police who gunned down Alexan­dros-Andreas Grig­oropou­los. 2009 has opened with a blood­bath in Gaza car­ried out by the Israeli Defence Force, while world lead­ers blame the vic­tims and refuse to inter­fere like they did with Iraq and Afghanistan, all because Israel is their friend. Only ordi­nary peo­ple through­out the world have raised their voic­es against this new wave of killing. Mean­while, over here, unem­ploy­ment and house repos­ses­sion are up because we pay for the cri­sis caused by pol­i­cy mak­ers and politi­cians. Let’s try to make 2009 a year when we can shake off these lead­ers who run this sick sys­tem. A year like Eng­land 1381, Great Britain 1640, France 1789, Europe 1848, Mex­i­co 1914, Rus­sia 1917, Kro­n­stadt and the Ukraine 1921, Spain 1936, Hun­gary 1956, every­where 1968 and East­ern Europe 1989. Most of these strug­gles fell just short, per­mit­ting dic­ta­tor­ships of the left and right, but these were still years in which ordi­nary peo­ple strived to bring about a bet­ter world, and will try again. (Oscar Nom­i­nee inspi­ra­tional speech time:) the time is always now, and if you’re inter­est­ed in join­ing the strug­gle in a move­ment where every­body is equal and val­ued, join us in Bath Activist Net­work. A bet­ter world is pos­si­ble!

Bath Activist Net­work are a local umbrel­la group cam­paign­ing on issues as diverse as devel­op­ment, envi­ron­men­tal­ism, anti-war, ani­mal rights, work­ers’ rights and more. Help­ing to pro­duce The Bath Bomb, we are open to any­one, and our mem­bers range from trade union­ists to anar­chists, lib­er­als to greens, and peo­ple who just want to change Bath for the bet­ter. For details on meet­ings, demos, or just to get in touch, ring us on 07949 611912, email bathactivistnet@yahoo.co.uk, or see our web­site: www.myspace.com/bathactivistnetwork

Earth First! Things First

Dur­ing the com­ing Bath Book fes­ti­val on the 1st of March, Bath Cen­tral Library will be host­ing the exhi­bi­tion ‘Por­trait of a Road Protest,’ about the goings on at Sols­bury Hill in the ear­ly 90s. It’s free entry to see the images, but a talk will take place from 3–4pm, £6 entry waged, £4 unwaged. Here’s a lit­tle his­to­ry les­son. The direct action protest against the would-be Bath­eas­t­on Bypass began in March ‘94, fol­low­ing the pub­lic enquiry sev­er­al years before. Bath­eas­t­on did have a traf­fic prob­lem, and a small bypass, traf­fic calm­ing or improved pub­lic trans­port (we’re still wait­ing) would have been accept­able, but the sheer scale of the road, destroy­ing water mead­ows and slic­ing through the low­er slopes of Sols­bury Hill, was mad­ness. The non-vio­lent direct action that took place con­sist­ed of sit­ting on dig­gers, build­ing tree camps, squat­ting, blockad­ing, and stand­ing up to the most­ly bru­tal secu­ri­ty guards (rumour has it that one was fed raw meat!). The protest brought many dif­fer­ent peo­ple togeth­er: locals, Earth First!ers and Don­gas, all fight­ing the Depart­ment of Trans­port. Over all, it went on for sev­er­al months, with reunion actions the fol­low­ing year, received lots of cov­er­age and, along with oth­er road protests round the rest of the coun­try, cut back around 90% of the UK road build­ing pro­gramme start­ed by the dread­ed iron lady.

Bath Bomb Word­watch: Don­ga, Don­ga Tribe (noun) — a group of semi-nomadic hip­pies and squat­ter-punks that joined to defend Twyford Down and oth­er road protest sites

www.earthfirst.org.uk

Air­port Expan­sion Is Plane Stu­pid

The run­way of Stanst­ed air­port was invad­ed by activists from the group Plane Stu­pid at 3.15am on 8th Decem­ber, while closed for main­te­nance work. Sched­uled to be reopened at 5am, the run­way was closed for three hours while con­fused cops and secu­ri­ty guards strug­gled to remove 57 pro­tes­tors. 56 flights were can­celled. The aver­age flight out of Stanst­ed releas­es 41.58 tonnes of CO2 into the atmos­phere. We lit­er­al­ly can’t go on like this – hopes of the UK meet­ing even the ridicu­lous­ly low gov­ern­ment-set tar­gets for emis­sions are screwed if we don’t cut our reliance on avi­a­tion, yet Neo-Labour has approved the capac­i­ty increase of Stanst­ed by ten mil­lion pas­sen­gers a year. So yeah, this action no doubt pissed many peo­ple off, but noth­ing else has worked so far. Who now would deny the wor­thi­ness of the cause of the suf­fragettes, and the effec­tive­ness of their tac­tics (which were far more dis­rup­tive than those of Plane Stu­pid, who’ve nev­er turned to explo­sives)? Thou­sands of well-behaved pro­tes­tors marched against the war in Iraq and got nowhere. The media claim that pro­tes­tors dis­rupt­ed work­ing class fam­i­lies’ hol­i­days, yet it is the poor who will be hit hard­est by cli­mate change — who gen­er­al­ly lack the means to sur­vive floods, famine and freak weath­er. Indeed, sta­tis­tics show that the major­i­ty of flights are still tak­en by busi­ness peo­ple and rich hol­i­day-mak­ers. Plane Stupid’s stunt comes at a crit­i­cal time when the gov­ern­ment is soon to make their deci­sion on Heathrow’s third run­way, and des­per­ate times call for rad­i­cal mea­sures. To pro­tect the very near future, we must act now.

www.planestupid.com/

Review Cor­ner: Off The Hoof

As we always say, going veg­an is a way for­ward to save the world against cli­mate change and to take a stand against the cru­el and mur­der­ous meat indus­try, so we here at the Bath Bomb thought we’d take a look at this lat­est news agent addi­tion. Off the Hoof is a mag­a­zine that pur­ports to cater for “veg­gies, veg­ans and meat eaters every­where.” How­ev­er, a clos­er inspec­tion reveals that this is unfor­tu­nate­ly a veg­an mag for veg­an peo­ple, with some of the con­tent sure to offend all but the thick­est-skinned of meat eaters. This first win­ter issue has inter­views with veg­an celebs such as con­tor­tion­ist Rub­ber Richie, medal-win­ning body builder Pete Ryan, and musi­cian Deb­bie Leigh Dri­ver, and fea­tures on veg­an stars like Natal­ie Port­man and Chris Mar­tin. Oh, and an arti­cle on non-veg­an Har­ry Hill and his fair trade nuts. The mag­a­zine is gen­er­al­ly a very good read with inter­est­ing arti­cles, and a style all of its own. Why not give it a read?

www.offthehoof.co.uk/

Duck Tales

It may be a new year, but some things nev­er change. The epic war between com­pas­sion­ate do-good­ers and the arro­gant ani­mal-abus­ing restau­ra­teurs of Bath over the issue of foie gras con­tin­ues. But enough objec­tive jour­nal­ism. The pro­duc­tion of foie gras is banned in this coun­try and many oth­ers, and involves tak­ing oth­er­wise free-range ducks and geese and forc­ing them to spend the last 12 weeks of their lives in tiny cages, being force-fed corn mash up to three times a day via gav­age pipes shoved down their throats. Even­tu­al­ly, as well as suf­fer­ing throat lac­er­a­tions and find­ing it painful to move, the birds’ liv­ers become infect­ed with the dis­ease ‘hepat­ic steato­sis’ and expand to up to ten times its nat­ur­al size – which is then served up as pâte de foie gras. Haute cui­sine this is not. Though restau­rants present this as an exot­ic del­i­ca­cy, the scale and eth­ic of pro­duc­tion is clos­er to that of fast food, and then they just slap on a hefty mark-up.

Over the Christ­mas peri­od, reg­u­lar protests and vis­its from Bath Ani­mal Action, Bath Activist Net­work and Bris­tol Ani­mal Rights Coali­tion per­suad­ed The Pinch and Bistro Num­ber 5 to stop pub­licly sell­ing, but they are both expect­ed to resume the dirty habit soon. The Olive Tree and Roy­al Cres­cent Hotel both appar­ent­ly only serve ‘faux gras,’ a sea­son­al, rar­er dish, based on the nat­ur­al over-eat­ing ten­den­cies of geese before migra­tion, and involves much less ani­mal tor­ture. Bathamp­ton Mill has been found to be sell­ing foie gras, as have Beau­jo­lais, who’ve been serv­ing dodg­i­ly under the counter ever since pre­vi­ous protests; didn’t your mum ever tell you lying was wrong? Whilst around 800 mem­bers of the pub­lic have now added their sig­na­tures to a peti­tion call­ing for a city-wide ban on the sale of the stuff, the offend­ing eater­ies should be expect­ing mys­tery shop­pers and more demos soon.

Here endeth the ser­mon.

www.banfoiegras.org.uk/
www.viva.org.uk/campaigns/foiegras/index.html

GOT A STORY? WANT TO RECEIVE THE BATH BOMB BY EMAIL? HOPING TO SUE? Con­tact us by e‑mailing bathbombpress@yahoo.co.uk. Large print e‑versions avail­able on request.

For Fox Sake

Box­ing Day saw hunt sabs from Bath team­ing up with Pewsey and Wales to stop the cru­el ‘sport’ of fox hunt­ing — we fol­lowed the hunters with video cam­eras to ensure they obeyed the law, and used cit­ronel­la spray to mask the fox’s scent. This jit­tery reporter was con­cerned by the hunt sup­port­ers’ his­to­ry of vio­lence towards sabo­teurs, yet the bar­bar­ic scum gave up after a piti­ful hour and a half. Maybe it had some­thing to do with the high­ly effec­tive hunt sab­bing seen on the day, or maybe the hunt mas­ter just realised he’d left his cousin hand­cuffed to the bed. It is ille­gal to hunt with dogs in the UK, although it is still legal to exer­cise hounds, chase a scent and flush out fox­es to be shot, mak­ing the ban vir­tu­al­ly un-enforce­able. Police gen­er­al­ly don’t give a shit, so sabo­teurs are need­ed as much as ever. To get involved con­tact Bath Hunt Sabs at bath­huntsabs [at] yahoo.co.uk, or find your local group at http://hsa.enviroweb.org/contact/index.html

And now, to the dis­claimer: As any­one is free to con­tribute, the opin­ions expressed in each arti­cle are not nec­es­sar­i­ly reflec­tive of each con­trib­u­tor. Nat­u­ral­ly, any right-wing or cor­po­rate bull­shit will be binned and spat on. Need­less to say, the opin­ions of the author of this dis­claimer does not nec­es­sar­i­ly rep­re­sent the views of any oth­er con­trib­u­tor…

For fur­ther info on any of our sto­ries see www.myspace.com/bathbomb

ELF Sabotage Bullfight Sponsor in Colombia

“In sol­i­dar­i­ty with the recent anti­au­thor­i­tar­i­an actions and to show a strength­en­ing com­mit­ment to the lib­er­a­tion of the earth and all ani­mals, the Autonomous Anar­chic Cell of the FLT in Bogo­ta does not stop!

ELF ColombiaELF Colombia“In sol­i­dar­i­ty with the recent anti­au­thor­i­tar­i­an actions and to show a strength­en­ing com­mit­ment to the lib­er­a­tion of the earth and all ani­mals, the Autonomous Anar­chic Cell of the FLT in Bogo­ta does not stop! Sab­o­taged 9 more phones of ETB, a spon­sor of the suf­fer­ing of inno­cents, on the night of Decem­ber 10; leav­ing anti­civ­i­liza­tion mes­sages and threats, the hand­sets were ripped out and the phone booths were ren­dered unus­able.

ANARCHIST ACTION TODAY AND FOREVER!
VIVA ANARCHIC GREECE!!!!!!!!!”

report­ed on Lib­eración Total: http://liberaciontotal.entodaspartes.net
trans­lat­ed by Bite Back: http://directaction.info
pre­vi­ous action: http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/actionreports/node/21875

Animal Rights Case Concern to Environmentalists & call out for 19th January — updated with CW analysis

While the case of 4 ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers found guilty on “con­spir­a­cy to black­mail” charges in rela­tion to con­tract test­ing com­pa­ny Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences (HLS) that tests on ani­mals may seem unre­lat­ed to the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment the case has direct rel­e­vance to all rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal­ists.

While the case of 4 ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers found guilty on “con­spir­a­cy to black­mail” charges in rela­tion to con­tract test­ing com­pa­ny Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences (HLS) that tests on ani­mals may seem unre­lat­ed to the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment the case has direct rel­e­vance to all rad­i­cal envi­ron­men­tal­ists. The activists were con­vict­ed for their part in the now famous SHAC (Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty) cam­paign that’s stat­ed aim is to close down the com­pa­ny.

Fol­low­ing their con­vic­tions the media lam­bast­ed the activists for numer­ous unlaw­ful and intim­i­dat­ing actions tak­en against Hunt­ing­don and asso­ci­at­ed com­pa­nies. Many of these actions will be dis­taste­ful to some and there are many dif­fer­ing views on ani­mal research in the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment how­ev­er this case has wider impli­ca­tions for activists across the board.

After a recent nation­al media arti­cle claim­ing a lone extrem­ist might be plan­ning an attack aimed at pop­u­la­tion reduc­tion was pub­lished, which NETCU appear to have had a hand in, some feel that NETCU (Nation­al Extrem­ism Tac­ti­cal Co-ordi­na­tion Unit) could be turn­ing their spot­light on the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment. Addi­tion­al­ly the polic­ing tac­tics expe­ri­enced at Cli­mate Camp indi­cate that ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers aren’t the sole focus of NETCU. If the envi­ron­men­tal move­ment is the new tar­get of NETCU this judge­ment should be tak­en seri­ous­ly by all envi­ron­men­tal­ists.

This case seems to imply that the “organ­is­ers” of rad­i­cal cam­paigns are ful­ly respon­si­ble for every­one that tar­gets the com­pa­ny that they are cam­paign­ing against. Indeed it is the case some cam­paign­ers act­ing against HLS and asso­ci­at­ed com­pa­nies used direct action and it’s true that the defen­dants did not nec­es­sar­i­ly con­demn this type of action either. How­ev­er what is being said is there is no evi­dence that the defen­dants were involved in or even incit­ed the actions list­ed in the media and which it seems they have been held liable for in court.

So what is to be under­stood by this case is that a rad­i­cal cam­paign, such as SHAC, Earth First or Cli­mate Camp is ful­ly respon­si­ble for the actions of all its sup­port­ers. It seems that a cam­paign is expect­ed to ‘con­trol’ activists and speak out against every ille­gal action they make or be faced with respon­si­bil­i­ty for the oth­er activist’s actions.

This will be a prob­lem for net­works and groups like Earth First and Cli­mate Camp the police need only arrest the group organ­is­ing the EF! gath­er­ing, the peo­ple who pro­mote Cli­mate Camp etc. and then hold them respon­si­ble for the actions of any­one cam­paign­ing on the same issue or using the cam­paign name, any­one tak­ing action against GMOs or who attacked the pow­er sta­tion dur­ing Cli­mate Camp.

The police no longer need to find and arrest the per­son who com­mit­ted the rel­e­vant action but can sim­ply imply that the cam­paign is respon­si­ble espe­cial­ly if the cam­paign sup­ports direct action or car­ries reports on such actions on their web­site.

On Mon­day 19th Jan­u­ary there has been a call out for a Nation­al Anti-Vivi­sec­tion Day of Action/Freedom to Protest Day of Action in sup­port of the SHAC activists that are being sen­tenced on that day. Because of the direct rel­e­vance of this case to envi­ron­men­tal­ists I ask that regard­less of your indi­vid­ual view­point on the SHAC cam­paign or ani­mal test­ing you do some­thing to sup­port the free­dom to cam­paign. This could be as sim­ple as ded­i­cat­ing an already planned envi­ron­men­tal action to the cam­paign­ers or hold­ing a small protest.

FREEDOM TO PROTEST NOW!

————–

State repres­sion of Anti-Cor­po­rate Dis­sent: Ani­mal right activists con­vict­ed of ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’

On Decem­ber 23rd, 4 out of 5 activists on tri­al at Win­ches­ter Crown Court were found guilty of ‘Con­spir­a­cy to Black­mail’ at Win­ches­ter Crown Court after a 3 and a half month long show tri­al. The world’s media, prompt­ed by police press offi­cers, were quick to con­demn activists by point­ing to harass­ment against the employ­ees of Hunt­ing­don Life Sci­ences (HLS) and their cus­tomers, share­hold­ers and investors. Actions against HLS, not linked to those con­vict­ed, such as hoax bombs, let­ters alleg­ing pae­dophil­ia, and threats were point­ed to as evi­dence of the defen­dants’ extrem­ism. Police spokes­men and the Nation­al Extrem­ist Coor­di­na­tion Unit (NETCU), the branch of the police set up to deal with the AR move­ment and oth­er expres­sions of the pub­lic’s dis­sent, hailed the con­vic­tions as a vic­to­ry. (For more infor­ma­tion on NETCU see here and here.

What was not exam­ined in the media was the wor­ry­ing devel­op­ment of the repres­sive use of the law which lead to the con­vic­tion of the four defen­dants.

Cor­po­rate Watch has fol­lowed the progress of the tri­al at Win­ches­ter since the begin­ning. The rea­son we were con­cerned about the tri­al is that we see it as part of a larg­er attack on the ani­mal rights move­ment moti­vat­ed by the state’s desire to pro­tect pri­vate cor­po­ra­tions against dis­sent. Since the ani­mal rights move­ment began to effec­tive­ly chal­lenge the prof­its of those involved in vivi­sec­tion and the phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal indus­try the state has repeat­ed­ly respond­ed with new repres­sive mea­sures. In May this year Sean Kirt­ley, an activist involved with Stop Sequani Ani­mal Tor­ture (SSAT), was sen­tenced to four and a half years in prison for updat­ing a web­site with news about a legal, non­vi­o­lent cam­paign to close down Sequani lab­o­ra­to­ries in Led­bury. Kirt­ley was con­vict­ed of ‘Con­spir­a­cy to inter­fere with the con­trac­tu­al rela­tions of an ani­mal research facil­i­ty under sec­tion 145 of the Seri­ous Organ­ised Crime and Police Act’ (SOCPA 145) . His only crime was to protest law­ful­ly against the lab and to update a web­site.

NETCU, how­ev­er, was not sat­is­fied with see­ing ani­mal rights activists banged up for four and a half years and chose to charge cam­paign­ers asso­ci­at­ed with Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty (SHAC) with ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’, an offence car­ry­ing up to 14 years in prison. In May 2007, police arrest­ed 32 peo­ple in raids dubbed ‘Oper­a­tion Achilles’. Since then, 15 peo­ple have been charged with ‘con­spir­a­cy’ and are being tried in two sep­a­rate tri­als, of which this was the first.

The charges relate to over four years of con­cert­ed cam­paign­ing against HLS, the largest con­tract test­ing lab­o­ra­to­ry in Europe. The defen­dants includ­ed peo­ple who had been involved in SHAC from the out­set. How­ev­er, two of the defen­dants, Ger­rah Sel­by and Dan Wad­ham, had been in their ear­ly teens at the begin­ning of the peri­od con­cerned and had only been involved for a short time. Wad­ham was only 17 when his part of the alleged con­spir­a­cy alleged­ly occurred.

SHAC, an inter­na­tion­al cam­paign group call­ing for the clo­sure of HLS, has been paint­ed by the police and the press as a ‘crim­i­nal organ­i­sa­tion’ dup­ing mem­bers of the pub­lic con­cerned with ani­mal abuse into donat­ing their mon­ey to fur­ther ‘a cam­paign of black­mail’. SHAC’s activ­i­ties, how­ev­er, have been over­whelm­ing­ly law­ful: the cam­paign pub­lish­es infor­ma­tion about ani­mal abuse inside HLS labs, reports cam­paign­ing activ­i­ties and issues action alerts call­ing on sup­port­ers to write polite let­ters to com­pa­nies work­ing with HLS and ask them to desist. If those com­pa­nies con­tin­ue to do busi­ness with HLS, protests would usu­al­ly fol­low. All mate­r­i­al on the SHAC web­site is checked by a bar­ris­ter and police are giv­en pri­or notice of their demon­stra­tions.

Cus­tomers, sup­pli­ers and share­hold­ers in HLS have also been the sub­ject of some direct action. Slo­gans have been daubed at com­pa­ny premis­es and employ­ees homes; cars have been painstrip­pered; hoax bombs have been sent and employ­ees have been accused of being pae­dophiles. How­ev­er, these actions are not direct­ly linked to the SHAC cam­paign and have only ten­u­ous links to the defen­dants, whose faces were spashed across many tabloid front pages after their con­vic­tions at Win­ches­ter.

Dur­ing the sum­mer, three defen­dants, com­mit­ted cam­paign­ers against HLS, plead guilty to charges of ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’. Dur­ing the tri­al, evi­dence recov­ered from the cam­paign PCs and activists’ per­son­al com­put­ers was pre­sent­ed. Police had found many doc­u­ments believed to have been per­ma­nent­ly delet­ed or shred­ded by their authors. This includ­ed a spread­sheet detail­ing names and address­es of peo­ple work­ing for com­pa­nies linked to HLS, details of direct actions car­ried out against them and a doc­u­ment con­tain­ing a pri­vate chat between activists appar­ent­ly talk­ing about direct action. This evi­dence may sug­gest that some activists had decid­ed to take direct action against com­pa­nies linked to HLS, but the evi­dence link­ing the defen­dants found guilty on 23rd Decem­ber to these doc­u­ments was cir­cum­stan­tial and, in some cas­es, non-exis­tent. Even if some activists linked to SHAC did decide to take direct action, this does not make every­body asso­ci­at­ed with the cam­paign guilty by asso­ci­a­tion. The pros­e­cu­tion case was that that the entire SHAC cam­paign was aimed at clos­ing down HLS, which is true, and that SHAC cam­paign­ers attempt­ed to per­suade com­pa­nies not to work with HLS, which is also true. The pros­e­cu­tion argu­ment, how­ev­er, went on to imply that, when com­pa­nies did not agree to cease trad­ing with HLS, they were the sub­ject of direct action. Often direct action did occur but this was not under the ban­ner of SHAC. More­over, SHAC did not pub­lish any infor­ma­tion about com­pa­nies that was not already in the pub­lic domain. But because some activists, some­times under the ban­ner of the Ani­mal Lib­er­a­tion Front (ALF), did take direct action, the pros­e­cu­tion argued that the SHAC cam­paign was facil­i­tat­ing direct action and giv­ing it its tac­it appo­val. The police went one step fur­ther and said SHAC and the ALF were one and the same thing!

Much of the evi­dence in the three-month tri­al was in rela­tion to law­ful demon­stra­tions against com­pa­nies linked to HLS. This was par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant in the instances of defen­dants who could not be linked to the uncov­ered com­put­er evi­dence. In sev­er­al cas­es, the only evi­dence was what they had said at demon­stra­tions. Com­ments made by defen­dants dur­ing protests in earshot of the police were por­trayed as link­ing them to the ‘con­spir­a­cy’. Com­ments, such as “we know where you live”, were tak­en as proof that defen­dants were par­ty to the con­spir­a­cy. In any oth­er con­text, such spur-of-the-moment com­ments would have, at most, lead to minor charges in the Mag­is­trate’s Court. Equal­ly impor­tant was the fact that some of those con­vict­ed were linked per­son­al­ly to the defen­dants who plead­ed guilty. Heather Nichol­son and Ger­rah Sel­by had both shared hous­es with them. This was obvi­ous­ly a fac­tor in find­ing them guilty by asso­ci­a­tion.

So what does this mean for free speech and anti-cor­po­rate dis­sent in the UK? By the same log­ic, an anti-war cam­paign that pub­lish­es infor­ma­tion on the where­abouts of a mil­i­tary base or arms fac­to­ry and calls for its clo­sure could be put in the frame for the same crime if that base was then the sub­ject of an arson attack. All it would take would be for the police to imply that the peo­ple run­ning the pub­lic cam­paign are linked to those involved in direct action. Con­se­quent­ly, cam­paign­ers might feel com­pelled to pub­licly dis­tance them­selves from acts of direct action lest they find that, unbe­known to them, those respon­si­ble for the covert actions are involved in pub­lic action too and the whole move­ment is charged with ‘con­spir­a­cy’. In fact, the use of such charges is a clas­sic police tac­tic aimed at spread­ing para­noia and con­vict­ing as many activists as pos­si­ble for acts car­ried out by only a few. The aim is also to min­imise pub­lic sup­port for ille­gal actions by har­rass­ing and crim­i­nal­is­ing those who speak up in sol­i­dar­i­ty.

NETCU have already inti­mat­ed, for exam­ple in the recent Mark Townsend arti­cle on ‘eco-ter­ror­ists’, that envi­ron­men­tal or anti-gm pro­test­ers might be their next tar­get.

The con­vict­ed activists are now long peri­ods in jail, they will be sen­tenced on Jan­u­ary 19th. Heather Nichol­son, who was remand­ed after her arrest in May 2007, has already spent over 19 months in jail, longer than some con­vict­ed of seri­ous assaults or sex crimes would spend in prison. In May this year, Sean Kirt­ley, who was impris­oned for his role in anoth­er ani­mal rights cam­paign, was sen­tenced to four and a half years in prison on the same day that men who beat a man until he was blind received two years. Since ‘Oper­a­tion Achilles’, the police have been pat­ting them­selves on the back for putting the ani­mal rights move­ment into ‘dis­ar­ray’. A NETCU source told the Observ­er in Novem­ber 2008 that the ani­mal rights move­men­t’s ‘ring­lead­ers’ had ‘either been pros­e­cut­ed or were await­ing pros­e­cu­tion.’ One may sus­pect that com­ments like these are more to do with main­tain­ing NETCU’s fund­ing than real­i­ty (see this Cor­po­rate Watch com­men­tary for more details).

In fact the attack on ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers does not seem to have lim­it­ed their capac­i­ty to take action. Reg­u­lar demon­stra­tions are still tak­ing place against com­pa­nies linked to HLS, with one planned for 29th Decem­ber.The ALF, which does not seem to be in need of ‘lead­ers’, has recent­ly freed 70 turkeys from a UK farm. If any­thing, the glob­al ani­mal rights move­ment seems to be grow­ing steadi­ly.

The deci­sion to try these cam­paign­ers for ‘con­spir­a­cy to black­mail’ was evi­dent­ly a polit­i­cal one. Huge amounts of police resources have been poured into this pros­e­cu­tion, and oth­ers like it, at the behest of the Labour gov­ern­ment. This is due to the effec­tive­ness of the ani­mal rights move­ment in con­fronting and chal­leng­ing the pow­er of cor­po­ra­tions involved in ani­mal abuse. The demon­i­sa­tion of ani­mal rights cam­paign­ers in the media, facil­i­tat­ed by NETCU press releas­es, only makes it eas­i­er for the state to repress them with­out pub­lic out­cry. The con­vic­tion of the defen­dants at Win­ches­ter is yet anoth­er nail in the cof­fin of the pub­lic’s right to voice their anger and dis­sent against cor­po­rate crime.

For more info see Stop Hunt­ing­don Ani­mal Cru­el­ty — www.shac.net

NETCU Watch — http://netcu.wordpress.com/

SCHnews — www.schnews.org.uk

Sea Shepherd Clashes With Whaling Fleet in Australian Waters

Decem­ber 26th, 2008
The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety ship Steve Irwin closed in on one of the ves­sels of the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet at 0730 Hours GMT (1930 Hours Syd­ney Time) on Decem­ber 26th off the coast of the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry north of the Maw­son Penin­su­la.

Steve Irwin clashes with Kaiko MaruDecem­ber 26th, 2008
The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety ship Steve Irwin closed in on one of the ves­sels of the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet at 0730 Hours GMT (1930 Hours Syd­ney Time) on Decem­ber 26th off the coast of the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry north of the Maw­son Penin­su­la.

The Kaiko Maru emerged from dense fog in front of the Steve Irwin. The Sea Shep­herd crew pur­sued and deliv­ered 10 bot­tles of rot­ten but­ter and 15 bot­tles of a methyl cel­lu­lose and indeli­ble dye mix­ture.

“That is one stinky slip­pery ship,” said Sea Shep­herd 2nd Offi­cer Peter Ham­marst­edt of Swe­den.

The Japan­ese ship was ordered out of the ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters of Aus­tralia by Aus­tralian cit­i­zen Jeff Hansen from Perth, West­ern Aus­tralia. The mes­sage was deliv­ered in Japan­ese.

As the Steve Irwin came along­side the star­board side of the Kaiko Maru, the whaler steered hard to star­board and struck the Steve Irwin light­ly crush­ing part of the aft port heli­copter deck guard rails on the Sea Shep­herd ship. There was no seri­ous dam­age to either ship.

The Sea Shep­herd crew’s objec­tive was to intim­i­date the Japan­ese fleet and to keep them mov­ing East­ward out of Aus­tralian Ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters. The Sea Shep­herd crew have been pur­su­ing the fleet east­ward for a week. There is only 90 miles left before the fleet enters the New Zealand Zone.

“Our objec­tive now is to chase them out of Aus­trali­a’s Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “I have a chart here and it clear­ly states that these waters are Aus­tralian EEZ. There is an Aus­tralian Fed­er­al Court Order specif­i­cal­ly pro­hibit­ing these ships from whal­ing in these waters. We have informed the whalers they are in con­tempt of this Court rul­ing.”

There is no doubt that Japan­ese whal­ing in Aus­tralian waters has been severe­ly dis­rupt­ed. Since Sat­ur­day, the Sea Shep­herd crew have chased the Japan­ese fleet for 400 miles through heavy fog, dense ice and nasty weath­er. Dur­ing that time they have not been able to kill any whales.

“We still have them on the run and we intend to keep them on the run for as long as our fuel resources allow,” said Cap­tain Wat­son.

Fight Speciesism! #7 — Out Now

Jan­u­ary issue of the lat­est anti-speciesist, anti-cap­i­tal­ist, abo­li­tion­ist direct action news is out now. Anti­speciesist Action is a col­lec­tive of mil­i­tant anti­speciesists and ani­mal rights activists com­mit­ted to con­fronting ani­mal abuse, suf­fer­ing and exploita­tion of non-human beings through the use of direct action.

Fight Speciesism! #7 - Out Now Jan­u­ary issue of the lat­est anti-speciesist, anti-cap­i­tal­ist, abo­li­tion­ist direct action news is out now. Anti­speciesist Action is a col­lec­tive of mil­i­tant anti­speciesists and ani­mal rights activists com­mit­ted to con­fronting ani­mal abuse, suf­fer­ing and exploita­tion of non-human beings through the use of direct action.

We believe in the ‘No Com­pro­mise’ phi­los­o­phy, veg­an­ism and active­ly sup­port the Ani­mal Lib­er­a­tion Front (ALF) and ani­mal rights pris­on­ers.

We are opposed to cap­i­tal­ism and the state, under­stand­ing that with­out both enti­ties, the uni­ver­sal exploita­tion of ani­mals would not be pos­si­ble.

Until Every Cage Is Emp­ty!

Arti­cles:

- In Mem­o­ry of Bar­ry Horne
— NYSE:LSR Under Attack
— Hunt Sab­bing News
— Mink Released
— Insur­rec­tion in Mex­i­co
— Let­ter from Sean Kirt­ley
— Whalers On The Run
— Glob­al Roundup
— Telmex Cam­paign
— Upris­ing in Greece

FS! #7 — http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/12/416034.html