Lappersfort Callout For Eviction

This morn­ing (Thurs­day 7th), the police snipped open part of our fence and broke their way in to the for­est

This morn­ing (Thurs­day 7th), the police snipped open part of our fence and broke their way in to the for­est

On Decem­ber 31st 09, a judge of the Brugge court ruled that the evic­tion notice passed against the occu­piers of 2002 may still be used to evict the present occu­piers of the Lap­pers­fort. On Tues­day last week, a rep­re­sen­ta­tive robot from Fab­ri­com GTI was quot­ed in the media say­ing that they would fol­low the judi­cial path, and were plan­ning to sit down and dis­cuss the evic­tion with the Brugge police. This claim that they will fol­low the “legal” path isn’t some­thing we’re rely­ing on, and we are expect­ing an evic­tion any day now. This morn­ing (Thurs­day 7th), the police snipped open part of our fence and broke their way in to the for­est. Four of them had a lit­tle pig­gy tour, tak­ing pho­tos and being gen­er­al­ly mys­te­ri­ous and stu­pid. One of us heard them sneak­ing around in the night, which means they must have cut the fence at night then snuck in dur­ing the morn­ing. As the police start doing such things here, and the fact that Fab­ri­com Suez already has an evic­tion notice, can only make us think that the evic­tion is just around the cor­ner.….

IN THE FOREST, WE NEED MORE HUMANS WILLING TO STAY HERE A WHILE AND DEFEND THE FOREST AGAINST THE POLICE IN CASE OF EVICTION.
OUTSIDE THE FOREST, WE NEED MORE HUMANS WILLING TO SUPPORT FROM OUTSIDE, TO COME TO BRUGGE AND DEMONSTRATE ON THE DAY OF EVICTION, AND TO TAKE SOLIDARITY ACTIONS AGAINST FABRICOM GTI AND GDF SUEZ. FOR A FREESPACE IN THE WOODS AND FOR THE WOODS, AND FOR WILDERNESS EVERYWHERE, LAPPERSFORT WON’T GO OFF WITHOUT A FIGHT.….
PLEASE TRANSLATE AND SEND ON THIS CALLOUT

lappersfort@riseup.net
http://lappersfort.freehostia.com

Struggle resumes in Valsusa (Italy)

9.1.10
Tomor­row the strug­gle starts again in Val­susa, an Alpi­an val­ley in Italy where the High Speed Train rail­way and all its infra­struc­ture is planned.

valsusa (Italy)9.1.10
Tomor­row the strug­gle starts again in Val­susa, an Alpi­an val­ley in Italy where the High Speed Train rail­way and all its infra­struc­ture is planned.
I mean, rather than ‘start­ing again’, the strug­gle will get more direct as these peo­ple have been up against this destruc­tive years for years. Peo­ple already stopped this project and the author­i­ties start­ed to think oth­er pos­si­bil­i­ties, includ­ing trans­fer­ring the project to anoth­er val­ley. Now, they are back in Val­susa to try again. How­ev­er, resis­tance has not van­ished, it keeps strong and once again they’ll try to stop the exca­va­tors and the… thou­sands of cops deploy for pro­tect­ing them.
There is snow over there but activists remain as pos­i­tive as ever.
They do send a call to any­one to join them, offer­ing food and shel­ter.
Police are already tak­ing on strate­gic places. So are activists. From tomor­row onwards the fight will be direct and will last days.
SERA DURA!! IT’LL BE HARD!
NO PASARÁN! THEY SHALL NO PASS!
NO TO THE HIGH SPEED TRAIN!

www.notav.eu

Coal Machinery Sabotaged in South Lanarkshire, Scotland

Late one night in ear­ly Jan­u­ary Pen­nile open cast coal mine was vis­it­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple who sab­o­taged machines. A total of 13 pieces of machin­ery were dam­aged, includ­ing one giant earth mover, six giant dumper trucks, four stan­dard sized earth movers and two flood light gen­er­a­tors.

Late one night in ear­ly Jan­u­ary Pen­nile open cast coal mine was vis­it­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple who sab­o­taged machines. A total of 13 pieces of machin­ery were dam­aged, includ­ing one giant earth mover, six giant dumper trucks, four stan­dard sized earth movers and two flood light gen­er­a­tors.

Recent­ly Pen­nile open cast fin­ished min­ing, but the machines Scot­tish Coal had work­ing there were sup­posed to be mov­ing to Main­shill Wood. How­ev­er as we all know Scot­tish Coal’s plans have been sub­stan­tial­ly dis­rupt­ed by the occu­pa­tion of the wood by the Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp.

This action was tak­en by autonomous peo­ple in sol­i­dar­i­ty with every­one who oppos­es the destruc­tion of Main­shill Wood and it’s devel­op­ment into anoth­er coal mine.

Japanese whale killers ram and destroy Sea Shepherd protest vessel the Ady Gil

6.1.2010
Ear­ly this morn­ing the Japan­ese whale killing ship Shonan Maru2 rammed and destroyed the Sea Shep­herd protest ves­sel the Ady Gil. It was a mir­a­cle no Sea Shep­herd crew were killed or seri­ous­ly injured.

From Sea Shep­herd CEO Steve Roest.

Sea Shepherd Ady Gil rammed6.1.2010
Ear­ly this morn­ing the Japan­ese whale killing ship Shonan Maru2 rammed and destroyed the Sea Shep­herd protest ves­sel the Ady Gil. It was a mir­a­cle no Sea Shep­herd crew were killed or seri­ous­ly injured.

From Sea Shep­herd CEO Steve Roest.
I was wok­en at 4am GMT to hear that the Japan­ese whaler and secu­ri­ty ves­sel Shonan Maru2 had delib­er­ate­ly rammed the small Sea Shep­herd inter­cept ves­sel Ady Gil. The Ady Gil had lost the front 3 metres of her nose com­plete­ly and it is a mir­a­cle nobody was seri­ous­ly injured or killed.

Cap­tain Wat­son has made the fol­low­ing state­ment to the press:

In an unpro­voked attack cap­tured on film, the Japan­ese secu­ri­ty ship Shonan Maru #2 delib­er­ate­ly rammed and caused cat­a­stroph­ic dam­age to the Sea Shep­herd ves­sel Ady Gil.

Six crew crewmem­bers, four from New Zealand, one from Aus­tralia and one from the Nether­lands were imme­di­ate­ly res­cued by the crew of the Sea Shep­herd ship Bob Bark­er. None of the crew Ady Gil crew were injured.

The Ady Gil is believed to be sink­ing and chances of sal­vage are very grim.

Accord­ing to eye­wit­ness Cap­tain Chuck Swift on the Bob Bark­er, the attack hap­pened while the ves­sels were dead in the water. The Shonan Maru #2 sud­den­ly start­ed up and delib­er­ate­ly rammed the Ady Gil rip­ping eight feet of the bow of the ves­sel com­plete­ly off. Accord­ing to Cap­tain Swift, the ves­sel does not look like it will be saved.

“The Japan­ese whalers have now esca­lat­ed this con­flict very vio­lent­ly.” Said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “If they think that our remain­ing two ships will retreat from the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary in the face of their extrem­ism, they will be mis­tak­en. We now have a real whale war on our hands and we have no inten­tion of retreat­ing.”

Cap­tain Paul Wat­son onboard the Steve Irwin is rac­ing towards the area at 16 knots but still remains some five hun­dred miles to the north. The Bob Bark­er will has tem­porar­i­ly stop the pur­suit of the Nis­shin Maru to res­cue the crew of the Ady Gil. The Japan­ese ships refused to acknowl­edge the May Day dis­tress of the Ady Gil and used the inci­dent to break away from the scene of the ram­ming.

The inci­dent took place at 64 Degrees and 03 Min­utes South and 143 Degrees and 09 Min­utes East

Until this morn­ing the Japan­ese were com­plete­ly unaware of the exis­tence of the Bob Bark­er. This newest addi­tion to the Sea Shep­herd fleet left Mau­ri­tius off the coast of Africa on Decem­ber 18th and was able to advance along the ice edge from the West as the Japan­ese were busy wor­ry­ing about the advance of the Steve Irwin from the North.

“This is a sub­stan­tial loss for our orga­ni­za­tion,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “The Ady Gil, the for­mer Earth­race ves­sel, rep­re­sents a loss of almost two mil­lion dol­lars. How­ev­er the loss of a sin­gle whale is of more impor­tance to us and we will not lose the Ady Gil in vain. This blow sim­ply strength­ens our resolve, it does not weak­en our spir­it.”

The Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety is request­ing that the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment send a naval ves­sel to restore the peace in the waters of the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry. We have 77 crew from 16 nations on three ves­sels, 6 of them were on the Ady Gil. Of these 21 are Aus­tralian cit­i­zens. 16 Aus­tralians on the Steve Irwin and 5 on the Bob Bark­er. Sea Shep­herd believes that the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment has a respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect the lives of Aus­tralian cit­i­zens work­ing to defend whales from ille­gal Japan­ese whal­ing activ­i­ties.

“Aus­tralia needs to send a naval ves­sel down here as soon as pos­si­ble to pro­tect both the whales and the Aus­tralian cit­i­zens work­ing to defend these whales.” Said Steve Irwin Chief Cook Lau­ra Dakin of Can­ber­ra. “This is Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters and I see the Japan­ese whalers doing what­ev­er they want with impuni­ty down here with­out a sin­gle Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment ves­sel any­where to be found. Peter Gar­rett, I have one ques­tion for you. Where the bloody hell are you?”

http://www.seashepherd.org

Sea Shep­herd vows to con­tin­ue cam­paign after whalers destroy Ady Gil

Yes­ter­day was a hec­tic day in Com­mon­wealth Bay, near Antarc­ti­ca, in the South­ern Ocean Whale Sanc­tu­ary. The Ady Gil, while sta­tion­ary, was pupose­ful­ly rammed at speed by the Japan­ese whal­ing secu­ri­ty ves­sel, the Shonan Maru 2. And the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet, and the world dis­cov­ered Sea Shep­herds sur­prise new con­ser­va­tion ship, the Bob Bak­er, an ex-Nor­we­gian Antarc­tic ice-class whal­ing ves­sel that was bought in 2009 and secret­ly refit­ted in South Africa.

In the Antarc­tic ear­ly morn­ing twi­light at 0300 Hours, 6 Jan­u­ary, the Bob Bak­er found the Nis­shin Maru and her four har­poon ves­sels. The Japan­ese whal­ing oper­a­tion had been caught unawares. They had been focussing on the loca­tion of the Steve Irwin, pay­ing New Zealan­der Glenn Inwood’s Ome­ka Pub­lic Rela­tions com­pa­ny to hire char­ter flights first in Albany, and then in Mel­bourne and Hobart to locate and fol­low the Steve Irwin.

The ‘spy flights’ from Albany were able to direct the Shonan Maru 2 to shad­ow the Steve Irwin when it left Fre­man­tle so that the main whal­ing fleet could avoid a con­flict and do their whale slaugh­ter in peace. The stra­e­gy worked for two weeks, until the Steve Irwin returned to Hobart to refu­el and repro­vi­sion. Leav­ing Hobart on New Years Eve, the Steve Irwin was able to slip past under­cov­er of a thun­der­storm. The spy flights from Mel­bourne and Hobart organ­ised by Glenn Inwood, esti­mat­ed to cost about $18,000, could not locate the Steve Irwin due to the low cloud cov­er.

The Sea Shep­herd also had some unex­pect­ed assis­tance depart­ing Hobart from six peo­ple on a small motor­boat, self iden­ti­fied as ‘Taz Patrol’, who patrolled the perime­ter of the Aus­tralian Eco­nom­ic Exclu­sion Zone (EEZ) locat­ing the Yushin Maru and twit­ter­ing it’s loca­tion to the world (and Sea Shep­herd).

So with the whal­ing fleet locat­ed, New Zealand skip­per of the Ady Gil, Pete Bethune, drove his power­boat around the Nis­shan Maru whal­ing fac­to­ry ship, attempt­ing to foul the fac­to­ry ship’s pro­pel­lors. Evi­dent­ly only one bauble of rot­ten but­ter reached the deck of the Nis­shan Maru, but the green laser pho­ton­ic dis­rupters were also used. In return the Nis­shan Maru fired up its LRAD acoustic weapon and used its water can­non. Stale­mate.

So the Ady Gil retreats with the Nis­shan Maru flee­ing. Sea Shep­herd’s new ves­sel the Bob Bak­er pre­pares to chase the Nis­shan Maru and the fleet, while most of the Ady Gil crew sit on the roof with the ves­sel in a sta­tion­ary idle. The videos show the Japan­ese har­poon ves­sel, the Shonan Maru 2 charg­ing the Ady Gil with water canons blaz­ing. Peter Bethune tells his crew to pre­pare for a drench­ing, lit­tle real­iz­ing the dan­ger he and his crew were fac­ing. While the water can­non sprays the roof of the Ady Gil blind­ing the crew, the Shonan Maru turns sharply to star­board right at the Ady Gil. In the few moments before impact Peter Bethune guns the Ady Gil, but it is far too late with Shonan Maru 2 slic­ing 2 metres off the bow of the Ady Gil, forc­ing the power­boat momen­tar­i­ly under­wa­ter and immers­ing the crew in the icy waters hold­ing on to the roof for their lives.

Even after impact and seper­a­tion of the ships, the Shonan Maru 2 con­tin­ues to pound the bedrag­gled crew hang­ing on to the top of the Ady Gil with water canon blasts.

Video: Japan­ese Whalers film Ady Gil being rammed by Shonan Maru 2

Video: Ady Gil rammed by Shonan Maru 2 filmed by Sea Shep­herd from Bob Bark­er

Rammed Ves­sel Ady Gil Sinks

Sea Shep­herd Resumes Pur­suit of Ille­gal Whalers

On Jan­u­ary 8, 2010 at 17:20 (GMT) the Sea Shep­herd Con­ser­va­tion Soci­ety ves­sel Bob Bark­er report­ed the last known posi­tion of anoth­er Sea Shep­herd ves­sel, the Ady Gil, to the Aus­tralian Res­cue Coor­di­na­tion Cen­ter (ARCC). This report was made because the Ady Gil—which was orig­i­nal­ly going to be towed to a near­by base—is now sink­ing and could pose a nav­i­ga­tion haz­ard for the next two to three hours.

Hav­ing bare­ly sur­vived a vicious attack by the ille­gal Japan­ese whal­ing ves­sel Shonan Maru No. 2 on Jan­u­ary 6, 2010, the Ady Gil began tak­ing on water. Since that time, Bob Bark­er crew mem­bers have been work­ing around the clock in an attempt to save the ship and remove pos­si­ble envi­ron­men­tal haz­ards in case the ves­sel had fur­ther com­pli­ca­tions while being towed.

videos from Mainshill and German treesit against a proposed pipeline

The Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp presents:

*Off With Their Heads!*

Hold­ing the politi­cians behind Main­shill Open Cast Coal Mine to account

Fea­tur­ing: Jim Hood MP, Karen Gillon MSP, Coun­cil­lor Dan­ny Meik­le and Lord Home

Snow and Anarchy at MainshillThe Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp presents:

*Off With Their Heads!*

Hold­ing the politi­cians behind Main­shill Open Cast Coal Mine to account

Fea­tur­ing: Jim Hood MP, Karen Gillon MSP, Coun­cil­lor Dan­ny Meik­le and Lord Home

This short film doc­u­ments the cor­rup­tion, con­flict of inter­est and hypocrisy dom­i­nat­ing the pol­i­tics of South Lanark­shire, that result in Scot­tish Coal receiv­ing approval for coal mine after coal mine in the Dou­glas Val­ley. With no regard for com­mu­ni­ty health, local democ­ra­cy, the envi­ron­ment or cli­mate change, Scot­tish Coal are allowed to run roughshod over the peo­ple of the Dou­glas Val­ley. The Main­shill Sol­i­dar­i­ty Camp occu­pied the site of Main­shill Wood over six months ago to help local com­mu­ni­ties fight off Scot­tish Coal and the landown­er Lord Home.

The strug­gle con­tin­ues!

Watch it here: http://www.politube.org/show/23788

Since the 18.12.09 ROBIN WOOD-Activists squat sev­er­al trees in the Gäh­ler­park in Ham­burg Altona to impende the con­truc­tion of a heat­ing pipeline for the planned coal pow­er plant Ham­burg Moor­burg, which would mean the loss of the trees in the park. The com­pa­ny propos­ing the pipeline is Vat­ten­fall, a Swedish cor­po­ra­tion. With their protest they sup­port two res­i­dents who have squat­tet two trees already at 3rd of decem­ber.

(Ger­man with Eng­lish sub­ti­tles)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJeo631Pyv4

Letter from Climate Prisoners

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

Some­thing is rot­ten (but not just) in Den­mark. As a mat­ter of fact, thou­sands of peo­ple have been con­sid­ered, with­out any evi­dence, a threath to the soci­ety. Hun­dreds have been arrest­ed and some are still under deten­tion, wait­ing for judge­ment or under inves­ti­ga­tion. Among them, us, the under­signed. We want to tell the sto­ry from the pecu­liar view­point of those that still see the sky from behind the bars.

A UN meet­ing of cru­cial impor­tance has failed because of sev­er­al con­tra­dic­tions and ten­sions that have shown up dur­ing the COP15. The pri­ma­ry con­cern of the pow­er­fuls was the gov­er­nance of the ener­gy sup­ply for nev­erend­ing growth. This was the case whether they were from the overde­vel­oped world, like the EU coun­tries or the US, or from the so-called devel­op­ing coun­tries, like Chi­na or Brazil.

At odds, hun­dreds of del­e­gates and thou­sands of peo­ple in the streets have raised the issue that the ratio­nale of life must be (and actu­al­ly is) opposed to that of prof­it. we have strong­ly affirmed our will to stop anthrop­ic pres­sure on the bios­phere.

A cri­sis of the ener­gy par­a­digm is com­ing soon. The mech­a­nism of the glob­al gov­er­nance have proven to be over­whelm­ing­ly pre­car­i­ous. The pow­er­fuls failed not only in reach­ing an agree­ment on their inter­nal equi­li­br­ruim but also in keep­ing the for­mal con­trol of the dis­cus­sion.

Cli­mate change is an extreme and ulti­mate expres­sion of the vio­lence of the cap­i­tal­is­tic growth par­a­digm. Peo­ple glob­al­ly are increas­ing­ly show­ing the will­ing­ness of tak­ing the pow­er to rebel against that vio­lence. we have seen that in Copen­hagen, as well as we have seen that same vio­lence. Hun­dreds of peo­ple have been arrest­ed with­out any rea­son or clear evi­dence, or for par­tic­i­pat­ing in peace­ful and legit­i­mate demon­stra­tions. Even mild exam­ples of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence have been con­sid­ered as a seri­ous threath to the social order.

In response we ask – What order do we threat­en and who ordered it? Is it that order in which we do not any­more own our bod­ies? The order well beyond the terms of any rea­son­able “social con­tract” that we would ever sign, where our bod­ies can be tak­en, man­aged, con­strained and impris­oned with­out any seri­ous evi­dence of crime. Is it that order in which the deci­sion are more and more shield­ed from any social con­flicts? Where the gov­er­nance less and less belongs to peo­ple, not even through the par­lia­ment? As a mat­ter of fact, non-demo­c­ra­t­ic organ­isms like the WTO, the NB, the G‑whatever rule beyond any con­trol.

We are forced to notice that the the­ater of democ­ra­cy is a bro­ken one as soon as, one approach­es the core of the pow­er. That is why we reclaim the pow­er to the peo­ple. We reclaim the pow­er over our own lives. Above all, we reclaim the pow­er to coun­ter­pose the ratio­nale of life and of the com­mons to the ratio­nale of prof­it. It may have been declared ille­gal, but still we con­sid­er it ful­ly legit­i­mate.

Since no real space is left in the bro­ken the­ater, we reclaimed our col­lec­tive pow­er – Actu­al­ly we expect­ed it – to speak about the cli­mate and ener­gy issues. Issues that, for us, involve crit­i­cal nodes of glob­al jus­tice, sur­vival of man and ener­gy inde­pen­dence. We did march­ing with our bod­ies.

We pre­fer to enter the space where the pow­er is locked danc­ing and singing. We would have liked to do this at the Bel­la cen­ter, to dis­rupt the ses­sion in accord with hun­dreds of del­e­gates. But we were, as always, vio­lent­ly ham­pered by the police. They arrest­ed our bod­ies in an attempt to arrest our ideas. we risked our bod­ies, try­ing to pro­tect them just by stay­ing close to each oth­er. We val­ue our bod­ies: We need them to make love, to stay togeth­er and to enjoy life. They hold our brains, with beau­ti­ful bright ideas and views. They hold our hearts filled with pas­sion and joy. Nev­er­the­less, we risked them. we risked our bod­ies get­ting locked in pris­ons. In fact, what would be the worth of think­ing and feel­ing if the bod­ies did not move? Doing noth­ing, let­ting-it-hap­pen, would be the worst form of com­plic­i­ty with the busi­ness that want­ed to hack the UN meet­ing. At the COP15 we moved, and we will keep mov­ing.

Exact­ly like love, civ­il dis­obe­di­ence can not just be told. We must make it, with our bod­ies. Oth­er­wise, we would not real­ly think about what we love, and we would not real­ly love what we think about. It’s as sim­ple as that. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

How the COP15 has end­ed proves that we were right. Many of us are pay­ing what is manda­to­ry for an obses­sive, per­va­sive and total repres­sion: To find a guilty at the cost of invent­ing it (along with the crime per­haps).

We are detained with evi­dent­ly absurd accu­sa­tions about either vio­lences that actu­al­ly did not take place or con­spir­a­cies and orga­niz­ing of law-break­ing actions.

We do not feel guilty for hav­ing shown, togeth­er with thou­sands, the recla­ma­tion of the inde­pen­dence of our lives from profit’s rule. If the laws oppose this, it was legit­i­mate to peace­ful­ly – but still con­flict­ual­ly – break them.

We are just tem­porar­i­ly docked, ready to sail again with a wind stronger than ever. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

Luca Tor­na­tore – from the Ital­ian social cen­tres net­work “see you in Copen­hagen”.
Natasha Ver­co – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Stine Gry Jonassen – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Tan­nie Nyboe – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Johannes Paul Schul Mey­er
Arvip Peschel
Chris­t­ian Beck­er
Khar­lanchuck Dzmit­ry
Cristoph Lang
Antho­ny Arra­bal

Lappersfort Eviction Notice Confirmed By Judge

On Decem­ber 31st 09, the Brugge court gave a ver­dict con­cern­ing the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers who signed a con­tract with the own­er, GDF Suez, and also con­cern­ing the evic­tion notice for the present occu­piers of the Lap­pers­fort.

Accord­ing to the judge, Suez can not hold the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers respon­si­ble for the new occu­pa­tion, and there­fore their claim against them has been dis­missed.

On Decem­ber 31st 09, the Brugge court gave a ver­dict con­cern­ing the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers who signed a con­tract with the own­er, GDF Suez, and also con­cern­ing the evic­tion notice for the present occu­piers of the Lap­pers­fort.

Accord­ing to the judge, Suez can not hold the 3 pre­vi­ous occu­piers respon­si­ble for the new occu­pa­tion, and there­fore their claim against them has been dis­missed.
How­ev­er, the judge has declared that the evic­tion notice issued in 2002, dur­ing the first occu­pa­tion of the Lap­pers­fort, is still valid and may be used to evict the cur­rent occu­piers. This, despite the fact that the first evic­tion notice was issued to 13 peo­ple iden­ti­fied by the court, and who were threat­ened after the first evic­tion with a €50,000 fine if they re-entered the for­est or were involved in any oth­er actions against Fab­ri­com / Suez. None of these 13 peo­ple have any­thing to do with the cur­rent occu­pa­tion and there­fore an evic­tion notice based on a ver­dict passed against them should not be able to be used against us, the present occu­piers. Suez had, before this tri­al, appar­ent­ly already approached a bailiff with the evic­tion notice from 2002, but the bailiff refused to enforce it, as it was doubt­ful whether they could still legal­ly use it. The judge’s ver­dict on the 31st has giv­en them bla­tant right to enforce this notice, claim­ing that the right to pri­vate prop­er­ty is one of the pil­lars of our soci­ety and there­fore must be upheld by the law enforcers blablabla.
As it stands, Suez now have a notice allow­ing them to evict the Lap­pers­fort, which they will have to present to a bailiff who will then have to acti­vate the remote-con­trol pig cir­cus. We are on evic­tion alert every day, and are well pre­pared, after 16 months of occu­pa­tion. We’re not sure how long the process will take from here, and we now need more humans inside the for­est, aswell as oth­ers sup­port­ing from the out­side. If Suez wants to destroy the Lap­pers­fort, now is the time to come togeth­er to make their job as dif­fi­cult as pos­si­ble.

Love respect and sol­i­dar­i­ty to our friends in Tit­nore Woods (eng­land), Des­dels­boscs (spain), Main­shill (scot­land), Tas­ma­nia (aus­tralia), also under evic­tion threat; to the peo­ple of the Brazil­ian Ama­zon fight­ing against the GDF Suez Jirau dam project, and to all oth­er humans defend­ing wilder­ness and nature across the plan­et.…

lap­pers­fort
— e‑mail: lappersfort@riseup.net

Climate Protestors in Court Following Defacing of Canadian Flag

Three cli­mate activists are this morn­ing due in West­min­ster Magistrate’s Court charged with crim­i­nal dam­age against the Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion in Lon­don fol­low­ing an action to stop the Tar Sands..

Tar Sands
Three cli­mate activists are this morn­ing due in West­min­ster Magistrate’s Court charged with crim­i­nal dam­age against the Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion in Lon­don fol­low­ing an action to stop the Tar Sands..

On Decem­ber 15th, while the Inter­na­tion­al Cli­mate Sum­mit was tak­ing place in Copen­hagen, the pro­test­ers scaled the entrance to the Cana­di­an High Com­mis­sion in Grosvenor Square. They cut loose the Cana­di­an flag, before defac­ing it with crude oil while unfurl­ing a ban­ner read­ing “Shut Down the Tar Sands”.

The action was a response to Cana­di­an Prime Min­is­ter Stephen Harper’s obstruc­tion of the sum­mit in Copen­hagen in order to pro­tect Canada’s Tar Sands Indus­try [1]. Tar Sands are the dirt­i­est fuel known to man, both in terms of its impact on the cli­mate and the dev­as­ta­tion inflict­ed on the
local com­mu­ni­ties [2].

There is an enor­mous open cast mine in the Alber­ta Tar Sands region of Cana­da, where an area the total size of Eng­land will be exploit­ed. This is the largest indus­tri­al devel­op­ment in the world and is dev­as­tat­ing for the indige­nous com­mu­ni­ties that live there, not only destroy­ing the land
itself but increas­ing lev­els of can­cer, poi­son­ing much of their tra­di­tion­al food sources and leav­ing the water unsafe to drink [3]. This vio­lates the indige­nous treaty rights legal­ly bound to this region.

Jake Col­man, 20, Bradley Day, 22, and Daniel White­ly, 19, are all par­tic­i­pants in the Camp for Cli­mate Action [4], an action group that occu­pied Trafal­gar Square for the two-week dura­tion of the Cli­mate Sum­mit.

Bradley Day, a wait­er from Oxford, speak­ing after the action:

“This is just the begin­ning of a UK-based direct action cam­paign to stop Cana­di­an Tar Sands. These mur­der­ous ven­tures are being fund­ed from with­in the UK, with the Roy­al Bank of Scot­land, now 84%-owned by the pub­lic invest­ing bil­lions, and British Petro­le­um cur­rent­ly prepar­ing to move in
to Tar Sands. [5] We won’t stand by and let these greed dri­ven cor­po­ra­tions cause cat­a­stroph­ic envi­ron­men­tal and human destruc­tion.”

Clay­ton Thomas-Muller, an Indige­nous activist with the Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work (IEN), spoke dur­ing the Copen­hagen sum­mit:
“The Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment con­tin­ues to ignore its own laws, which state they must con­sult with Indige­nous Peo­ples who have been try­ing to con­vey con­cerns about Tar Sands devel­op­ment. Tar Sands are killing our com­mu­ni­ties and tram­pling over our rights. Fur­ther­more, the envi­ron­men­tal destruc­tion wreaked by the Tar Sands is direct­ly threat­en­ing thou­sands of lives now and is dri­ving our cli­mate into chaos. The world has wok­en up to the fact that Cana­da is now Pub­lic Cli­mate Ene­my Num­ber One. It’s time Cana­da did its glob­al duty and shut down the Tar Sands,”

NOTES TO EDITORS:

[1] At the failed Copen­hagen Cli­mate Sum­mit, Cana­da pro­posed an inad­e­quate tar­get for reduc­ing green­house emis­sions by only 3% by 2020 ignor­ing world sci­en­tists’ rec­om­men­da­tions to com­mit to over 40% reduc­tions below 1990 lev­els in order to avoid dan­ger­ous run­away cli­mate change. Cana­da already failed to meet its com­mit­ments to the Kyoto Treaty and refus­es to sign the UN’s Dec­la­ra­tion of Rights for Indige­nous Peo­ples whilst con­tin­u­ing devel­op­ment of Tar Sands oil extrac­tion.

[2] Tar Sands fuel is a way of extract­ing oil who’s ener­gy inten­sive process has not only com­plete­ly destroyed areas of the Bore­al forests the size of Eng­land, burns enough nat­ur­al gas to pow­er 6 hun­dred thou­sand homes a year, pro­duces lakes of tox­ic waste 66km wide ‑which fil­ters into
all local life and drink­ing water- but would itself be enough to push our cli­mate into chaos.

http://tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com/about/

[3] http://tarsandsinfocus.wordpress.com/about/

[4] http://climatecamp.org.uk

[5] This is the start of a fast grow­ing UK cam­paign against Tar Sands. Although we do not receive oil direct­ly from Cana­di­an Tar Sands, Cor­po­ra­tions such as RBS which is now 84% owned by the British Tax Pay­er invests bil­lions and British Petro­le­um have plans to move in to the ‘Sun Rise’ site in the com­ing months. Action on these issues and these cor­po­ra­tions are soon to become a focus of UK activism as we begin to stand up to Inter­na­tion­al injus­tices such as Tar Sands in Cana­da.

Stop the Tar Sands

Environmental Activists killed by Mining Companies in Latin America

On 26th Decem­ber, Dora Ali­cia Reci­nos Sor­to became the third vic­tim of a wave of vio­lence against envi­ron­men­tal cam­paign­ers in the Cabañas Region of El Sal­vador, where com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers are protest­ing against the re-open­ing of a Gold Mine by Cana­di­an Com­pa­ny Pacif­ic Rim.

On 26th Decem­ber, Dora Ali­cia Reci­nos Sor­to became the third vic­tim of a wave of vio­lence against envi­ron­men­tal cam­paign­ers in the Cabañas Region of El Sal­vador, where com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers are protest­ing against the re-open­ing of a Gold Mine by Cana­di­an Com­pa­ny Pacif­ic Rim.

Dora Ali­cia was a mem­ber of the Cabañas Envi­ron­men­tal Com­mit­tee, and had been active in oppos­ing the mine. She was eight months preg­nant when she was shot dead, and her two year old son was also wound­ed in the attack.

Her mur­der comes six days after the fatal shoot­ing of Ramiro Rivera Gomez, Vice Pres­i­dent of the Cabañas Envi­ron­men­tal Com­mit­tee, who had sur­vived being shot eight times in August this year. In June, anoth­er envi­ron­men­tal cam­paign­er, Gus­ta­vo Marce­lo Rivera Moreno, had been tor­tured and killed. Many oth­er mem­bers of the com­mu­ni­ty have received death threats, includ­ing youth work­ers and jour­nal­ists for the local com­mu­ni­ty radio sta­tion Radio Vic­to­ria, and the local priest Father Luis Quin­tanil­la nar­row­ly escaped an attempt­ed kid­nap­ping.

In Mex­i­co, Mar­i­ano Abar­ca Rob­lero cam­paigned against the envi­ron­men­tal­ly destruc­tive open-pit Bar­i­um mine Black­fire, a World Bank project. He was shot to death on the evening of Novem­ber 27, 2009, in front of his house in Chico­muse­lo, Chi­a­pas. More details.

Whalers and Whale Defenders Clash for the First Time This Season

The first clash between whalers and whale defend­ers took place on Decem­ber 14th when the Steve Irwin and the Shonan Maru #2 exchanged shots with their water can­nons.

Sea Shepherd's Steve Irwin & Nisshin Maru playThe first clash between whalers and whale defend­ers took place on Decem­ber 14th when the Steve Irwin and the Shonan Maru #2 exchanged shots with their water can­nons.

The Shonan Maru #2 has been fol­low­ing the Steve Irwin from Fre­man­tle since Decem­ber 9th. At 1400 Hours (Mel­bourne time) the Steve Irwin went around an ice­berg, did a fig­ure eight out of view of the Shonan Maru #2 and re-emerged with­in a quar­ter of a mile of the Japan­ese whaler’s port­side quar­ter catch­ing the whalers com­plete­ly by sur­prise.

A pur­suit began and the Shonan Maru #2 turned on two water can­nons. The crew of the Steve Irwin imme­di­ate­ly respond­ed by plac­ing their water can­non in readi­ness. The Shonan Maru #2 and the Steve Irwin were engaged in a high speed pur­suit for two hours before Cap­tain Wat­son decid­ed to break off the pur­suit to resume course to the coast of Antarc­ti­ca.

The Japan­ese whalers are spend­ing a great deal of mon­ey, first locat­ing the Steve Irwin by air and then direct­ing the Shonan Maru #2 to the coor­di­nates of the Sea Shep­herd ves­sel. By stay­ing on the tail of the Steve Irwin, the har­poon ves­sel is able to keep the rest of the fleet aware of the Sea Shep­herd posi­tion. Cap­tain Paul Wat­son needs to lose the tail of the Shonan Maru #2 in order to locate the whal­ing fleet. He is count­ing on heav­ier ice con­di­tions to assist in this effort.

“We will use the ice­bergs and the ice floes to our advan­tage.” Said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “I’ve observed today that I am a more expe­ri­enced ice nav­i­ga­tor than the Japan­ese cap­tain chas­ing us. We need to get him to fol­low us into the ice fields and let the ice work for us.”

The Steve Irwin crew were left wet, but in good spir­its after the con­fronta­tion.

—-

Sea Shep­herd Evades Pur­suit by Japan­ese Whal­ing Fleet Secu­ri­ty Ves­sel

The Sea Shep­herd ship Steve Irwin has suc­cess­ful­ly left the Aus­tralian Eco­nom­ic Zone (EEZ) with­out any sign of the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet secu­ri­ty ship Shonan Maru No. 2.

The Steve Irwin depart­ed from Hobart at 1800 Hours on Decem­ber 31st and took advan­tage of gale force winds and heavy swells to slip past the wait­ing Japan­ese ves­sel.

“It’s a big ocean down here they have no idea where we are,” said Cap­tain Paul Wat­son. “I’m now con­fi­dent that we can pro­ceed with our search for the Japan­ese whal­ing fleet with­out fur­ther inter­fer­ence from the Shonan Maru No. 2.”

The Sea Shep­herd ves­sel Ady Gil is patrolling the South­ern Ocean in advance of the Steve Irwin in search of the fleet.

The Shonan Maru No. 2 was wait­ing for the Steve Irwin when it left Fre­man­tle on Decem­ber 7th. The Japan­ese had char­tered an air­craft out of Albany to locate the con­ser­va­tion ves­sel. They then relayed the Steve Irwin’s posi­tion to the Shonan Maru No. 2 to enable the Japan­ese secu­ri­ty ves­sel to inter­cept the Steve Irwin.

The Steve Irwin was unable to lose the pur­suit of the Shonan Maru No. 2 for more than two weeks. Only by return­ing to Tas­ma­nia was the tail lost because Japan­ese whal­ing ships are pro­hib­it­ed from enter­ing Aus­tralian ter­ri­to­r­i­al waters.

“Thanks to the stormy weath­er, there was no pos­si­bil­i­ty of a char­tered flight locat­ing the Steve Irwin and we were able to pass back into inter­na­tion­al waters with­out any sign of the Shonan Maru No. 2,” said Cap­tain Wat­son. “They will be hard pressed to locate us now and with­out them on our tail, I am con­fi­dent that we will be able to track down the whale poach­ers in the Aus­tralian Antarc­tic Ter­ri­to­ry.”
“It was awe­some see­ing them run like cow­ards when we turned on them,” said Third Mate Vin­cent Hayes from Williamstown in Vic­to­ria.