A Climate Camp visits the Government Office in Leeds

29.2.2008
Res­i­dents from flood strick­en areas of York­shire and Hum­ber­side today block­ad­ed the Gov­ern­ment Office in Leeds to protest at its con­tin­ued pro­mo­tion of air­port expan­sion. Inspired by last year’s camp for cli­mate action at Heathrow, the pro­tes­tors from Hull, South York­shire and the Calder Val­ley used pop-up tents to set up camp out­side the main entrance.

Yorkshire RSS protest29.2.2008
Res­i­dents from flood strick­en areas of York­shire and Hum­ber­side today block­ad­ed the Gov­ern­ment Office in Leeds to protest at its con­tin­ued pro­mo­tion of air­port expan­sion. Inspired by last year’s camp for cli­mate action at Heathrow, the pro­tes­tors from Hull, South York­shire and the Calder Val­ley used pop-up tents to set up camp out­side the main entrance.

This morn­ing, con­cerned and mod­er­ate local peo­ple have block­ad­ed the entrance to their Gov­ern­ment Office. Their mes­sage; that with its con­tin­ued sup­port for expan­sion of air trav­el in the region, the Gov­ern­ment is fly­ing in the face of sci­ence.

Res­i­dents from flood strick­en areas of York­shire and Hum­ber­side today block­ad­ed the Gov­ern­ment Office at 8 City Walk, Leeds to protest at its con­tin­ued pro­mo­tion of air­port expan­sion.

The tim­ing of the protest coin­cid­ed with the final stages in the adop­tion of the Region­al Spa­tial Strat­e­gy (RSS) – the area’s fif­teen year devel­op­ment plan which is cur­rent­ly on the desk of gov­ern­ment min­is­ter Baroness Andrews, await­ing final approval. The plan allows for a three­fold expan­sion of pas­sen­ger flights from York­shire and Hum­ber­side. Bizarrely, voic­es which you might have expect­ed to argue against this mad­ness seem all to eager — Friends of The Earth made a sub­mis­sion to the RSS sug­gest­ing that an expan­sion of air trav­el was accept­able. (Maybe they should rename them­selves Foes of the Earth?)

Gov­ern­ment trans­port poli­cies were sin­gled out for crit­i­cisim by the plan’s Sus­tain­abil­i­ty Appraisal, which com­ment­ed that any pos­i­tive impacts of pro­posed changes to the RSS might not be able to counter wider neg­a­tive trends.

The pro­tes­tors made a for­mal pre­sen­ta­tion of a sci­en­tif­ic brief­ing for con­sid­er­a­tion by Baroness Andrews and issued the fol­low­ing state­ment::-

“We are con­tin­u­al­ly bom­bard­ed with mes­sages ask­ing us to “do our bit”, but this should go for gov­ern­ment too. It is shame­ful that their pol­i­cy to expand avi­a­tion and unsus­tain­able eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment is total­ly at odds with their stat­ed pol­i­cy to reduce CO2 emis­sions.

They are fly­ing in the face of sci­ence, and under­min­ing any hope of pre­vent­ing cli­mate change accel­er­at­ing beyond con­trol. York­shire and Hum­ber­side will be par­tic­u­lar­ly hard hit, because of our vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty to coastal ero­sion and flood­ing. This will spell mis­ery for hard work­ing fam­i­lies through­out the region”.

It’s clear that Baroness Andrews needs to insti­gate a major revi­sion of the region­al trans­port plan ele­ment of the RSS to remove the empha­sis on air­port growth, and to ensure a sig­nif­i­cant decrease in car­bon emis­sions from our area. A fif­teen year plan that ignores its own sus­tain­abil­i­ty appraisal is a bad fif­teen year plan, but maybe sci­ence and com­mon sense aren’t enough on their own when Gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy is made in the board­rooms of multi­na­tion­als like BAA?