Letter from Climate Prisoners

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

This is a let­ter writ­ten by friends who are still impris­oned in Den­mark. Also check out the pris­on­er sup­port web­site – Cop-enhagen.net

Some­thing is rot­ten (but not just) in Den­mark. As a mat­ter of fact, thou­sands of peo­ple have been con­sid­ered, with­out any evi­dence, a threath to the soci­ety. Hun­dreds have been arrest­ed and some are still under deten­tion, wait­ing for judge­ment or under inves­ti­ga­tion. Among them, us, the under­signed. We want to tell the sto­ry from the pecu­liar view­point of those that still see the sky from behind the bars.

A UN meet­ing of cru­cial impor­tance has failed because of sev­er­al con­tra­dic­tions and ten­sions that have shown up dur­ing the COP15. The pri­ma­ry con­cern of the pow­er­fuls was the gov­er­nance of the ener­gy sup­ply for nev­erend­ing growth. This was the case whether they were from the overde­vel­oped world, like the EU coun­tries or the US, or from the so-called devel­op­ing coun­tries, like Chi­na or Brazil.

At odds, hun­dreds of del­e­gates and thou­sands of peo­ple in the streets have raised the issue that the ratio­nale of life must be (and actu­al­ly is) opposed to that of prof­it. we have strong­ly affirmed our will to stop anthrop­ic pres­sure on the bios­phere.

A cri­sis of the ener­gy par­a­digm is com­ing soon. The mech­a­nism of the glob­al gov­er­nance have proven to be over­whelm­ing­ly pre­car­i­ous. The pow­er­fuls failed not only in reach­ing an agree­ment on their inter­nal equi­li­br­ruim but also in keep­ing the for­mal con­trol of the dis­cus­sion.

Cli­mate change is an extreme and ulti­mate expres­sion of the vio­lence of the cap­i­tal­is­tic growth par­a­digm. Peo­ple glob­al­ly are increas­ing­ly show­ing the will­ing­ness of tak­ing the pow­er to rebel against that vio­lence. we have seen that in Copen­hagen, as well as we have seen that same vio­lence. Hun­dreds of peo­ple have been arrest­ed with­out any rea­son or clear evi­dence, or for par­tic­i­pat­ing in peace­ful and legit­i­mate demon­stra­tions. Even mild exam­ples of civ­il dis­obe­di­ence have been con­sid­ered as a seri­ous threath to the social order.

In response we ask – What order do we threat­en and who ordered it? Is it that order in which we do not any­more own our bod­ies? The order well beyond the terms of any rea­son­able “social con­tract” that we would ever sign, where our bod­ies can be tak­en, man­aged, con­strained and impris­oned with­out any seri­ous evi­dence of crime. Is it that order in which the deci­sion are more and more shield­ed from any social con­flicts? Where the gov­er­nance less and less belongs to peo­ple, not even through the par­lia­ment? As a mat­ter of fact, non-demo­c­ra­t­ic organ­isms like the WTO, the NB, the G‑whatever rule beyond any con­trol.

We are forced to notice that the the­ater of democ­ra­cy is a bro­ken one as soon as, one approach­es the core of the pow­er. That is why we reclaim the pow­er to the peo­ple. We reclaim the pow­er over our own lives. Above all, we reclaim the pow­er to coun­ter­pose the ratio­nale of life and of the com­mons to the ratio­nale of prof­it. It may have been declared ille­gal, but still we con­sid­er it ful­ly legit­i­mate.

Since no real space is left in the bro­ken the­ater, we reclaimed our col­lec­tive pow­er – Actu­al­ly we expect­ed it – to speak about the cli­mate and ener­gy issues. Issues that, for us, involve crit­i­cal nodes of glob­al jus­tice, sur­vival of man and ener­gy inde­pen­dence. We did march­ing with our bod­ies.

We pre­fer to enter the space where the pow­er is locked danc­ing and singing. We would have liked to do this at the Bel­la cen­ter, to dis­rupt the ses­sion in accord with hun­dreds of del­e­gates. But we were, as always, vio­lent­ly ham­pered by the police. They arrest­ed our bod­ies in an attempt to arrest our ideas. we risked our bod­ies, try­ing to pro­tect them just by stay­ing close to each oth­er. We val­ue our bod­ies: We need them to make love, to stay togeth­er and to enjoy life. They hold our brains, with beau­ti­ful bright ideas and views. They hold our hearts filled with pas­sion and joy. Nev­er­the­less, we risked them. we risked our bod­ies get­ting locked in pris­ons. In fact, what would be the worth of think­ing and feel­ing if the bod­ies did not move? Doing noth­ing, let­ting-it-hap­pen, would be the worst form of com­plic­i­ty with the busi­ness that want­ed to hack the UN meet­ing. At the COP15 we moved, and we will keep mov­ing.

Exact­ly like love, civ­il dis­obe­di­ence can not just be told. We must make it, with our bod­ies. Oth­er­wise, we would not real­ly think about what we love, and we would not real­ly love what we think about. It’s as sim­ple as that. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

How the COP15 has end­ed proves that we were right. Many of us are pay­ing what is manda­to­ry for an obses­sive, per­va­sive and total repres­sion: To find a guilty at the cost of invent­ing it (along with the crime per­haps).

We are detained with evi­dent­ly absurd accu­sa­tions about either vio­lences that actu­al­ly did not take place or con­spir­a­cies and orga­niz­ing of law-break­ing actions.

We do not feel guilty for hav­ing shown, togeth­er with thou­sands, the recla­ma­tion of the inde­pen­dence of our lives from profit’s rule. If the laws oppose this, it was legit­i­mate to peace­ful­ly – but still con­flict­ual­ly – break them.

We are just tem­porar­i­ly docked, ready to sail again with a wind stronger than ever. It’s a mat­ter of love, jus­tice and dig­ni­ty.

Luca Tor­na­tore – from the Ital­ian social cen­tres net­work “see you in Copen­hagen”.
Natasha Ver­co – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Stine Gry Jonassen – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Tan­nie Nyboe – Cli­mate Jus­tice Action
Johannes Paul Schul Mey­er
Arvip Peschel
Chris­t­ian Beck­er
Khar­lanchuck Dzmit­ry
Cristoph Lang
Antho­ny Arra­bal