Statement from No Dash for Gas on today’s court appearance 20th Feb

Today, 21 No Dash for Gas activists appeared in court, to face charges of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass fol­low­ing the week-long occu­pa­tion of EDF’s West Bur­ton pow­er sta­tion last October/November. All 21 chose to plead guilty, because they felt their time will be bet­ter spent cam­paign­ing against the gov­ern­men­t’s insane dash for gas, rather than being tied up in a pro­tract­ed court case.

Today, 21 No Dash for Gas activists appeared in court, to face charges of aggra­vat­ed tres­pass fol­low­ing the week-long occu­pa­tion of EDF’s West Bur­ton pow­er sta­tion last October/November. All 21 chose to plead guilty, because they felt their time will be bet­ter spent cam­paign­ing against the gov­ern­men­t’s insane dash for gas, rather than being tied up in a pro­tract­ed court case. They are due to be sen­tenced on 20th March and 2 April.

The activists have issued the fol­low­ing state­ment:

“We under­took our care­ful­ly con­sid­ered protest action last Octo­ber out of a sin­cere belief that com­pa­nies such as EDF, in col­lu­sion with gov­ern­ment, are unac­count­able, unrep­re­sen­ta­tive and wrong in pur­su­ing gas as a dom­i­nant fuel in our coun­try’s ener­gy sys­tem.

We have no influ­ence over where and how our ener­gy is sourced, priced and deliv­ered in this coun­try. We believe that these deci­sions should be made demo­c­ra­t­i­cal­ly and in the pub­lic inter­est.

Six large multi­na­tion­al cor­po­ra­tions have a monop­oly over our domes­tic ener­gy sup­ply and some of their per­son­nel write pol­i­cy at the Depart­ment for Ener­gy and Cli­mate Change. These com­pa­nies set the ener­gy agen­da in this coun­try, to the detri­ment of the pub­lic inter­est and legal­ly bind­ing car­bon reduc­tion tar­gets. We do not have the pow­er, access or cap­i­tal that these com­pa­nies have. Civ­il dis­obe­di­ence is one of the only means we have to inter­vene in this agen­da.

The major­i­ty of peo­ple in this coun­try want clean, renew­able, cheap­er ener­gy. We act­ed out of neces­si­ty and, we sin­cere­ly believe, in the pub­lic inter­est — to pre­vent an esca­la­tion in the cri­sis of cli­mate change that threat­ens the safe­ty and secu­ri­ty of mil­lions of peo­ple and ecosys­tems in the UK and around the world.”