Victory Over Mexico’s La Parota Dam

Inter­view: June 30, 2009
From June 2009 World Rivers Review

Inter­view: June 30, 2009
From June 2009 World Rivers Review

Since 2004, thou­sands of Mex­i­can farm­ers have been fight­ing the con­struc­tion of La Paro­ta Dam in the state of Guer­rero. They have staged block­ades, protests and legal actions and have faced vio­lent police repres­sion in return. In May, the Mex­i­can press report­ed that the gov­ern­ment would post­pone La Paro­ta Dam until after 2018. World Rivers Review inter­viewed Rodol­fo Chavez Galin­do, a leader of the vibrant move­ment to stop the dams, about the bat­tle over La Paro­ta.

WRR: How is the local move­ment orga­nized?
RCG: The Coun­cil of Com­mu­nal Lands and Com­mu­ni­ties Opposed to La Paro­ta Dam (CECOP) was cre­at­ed by farm­ers and indige­nous peo­ples to defend their lives, land, water and nat­ur­al resources. It is com­posed of more than 5,000 men and women from 39 vil­lages. Its prin­ci­pal strength is that deci­sions are made in a com­mu­nal way, in assem­blies that have been held every Sun­day with­out fail dur­ing the six years we have been fight­ing the project.

The move­ment began on July 28, 2003, when the peas­ants of three vil­lages blocked engi­neers with the Fed­er­al Elec­tric­i­ty Com­mis­sion (CFE) from enter­ing com­mu­ni­ty lands. The CFE had ille­gal­ly entered the com­mu­ni­ty’s land with­out peo­ple’s per­mis­sion. The land com­pen­sa­tion process had not start­ed, nor the envi­ron­men­tal licens­ing process. The CFE cleared thou­sands of trees — which is a fed­er­al crime — opened roads, and brought in heavy machin­ery to begin con­struc­tion. Peo­ple got angry when they cut trees, fences and crops.

WRR: What was the reac­tion of the gov­ern­ment?
RCG: The CFE removed the machin­ery from the peas­ants’ lands. The com­mu­ni­ty set up guard posts to ensure the CFE would not return. The CFE has not been able to re-enter these lands since 2003. The resis­tance was strength­ened by law­suits, which have sus­pend­ed the project until now.

The CFE tried oth­er tac­tics, pay­ing off gov­ern­ment offi­cials to try and expro­pri­ate the land. They con­vened fraud­u­lent assem­blies. When the farm­ers who were the own­ers of the lands tried to enter these assem­blies, the CFE imped­ed their entry with 1,500 police that repelled the farm­ers with tear gas. Instead, the CFE filled the meet­ings with peo­ple they brought from the cities who were not farm­ers, a move that was total­ly ille­gal.

WRR: Besides road blocks, what oth­er tac­tics have you used to fight the project?
RCG: Faced with these seri­ous vio­la­tions, the move­ment turned to the law. They asked the courts to nul­li­fy the assem­blies and after three years won a court order. In 2008, the CFE admit­ted that it could not begin work on the dam because it had not obtained the required per­mis­sions, and it had been defeat­ed in the courts.

Law­suits were also brought on envi­ron­men­tal grounds based upon CFE’s ille­gal defor­esta­tion and on crim­i­nal grounds based upon forged sig­na­tures used by CFE to legit­imize the fraud­u­lent assem­blies. Using the law has been one of the move­men­t’s strongest weapons, but the most impor­tant has been the strength and deter­mi­na­tion of the move­ment itself.

WRR: Has CECOP pre­sent­ed its case at an inter­na­tion­al lev­el?
RCG: We pre­sent­ed the case of La Paro­ta to the Unit­ed Nations Depart­ment of Eco­nom­ic and Social Affairs (DESA) through a peti­tion signed by 102 Mex­i­can orga­ni­za­tions. The DESA Com­mit­tee issued a rec­om­men­da­tion that the Mex­i­can gov­ern­ment respect the deci­sions won by the farm­ers in the courts, that they respect their legit­i­mate prop­er­ty rights and that any deci­sion be based on a process of free, pri­or and informed con­sent by the farm­ers.

Oth­er UN offi­cials vis­it­ed the area and rec­og­nized the farm­ers’ rights to defend their land. They also con­firmed vio­la­tions of the rights of indige­nous peo­ples and the right to infor­ma­tion and con­sul­ta­tion.

WRR: How did farm­ers react when the Mex­i­can press report­ed that the gov­ern­ment is post­pon­ing La Paro­ta until 2018? Is this true?
RCG: We have received no offi­cial infor­ma­tion about this from the CFE. And, our demand is that the project be can­celled once and for all, not post­poned!

After deliv­er­ing a peti­tion to Pres­i­dent Calderón demand­ing a meet­ing with the CFE, we met with them on May 21, 2009. Our posi­tion is that La Paro­ta Dam in Guer­rero state, the Paso de la Rey­na Dam in Oax­a­ca, and the Arce­di­ano and El Zapotil­lo dams in Jalis­co must be can­celled, and that those dis­placed by El Cajón Dam in Nayarit must receive just com­pen­sa­tion.

To win, we will need uni­ty among diverse move­ments, begin­ning with dam-affect­ed com­mu­ni­ties. We must inte­grate our strug­gle with oth­ers suf­fer­ing from envi­ron­men­tal degra­da­tion in Mex­i­co and in oth­er coun­tries. And, we must strength­en the strug­gle for an alter­na­tive ener­gy pol­i­cy.

More infor­ma­tion:

Inter­na­tion­al Rivers’ La Paro­ta Cam­paign