Sizewell Nuclear Power Blockade

1.12.2007
At 6:50 am this morn­ing 8 sleepy pro­tes­tors arrived at the gates of Sizewell A and B in Suf­folk. What else would you do at this time in the morn­ing at a nuclear pow­er sta­tion, oth­er than lay on the road, lock your­selves togeth­er, unfurl your ban­ner read­ing ‘nuclear pow­er is not the answer to cli­mate chaos’ and wait 15 min­utes for the secu­ri­ty to notice you.

Sizewell 11.12.2007
At 6:50 am this morn­ing 8 sleepy pro­tes­tors arrived at the gates of Sizewell A and B in Suf­folk. What else would you do at this time in the morn­ing at a nuclear pow­er sta­tion, oth­er than lay on the road, lock your­selves togeth­er, unfurl your ban­ner read­ing ‘nuclear pow­er is not the answer to cli­mate chaos’ and wait 15 min­utes for the secu­ri­ty to notice you.

As the shift change began, we lay com­fort­ably on the wet and cold road, and only one work­er threat­ened to run us over.
The griffins arrived (civ­il nuclear police), Suf­folk police, and a cou­ple of gnomes (or maybe secu­ri­ty peo­ple). Appar­ent­ly, peo­ple want­ed to go to work, and so the police asked us to move. We declined.
After 2 and a half hours of shift change dis­rup­tion (job done!) we made a deal with the cop­pers that we could leave, with all of our equip­ment, not get arrest­ed, and be free to come and do it again anoth­er day. Bizarrely, the police agreed to this. Watch the video below of what hap­pened just after release – appar­ent­ly, they couldn’t arrest us under the human rights act – pro­por­tion­al­i­ty and all that, innit.

Videos:
The rea­sons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i7-Z3wdjAM
Inter­ac­tions with the police http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57OiMfCGC94
Leav­ing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnPMcvj7BBQ

Below is the press release we sent out.

This week it was announced that Sizewell is one of the four sites pro­posed for the new build of nuclear pow­er plants. Brown indi­cat­ed that large gov­ern­ment incen­tives for new nuclear sta­tions will be promised in the new year. These would include a plan­ning reform bill that will speed up the plan­ning process. The pro­test­ers say that this will take away the abil­i­ty to refuse per­mis­sion on a local lev­el and that many safe­ty fea­tures were intro­duced dur­ing the exten­sive plan­ning phase for Sizewell B.

One of the pro­test­ers, Peter Lux from Nor­wich said, “Gor­don Browns state­ment is com­plete­ly at odds with what we should be doing to com­bat cli­mate change. The pro­posed avi­a­tion pol­i­cy with the expan­sion of Heathrow will cause sev­er­al times more green­house gas emis­sions than could pos­si­bly be saved by replac­ing our exist­ing nuclear pow­er sta­tions even if nuclear pow­er was car­bon neu­tral which it is not.”

Anoth­er pro­test­er said: “It is so frus­trat­ing to think that we do not even have a democ­ra­cy when it comes to our ener­gy needs and use. That’s why we have to come and take direct action, how can we sit back and watch when we know this is the wrong route to be tak­ing?.” Said Mell Har­ri­son, one of the pro­test­ers and Cam­paigns Coor­di­na­tor for East­ern Region CND. She went on “The gov­ern­ment are going ahead with build­ing new nuclear pow­er sta­tions with­out prop­er pub­lic debate and con­sul­ta­tion. All you ever hear from the Gov­ern­ment is about our grow­ing ener­gy needs, but the real answer is ener­gy con­ser­va­tion and more sus­tain­able life styles. For exam­ple we hear about China’s ever grow­ing ener­gy needs, but it’s the West’s desire for more cheap goods from Chi­na that is one of the biggest rea­sons for their car­bon emis­sions.”
Sizewell B was the last nuclear reac­tor to be built in the UK and was com­plet­ed in 1995. It took 15 years to com­plete, cost over £3billion with about £800 mil­lion in cost over­runs, which result­ed main­ly from addi­tion­al safe­ty fea­tures.
The nuclear indus­try also suf­fered a set­back ear­li­er this month when it was announced that the Nuclear Decom­mis­sion­ing Author­i­ty was unable able to say what the costs of clean­ing up Britain’s nuclear pow­er sta­tions would reach, but last month it raised its esti­mate by more than 12 per cent to £72.7 bil­lion. This ris­ing cost will be met by the tax­pay­er rather than the nuclear indus­try.

plunk@hushmail.com
http://www.easterncnduk.org