Squat news — London, Cambridge

12.06.2008

Bowl Court Social Cen­tre Days Are Num­bered — Lon­don

12.06.2008

Bowl Court Social Cen­tre Days Are Num­bered — Lon­don

The court­ing hear­ing today ruled in favor of the prop­er­ty devel­op­ers claim­ing own­er­ship of the derelict ware­house in Bowl Court that has been used as a rad­i­cal social cen­tre since open­ing 23rd March. The David vs Goliath case was clear­ly moti­vat­ed by Ham­mer­sons desire to pre­vent the new social cen­tre becom­ing a hub for the local cam­paigns against their pro­posed devel­op­ment for the area, the biggest devel­op­ment in Lon­don since Dock­lands in the eight­ies.

The vic­to­ri­an social cen­tre is locat­ed in the Shored­itch Street Con­ser­va­tion area and pre­vi­ous attempts to obtain plan­ning con­sent for demo­li­tion have been refused. The neigh­bor­ing ware­house was knocked down with­out plan­ning per­mis­sion by Gam­ma City Devel­op­ments which was pur­chased by Ham­mer­son, along with vast tracts of lands ear­marked to become a for­est of glass sky­scrap­ers over the next ten years. Num­ber 6 Bowl Court was left emp­ty for years with a gap­ing hole cut in the roof and deep exca­va­tions dug around it’s exter­nal walls, appar­ent­ly with the aim of speed­ing up it’s decay to jus­ti­fy future appli­ca­tions for demo­li­tion.

Although at least two oth­er squat­ters occu­py near­by prop­er­ties which Ham­mer­son claim to own, the attempts to evict Bowl Court came about only as it became appar­ent that the social cen­tre was becom­ing involved in the local cam­paigns against the rede­vel­op­ment plans for the area. The com­pa­ny had been informed of the occu­pa­tion on the 24th March but only made moves to repos­sess the prop­er­ty three weeks ago.

In court, the defen­dants ques­tioned the evi­dence pre­sent­ed by the claimants regard­ing own­er­ship. Their land reg­istry title was con­tra­dict­ed by titles known to be held by oth­er com­pa­nies. There was also issue over whether the notice of the pro­ceed­ings had been cor­rect­ly served as res­i­den­tial prop­er­ty requires five days clear notice but only three had been giv­en. With no pro­fes­sion­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion, the defen­dants were unable to put togeth­er a robust defense and also found them­selves threat­ened with over £21,000 in costs. How­ev­er, the judge also con­sid­ered the costs to be out­ra­geous­ly inflat­ed an choose to award just £2,500 in costs.

The future of the social cen­tre is now obvi­ous­ly in doubt but in the mean­time events con­tin­ue as nor­mal. See http://www.bowlcourt.co.nr for details.

——-

Mill Road Social Cen­tre May Stay For Flip­pin’ Ages — Cam­bridge

A pos­ses­sion order was grant­ed to Tesco today in court, yet rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the Mill Road Social Cen­tre had appar­ent con­fir­ma­tion of indef­i­nite leave to remain from Tesco’s solic­i­tors.

About 20 social cen­tre groupies went to court today dressed in all our wet fin­ery and had a friend­ly bit of ban­ter with the Tesco legal rep­re­sen­ta­tive and the judge. The judge decid­ed that, although we point­ed out in our defense that their claim was­n’t accu­rate and so should be thrown out, she was hap­py to quick­ly amend it in court. This meant that we no longer had a defense as that was the only way our legal assis­tance had found for reject­ing the claim. So, the judge award­ed Tesco the pos­ses­sion order, as we thought they might.

We raised the issue of Tesco stat­ing that they did­n’t want to apply the pos­ses­sion order imme­di­ate­ly, they just want­ed hold of it. The solic­i­tor again con­firmed that this was the case.

SO, net result, as far as we know, we can remain in there doing fun things until Tesco want to get the builders in, hope­ful­ly some­time nev­er. Obvi­ous­ly it’d be use­ful to keep open some kind of dia­logue with Tesco about when they’re going to move in and we’ll look into that, how­ev­er the ear­ly hope is that we actu­al­ly have the space for a num­ber of weeks and can get crack­ing in earnest to make it even more love­ly and use­ful.

The solic­i­tor said in court that “Tesco has no use today for the premis­es.” to which the judge replied “So they are in no posi­tion to com­mence rede­vel­op­ment at this moment?”, and the solic­i­tor answered “No.”. So if that’s right, and if they do want to wait on the plan­ning process before try­ing to evict us, it could be a long long time. Hur­rah! 🙂 It also means they were fib­bing when they said they could open a store “tomor­row” in the evening news. Cheeky blighters.

millroadsocialcentre@lists.riseup.net
http://millroadsocialcentre.wordpress.com

social cen­tre attacked (again)

15.06.2008
At about half 1 this morn­ing the mill rd social cen­tre was attacked for the sec­ond time in a week. Thugs armed with an iron bar smashed win­dows and dam­aged vehi­cles in attempt to intim­i­date the occu­pants, then drove off. No Pasaran.
———-

New autonomous and cre­ative social space in South Lon­don

The Chapel project is an autonomous and cre­ative social space sit­u­at­ed in the heart of Nun­head. The space is used for all kinds of cre­ative and social­ly mind­ed work­shops and events. Our main aim is to pro­vide afford­able cul­tur­al activ­i­ties to peo­ple, pro­mot­ing cre­ative inter­ac­tion and there­fore social change.

Come and get involved. What­ev­er ideas, mate­ri­als or pos­i­tive ener­gies you can share would be great whether its run­ning a work­shop, show­ing your art work, or just spread­ing the word. We hope to see you soon.

http://www.chapelproject.com