North Dakota Shale Boom Displaces Tribal Residents

Heather Young­bird and Crys­tal Dee­gan used to live in a trail­er at the Prairie Winds Mobile Home Park in the Fort Berthold Indi­an Reser­va­tion in North Dako­ta. Last week Leroy Olsen, their land­lord, removed their front door and cut off the elec­tric­i­ty and the propane sup­ply. The rea­son?

Heather Young­bird and Crys­tal Dee­gan used to live in a trail­er at the Prairie Winds Mobile Home Park in the Fort Berthold Indi­an Reser­va­tion in North Dako­ta. Last week Leroy Olsen, their land­lord, removed their front door and cut off the elec­tric­i­ty and the propane sup­ply. The rea­son? New homes to be con­struct­ed for out of town oil work­ers com­ing to take part in the shale explo­ration boom.

“This oil boom has divid­ed the Man­dan, Hidat­sa and Arikara peo­ple and pit­ted them against each oth­er in a neg­a­tive way,” says Kan­di Mos­sett, a trib­al mem­ber and orga­niz­er with the Indige­nous Envi­ron­men­tal Net­work.

In 2010, WPX Ener­gy of Okla­homa paid $925 mil­lion for the right to explore for oil on the 86,000 acres of the Fort Berthold Indi­an Reser­va­tion. The com­pa­ny plans to squeeze oil out of shale, the most abun­dant form of sed­i­men­ta­ry rock. Until recent­ly such explo­ration was pro­hib­i­tive­ly expen­sive, but with the evo­lu­tion of tech­nol­o­gy and the rise in the price of oil, many rur­al com­mu­ni­ties from Eng­land to the Ukraine, from Argenti­na to North Dako­ta, have become tar­gets for the shale oil boom.

Anoth­er com­pa­ny prof­it­ing from the Bakken boom, which has been described as the biggest oil find in North Amer­i­ca in four decades with an esti­mat­ed 4.3 bil­lion bar­rels of recov­er­able oil, is Con­ti­nen­tal Resources, also from Okla­homa.

Fort Berthold – the cen­ter of the oil boom — has long suf­fered from crum­bling roads and the lack of good hous­ing and prop­er sewage facil­i­ties on the reser­va­tion. The com­pa­nies plan to invest in hous­ing and infra­struc­ture for their work­ers and plants, but not for local res­i­dents.

“Right now, any­thing that’s avail­able that has water and sew­er on it is very attrac­tive to any­body that’s try­ing to con­tin­ue to grow their busi­ness,” says John Reese, the CEO of the Unit­ed Prairie Coop­er­a­tive com­pa­ny, which has tak­en over the trail­er park.

“We were not even giv­en a for­mal 30 day evic­tion notice and now that we have been kicked out of our home we are cur­rent­ly home­less,” said Heather Young­bird. The remain­ing res­i­dents of Prairie Winds Mobile Home Park have been told that they had to leave their trail­ers by May 1, but the evic­tion date has now been post­poned until August 31.

More trou­ble is expect­ed for the trib­al com­mu­ni­ty: Envi­ron­men­tal groups note that res­i­dents may also soon see prob­lems with their drink­ing water. “Infor­ma­tion post­ed hydraulic frac­tur­ing flu­id chem­i­cals on the Frac­Fo­cus web site indi­cates that Bakken Shale oil wells may con­tain tox­ic chem­i­cals such as hydrotreat­ed light dis­til­late, methanol, eth­yl­ene gly­col, 2‑butoxyethanol (2‑BE), phos­pho­ni­um, tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-sulfate (aka phos­pho­n­ic acid),  acetic acid, ethanol, and napth­lene,” writes Earth­Works, a Wash­ing­ton DC based group.

Then there is the air pol­lu­tion: the oil com­pa­nies are not even both­er­ing to cap­ture the nat­ur­al gas that is gen­er­at­ed by the drilling, part­ly because there are no state reg­u­la­tions to force them to and part­ly because it is expen­sive. Instead the gas is being “flared” or burnt off, the same way Shell does in the Niger delta with sim­i­lar envi­ron­men­tal con­se­quences.

“Across west­ern North Dako­ta, hun­dreds of fires rise above fields of wheat and sun­flow­ers and bales of hay. At night, they illu­mi­nate the prairie skies like giant fire­flies,” wrote Clif­ford Krauss in the New York Times last Sep­tem­ber. “Every day, more than 100 mil­lion cubic feet of nat­ur­al gas is flared this way — enough ener­gy to heat half a mil­lion homes for a day.”

Per­haps the great­est irony is that North Dako­ta has the great­est wind resource of almost any state in the coun­try, says Mos­sett. She says that North Dako­ta could sup­ply 1.2 tril­lion kilo­watt-hours (kWh) of annu­al elec­tric­i­ty.

Prat­ap Chat­ter­jee is the Senior Edi­tor at CorpWatch.org, where this arti­cle orig­i­nal­ly appeared.