BLM Wants To Close Public Forest To Keep Out Enviromental Activists, US

White Castle Tree Sit

White Castle Tree Sit

14th August 2013: The Bureau of Land Man­age­ment wants to close to the pub­lic more than 2,000 acres of forest­land east of Myr­tle Creek to keep out envi­ron­men­tal activists try­ing to stop log­ging.

Cas­ca­dia For­est Defend­ers tree-sit­ters have perched them­selves to block the White Cas­tle tim­ber sale, one of three pilot projects planned by the BLM to log and simul­ta­ne­ous­ly cre­ate wildlife habi­tat.

The group’s spokesman, Jason Gon­za­les, said any­where from five to 30 pro­test­ers at any one time are occu­py­ing what the group calls a “tree vil­lage.”

“There is nowhere they could log right now. There are tree-sits cov­er­ing an entire sec­tion to be logged,” he said.

To pre­vent pro­test­ers from inter­fer­ing with log­gers or from being harmed by falling trees, the BLM has indi­cat­ed it intends to block off 2,167 acres, includ­ing 15 miles of road, for up to two years while the trees are cut. The agency will take pub­lic com­ments until Aug. 30.

 

The move would pre­vent peo­ple who recre­ate in the Myr­tle Creek water­shed from enter­ing the area.

A Rose­burg BLM field man­ag­er, Steven Lydick, said the BLM’s biggest con­cern is safe­ty.

“We would be work­ing with the Dou­glas Coun­ty Sheriff’s Office to remove peo­ple from the area,” Lydick said. “But it is our hope they would leave vol­un­tar­i­ly.”

The tree-sit­ters took up their posi­tions more than a month ago. So far, there have been no arrests or forcible removals, although Cas­ca­dia For­est Defend­ers states pro­test­ers have been vis­it­ed by law enforce­ment.

The Scott Tim­ber Co., a sub­sidiary of Rose­burg For­est Prod­ucts, already has the con­tract to log 6.4 mil­lion board feet, but has put the har­vest on hold.

“We are unable to oper­ate on it because of the tree-sit­ters and seri­ous fire risks,” said Scott Folk, the vice pres­i­dent of resources with Rose­burg For­est Prod­ucts. “We would be log­ging right now, assum­ing con­di­tions were bet­ter.”

The agency is using the 187-acre har­vest to test prin­ci­ples devel­oped by forestry pro­fes­sors Jer­ry Franklin of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Wash­ing­ton and Norm John­son of Ore­gon State Uni­ver­si­ty. The Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion has backed the exper­i­ment as a way to increase tim­ber har­vests while heed­ing con­ser­va­tion val­ues.

Pro­po­nents of the exper­i­men­tal tim­ber har­vests say they will mim­ic nat­ur­al for­est fires and cre­ate clear­ings for flow­ers and shrubs to grow unshad­ed by trees. Native plants thriv­ing in the sun­light will feed but­ter­flies, birds and small mam­mals.

Con­ser­va­tion groups, how­ev­er, have crit­i­cized the sales as a ruse to clear-cut forests and have filed admin­is­tra­tive chal­lenges.

“Peo­ple are con­cerned the trees in the White Cas­tle tim­ber sale will start to fall,” said Fran­cis Eather­ing­ton, con­ser­va­tion direc­tor for Cas­ca­dia Wild­lands, a dif­fer­ent group than the one occu­py­ing trees.

“These are young peo­ple putting their lives in dan­ger to save these forests. They are very brave,” she said.

Gon­za­les accused the BLM of obscur­ing plans to clear-cut with the term “regen­er­a­tion har­vest.”

“We think it’s very sneaky of (BLM) to use the term ‘regen­er­a­tion har­vest’ with­out peo­ple know­ing what it is,” he said.

Lydick said it’s wrong to equate the har­vests with clear-cut­ting.

“The pilot project is real­ly intend­ed to make a habi­tat mosa­ic. Some areas will be cut and oth­ers will remain com­plete­ly intact,” he said.

The Umpqua Lands Trail Rid­ers Asso­ci­a­tion has pro­posed an off-road vehi­cle trail through the area. The association’s trail man­ag­er, Wayne Brady, said he would not be par­tic­u­lar­ly con­cerned if the clo­sure were only tem­po­rary.

He not­ed that his group and con­ser­va­tion groups have not been allies. “They were dead-set against our pro­pos­al too,” he said.

“If they are out there inter­fer­ing, then the clo­sure is not too long,” Brady said. “If the clo­sure becomes per­ma­nent, then that’s a slap in our face.”

A two-year clo­sure would even­tu­al­ly affect hunt­ing in the area, said Cindy Rooney, pres­i­dent of the Ore­gon Hunters Association’s Umpqua Val­ley Chap­ter.

“It’s my per­son­al feel­ing that peo­ple should have access to pub­lic lands,” she said.